Theme: Sex Differences

  • YOU SO: THE CONSEQUENCES OF ASSORTATIVE MATING Why opposites shouldn’t attract B

    http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/5bb67aba-8dff-11e3-bbe7-00144feab7de.html?ftcamp=published_links%2Frss%2Farts_columnists_timharford%2Ffeed%2F%2Fproduct#axzz2smCJo3kUTOLD YOU SO: THE CONSEQUENCES OF ASSORTATIVE MATING

    Why opposites shouldn’t attract

    By Tim Harford


    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-08 18:33:00 UTC

  • UKRAINIAN WISDOM (fun)(true) “There is nothing so useful in the home as a guilty

    UKRAINIAN WISDOM

    (fun)(true)

    “There is nothing so useful in the home as a guilty husband.”

    The degree of labor extraction a woman can obtain from a man is determined by BOTH her ability to identify and exploit opportunities for guilt, AND her ability to trade care, affection and sex. The economics of this indicates that over time, in any relationship, a woman will seek to reduce her costs and rely upon guilt as often as possible.

    The only male defense then, is to **never feel guilty**. Which is what happens in most relationships. Both parties reduce their efforts until they justify reducing their efforts, and therefore they cause the loss of hope for any reward, and they remain together purely out of the problem of opportunity costs: they aren’t marketable any longer.

    We can scientifically demonstrate that women have much higher expectations of men than men of women. I kind of wonder if this is some female genetic bias: that the reason they feel attracted to men is the promise extraction of labor. And males the promise of extraction of sex.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-08 05:12:00 UTC

  • UKRAINIAN LOGIC Man: “He loves her more than she loves him, I think.” Woman: “Of

    UKRAINIAN LOGIC

    Man: “He loves her more than she loves him, I think.”

    Woman: “Of course. He is a man. He must worship his wife.”

    Man: “You look beautiful tonight!”

    Woman: Scowl. “Does that mean I do not always look beautiful?”

    My mom did me a great favor, which was to teach me to compliment women in particular, on something small that they had DONE (rather than their bodies obviously), and that’s turned out to be a very useful habit to get into. Guys like it a lot too. So I compliment the hell out of men on whatever I can. Because almost nobody does. It’s like throwing rose petals into the air. It just makes the world a better place.

    I really don’t notice men paying much rude attention to women here. I’m sure it happens but maybe not around the kind of people I associate with. Men and women just talk to each other. And there is a lot of glance-look-flirt subtlety (which is incomprehensible to me). And it’s all pretty honest and direct and free of all that. Women are incredibly forward. I had one woman grab my by the hair and forcibly kiss me. Another just told me her husband was out for the weekend and invited me over. (um..no thanks.) But most of the women just ask you to dance, or start pleasant conversations. Some are a little too demure. And I get in a little trouble because I’m extremely friendly and playful but really not interested in other than just fun.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-02-07 10:29:00 UTC

  • MEN SHOULD BOYCOTT MARRIAGE

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D33L4zxjpH0WHY MEN SHOULD BOYCOTT MARRIAGE


    Source date (UTC): 2014-01-22 06:42:00 UTC

  • AND DISCIPLINES – EXCEPT AT THE MARGINS IT’S PREFERENCE Let us assume that the h

    http://www.newappsblog.com/2011/05/the-low-percentage-of-women-earning-phds-in-philosophy.htmlGENDERS AND DISCIPLINES – EXCEPT AT THE MARGINS IT’S PREFERENCE

    Let us assume that the human brain requires N amount of positive stimulation to remain in a state of calm, or rather, constant reward from exposure to stimuli. (it does).

    Lets assume that humans have M{} possible forms of stimulation. (we do).

    Lets assume that males have M{}-Mx{} fewer forms of stimulation available to them. (They do.)

    Lets assume that x{} forms of stimulation consist of empathic experiences. (they do)

    That would, alone, without any further requirement, produce greater specialization in abstractions in males, than females.

