Abrahamic religions lead to leftism, because abrahamic religion sell the feminine, and all feminine instinct and intuition results in leftism because leftism is just feminine irresponsibility for truth reciprocity meritocracy and commons.
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 22:25:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671283198867697665
Reply addressees: @LoboConsciente2 @PaulGottfried6 @ConceptualJames
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671278638480646146
Martin is speaking to his audience and they are very concerned about the (eastern) jewish contribution to the destruction of the west using their and the female means of undermining, sedition, and treason using pseudoscience and sophistry and baiting into hazard, against western maximization of individual responsibility for private and common. This is instinctual and cultural. While some have the malice of intent, others are just captured by culture and instinct.
My opinion is different from Martin’s, in that I hold that all groups can be domesticated into european civilization with the use of sufficient legal code and police, judicial, and legislative enforcement.
That does not mean that race differences will ever be eliminated. It means we can continue domestication of man into rule of law by natural law instead of the various other means of lying whether state, pseudoscientific, philosophical, or religious.
ANd as such we can all cooperate for our mutual benefit even if it requires separate polities to do so, with the corresponding low power distance, and high redistribution most ingroups prefer.
Reply addressees: @JoshFie93044227 @TheAutistocrat
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 20:38:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671256131048554498
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671254464932741120
MALE
Mlitary -> Political -> Economic -> Social -> Interpersonal
vs
FEMALE
Interpersonal -> Social -> Political -> Economic -> Military
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 20:20:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671251776388104193
GREAT QUESTION
–“Why not just say: “Slave morality is female morality, and master slave is male morality, because these are terms for sex differences in instinctual responsibility for the commons.” Why use “indifferent from”?”–
Because I was trained in economics and I work in epistemology and decidability, and a such “is” means equals or identical to, and that would be false.
1) In economics, things are either marginally indifferent or marginally different, but almost never the same. Ergo, if you have 100 bags of flour to make it through the season, the first back is of lower subjective value than the last. If we are buying that same flour on the market in a commodities trade, then it’s possible they are marginally indifferent for all purposes. Despite that there are no such conditions because all flour, like all oil, is not identical in composition and quality. Ergo “identity is a property of the risks of inequality”.
2) In decidability and in operational prose within decidability, we only use the word ‘is’ as ‘exists as x’ not as ‘is equal to or approximately equal to’, because the copula (the verb to be) is the means by which most sophistry, deceit, and philosophical nonsense is constructed. For that reason, we generally prohibit the use of the verb to-be in proofs of constructability (truth statements).
So your question is the equivalent of why a mathematician uses specific symbols: it’s the same reason. Symbols in math, and operational language in testimony, are just a requirement of the grammar of disambiguation necessary for the use of each in the conduct of any measurement. Because ambiguity is the cause of logical falsehood.
I hope that very nerdy explanation helps. 😉
Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis @TheAutistocrat @PaulGottfried6 @ConceptualJames
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 13:47:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671152763709841410
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671149771233579012
RT @Explicatur1: Support for truth and free speech go away as women gain institutional power. Any political theory or movement that doesn’…
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-20 03:05:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670991342577545217
What is the difference between male and female competency in taking, holding, and demonstrating successful responsibility?
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-19 19:22:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670874670596255747
Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670873467749638145
THE FORMULA FOR RECIPROCITY BETWEEN THE SEXES: RELATIONSHIPS
Men should be dominant (responsible) regardless of context and seek recovery in the affection of women’s respect and ‘care’.
Women should be dominant (responsible) only when and where they wish to and seek recovery in the dominance (responsibility) of men’s respect and ‘care’.
A relationship consists of the echange of putting the other person’s interests at peer or above your own, whenever and wherever it is possible to do so, and the exchange of that priority for mutual gain. By combining the best of each sex, by the only criteria for which we have reason to place one person above the other: care, mating, and reproduction.
You will notice that our organization focuses our attention on first principles, and responsibility is the first principle that most separates the sexes. Why? Male predator bias to control territory and resources with other men, and female prey bias to protect offspring in the sharing of caretaking with other women. It’s baked into our genes.
We are happiest when we figure out how to make the other person feel ‘safe’ (secure, loved), and we each fulfill those responsibilities we can because we can fulfill them most successfully and with the least stress.
Respect and responsibility are two terms that have gone out of tradition and fashion because the left promises self-indulgence and irresponsibility, meaning evasion of conformity to Western high investment commons, and high trust manners, ethics, and morals.
What I notice most in the sequence of generations is the decline in responsibility, respect, reciprocity, suppression of attention seeking, and self-indulgence, in favor of creating a high trust commons whose purpose is creating an environment optimized for the raising of children – instead of the indulgence of consumption by irresponsible hyperconsumptive adults.
I don’t make the rules – Nature does. Evolution did. I just explain the consequences of violating those rules and the tragic cumulative cost of doing so.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-19 18:52:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670867208283488280
(a) Neoteny (fertility, adaptability, non conflict)
(b) Whiteness is natural. Black is the adaptation to solar radiation in the absence of fur. Primates have white skin.
I’m not going all-in on this because while I understand it I don’t necessarily like it, feel it myself, or care. But it is the reason for selection for lighter skin, fairer hair, fairer eyes, more notenic features. The rest is just symmetry, and long legs.
Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-19 14:30:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670801306053758982
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670799174349074436
Note that it’s a feminist opinion piece (essay not paper) free of any science. And continues the feminist pseudoscientific claim that observable measurable physical structures (other than amygdala and corpus callosum) do not show brain differences like genitals show differences. However, this is childlike pseudoscience because it is connectivity and weights that determine sex differences in brain organization, and we can easily tell the sex of the individual in increasingly sophisticated variations on fMRI imaging.
You would know that if you were even vaguely familiar with the literature (which you aren’t).
BUt like all women you double down and never admit y you’re wrong, you just pretend otherwise, continue your magical thinking, and demonstrate how right I am with every word you think, speak or write.
Reply addressees: @helenfromhel @Barbarian_Brain @dosontheshinshi @MudKevin
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 22:00:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670189796637958145
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670177934093561858
You’re proving my point that women can’t tell the difference between truth and preference – and lying as I’ve documented in detail, and explained with excruiciating precision.
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 19:19:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670149272879214593
Reply addressees: @helenfromhel
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670148666483417088