Curt Doolittle

Theme: Science

  • QUANTUM PHYSICS FAITH, PLATONISM, OBSCURING THE OBVIOUS (from elsewhere) 1) “Phe

    QUANTUM PHYSICS FAITH, PLATONISM, OBSCURING THE OBVIOUS

    (from elsewhere)

    1) “Phenomena – or ‘states’- consist of Particles and Waves” Meaning excitations of a quantum energy field produce some particle (concentrated) effects and some wave (distributed) effects.

    2) “Quantum Physics Is Probabilistic” Meaning causal density is higher than we can determine with the limited scope of electromagnetic radiation.

    3) “Quantum Physics is Discrete” Meaning the total ELECTROMAGNETIC energy contained in a particular ELECTROMAGNETIC light field is an integer multiple of that energy.

    4) “Quantum Physics Is Non-Local” Meaning that the causal relationship between visible energy, invisible energy, and space time is not understood, and despite the rather obvious routes of investigation the physics community continues its use of platonism and magic and mathematical-ism, and then spreading this magical-nonsense language to the population.

    4) “Quantum Physics Is Not Magic” Meaning, that the profession, out of allegiance to the scientific method’s presumption that we leave all avenues of investigation open, has adopted the platonism of mathematics rather than simply stating the obvious: there is something fundamentally missing with our understanding of the universe, and it’s been patently obvious for a century now: the math doesn’t add up. It doesn’t add up because we are currently as blind to dark energy as we were to electromagnetism prior to Maxwell. In that sense, I don’t see einstein’s value anywhere as important as whomever the next Maxwell will be. And my presumption is that the energy and technology required to perform the tests necessary to conduct that line of inquiry is logarithmically more expensive than the entire scope of human history up until maxwell. (I am subconsciously worried that having produced an einstein and his efforts, we are obscuring a venue for the next Maxwell. This kind of impedimentary ignorance is common in our history.)

    ***All mathematical calculations are operationally definable, but all mathematical descriptions of phenomenon are merely correlative. We know only correlation of mathematical descriptions until we can determine causation: algorithms.***

    And we know causation only when we know the possible operations that produce the changes in state.

    We do not know enough about the non-electromagnetic spectrum (dark world) to determine its relationship with the electromatic (light world).

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-21 11:35:00 UTC

  • RT @JayMan471: No. Because you should *never* trust scientists to interpret thei

    RT @JayMan471: No. Because you should *never* trust scientists to interpret their data if you want to really know for yourself. https://t.c…

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-21 00:51:44 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/866094122335129600

  • Retweeted JayMan (@JayMan471): No. Because you should *never* trust scientists t

    Retweeted JayMan (@JayMan471):

    No. Because you should *never* trust scientists to interpret their data if you want to really know for yourself. https://t.co/QgOQZDKYXV

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-20 20:51:00 UTC

  • Q: “IS THE WHITE RACE NATURALLY MORE VIOLENT, OR IS IT TRAINED TO BE?” I’m going

    Q: “IS THE WHITE RACE NATURALLY MORE VIOLENT, OR IS IT TRAINED TO BE?”

    I’m going to give you the best, most scientific answer that is currently available. You may or may not like it. But to the best of my knowledge it’s unassailable.

    1. The white race is empirically less violent than all other races. (sorry. fact.) We currently attribute this to the facts that (a) limited survival of the underclasses in harsh winters, (b) the aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year (heavy intolerance for crime), (c) high sexual dimorphism combined with lower levels of testosterone and therefore lower levels of impulsivity and aggression, (d) higher demonstrated creativity which appears to be a genetically influenced personality trait (curiosity, ‘worry’, and industriousness). (e) greater freedom (for men) to compete in the dominance hierarchy.

    2. The white race is empirically superior at the application technology, voluntary cooperation, planning, and maneuver to the use of violence, thereby allowing smaller numbers of warriors to defeat superior and wealthier numbers.

    3. The white race has empirically used the application of violence to create markets that in turn increase wealth.

    4. The white race’s superiority in ancient and modern ages is because of the use of violence and technology to create markets.

