Theme: Sex Differences

  • Video. 1) reading list 2) haidts moral foundations as property rights. 2) proper

    Video.

    1) reading list

    2) haidts moral foundations as property rights.

    2) property and reproductive strategy

    3) politics and reproductive strategy.

    4) the limit if reason at human scsle.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-10-01 03:38:00 UTC

  • “A Norwegian businessman explained to me the other day that he comes to Lviv oft

    –“A Norwegian businessman explained to me the other day that he comes to Lviv often because Scandinavia has become a place completely devoid of femininity. I think it lazy, however, to blame the women. Men must realize that it has been decades since we were masculine. When was the last time you rose when a woman arrived at your table? wore a suit to the airport? fixed a leak in your sink? or had a fist fight?”-Don Finnegan


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-30 14:27:00 UTC

  • Women have a lot of choices from 16-32, and men have a lot of choices from 35-up

    Women have a lot of choices from 16-32, and men have a lot of choices from 35-upward. So men are sort of picky complainers about women in my age range the same way that women are picky complainers when they are in their prime. The problem in our range is money. You can find nice girls, pretty girls, smart girls, and girls who don’t want to spend your money with reckless abandon. But its very hard to find all of that in one package.

    One of the reasons Ukrainian women in the last category are so rare, is that women compete here on femininity not masculinity, so they need resources to do that, and the result doesn’t make money, but encourages laxity. In the states women first want a man to increase status and consumption, then to increase resources for reproduction, then to provide economic security when the children are gone. Men tend to want the same thing all along: sex, nesting and care-taking.

    I have usually done pretty well by sacrificing a bit on looks to get intelligence. I suppose women look at me and sacrifice hight for intelligence (lol). However the combination of not-nice, and spending your money with abandon, is a pretty bad deal, no matter how smart and pretty they are.

    And since I am pretty much incapable of existence in the world without that care-taking, I’d prefer it was nice and to control the costs. 🙂

    sigh.

    Why share this. ‘Cause men don’t. And should. Whether you live old age in wealth or poverty depends largely on the woman you choose.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-30 11:02:00 UTC

  • Overheard amidst laughter: –” A Flight of Birds “– –” A Conspiracy of Liberta

    Overheard amidst laughter:

    –” A Flight of Birds “–

    –” A Conspiracy of Libertarians “–

    –” A Rage Of Feminists “–

    –” An Inflammation of Prostitutes “–

    Much funnier if you’ve been drinking…..


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-24 13:52:00 UTC

  • GIVE THE DEVIL HIS DUE (cultural observations) Jaw-dropping. Beautiful. Feminine

    GIVE THE DEVIL HIS DUE

    (cultural observations)

    Jaw-dropping. Beautiful. Feminine. Everywhere. Every day. My brain stem forces the production of happiness inducing chemistry telling me my brothers and I have captured lots of good women from competing males. Maybe that is why Slavs are so much less aggressive: lots of environmentally induced dopamine. 😉

    I took a walk in the park here today. It rivals western parks in the 19th century tradition. Long wide walks, stone walls, ponds and birds. Sweeping lawns. A physical commons without beggars and bums.

    This is who we were – when we were still a civic society. When people participated in, took responsibility for, and managed the commons themselves, rather than politicians – administrative whores.

    This beauty. These buildings. This land. This character. These parks. These norms. This religion. This is who we were.

    THIS IS WHO WE WERE.

    For the crime of statism alone, we should slaughter every one of them forward and backward for three generations. For the crime of socialism we should do it for all living generations.

    LOOK AT WHAT THEY HAVE DONE TO US.

    Statism and imperialism are crimes against humanity that must be so feared that no living soul in our society ever dares breath the idea again.

    Kill them all and give the devil his due.

    Mercy is for those who deserve it.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-23 07:43:00 UTC

  • TRUTH AND FEMALE MYSTICISM (very controversial) TRUTH BY CULTURE German Protesta

    TRUTH AND FEMALE MYSTICISM

    (very controversial)

    TRUTH BY CULTURE

    German Protestant : Martial Duty. Truth and Duty are inseparable.

    English Catholic (Episcopalian) : Aristocratic Paternalism. Testimonial Truth.

    Italian Catholic : Utilitarian Paternalism. Objective Truth, Pragmatic action.

    French Catholic : Authoritarian Paternalism. Pragmatism as Truth.

    European Jews : Authoritarian Separatism. Results, not truth. (Truth unknowable)

    Finns and Estonians (lutherans) : Pagans using christian rituals.

