[I] think the tide has changed and that science of HBD has won out over “The Great Boazian Lie”. POSITION Most variation in human behavior is hormonal, normative, and institutional. With the most influential difference in behavior (if not appearance) caused by norms and institutions. In other words, we ‘grow’ differently despite very similar genetic composition. 1) the majority of differences between the great tribes (races) is in the rates of reproduction of the lower classes. Or conversely, the rates of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses and the concentration of reproduction in the middle and upper classes. 2) that sexual maturity regulates aggression and impulse and time preference.(humans are no different from foxes or any other creature). Hence the increasing aggression (and penis size) from east asian, northern whites(Ukrainian), southern(Iranian) whites, arabs, and africans. 3) cranial size effects intelligence disproportionately since intelligence is largely a function of memory. 4) there appears to be a difference in the evolution of different brain agents (language in particular) and in cooperation (frontal lobe) that is expressed in the races, and verbal self expression both limits frustration and increases cooperation. 5) raw athletic ability decreases with decreases in sexual maturity. In other words, this hormonal theory of sexual maturity is a sufficient explanation for the variation in COMPETITIVENESS our gene pools, and the strategies that we adopt as norms and traditions given our competitiveness (or lack of it). And furthermore, any other theory would need be more parsimonious. And my position at present is that further improvement in our genetic understanding of man’s differences will augment rather than contradict or falsify this theory. Or put another way, the end of evolution is that we reach minimum sexual maturity for reproduction but never switch off the youth and on the maturity signals. Why am I only concerned about this level of precision rather than enumerating what appear to be significant differences between races (including the Ukrainian white and Indo-Iranian White)? Because I don’t need to suggest universalism under paternal aristocracy. Meaning I’m not advocating universalism. I’m not advocating diversity or equality. I’m merely pointing out that each tribe and sub-tribe will evolve into a high trust society that is not a threat to its neighbors if it practices eugenic reproduction and rule of law. Not an aristocracy of everyone, but everyone living in aristocracies. THEREFORE The problem for any society to solve is largely one of reducing the relative size of the individuals below what we consider 106IQ today, and a target for any polity should be a distribution no less that 115, and preferably 125 if we wish to see ‘Star Trek’ – whereas the current downward trend is producing a devolution to a future of ‘Favelas’. WORSE It is possible that we have passed peak human, since it is very difficult to cleans defective genes from a polity, and intelligence is comprised of a complex set of genetic biases. EXAMPLES China surpasses india both because of superior suppression of the underclasses, and superior ability of the red army to force literacy. THE WEST The west succeeded because of (a) Aristocratic egalitarianism (b) martial truth (d) dramatic culling of the lower classes both by starvation, access to land, and aggressive hanging. You do not so much improve your population as limit the harm done to it by the lower classes. This is a consistent theme that I’ve discovered in most of my work: we do not know the truth but we know falsehood. WE do not know goods but we know bads. We cannot breed better men, we can only stop bad men from breeding more. The EUGENICS program was perhaps the most important objective of western man, and the failure of it due to women and pseudosciences was the second catastrophe. 1) The Enlightenment fallacy of oppressed man vs eugenic civilization. 2) The Enlightenment undermining of monarchy, aristocracy, instead of addition of new houses for newly participatory classes. 3) The enfranchisement of women and women’s advocacy of enfranchising slaves as a means of gaining their own enfranchisement. 4) The Jewish Cosmopolitan Pseudoscientific movement as an attempt to create a second Religion for women and slaves (underclasses): Boaz(sociology), Marx(economics), Freud (psychology), Frankfurt School (politics). 5) The Anglo attack on german civilization in the first war. The anglo attack on german civilization in the second war, and failure of Germany to restore european civilization to aristocratic, aesthetic, and egalitarian origins. 6) The adoption of the Pseudoscientific Religion by the Academy, State, Media complex and its appeal to women in academy: as revenue, state voting as power, and consumer consumption of goods as revenue. (a degree in other than STEM fields appears to be nothing more than a modern sale of Indulgences to build universities instead of churches.) 7) The 1965/66 Immigration law by which the Women, Blacks, Jews, the Pseudoscientific Religion of the Academy, State, Media complex sought to achieve through depopulation (destruction of the family) and immigration (invasion) what they could not achieve by propaganda. 8) The failure of the masculine, familial, conservative, libertarian, and scientific thought leadership to produce a body of thought to counter the second use of women as a means of distributing the Pseudoscientific Revolution’s attempt at the Second Great Lie (pseudoscience) second only to the First Great Lie (monotheism). (Which Propertarianism and Testimonialism, Genetic and Cognitive science, plus a century of recorded damage to civilization help to overturn.) 9) the great wealth to be made from the conquest and sale of the North American (US/Canadian), and Australian continents, has been interpreted as a property of American Democracy rather than american democracy is a temporary luxury made possible by the rather ridiculous wealth from the 300 year long sale of the Continent to immigrants. And while we were limited to immigration of middle class gene pools without access to land from above the Hanjal line, we now are engaged in a pollution of all forms of capital. (the same applies to Russia by the way.) Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
Theme: Sex Differences
-
REDUCING H.B.D. TO RULE OF LAW I think the tide has changed and that HBD has won
REDUCING H.B.D. TO RULE OF LAW
I think the tide has changed and that HBD has won out over “The Great Boazian Lie”.
