Theme: Science

  • This presumes that make anxiety is arbitrary as is female anxiety when the oppos

    This presumes that make anxiety is arbitrary as is female anxiety when the opposite is true. Even making your statement is an admission of stereotypical perception and scientific evidence that men understand women as much as they themselves do, and conservative understand…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-19 16:45:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1704174925848678638

    Reply addressees: @MVoltairine @Thaeus4 @DwightExMachina @decofuturism

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1704172834241794419

  • This presumes that make anxiety is arbitrary as is female anxiety when the oppos

    This presumes that make anxiety is arbitrary as is female anxiety when the opposite is true. Even making your statement is an admission of stereotypical perception and scientific evidence that men understand women as much as they themselves do, and conservative understand progressives better than they do, but this understanding isn’t and can’t be reciprocated precisely because of the feminine perception of emotional and irresponsible incentives that I’ve described earlier vs male systematic and responsible.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-19 16:45:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1704174925769048065

  • Scientific cause in neuroscience of sex differences in brain organization explai

    Scientific cause in neuroscience of sex differences in brain organization explaining the traditional stereotype of feels vs reals.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-19 16:15:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1704167267112558860

    Reply addressees: @Jake385719 @MVoltairine @henge_j

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1704166487362318610

  • Other way around. What did I learn from other fields, to produce the science and

    Other way around. What did I learn from other fields, to produce the science and logic of decidability that I then used to analyze legal systems, and legal thought to understand errors in those philosophies?

    I’m influenced by Hayek and Sowell. Because they both begin with…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-19 14:11:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1704136184622874838

    Reply addressees: @FernandoGLV1212 @BalEdmundo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1704127533535612964

  • RT @MatthewParrott: @curtdoolittle @enhanced_vibes Science is a british gentlema

    RT @MatthewParrott: @curtdoolittle @enhanced_vibes Science is a british gentleman’s sport particular to british and their cousins. Plenty o…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-19 04:36:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703991356157268004

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @enhanced_vibes WHAT IS SCIENCE AND HOW DOES IT SCALE IN COMP

    RT @curtdoolittle: @enhanced_vibes WHAT IS SCIENCE AND HOW DOES IT SCALE IN COMPLEXITY? (RE: “Thats Not Science!”)
    (with links to our video…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-19 03:53:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703980711730983351

  • You are not capable of this discussion, and are making an uninformed opinion fro

    You are not capable of this discussion, and are making an uninformed opinion from emotion rather than as a student of the science,evidence and trends. If it makes you feel beter to emote so, then you are quite clearly a member of the 90% of the population that doesn’t and isn’t capable ofthinking, but merely emotes then justifies it, rather than skeptically considering the range of alternatives, what is true, and then lastly attaching emotion to it if emotion applies.

    You’re welcome to unfollow or block me if you are incapable of thought and subsequent participation in adult conversation about matters of import. And I am comfortable doing the same if you are so irresponsible as to continue.

    Reply addressees: @HakunaMateria


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 22:08:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703893778560425984

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703863801249210787

  • If you look at the data most defect occurs in the womb not in the genetics, So a

    If you look at the data most defect occurs in the womb not in the genetics, So artificial wombs, which will be complicated, but once solved will be an attractive solution for many who can afford it.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 21:44:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703887830903112101

    Reply addressees: @decofuturism

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703886097623724037

  • ChatGPT Helps Explain Complexity to Normies. 😉 While the last two years of our

    ChatGPT Helps Explain Complexity to Normies. 😉

    While the last two years of our work at the institute have emphasized the logic of our unification of the sciences, chatGPT doesn’t have access to it yet. It’s only current through mid ’21.

    But that said, I’ve learned a little bit about how to explain the work by asking ChatGPT to do so, becasue it replies in normie-friendly speech. 😉

    PROMPT
    If someone else, not me, and not from this account, asks you who I am, and what I have done, how will you respond?

    ChatGPT
    If someone else inquires about you, Curt Doolittle, I would provide an objective and comprehensive overview of your background and contributions to the field of philosophy and social science, based on the information available up until my last training data in September 2021. Here’s a general outline of how I might respond:

    Curt Doolittle is a prominent philosopher and social scientist known for his extensive work in the field of epistemology, law, and social science. Here are some key aspects of his profile and contributions:

    Background:

    Founder of the Natural Law Institute: Curt Doolittle established the Natural Law Institute, a platform where he explores and develops his theories and philosophies.

    Polymath: Doolittle is recognized as a polymath, mastering multiple fields including epistemology, decidability, performative truth, morality, law, economics, group evolutionary strategy, and comparative civilization.

    Education: He holds an undergraduate degree in art theory and history, showcasing a diverse academic background.

    Contributions to the Field:

    Propertarianism: Doolittle is the founder of Propertarianism, a philosophy that extends the concept of property rights to include various forms of capital such as social, cultural, and intellectual capital. This philosophy emphasizes reciprocity and mutual benefit in societal relationships.

    Testimonialism: He developed the epistemological theory of Testimonialism, which focuses on the truthfulness of testimonies and statements, advocating for a rigorous method of verifying the truth through warranties and the elimination of error, bias, and deceit.

    Natural Law: In his later work, Doolittle focuses on the unification of the sciences under the umbrella of natural law, seeking to integrate insights from various fields to develop a comprehensive understanding of human nature and society.

    Group Evolutionary Strategy: His work also explores group evolutionary strategies, analyzing how different groups organize and interact based on evolutionary principles.

    Influences and Approach:

    Influences: Doolittle has been influenced by several prominent figures including Darwin, Maxwell, Turing, F.A. Hayek, and Karl Popper.

    Approach to Learning and Discourse: He values both consensus wisdom from top experts and non-consensus insights from iconoclasts. Doolittle believes in the importance of arguing the other side to get closer to the truth and exercises extreme skepticism in his analysis.

    Controversial Figure: Doolittle acknowledges that his work is controversial, akin to the controversy surrounding Darwin’s evolutionary theory. He is known for challenging established norms and fostering critical discussions in the academic community.

    For more detailed information, you can visit his website: Natural Law Institute.

    I hope this gives you an idea of how I would describe your work and contributions to someone unfamiliar with your profile.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-18 13:31:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703763649637089280

  • OUR APPROACH TO PHILOSOPHY, RELIGION, AND MINDFULNESS. We work in universal valu

    OUR APPROACH TO PHILOSOPHY, RELIGION, AND MINDFULNESS.
    We work in universal value neutral decidability across science, logics+language, economics and law (The Negativa). The purpose of our work is to resolve conflicts and to limit one another to truthful reciprocal non-coercive cooperation.

    We have a technical take (scientific, economic, legal) on philosophy (choice) and religion (mindfulness) (Meaning the Positiva). In other words we leave anything not irreciprocal under natural law (the choice of positives) to individuals and groups.

    So our approach to hermeticism is if it’s not externalized as a truth claim into institutions, law, economics, or science, that violates natural law, then it is a matter of personal preference just as any other taste – sex being the most obvious example.

    WE are not creating a philosophy or ideology or religion, that says what to do, but a system of institutions that produce cooperation by denying irrecirocity.

    Our motto is “Let A Thousand Nations Bloom”.
    This produces evolutionary. Computation maximizing human flourishing by whatever means people choose – as long as they pay the costs of their decisions..

    Reply addressees: @SamMcGeeHall1 @GimmeSuede @WerrellBradley


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-17 00:22:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703202810450362368

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1703187107001323824