Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • if they measured the sexes based upon rates of maturity it would be even more ex

    if they measured the sexes based upon rates of maturity it would be even more exaggerated. Takes a long time to grow a male.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-06 10:24:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/750636555321180165

    Reply addressees: @SteveStuWill

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/749269073305833472

    IN REPLY TO:

    @SteveStuWill

    Sex differences in reading, math, and science at the mean and extreme tails the distribution https://t.co/IcMEcfgY64 https://t.co/OCwEL5pjBc

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/749269073305833472

  • ELI ON THE RATIONAL RISK PURSUIT AND AVERSION OF GENDERS —” While there certai

    ELI ON THE RATIONAL RISK PURSUIT AND AVERSION OF GENDERS

    —” While there certainly can be exceptions, in general, women are going to be more risk averse and men more risk tolerant.

    That’s a sensible risk management strategy. If a man fails, (in contrast to a woman) the individual consequences may be severe, but the consequences to the group are less severe, because a man doesn’t have a uterus. On the other end, men can’t afford NOT to take risks because they have to *demonstrate* value, and if they don’t, they’ll be left behind by men who do.

    Women, on the other hand, can afford not to take risks, because their uterii automatically give them some value, and so they’re usually better off playing it safe.

    So this division of risk-taking makes evolutionary sense for all parties.

    The problem comes when women attempt to IMPOSE their risk aversion on men as well, and this prevents men, not just from failing, but also from succeeding. And so it’s basically pointless even having men under those conditions, because they’re only women without uterii. And it prevents women from sharing in the successes that men can only obtain by taking risks.

    But this condition is unstable, because that society will be highly susceptable to revolt or conquest by aggressive, risk-taking, males. (Think “Demolition Man.”) And when push comes to shove, the effeminate males will simply be killed, and the risk-averse women will fold to save themselves.”— Eli Harman

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-05 08:15:00 UTC

  • THE ORIGINS OF THE LEFT’S EFFEMINATE R-SELECTION BIAS I think what is abhorrent

    THE ORIGINS OF THE LEFT’S EFFEMINATE R-SELECTION BIAS

    I think what is abhorrent to leftists is that business and productivity are innately competitive and consist of attempting to outwit other tribes of males for market territory.

    This is antithetical to the r-selection instincts of females and their effeminate offspring and the sexually inverted ((( tribes ))).

    In their world the cannot compete and seek consensus and non-conflict and reciprocality.

    They do not see competition as calculation by trial and error of efficiencies in the interest of all.

    They sense only the short term experience rather than judge long term consequences.

    Hence why we must never take the feminine or effeminate opinion seriously.

    It is a temporal blindness and a moral blindness just like Color blindness.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-05 04:30:00 UTC

  • Typical Ukrainian man: “I have two children and three jobs. But I am happier wit

    Typical Ukrainian man:

    “I have two children and three jobs. But I am happier with three jobs than with one”

    There are good men here but it’s hard to find them.

    He says American women are more “practical and cunning” with honest respect.

    I have been in an anti feminism bent for a long time but you know one of the reasons for American excellence is our ability to compete in the middle of the distribution with our women.

    At the cost to genes and civilisation, true. But if the measure of the men of any civilisation is the privileges with which we can enable our women is a measure of our other excellences.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-05 03:51:00 UTC

  • All women are even more beautiful in lace

    All women are even more beautiful in lace.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-04 04:32:00 UTC

  • Weird. Beards, metro sexuality, millennial male effeminacy, and sjw’s all just p

    Weird.

    Beards, metro sexuality, millennial male effeminacy, and sjw’s all just peaked.

    Just getting my full brains back and I might be behind, but the shift just happened.

    Not sure what it means .. I think less pretense, more real.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-27 04:00:00 UTC

  • Women exist as our mothers, sisters, daughters, wives and friends. In that capac

    Women exist as our mothers, sisters, daughters, wives and friends. In that capacity we are equal. But in politics and war women are as incapable as men are of conception and birth. And it is more likely that men will give birth than women will demonstrate capability in politics and war. Dependence upon female defense of communal capital is as suicidal as dependence upon male bearing of offspring.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-26 13:30:00 UTC

  • You can be both a libertarian and a redistributionist as long as youre also a eu

    You can be both a libertarian and a redistributionist as long as youre also a eugenicist. 😉 The problem is eugenics. Our ancestors knew that.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-24 06:48:00 UTC

  • CONSERVATIVES CANNOT BE HONEST UNDER DEMOCRACY Why? Conservatism is a eugenic so

    CONSERVATIVES CANNOT BE HONEST UNDER DEMOCRACY

    Why? Conservatism is a eugenic social order. And the ‘good’ families are dwarfed in number by the ‘not good’ families.

    Western success is due in no small part to its adoption of eugenic institutions and policies in every walk of life. Puritan american was an attempt to create a eugenic civilization.

    But America, like every other attempt at creating a eugenic state has failed for the same reason: insufficient understanding of the reasons for the west’s rise; insufficient honesty in its constitution; and insufficient violence to preserve it.

    And this is why traditionalism and conservatism in all their variations have failed. Conservatism is a deterministically eugenic social, political, legal, and economic system that arose in the era of productive scarcity.

    Majoritarian democracy, redistributive socialism, and feminism are deterministically dysgenic social, political, legal, and economic systems that arose in the era of productive plenty.

    Western eugenics were negative: constraining the lower classes and devoting resources to the reproduction of the middle and upper classes. They were not positive in any sense: arranged breeding. This conflation of negative eugenics and positive eugenics is what brought an end to the movement. Even if medically induced positive eugenics is probably a future we can assume will expand.

    Assuming that we must preserve the means of constructing commons, and assuming we want to preserve prosperity and western creativity, we have two choices: we can either remove the franchise from the non-producers and restore the family to the central object of policy, or we can construct houses for the production of commons that once again reflect that interests of the genders and classes. The first will create an oligarchy open to corruption. The second will create a market whereby genders and classes cannot impose costs upon one another without benefit in exchange.

    If we fail to do the second, we will be forced to do the first. And if we fail to do the first, we will no longer exist as a civilization.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, UKraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-23 05:31:00 UTC

  • “You. on the other hand, have that horse-face thing going on that says your fema

    —-“You. on the other hand, have that horse-face thing going on that says your female progenitors had to pick males impulsively – if they weren’t scullery maids who took seed involuntarily.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-22 16:57:00 UTC