My position on HBD is:
1) the majority of differences between the great tribes (races) is in the rates of reproduction of the lower classes. Or conversely, the rates of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses and the concentration of reproduction in the middle and upper classes.
2) that sexual maturity regulates aggression and impulse and time preference.(humans are no different from foxes or any other creature). Hence the increasing aggression (and penis size) from east asian, northern whites(Ukrainian), southern(Iranian) whites, arabs, and africans.
3) cranial size effects intelligence disproportionately since intelligence is largely a function of memory.
4) there appears to be a difference in the evolution of different brain agents (language in particular) and in cooperation (frontal lobe) that is expressed in the races, and verbal self expression both limits frustration and increases cooperation.
5) raw athletic ability decreases with decreases in sexual maturity.
THEREFORE
The problem for any society to solve is largely one of reducing the relative size of the individuals below what we consider 106IQ today, and a target for any polity should be a distribution no less that 115, and preferably 125 if we wish to see ‘Star Trek’ – whereas the current downward trend is producing a devolution to a future of ‘Favelas’.
WORSE
It is possible that we have passed peak human, since it is very difficult to cleans defective genes from a polity, and intelligence is comprised of a complex set of genetic biases.
EXAMPLES
China surpasses india both because of superior suppression of the underclasses, and superior ability of the red army to force literacy.
The west succeeded because of (a) Aristocratic egalitarianism (b) martial truth (d) dramatic culling of the lower classes both by starvation, access to land, and aggressive hanging.
You do not so much improve your population as limit the harm done to it by the lower classes.
This is a consistent theme that I’ve discovered in most of my work: we do not know the truth but we know falsehood. WE do not know goods but we know bads. We cannot breed better men, we can only stop bad men from breeding more.
The EUGENICS program was perhaps the most important objective of western man, and the failure of it due to women and pseudosciences was the second catastrophe.
1) The Enlightenment fallacy of oppressed man vs eugenic civilization.
2) The Enlightenment undermining of monarchy, aristocracy, instead of addition of new houses for newly participatory classes.
3) The enfranchisement of women and women’s advocacy of enfranchising slaves as a means of gaining their own enfranchisement.
4) The Jewish Cosmopolitan Pseudoscientific movement as an attempt to create a second Religion for women and slaves (underclasses): Boaz(sociology), Marx(economics), Freud (psychology), Frankfurt School (politics).
5) The Anglo attack on german civilization in the first war. The anglo attack on german civilization in the second war, and failure of Germany to restore european civilization to aristocratic, aesthetic, and egalitarian origins.
6) The adoption of the Pseudoscientific Religion by the Academy, State, Media complex and its appeal to women in academy: as revenue, state voting as power, and consumer consumption of goods as revenue. (a degree in other than STEM fields appears to be nothing more than a modern sale of Indulgences to build universities instead of churches.)
7) The 1965/66 Immigration law by which the Women, Blacks, Jews, the Pseudoscientific Religion of the Academy, State, Media complex sought to achieve through depopulation (destruction of the family) and immigration (invasion) what they could not achieve by propaganda.
8) The failure of the masculine, familial, conservative, libertarian, and scientific thought leadership to produce a body of thought to counter the second use of women as a means of distributing the Pseudoscientific Revolution’s attempt at the Second Great Lie (pseudoscience) second only to the First Great Lie (monotheism). (Which Propertarianism and Testimonialism, Genetic and Cognitive science, plus a century of recorded damage to civilization help to overturn.)
9) the great wealth to be made from the conquest and sale of the North American (US/Canadian), and Australian continents, has been interpreted as a property of American Democracy rather than american democracy is a temporary luxury made possible by the rather ridiculous wealth from the 300 year long sale of the Continent to immigrants. And while we were limited to immigration of middle class gene pools without access to land from above the Hanjal line, we now are engaged in a pollution of all forms of capital. (the same applies to Russia by the way.)
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 06:03:00 UTC
-
BEHOLD IMPULSIVE WOMAN, THE PANDORA: DESTROYER OF CIVILIZATION Men developed the
BEHOLD IMPULSIVE WOMAN, THE PANDORA: DESTROYER OF CIVILIZATION
Men developed the many prohibitions and regulations of male impulses, biases and intuitions for no less than ten thousand years.
And yet we handed women equal political power without equal prohibitions and regulations on female impulses, biases, and intuitions.
Men used civilization to prolong consumption in favor of capital accumulation. Women used the voting booth to pull forward consumption in favor of unbounded reproduction. Women undid in just over one century thousands of years of civilization.
Unlike ‘conservatives’ I do not seek to withdraw women’s participation, but to limit the damage done by female impulses, biases and intuitions just as we limited the damage that can be done by male impulses, biases and intuitions.
Unfortunately for the Feminist movement, it has become clear that it was the impulses of in-group women that we controlled throughout the process of civilization, and the impulses of out-group men we controlled through the process of civilization.