    I don’t feel ready to express any confidence in the eastern european concept of truth because as most Russians have said, it is almost impossible for westerners to understand the depth of Russian nihilism. As far as I can tell, eastern europeans practice demonstrable truth, and non-demonstrable mysticism, although their mysticism can be expressed as the opposite of western optimism: a deep presumption that the universe conspires to cheat or oppress them somehow, and that the truth is hidden from them by the universe, and they must defend against both man and the universe.

    ON WOMEN, PRE-SCIENTIFIC AND PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC MYSTICISM

    Women are easier to diagnose than men, since, for example, in the west, we have all the “crazy-chicks” that are into light therapy, pop psychology, postmodern sociology, horoscopes, feminism as an aspirational social model, yoga as religion, and reactionary religions in themselves. ***Western women have, at every single class level, and every single level of education, replaced traditional mysticism with pseudoscientific mysticism.*** The cosmopolitans have sold women every possible means of fulfilling their mystical desires.

    Here in the east, women are still very likely to resort to pre-scientific mysticism. They believe in magic, spells, taboos, superstitions, talismans, gods and demons, female intuition as extra sensory perception, and ‘the order of the universe’ as anthropocentric. Although we do see a creeping expansion of female pseudoscientific mysticism in the culture, as pre-scientific mysticism no longer seems to fulfill their needs, and the various female cults of buddhism, yoga in particular, and other emotionally loaded forms of mysticism evolve in response to increases in formal education. But there is no sign here or in the west that women have abandoned mysticism, even if it is formalized as a pseudoscience in the extreme of academic feminism.

    Women have been traditionally considered the root of evil. And given their impact on devolution of the aristocratic society, back to socialist and premodern forms, and their fascination by and expansion of pseudoscientific mysticism as a replacement for traditional mysticism, it is becoming statistically irrefutable that there is truth to this ancient caution.

    The root is quite obvious however. Female reproduction and intuition evolved for the self and her genes, while male reproduction and intuition evolved for the tribe and advancing the tribe. For women, peace means that they can select preferred mates, but they select mates poorly for regressive (aggressive and impulsive) traits whenever possible (sorry ladies, I just go with the data). Males on the other hand want to band together as brothers to create a tribe, that can compete with other tribes of men.

    For this reason women are politically and genetically destructive. The evidence is that under democracy women have sought to, and succeeded in, destroying their own civilization, mostly by their support of pseudoscientific mysticism as the new religion, and attacking traditional religion so that the could replace it with new pseudoscientific religion. That is why the other civilizations are rebelling against expansion of cultural suicide. They adopt central banking, fiat money, consumer capitalism, but not democracy. Because under democracy the lowest common denominator is expressed in law, and therefore in culture.

    For this reason male dominated cultures will always conquer female dominated cultures. Because if males submit to female political preferences, the more aggressive males have, and always will, propagate. Which is in contrast to evolution that has shown us that the most advanced civilizations suppress impulsivity and aggression at the genetic level.

    POLITICAL SOLUTIONS

    I am not recommending that women be disenfranchised, only that we acknowledge that male and female votes are not of equal weight, or of similar interest. As such, just as we have had the monarchy, the aristocracy (the great families), the business class (the good families), and the church (the peasantry) as separate ‘houses’ of government, representing competing interests, we should also separate the male and female vote, representing competing interests. Competing interests with houses of government allow those houses to conduct exchanges rather than under a monopoly, conduct thefts (“takings”).

    I promote compatibilism through voluntary exchange (cooperation). This promotes truth telling. Democracy requires that we lie (conquest). And the evidence is that all we do is lie under democracy. And anyone who tries will have a very hard time refuting this argument.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-21 09:07:00 UTC

  • Women are wonderful but they come and go. Men are loyal and remain. We must take

    Women are wonderful but they come and go.

    Men are loyal and remain.

    We must take better care of one another.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-19 20:43:00 UTC

  • ADVICE TO THE YOUNG (WOMEN): CHOOSING DEGREES FOR LIFETIME HAPPINESS Don’t pay c

    ADVICE TO THE YOUNG (WOMEN): CHOOSING DEGREES FOR LIFETIME HAPPINESS

    Don’t pay college tuition for trade school education. Get a major in something that is the maximum extent of your abilities, and then minor in or take basic courses in your trade.

    In this case I’m referring to a young relative of mine that I love who is too smart for the career she has targeted. I would suggest that if you are a woman and can handle the nursing curriculum then whether or not you choose to be a nurse you can always downgrade if you can’t hack the program. If you do hack it, the entire healthcare field is open to you. Furthermore you can get an advanced degree such as Nurse Practitioner, and and within this generation, nurses will approach doctor salaries. NP is a great career for a smart woman who wants to participate in care-taking fields.