    5. The white race’s superiority at producing arts, sciences, and technologies is because of their discovery of ‘deflationary truth’. (What we call scientific or empirical truth, that evolved from ‘reporting’ or ‘testifying’ rather than opining, elaborating, or conflating – regardless of cost to the self or others.)

    6. The white race’s discovery of ‘deflationary truth’ was caused by the use of the militia, that indoctrinated all free men into the use of military and technological epistemology. This mean that all mean of property were trained to some degree, and all the wealthier families were professionally trained, to use maneuver,

    7. The white race’s use of militia, forced meritocracy, and meritocracy forced ‘sovereignty’, and sovereignty forced the natural law of voluntary reciprocity, and use of the natural law forced markets in everything: the jury, freedom of association, of cooperation, of cooperative production, of reproduction (Marriage), of production of commons (government), of polities (competing rule).

    8. The white race (North Sea Peoples) evolved the only government without governors: Rule of Law, by Natural Law, incrementally discovered by independent professional judges, and recorded in the Common Law of Torts, with judicial decidability provided by the changes in state of Property in Toto, where Property in Toto was determined by the bearing of costs to obtain an interest without imposing a cost upon the costs born by others. This form of law evolves faster than all alternatives, and leaves the least opportunity for the evolution of all forms of parasitism and predation. (Or it did until 20th democracy eliminated Rule of Law.)

    9. So to answer the question, while whites are demonstrably less violent, they are demonstrably more cooperative, with demonstrably higher trust in one another, producing lower risk and friction, allowing greater risk, allowing greater returns, and thereby evolving technologies both institutional, normative, commercial, and technological, faster than all other civilizations. This is why the west, despite being on the edge of the bronze age, evolved fastest in the ancient world, and fastest in the modern world, with the dark ages of religiously enforced ignorance causing a thousand year delay in world innovation.

    ***However, it is probably more correct to view white people as more patient and disciplined and industrious – probably due to four or more millennia of selection pressures above the 40th parallel – and therefore suppressing petty violence in exchange for expression of superior exceptional violence. But again, this may be for the simple reason that except for Han, Korean, and the Japanese, White People are the most genetically homogenous, genetically isolated, genetically domesticated, for the simple reason that they have systematically eradicated their lower classes.***

    And that the white race preserved its evolutionary advantage by preventing regression toward the mean – until the latter half of the twentieth century and the evolution of the critical theorists and postmodernists. At present the combination of socialism, critical theory and postmodernism

    10. The white race was able to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, tyranny, poverty, starvation, and disease, one civilization at a time, by the application of sovereignty (property), markets, technology, truth, using violence to do so. Evolution is unkind to primitive organisms. primitive social organizations, and primitive ideas.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-20 14:11:00 UTC

  • Is The White Race Violent Naturally Or Were They Taught To Be?

    I’m going to give you the best, most scientific answer that is currently available. You may or may not like it. But to the best of my knowledge it’s unassailable.

