Theme: Sex Differences

  • JEWISH MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES ARE A BIT OVERSTATED BUT BIASED A BIT TO THE FEMALE

    JEWISH MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES ARE A BIT OVERSTATED BUT BIASED A BIT TO THE FEMALE NEUROSIS SPECTRUM
    (Kind of interesting)

    I can explain this in detail but I’m already complaining about every race on the planet today so I’d prefer to avoid it. So I’ll just give you an overview.

    Now, first, we should start with sex differences in mental illness and antisocial behavior. Women manifest mental instability on an astounding scale, with 30-40% of american women on some sort of mood stabilizer. Men however manifest these behaviors very differently. Usually exteranlizing them as aggression, alcohol, crime, disagreeablness, or laziness.

    We should expect to see certain expressed behaviors in the ashkenazim, and the same for the arabized population, and we do see them. (A jewish friend’s daughter committed suicide years ago ago because the schizophrenia progressed rapidly and dangerously. It was terribly painful for all.)

    However, what we should observe and do observe is the female end of the spectrum with neuroticisms rather than the male version (alcohol and drug abuse)

    And we do: neurosis, manic depression (bipolar disorder), dysthymia, (minor depression, major depression, simple phobia and schizophrenia. Note these are integrative disorders not compartmentalized disorders).

    However other mental illnesses are within the same ranges as the rest of the european population: panic disorder, agoraphobia, social phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, alcohol, and drug abuse. Note these are compartmentalization disorders not integrative disorders.

    In other words these suggest a sex difference in cognitive organization – which is what we should expect to see.

    So in other words, if men manifest these behaviors (“if you slice open an actor you’ll find an actress”) they’re more visible. And if a woman, and you’re more attention seeking and aggressive, they’re more visible.

    So I don’t think we’re seeing as much mental illness as more expression of female behavior in a group that is cognitively biased for female behavior, both in origin, genetic integration with european wome, and selection for skill sets favoring female cognition.

    In other words, Ashkenazi men manifest female bias in psychological behaviors, and I think we just notice it more because it’s different from our expectations. I’m not sure with ashenazi women. There isn’t any data. My sample is pretty large but IMO the distribution is more stable than the male. But we need science on this issue. I can’t tell if I’m engaging in fitting observations to the theory.

    At least that’s my charitable understanding of the matter. it’s also the opinion of most historians who have thought about the issue.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Abhi_Bilkan


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 16:52:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714686018706685952

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714667239394459871

  • There is no zero percent. It’s nonsnese. The entire world is moving this directi

    There is no zero percent. It’s nonsnese. The entire world is moving this direction simply because it’s affordable for women to do so rather than settle for an undesirable man.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 16:33:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714681174465884494

    Reply addressees: @kourtni124

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714668523547488706

  • Hard to tell. Turkey doesn’t publish the stats. And unmarried women with childre

    Hard to tell. Turkey doesn’t publish the stats. And unmarried women with children are legally disadvantaged and outcast.
    But across the arab world the ‘disease’ is spreading wherever it’s economically possible.
    Same is true worldwide.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 16:29:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714680040519020771

    Reply addressees: @GilWebert

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714678569283227789

  • WHY DO SO MANY ASHKENAZIM HAVE RED HAIR? (not complicated – sorta….) 1) Back h

    WHY DO SO MANY ASHKENAZIM HAVE RED HAIR?
    (not complicated – sorta….)

    1) Back haired south eurasian semititic male jews from the levant.
    2) Brown, Blonde, Red, haired European Women from the Roman Region
    3) Immediate inbreeding.
    4) Jewish population bottlnecks
    5) Continued…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 16:18:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714677224266256424

    Reply addressees: @Jawgenius

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714669671658475604

  • WHY DO SO MANY ASHKENAZIM HAVE RED HAIR? (not complicated – sorta….) 1) Back h

    WHY DO SO MANY ASHKENAZIM HAVE RED HAIR?
    (not complicated – sorta….)

    1) Back haired south eurasian semititic male jews from the levant.
    2) Brown, Blonde, Red, haired European Women from the Roman Region
    3) Immediate inbreeding.
    4) Jewish population bottlnecks
    5) Continued Extraordinary inbreeding creating extraordinary mutations – ie: why jews are more vunlerable to genetic defects and diseases.
    6) Coloring, especially hair, is polygenic. Though one gene in particular carries heavy influence.
    7) Small groups with similar complex mutational load combined with polygenic expression, selected for memory, verbal and calculation skills, selects for female traits, yielding european coloring bias. (Yes, turns out that historical observation as well as present suspicions are true. 😉 )

    Summary,
    European female introgression, european female bias in recursive trait selection, inbreeding, mutation, bottlenecking. (Kinda neat really.)