    I will also put out that when you are a young woman you are probably very ignorant about the world, and certainly too ignorant of the world to know in high school what career you should follow. And to make matters worse, you also have raging hormones in your body making you extremely sensitive to care-taking stimuli. By the time you are in your late twenties to mid thirties these hormones will decline in influence and you will care very much more that you are working with people who think about the world the way that you do, and are interesting than you will about care taking of yet another of the same problems that you have seen a thousand times. You can let your hormonal influences in youth determine your mid and late life circumstances, but if you do you will end up as one of the many unsatisfied people in the world who dreams of being what else she could have been.

    In general if you want to have the most fulfilling life, you should always try to operate at the limits of your ability, and associate with people at that same limit. You will constantly make each other better. If you associate with people who have 95-105 IQ’s they are ‘normal’, but if you associate with people 105-115, it’s a very different world you will live in. For example, in the medical field, doctors are usually above 125, and often much higher, while almost all workers in medical administration and service are below 100. If you want to know why doctors act the way they do it’s because it’s very frustrating to talk to people more than 15 points different from you. You don’t see it usually in your education system, but as you mature, you rapidly understand that at 15 points is a standard deviation, and that our social classes (if not our economic classes) are structured by IQ, and that it is much more rewarding for you to work with the people at the top of your spectrum rather than with people below it.

    Next, in the same vein, when you are young, and female (with lower dominance than males) the idea of managing people is harder to imagine than doing a job that does not require a lot of collaboration. But if you are smart, then the only rewarding job as you mature is that which requires a lot of collaboration. If you are smart enough that bad customer service, organizational disorder and inefficiency bother you, and wise enough to understand that people must do things differently because they are each equipped differently, then it is wise to look at careers with management responsibility.

    If you don’t like what this says to you then I am sorry for you – because life will teach you this lesson even if you do not want to learn it. Associate with the best people you can. That means the people who constantly challenge you to improve yourself. You will make them better and they will make you better.

    The opposite is also true. If you associate with people less able than you are, in a career that is less challenging than you are capable of, you will be both socially and occupationally bored, and constantly frustrated by what you see as pervasive incompetence and error. And you will rapidly find yourself a prisoner of that little world in which you have walled yourself.

    Money is not everything. Once you make over 60K, happiness does not improve – you just buy more expensive houses, cars, clothes, and ‘stuff’. But this is a misleading statistic. Because once you make over say, 90K, the quality of people you associate with on a daily basis increases dramatically. Fulfillment in life comes from your family, your friends, but the people you spend the most time with are those at your work. So just as you would be careful with friends, careful selecting a mate, it is wise to be careful selecting a line of work where you are with people who fulfill you rather than frustrate you.

    If you are smart – smart enough to graduate in the upper 10 or 20% of your class, make sure that you are not consigning yourself to your parent’s social class, and the kinds of careers that are easily understood among your family, friends and associates. If you live in NYC or SF you are more aware of the many careers available. If you live in a small town somewhere rural you are not. It helps to read help wanted advertisements in big cities if you want to understand the world. Employment offers are the map of the world as it is. Whatever people tell you is largely mythology.

    So my advice to everyone at every level of ability is to shoot for the most complex degree in one of the most complex fields with the greatest quantitative demands that you can handle. And to consider trade school your last option. You can always switch from harder degree to less hard degree. But if you work hard you will not. But if you are going to pay that much money for an education, do not pay for trade school expecting a college education. It’s a recipe for debt and an unsatisfying life.

    Affections.

    Curt


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-15 10:47:00 UTC

  • American in-group dating bias is up about 25% or more this year, (or conversely,

    American in-group dating bias is up about 25% or more this year, (or conversely, out-group dating is down) and the spread continues to expand. The exception being Asian women for both white and asian men, and white men in general. The numbers are distorted believe it or not by lower dislike of blacks by whites than dislike of blacks by asians and latinos. I’m getting most of this second and so I haven’t seen the data. And what I suspect, is that the numbers are being driven largely by increases in Latino and Asian populations on the west coast, both of which demonstrate more stratification in mating preferences than whites. But net of the data trend is that we overwhelmingly mate in-group.


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-15 07:34:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    http://www.tcmag.com/magazine/bill_burr_on_the_epidemic_of_gold_digging_whoresyep


    Source date (UTC): 2014-09-12 23:46:00 UTC