Curt Doolittle

Theme: Science

  • Early Irish People

    (by Simon Strom) The Irish Bell Beaker people were genetically like modern north Europeans, and not only did LN-EBA Irish look like that autosomally, they also had R1b and sported significant IBD signals of genealogical relatedness to Yamnaya and even Afanasevo specimens from Siberia. Which shows that not only were the Irish white already 5,000 years ago, they were also part of the vast Indo-European dominion of the Bronze Age resulting from having expanded in all directions from the homeland in ~Ukraine. The people inhabiting Ireland before the beakers were largely similar to modern South Europeans.

  • 2) So I view my work as completing the enlightenment, and trying to provide the

    2) So I view my work as completing the enlightenment, and trying to provide the next empirical revolution – in psychology, social science, law, economics, and science – to compensate for the errors-wishful-thinking-deceit of the French, German, and Jewish counter-enlightenments.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-04 18:17:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948981603170181120

    Reply addressees: @KyleHen44723716

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948849390885666817

    IN REPLY TO:

    @KyleHen44723716

    @curtdoolittle Bureaucratic strangulation (modern system)-William. Before Norman colonial expansionism, there existed space to develop the base ideas of propertarianism. Question is where is the strength to protect it against organised long term planning? Can you direct me to defence methods?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948849390885666817

  • 1 – Smart observation. Yes. Only today it’s Pseudoscience(Jewish) vs Pseudo- Rat

    1 – Smart observation. Yes. Only today it’s Pseudoscience(Jewish) vs Pseudo- Rationalism (French-German), vs Rule of Law-Tradition and History-Tradition (Empiricism), Just as it has been since the industrial revolution. Anglo >French >German>Jewish. Each was +100yrs. Ending now.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-04 18:15:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948981108036849666

    Reply addressees: @KyleHen44723716

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948847618138034176

    IN REPLY TO:

    @KyleHen44723716

    @curtdoolittle A little abstract,but when I think of Propertarianism in terms of development. I keep thinking of England in the year 1066. The chaos following the battles of Stamford Bridge & Hastings. Three ideologies-Pagan mysticism Harald. Roman mysticism- Harold.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/948847618138034176

  • The Age of Calculation (Math, Engineering, Reason, Law) The Age of Scriptural Mo

    The Age of Calculation (Math, Engineering, Reason, Law) The Age of Scriptural Monotheism (Fictionalism) – The Revolt against reason and Meritocracy. (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) The Abrahamic Dark Age. (1000 years) The Age of Empiricism The French and German Age of Rationalism (Rousseau, Kant) – A revolt against empiricism The Age of Science (Darwin, Maxwell, Pareto/Durkheim, Menger, Poincare) The Age of Pseudoscience (Marx, Boaz, Freud, Keynes) – A revolt against Science. The Age of Outright Lying (Postmodernists – the current age) Now what? (I’m working on it…) lol

  • The Age of Calculation (Math, Engineering, Reason, Law) The Age of Scriptural Mo

    The Age of Calculation (Math, Engineering, Reason, Law)

    The Age of Scriptural Monotheism (Fictionalism) – The Revolt against reason and Meritocracy. (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam)

    The Abrahamic Dark Age. (1000 years)

    The Age of Empiricism

    The French and German Age of Rationalism (Rousseau, Kant) – A revolt against empiricism

    The Age of Science (Darwin, Maxwell, Pareto/Durkheim, Menger, Poincare)

    The Age of Pseudoscience (Marx, Boaz, Freud, Keynes) – A revolt against Science.

    The Age of Outright Lying (Postmodernists – the current age)

    Now what?