    Sidebar:
    (One of my best friends is a prototypical tall, large round- headed, blue eyed, red haired half jewish male working in the upper reaches of the financial sector. My wife had long red hair. So did my best friend when I was younger. So did my first girlfriend. While my hair was originally blond and matured into taupe (mouse brown), and now as I’m older it’s darker brown, I had quite abit of red and blonde in my beard before it went grey. So I’m kind of partial to red hair. (Very))

    GENETICS OF THE COLOR OF HAIR
    The coloration of hair is primarily determined by the type, amount, and distribution of pigments called eumelanin and pheomelanin, produced by cells known as melanocytes. These pigments are influenced by a variety of genes and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Here are some primary genetic distinctions:

    Note: (a) primary influence is expression of, resistance of antagonism of the MC1R gene. (b) we don’t know how many copies of these genes exist (that I know of) or how many variable expressions are regulated, but it’s dominant. (c) there are really two regions that determine coloration. It’s the Black/Brown and the Blonde. The blond is from the Ancestral North Eurasians where we have genetics from around Lake Bikal I believe. (They’re gone, just integrated into us).

    Black Hair:
    MC1R Gene: In people with black hair, the MC1R gene typically functions efficiently, facilitating a high production of eumelanin. This creates the darkest hair shades.

    ASIP Gene: The Agouti Signaling Protein (ASIP) gene can inhibit the MC1R function to some extent but usually doesn’t in the case of black hair. Efficient MC1R function ensures eumelanin dominates.

    TYR, TYRP1, and DCT Genes: These genes are also crucial for the enzymatic pathway that leads to eumelanin production. Mutations or polymorphisms in these genes usually result in less effective eumelanin production and thus lighter hair.

    HERC2/OCA2 Complex: The intronic SNP rs12913832 in HERC2 influences OCA2 expression, and a specific combination of alleles at this SNP is generally associated with darker hair colors including black.

    Brown Hair:
    MC1R Gene: In brown-haired individuals, the Melanocortin 1 Receptor (MC1R) gene usually functions normally, promoting the production of eumelanin over pheomelanin.

    TYR, TYRP1, and DCT Genes: These genes are also responsible for the production and function of enzymes involved in eumelanin production.

    SNPs: Various SNPs like rs12821256 have been associated with brown hair, usually increasing eumelanin synthesis or affecting its distribution.

    Red Hair:
    MC1R Variants: Variants of the MC1R gene are the most significant factor for red hair. These variants reduce the MC1R protein’s activity, leading to higher levels of pheomelanin.

    RHC or Red Hair Color Alleles: Specific mutations like V60L, D84E, R151C, R160W, and D294H on the MC1R gene are known as RHC alleles and are commonly found in red-haired individuals.

    Other Contributing Genes: Although MC1R is the primary determinant, other genes may also contribute to red hair color when mutated, though these are less well-understood.

    Blond Hair:
    KITLG and SLC24A4 Genes: These genes have been found to influence lighter hair shades, including blond.

    MC1R: A normally functioning MC1R gene can also result in blond hair if other genes that contribute to lighter pigmentation are present.

    SNPs: Various SNPs like rs1667394 in the OCA2 gene have been associated with blond hair.

    Interactions and Modifiers:
    Polygenic Traits: Hair color is polygenic, meaning it’s influenced by multiple genes interacting with each other.

    Environmental Factors: Sun exposure and other environmental factors can also modify hair color over time, although these changes aren’t genetically mediated.

    Sources:

    “Genome-wide association studies identify several new loci associated with pigmentation traits and skin cancer risk in European Americans” by D. Liu et al., Human Molecular Genetics, 2015.
    “Genetics of Skin Color Variation in Europeans: Genome-wide Association Studies with Functional Follow-up” by M.A. Visser et al., Human Genetics, 2014.
    “Variants of the melanocortin 1 receptor gene (MC1R) and freckling among Hispanics” by E.J. Herraiz et al., Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2016.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 16:18:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714677223876153344

  • I dunno. Humans follow incentives. The incentives today for men are roughly the

    I dunno. Humans follow incentives. The incentives today for men are roughly the same, but for women they are not. As such we are seeing a natural return to matrilnealism even if we are preserving some patriarchy.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 13:32:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714635565499293898

    Reply addressees: @boxkicker2191

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714634962236850359

  • No, because (a) semitic cognition is more feminine (b) ashkenazi advantage is th

    No, because (a) semitic cognition is more feminine (b) ashkenazi advantage is through the male jewish intermarriage with the european female line, and continued selection upon it, within a cognitively feminine subculture.