    1. The white race is empirically less violent than all other races. (sorry. fact.) We currently attribute this to the facts that (a) limited survival of the underclasses in harsh winters, (b) the aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year (heavy intolerance for crime), (c) high sexual dimorphism combined with lower levels of testosterone and therefore lower levels of impulsivity and aggression, (d) higher demonstrated creativity which appears to be a genetically influenced personality trait (curiosity, ‘worry’, and industriousness). (e) greater freedom (for men) to compete in the dominance hierarchy.
    2. The white race is empirically superior at the application technology, voluntary cooperation, planning, and maneuver to the use of violence, thereby allowing smaller numbers of warriors to defeat superior and wealthier numbers.
    3. The white race has empirically used the application of violence to create markets that in turn increase wealth.
    4. The white race’s superiority in ancient and modern ages is because of the use of violence and technology to create markets.
    5. The white race’s superiority at producing arts, sciences, and technologies is because of their discovery of ‘deflationary truth’. (What we call scientific or empirical truth, that evolved from ‘reporting’ or ‘testifying’ rather than opining, elaborating, or conflating – regardless of cost to the self or others.)
    6. The white race’s discovery of ‘deflationary truth’ was caused by the use of the militia, that indoctrinated all free men into the use of military and technological epistemology. This mean that all mean of property were trained to some degree, and all the wealthier families were professionally trained, to use maneuver,
    7. The white race’s use of militia forced meritocracy, and meritocracy forced ‘sovereignty’, and sovereignty forced the natural law of voluntary reciprocity, and use of the natural law forced markets in everything: the jury, freedom of association, of cooperation, of cooperative production, of reproduction (Marriage), of production of commons (government), of polities (competing rule).
    8. The white race (North Sea Peoples) evolved the only government without governors: Rule of Law, by Natural Law, incrementally discovered by independent professional judges, and recorded in the Common Law of Torts, with judicial decidability provided by the changes in state of Property in Toto, where Property in Toto was determined by the bearing of costs to obtain an interest without imposing a cost upon the costs born by others. This form of law evolves faster than all alternatives, and leaves the least opportunity for the evolution of all forms of parasitism and predation. (Or it did until 20th democracy eliminated Rule of Law.)
    9. So to answer the question, while whites are demonstrably less violent, they are demonstrably more cooperative, with demonstrably higher trust in one another, producing lower risk and friction, allowing greater risk, allowing greater returns, and thereby evolving technologies both institutional, normative, commercial, and technological, faster than all other civilizations. This is why the west, despite being on the edge of the bronze age, evolved fastest in the ancient world, and fastest in the modern world, with the dark ages of religiously enforced ignorance causing a thousand year delay in world innovation.

      However, it is probably more correct to view white people as more patient and disciplined and industrious – probably due to four or more millennia of selection pressures above the 40th parallel – and therefore suppressing petty violence in exchange for expression of superior exceptional violence. But again, this may be for the simple reason that except for Han, Korean, and the Japanese, White People are the most genetically homogenous, genetically isolated, genetically domesticated, for the simple reason that they have systematically eradicated their lower classes.
    10. The white race was able to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, tyranny, poverty, starvation, and disease, one civilization at a time, by the application of sovereignty (property), markets, technology, truth, using violence to do so. Evolution is unkind to primitive organisms. primitive social organizations, and primitive ideas.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine

    https://www.quora.com/Is-the-white-race-violent-naturally-or-were-they-taught-to-be

  • If you have to embed your wisdom in lies, pseudorationalism, or pseudoscience, h

    If you have to embed your wisdom in lies, pseudorationalism, or pseudoscience, how can you claim it is wisdom?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-19 14:13:00 UTC

  • Ten years ago, chinese ‘science’ was anything but. Today, we are seeing papers t

    Ten years ago, chinese ‘science’ was anything but. Today, we are seeing papers that are technically competent coming out of chinese researchers. They excel, as do the japanese, at marshaling a large number of people to contribute to a single project. Whereas in the west, our signal economy drives us to innovate in inexpensive niches, rather than expensive objectives.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-18 06:44:00 UTC

  • The Languages: Myth, Religion, Literature, Philosophy, Science, Engineering, and

    The Languages: Myth, Religion, Literature, Philosophy, Science, Engineering, and Law.

    **Intellectual History Must Include All**

    And the sequence I’ve listed them in matters a great deal.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-12 10:50:00 UTC

  • WE ARE GREAT AT TESTING ONE ANOTHER’S ARGUMENTS, BUT NOT OUR OWN – AND THAT’S A

    http://science.sciencemag.org/content/356/6338/589?utm_campaign=toc_sci-mag_2017-05-11&et_rid=224559666&et_cid=1321806YES WE ARE GREAT AT TESTING ONE ANOTHER’S ARGUMENTS, BUT NOT OUR OWN – AND THAT’S A GOOD THING

    Markets in everything.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-11 20:06:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM FOR FASHY FRIENDS by Joel Davis Some ‘Fashy’ friends asked me to

    PROPERTARIANISM FOR FASHY FRIENDS

    by Joel Davis

    Some ‘Fashy’ friends asked me to explain Propertarianism.

    Essentially, ‘Propertarianism’ is an attempt at unifying the social sciences.

    When attempting to reason a political system from this unified science, those of us who, in my opinion, really understand it, all seem to come to the same conclusion: Market Fascism (Meritocratic Aristocracy) provides the only possible, logical and scientific solution.

