Theme: Science

  • FACTS A fact is to a description of observations as theory is to a description o

    FACTS

    A fact is to a description of observations as theory is to a description of a general rule.)

    Observations -> Criticisms -> Facts (surviving observations)

    Hypotheses -> Criticisms -> Theories (surviving general rules)

    There is only one epistemological method regardless of causal density (scale).

    The scale of facts is smaller than the scale of theories. That is all.

    Facts and Theories have survived criticism.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-07 14:26:00 UTC

  • We are all that stand between man’s evolution into gods, and another dark age of

    We are all that stand between man’s evolution into gods, and another dark age of ignorance, mysticism, and suffering. We are the superpredators of the superpredator man. It is our gift.

    Revel in it. Master it. Use it.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-07 02:22:00 UTC

  • ( criticism of pseudoscientific drivel ) —“from the Kant generator in the Waff

    ( criticism of pseudoscientific drivel )

    —“from the Kant generator in the Waffle Hall of Fame”–


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-02 14:01:00 UTC

  • We do not judge religions by what they claim, but by differences. Same with scie

    We do not judge religions by what they claim, but by differences. Same with science. Same with epistemology. Name != Cause.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-01 07:09:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/748775618372706304

    Reply addressees: @LibertarianMike

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/748754129485377536


    IN REPLY TO:

    @LibertarianMike

    The United States is in no way founded upon the Christian religion — George Washington & John Adams, in a diplomatic message to Malta.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/748754129485377536

  • Empirically speaking, we already overspend on Grad and PhD students. We overspen

    Empirically speaking, we already overspend on Grad and PhD students. We overspend on most sciences (because they’re psuedosciences) and underspend on those that matter (physics, material science, chemistry, biological chemistry, genetics, archaeology) Virtually all other programs (psychology, social sciences, political sciences), and certainly all pseudosciences (the humanities) are a waste of money.

    Even in those hard sciences we can see in the cites that the number of scientists that do meaningful work remains relatively constant over time, no matter how many scientists we add to the pool it seems to make very little difference. Just why this is true, we aren’t sure.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-07-01 00:03:00 UTC

  • I work in testimonial (scientific) truth. Since every ideological group lies lik

    I work in testimonial (scientific) truth. Since every ideological group lies like hell, it’s no wonder they all damn me. 🙂


    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-28 05:10:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747658299173126146

    Reply addressees: @enlightdark

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747650625488494594


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/747650625488494594

  • THE CHURCH FAILED TO REFORM AND THE SCIENCES DIDN”T HAVE TIME TO COMPLETE THEIR

    THE CHURCH FAILED TO REFORM AND THE SCIENCES DIDN”T HAVE TIME TO COMPLETE THEIR EVOLUTIONARY PROGRAM

    I mean, another way to look at the 20th century is that in response to Darwin, Maxwell, Spencer, (a) the church failed to reform in response by stating that god and natural and physical laws were the same expression of his divinity, and (b) our intellectual class failed to synthesize operationalism as a means of reforming scientific thought-at its new-grand-scale, and (c) the Jewish pseudoscientists (Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor) filled a void that both state, academy, and finance could use to profit from the new wave of democratic voters (customers), students (customers), and consumers (customers) who they could not force to spend down their accumulated cultural and institutional capital.

    We can easily argue that this is the same strategy the ancient Jews took in response to the imposition of (scientific Aryan-universalist) roman law on top of their (mystical authoritarian separatist) Jewish law. I mean, it worked against classical civilization, why wouldn’t it work against restored classical civilization of the enlightenment?

    Intellectuals provide a product for a market. I am just concerned that we do not let another era of fraudulent defective products like ancient Jewish mysticism and modern Jewish pseudoscience into a civilization where second tier intellectuals, women, and the underclass are all too willing to embrace utter falsehoods at the expense of their civilization and it’s progenitors – and in the case of western civilization, all of human kind that benefits from western creativity.

    So what we see, is that between the failure of democracy, the progressive failure of Keynesian economics, the failure of Freudian psychology, of Boazian anthropology, of Marxist economics and sociology, and even Cantorian infinity to survive scrutiny by late 20’th and early 21st century science, that we have at least a temporary opportunity to overthrow the Second Great Deceit’s attack on western truth, science, and eugenics.

    But we have a short time before the second great deceit and it’s customers in women and the underclasses, possess such numbers that we can be forced into another dark age. And that the promise of a eugenic north America, like a eugenic Europe, insulated from the steppe, desert, and jungle, can continue to provide an engine of innovation for mankind.

    For the simple reason that we pay the high cost of truthfulness: That discipline of eliminating error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, and deceit, that we call ‘science’.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    We must achieve by force what they have achieved in both the ancient and modern world by deceits.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-28 03:38:00 UTC

  • Crossing my fingers that we will soon depart the STATISTICALLY CORRELATIVE era o

    Crossing my fingers that we will soon depart the STATISTICALLY CORRELATIVE era of policy, and enter the OPERATIONALLY EXISTENTIAL era of policy.

    Will science defeat the era of pseudoscience?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-06-28 01:51:00 UTC

  • Philosophical Crimes:

    0 – Ignorance 1 – Error 2 – Bias 3 – Wishful Thinking 4 – Suggestion, Loading and Framing 5 – Obscurantism, Pseudorationalism, Pseudoscience 6 – Overloading, Saturation, and Propaganda 7 – Deceit

  • Philosophical Crimes:

    0 – Ignorance 1 – Error 2 – Bias 3 – Wishful Thinking 4 – Suggestion, Loading and Framing 5 – Obscurantism, Pseudorationalism, Pseudoscience 6 – Overloading, Saturation, and Propaganda 7 – Deceit