    WOmen are actually more aggressive than men, and this…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 13:30:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714635184526541063

    Reply addressees: @cerflerg @Steve_Sailer @RichardHanania

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714624392750137626

  • No, because (a) semitic cognition is more feminine (b) ashkenazi advantage is th

    No, because (a) semitic cognition is more feminine (b) ashkenazi advantage is through the male jewish intermarriage with the european female line, and continued selection upon it, within a cognitively feminine subculture.

    WOmen are actually more aggressive than men, and this is part of why the ashkenazi succeed. Higher intelligence, (not by much but enough), verbal-pictoral specialization (female), greater ability to carry calculative workload (female), and higher aggression.

    Kind of fascinating really.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 13:30:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714635183918317568

  • Openness is a proxy for IQ. I’m kind of surprised why that isn’t more commonly u

    Openness is a proxy for IQ. I’m kind of surprised why that isn’t more commonly understood.

    The big five are just sex differences in before, during, and after reaction to information.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 13:27:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714634258734612827

    Reply addressees: @cerflerg @Steve_Sailer @RichardHanania

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714625021916651814

  • Not quite. But yes it’s the wrong term. In the literature, he term is ‘fluency’

    Not quite. But yes it’s the wrong term. In the literature, he term is ‘fluency’ – meaning the number of ad rapidty of associations made between words – that’s how the tests measured it.

    It’s association velocity in verbal pictoral. Verbal pictoral is cheaper cognition than spatial – temporal. I don’t like such reductions, but it’s female gathering, inventorying, and children vs male hunting, territory, and politics.

    The fact that these are just divisions of time and space should be more obvious than it is. Speed (male) vs mass (female) continued as a division of population, time and space.

    Abstractions I don’t think is correct. Associations yes. You’ll notice on the feminine left their inability to cognitively scale concepts in time, populatino, and space.

    Comparison
    Both “verbal acuity” and “verbal fluency” pertain to language skills, but they refer to different dimensions of language competency.

    Verbal Acuity:
    Definition: Verbal acuity refers to the precision, clarity, and effectiveness of language use. It involves choosing the most accurate words to convey a message and understanding nuances in meaning.

    Components: It involves vocabulary, understanding of syntax, and comprehension, but it’s more about the quality of word usage rather than the quantity.

    Assessment: Can be assessed through tasks that require precise word choice, understanding of idiomatic expressions, or interpreting nuanced textual information.

    Practical Examples: A person with high verbal acuity might excel in crafting persuasive arguments, comprehending complex texts, or communicating intricate concepts clearly.

    Relation to Cognitive Processes: Verbal acuity is closely linked with crystallized intelligence, which involves the ability to use learned knowledge and experience.

    Verbal Fluency:
    Definition: Verbal fluency is the ability to produce words rapidly and smoothly. In a clinical or experimental context, it often involves producing as many words as possible within a given time frame, typically under certain constraints like starting with a particular letter or belonging to a particular category.

    Components: It involves not just vocabulary but also the speed of lexical retrieval and the ability to switch between topics or lexical categories quickly.

    Assessment: Typically assessed through timed tasks where the individual has to produce as many words as possible within certain constraints.

    Practical Examples: A person with high verbal fluency might excel in improvisational speaking, brainstorming sessions, or situations requiring quick thinking and rapid verbal response.

    Relation to Cognitive Processes: Verbal fluency is often considered an aspect of executive function and is linked with fluid intelligence, which involves the ability to solve new problems, use logic in new situations, and identify patterns.

    Key Differences:
    Quality vs Quantity: Verbal acuity focuses on the quality of language use, while verbal fluency focuses on the quantity and speed.

    Assessment: Verbal acuity tests often require deep thinking and precision, whereas verbal fluency tests usually have a timed component focusing on quick retrieval.

    Cognitive Links: Verbal acuity is often more closely related to crystallized intelligence and learned knowledge, while verbal fluency is more closely related to fluid intelligence and executive function.

    Reply addressees: @cerflerg @therminium @Steve_Sailer @RichardHanania


    Source date (UTC): 2023-10-18 13:26:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714634053226246150

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714625949805760628