    By Market fascism we mean ‘markets in everything, and intolerance for anything else’.

    We also start without the presumption that there is superior value in cooperation at any cost. There isn’t value to cooperation at any cost. So, the first question the philosophy asks is this; “Why shouldn’t I use force against others?”. Why shouldn’t I engage in violence, harm, theft, fraud, free riding, conspiracy, invasion, and conquest?

    And, to answer this question, we rely upon the obvious rationality. But what determines rationality? Marginal utility (total costs/total benefits). We use force against others when we perceive it to be marginally profitable to do so, as if we didn’t perceive the use of force to provide us with benefits which outweighed the costs of using it, why would we?

    And, as all law and therefore government fundamentally consists of the application of force (as laws without force are merely words), either to resolve a conflict, or to enforce a behavior through threat, essentially what we are asking is, “what should the law be?”, or “what form of government should we use if we are to choose to cooperate rather than prey upon one another?”.

    By reason (marginal utility) we not only understand why and how governments govern as they do, we may also determine what form of government benefits us the most, and how to achieve it.

    The question then becomes, how do we measure the marginal utility of force? The answer is property.

    (Hence why we call it “Propertarianism”)

    Why?

    To first answer that question we must first define ‘property’. We can possess things without the consent of others, by defending them. We can hold property by the consent of others, and together, defend abuses of it. We can create an insurer of our property and grant one another rights to use this insurer to defend and restore abuses of it.

    Our property, whether held by possession, norm of property, or property rights defended by an insurer, is something we control the use of. It is the best unit by which we may measure the marginal utility of force because control is by definition the application of force in the successful pursuit of consequences, and why would we pursue consequences unless we desired them? And, why would we desire consequences that we didn’t perceive as net beneficial?

    Thus, we appropriate interests in kin, mates, relationships, goods, services, information, institutions, and polities in pursuit of marginal utility.

    In light of this, what strategy will we maximize our marginal utility? Game Theory has given us an answer, the answer is reciprocity.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tit_for_tat

    Game Theory demonstrates that if we can negotiate mutually beneficial exchanges with others (cooperate), this is of greater long-term marginal profitability than using force to gain unreciprocated benefits (conflict). The marginal utility of violence only rises higher than the marginal utility of peace when the net cost of peace rises higher than the net cost of violence (when mutually beneficial exchange cannot be negotiated).

    Therefore, we desire maximum cooperation within our society and between our society and other societies, to enable our society to gain maximum collective marginal utility, as by cooperating with our society, in return it will therefore be able to provide ourselves and our kin with maximum marginal utility.

    However, for cooperation to reach optimum levels, all those who consume greater benefits than they contribute (free-riders) must be forced to reciprocate to preserve the marginal utility of cooperation, if you can get something for free why pay for it?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-operation_(evolution)

    Thus, we shouldn’t use force against people who are marginally beneficial to cooperate with or marginally neutral to leave alone, as the costs of force would outweigh the benefits. However, we should use force against people who are marginally costly (if they are either straight up aggressive, or free-riders).

    Therefore, by raising the costs of free-riding and aggression against our kin, we maximize the incentive to either find some way to benefit us or ‘stay out of our way’.

    How do we maximize the costs of free-riding and aggression against our kin?

    By establishing the most powerful form of sovereignty we can. We can establish the most powerful form of sovereignty that we can through the application of reciprocity to the common law. The common law discovers new means of violating reciprocity with every case it adjudicates. It’s purely empirical. Evolutionary. Unplanned. We can stop every form of parasitism from murder, harm, theft, fraud, free riding, conspiracy, and invasion, to conquest.

    By establishing sovereignty using the natural law of reciprocity to provide decidability in the common law, we leave people no alternative to survive but self production, and markets in everything.

    Therefore, we advocate a Martial Aristocracy which charges the maximum price it can in return for its’ protection (taxation), this maximum is determined by the threshold at which excessive taxation causes the market to diminish more than its’ protection is worth (as if you raise taxes too high, you stifle the economy and the amount of money people have left to pay taxes diminishes).

    Thus, we seek the most powerful government possible, and we may achieve this through taxing the freest markets possible as much as possible.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-05-09 11:43:00 UTC