So the evolution of property accomplished both the regulation of women’s impulsive reproduction at the expense of capital accumulation. Or put more simply: it was as equally important to regulate women as it was men.
But our institutions and laws regulated men, while our norms regulated women. Given access to the ballot box, and thereby to political power, women destroyed civilization in pursuit of their impulses.
Houses for competing group evolutionary strategies.
Houses like the senate and jury, hear appeals.
Contracts for commons must pass dissent by involuntary transfer, not assent.
It is hard for us to grasp that there is not much that is a knowable good goal, only knowable good process for achieving goals. Yet that there are knowable bad goals and knowable bad processes, and knowable bad actions.
That which is bad can be known: they are truths.
That which is good is that which is not bad.
That which is better is a matter of preference not truth.
We can enfranchise anyone under the prevention of the bad.
And we can return Pandora to the box.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-14 05:19:00 UTC
-
Women Unleashed The Ghouls of Society
[A]nother Pandora’s Box
—“Here’s the dirty secret of women working — they can do what they want but here ya go — when they started entering the work force in mass, the ghouls of society took over raising the kids and installing Mental Malware into their mush brains. Stress was raised in the house, since both partners were dead ass tired at the end of the day, oh and with all that extra income, they first just spent more of it, then the government figured out they could just tax the surplus — and now we went from it being a choice for women to work to being a requirement — and collectively have the same purchasing power they did before when only the husband worked.”— James Santagata
-
Women Unleashed The Ghouls of Society
[A]nother Pandora’s Box
—“Here’s the dirty secret of women working — they can do what they want but here ya go — when they started entering the work force in mass, the ghouls of society took over raising the kids and installing Mental Malware into their mush brains. Stress was raised in the house, since both partners were dead ass tired at the end of the day, oh and with all that extra income, they first just spent more of it, then the government figured out they could just tax the surplus — and now we went from it being a choice for women to work to being a requirement — and collectively have the same purchasing power they did before when only the husband worked.”— James Santagata
-
WOMEN UNLEASHED THE GHOULS OF SOCIETY —“Here’s the dirty secret of women worki
WOMEN UNLEASHED THE GHOULS OF SOCIETY
—“Here’s the dirty secret of women working — they can do what they want but here ya go — when they started entering the work force in mass, the ghouls of society took over raising the kids and installing Mental Malware into their mush brains. Stress was raised in the house, since both partners were dead ass tired at the end of the day, oh and with all that extra income, they first just spent more of it, then the government figured out they could just tax the surplus — and now we went from it being a choice for women to work to being a requirement — and collectively have the same purchasing power they did before when only the husband worked.”— James Santagata
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-13 06:01:00 UTC
-
WOMEN NEED THEIR OWN KITCHEN (SOVIETS DEMONSTRATED IT) OK. So if “In the kitchen
WOMEN NEED THEIR OWN KITCHEN (SOVIETS DEMONSTRATED IT)
OK. So if “In the kitchen, cooking, barefoot, and pregnant” is such a bad thing, how come whenever women are in the kitchen together, in slippers, and at least one is pregnant, they are so damned happy?
Never listen to what people say. Watch what they do and how they behave when doing it.
I think, most men, if they could build brick and stone buildings, and sew fields, and hunt a bit, in ‘crews’, and not do so at risk, would be much happier than they are working in isolation on abstractions without visible accomplishment.
There must be some balance (like they have in France, eastern Europe and in Russia) between having a cottage and garden in the countryside, and an apartment and work in the city.
What if we had 4-day work weeks and 3-day weekends, and our old folks were the responsibilities of offspring in villages, rather than old folks homes?
I hate the industrialization of society. The socialist and communists were a human catastrophe.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-13 05:47:00 UTC
-
CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS Jewellery shop. Two customers. Women. 30’s, 50’s. After mu
CULTURAL OBSERVATIONS
Jewellery shop. Two customers. Women. 30’s, 50’s.
After much consideration, the younger woman flirts with her husband, and he buys what she wants. His expression is one of resigned helplessness.
Due to subtle communication between women invisible to me the older woman and the salesgirls smile and giggle.
The older woman says “see that is a real Ukrainian woman.”
Husband says “I cannot say no.”
Another round of giggles.
Older woman ups the compliment. “Yes. A perfect Ukrainian woman.”
In that expression of power, lies the difference between eastern and western relationships.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-12 02:47:00 UTC
-
not sure that holds up to scrutiny since the worst presidents are those with gre
not sure that holds up to scrutiny since the worst presidents are those with greatest support from women.
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-11 15:09:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/675331667796631552
Reply addressees: @jackiep713
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674952401569185792
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/674952401569185792
-
Eve bit the Forbidden Fruit and cast us out of Eden. Pandora Opened The Forbidde
Eve bit the Forbidden Fruit and cast us out of Eden.
Pandora Opened The Forbidden Box and Let Evil Into the World
Western Woman Opened the Ballot Box and Invited Evil The West.
What do we learn from this?
Source date (UTC): 2015-12-11 14:10:00 UTC