    (I’m working on it…) lol

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-02 12:17:00 UTC

  • The Age of Calculation (Math, Engineering, Reason, Law) The Age of Scriptural Mo

    The Age of Calculation (Math, Engineering, Reason, Law) The Age of Scriptural Monotheism (Fictionalism) – The Revolt against reason and Meritocracy. (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) The Abrahamic Dark Age. (1000 years) The Age of Empiricism The French and German Age of Rationalism (Rousseau, Kant) – A revolt against empiricism The Age of Science (Darwin, Maxwell, Pareto/Durkheim, Menger, Poincare) The Age of Pseudoscience (Marx, Boaz, Freud, Keynes) – A revolt against Science. The Age of Outright Lying (Postmodernists – the current age) Now what? (I’m working on it…) lol

  • Why Hasn’t The Us Free Market Converted To Alternative Fuels If They’re So Affordable And Available?

    They aren’t affordable and they aren’t available and are universally a bad investment.

    DO THE MATH.

    Second, read on the Return on Energy Invesment.

    Return on energy is rapidly declining. Meaning that we have captured most of the low hanging fruit of the revolution in energy capture.

    The world runs on energy today the way it ran on food in the past.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-hasnt-the-US-free-market-converted-to-alternative-fuels-if-theyre-so-affordable-and-available

  • Math Exists As A Logic, Not A Science.

    As far as I know, mathematics consists not of science but of a logic. A logic meaning a grammar of decidability. And in the case of mathematics, the grammar of decidability consists of reduction of all references to positional names, and therefore all relations to positional relations. And we can do so with an unlimited number of dimensions, A science is necessary when we do not know the first principles (causal relations) of phenomenon and seek to identify them. Science therefore consists of theories and laws. A logic is necessary when we do know the first principles (causal relations). Ergo, logics consist of axioms. You can declare an axiom, but only identify a law. Once a law is known you may model it with axioms. That I know of there are only two assumptions in mathematics, and both are necessary for the simple reason that independent of context (applied mathematics) we have no means of decidability in matters of scale independence. The law of the excluded middle. The need for choice. Mathematics is actually quite simple. Its that because it is so simple, consisting only of positional relations, we can describe any set of constant relations with it.

  • EXISTS AS A LOGIC, NOT A SCIENCE. As far as I know, mathematics consists not of

    https://www.quora.com/If-mathematics-is-an-exact-science-why-are-there-assumptions/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=8eada093&srid=u4QvMATH EXISTS AS A LOGIC, NOT A SCIENCE.

    As far as I know, mathematics consists not of science but of a logic. A logic meaning a grammar of decidability. And in the case of mathematics, the grammar of decidability consists of reduction of all references to positional names, and therefore all relations to positional relations. And we can do so with an unlimited number of dimensions,

    A science is necessary when we do not know the first principles (causal relations) of phenomenon and seek to identify them. Science therefore consists of theories and laws.

    A logic is necessary when we do know the first principles (causal relations). Ergo, logics consist of axioms.

    You can declare an axiom, but only identify a law.

    Once a law is known you may model it with axioms.

    That I know of there are only two assumptions in mathematics, and both are necessary for the simple reason that independent of context (applied mathematics) we have no means of decidability in matters of scale independence.

    The law of the excluded middle.

    The need for choice.

    Mathematics is actually quite simple. Its that because it is so simple, consisting only of positional relations, we can describe any set of constant relations with it.Updated Dec 29, 2017, 8:21 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-29 20:21:00 UTC

  • Math Exists As A Logic, Not A Science.

    As far as I know, mathematics consists not of science but of a logic. A logic meaning a grammar of decidability. And in the case of mathematics, the grammar of decidability consists of reduction of all references to positional names, and therefore all relations to positional relations. And we can do so with an unlimited number of dimensions, A science is necessary when we do not know the first principles (causal relations) of phenomenon and seek to identify them. Science therefore consists of theories and laws. A logic is necessary when we do know the first principles (causal relations). Ergo, logics consist of axioms. You can declare an axiom, but only identify a law. Once a law is known you may model it with axioms. That I know of there are only two assumptions in mathematics, and both are necessary for the simple reason that independent of context (applied mathematics) we have no means of decidability in matters of scale independence. The law of the excluded middle. The need for choice. Mathematics is actually quite simple. Its that because it is so simple, consisting only of positional relations, we can describe any set of constant relations with it.