    We all start out female. THE MALE BRAIN IS DAMAGED IN UTERO TO PRODUCE THIS OUTCOME: SPECIALIZATION.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-01-18 11:59:00 UTC

  • YOU DON’T HIT WOMEN. Sorry guys, but, yes, we all understand that women are pret

    YOU DON’T HIT WOMEN.

    Sorry guys, but, yes, we all understand that women are pretty much all some degree of crazy. But a far as I can tell it’s their right to be crazy. It may even be a necessity for them. But as long as they aren’t trying to pierce the surface of your body with a foreign object, you don’t hit them.

    Ever. Never ever.

    There are certain costs of doing business so to speak. Ignoring crazy is one of them. Remind women that your life is yours to live and that the only ‘good’ is one that suits both your interests according to your own priorities. There is no abstract good.

    The way it works is, that in the womb, we get brain damaged by the mother, as part of the process of turning off what is female and turning on what is male. What remains is what’s male. And yes, it takes us longer to mature because of that in-utero damage to our brains. We have to sort of ‘grow around’ it to compensate for the damage. In exchange we get to be not-crazy: factual and rational, and perfectly happy in a world with food, beer, and fire to stare at. They get stuck in their world of crazy, empathic, and irrational, so that they can understand children, and be maniacally driven to care for such annoying things as babies (and us).

    So you know, it’s just a cost of doing business.

    You don’t hit them. Ever. You walk away. You keep your own bank accounts, off shore it if you must. But you walk away. Believe it or not there are far more women in this world than men, and they need us more than we need them. ‘Cause we have much lower maintenance costs by our nature. Just how it is. The trend looks like about a third of men, and as much as forty percent will drop out of participation in the work force, and out of self sacrifice for society. (If we aren’t there already to some degree.)

    Let the market do its work.

    Better to be John Galt than a woman-beater.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-01-12 08:05:00 UTC

  • “Men are demonstrating that they’re John Galt, not Peter Pan” priceless

    “Men are demonstrating that they’re John Galt, not Peter Pan”

    priceless


    Source date (UTC): 2014-01-11 12:50:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/jerrybowyer/2014/01/08/men-are-on-strike-throughout-the-u-s-what-are-the-causes/


    Source date (UTC): 2014-01-10 21:09:00 UTC

  • VIOLENCE IN IDLE HANDS By my faith and honor, Our women do mock us, And daily de

    VIOLENCE IN IDLE HANDS

    By my faith and honor,

    Our women do mock us,

    And daily demonstrate,

    Our mettle is all bred out.

    And they give their bodies,

    to the lust of foreign youth

    To new-store Europa

    With bastard sons.

    Lest we rise and remember,

    Whence came our repose,

    Mined from violence mastered

    To multiply our numbers fold.

    We herded the world, unwanted,

    From ignorance into wealth,

    And in folly dreamed us creditor

    While debtors envious evade.

    Our women, they do mock us,

    And daily prattle, with scorn,

    Debtors too, forgotten:

    “Their mettle is all bred out”

    Words complain, rest abstains,

    Patience excuses, uncertainly refrains.

    Debts enforced by violence,

    or abandoned through convenience.

    The greatest virtue is violence used,

    In defense of blood entombed.

    Whose interest sustains us,

    But whose principle has run out.

    Conviction and Intolerance,

    Heady violence, unforgiving demand,

    Virtues in their context,

    But lost in idle hands.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-01-10 12:34:00 UTC

  • MEANS OF FEMINIST OPPRESSION OF REALITY? CENSORING THE INTERNET Uh ho. What?. Sh

    http://www.psmag.com/navigation/health-and-behavior/women-arent-welcome-internet-72170/NEXT MEANS OF FEMINIST OPPRESSION OF REALITY? CENSORING THE INTERNET

    Uh ho. What?. Shaming and Rallying don’t work on the internet?

    Your rejection is powerless? You words can’t carry their own weight?

    You can’t claim that you were open to physical threats on the internet?

    Why do you think men spend more time here than women?

    Words disempower your politicking. But please tell me when you have the right not to be sneered at, jeered, insulted, ridiculed, threatened via twitter messages….


    Source date (UTC): 2014-01-07 17:35:00 UTC