Curt Doolittle

Theme: Science

  • When Someone Uses The Term “Reductionism” They”re Admitting They Have No Argument.

    WHEN SOMEONE USES THE TERM “REDUCTIONISM” THEY”RE ADMITTING THEY HAVE NO ARGUMENT. —“The notion that “ancient western man lifted mankind out of ignorance” is a biased and parochial view of philosophical history. There was and is a global network. “— You have an unscientific (and non-operational) undrestanding of history. Why is it that each kin group aggressively preserved it’s grammars and semantics? Their group evolutionary strategies? Truth was invented precisely once. Militia > Heroism > Sovereignty > Reciprocity > Natural Law > Truth regardless of impact on the status quo > Reason > Rationalism > Science > Markets in Everything — was developed precisely once. Those people in that global network actively sought, and actively seek, to circumvent that unique western individualism (sovereignty). Man has resisted it at every single opportunity. the closest movement – that of the chinese – was a reaction to it. The original development of religion as we understand it was in reaction to it (indo-iranian vs european divide) That vast system of fraud we call the abrahamic religions was invented to counter it. Rousseau-Kant and the counter-enlightenment that continues today on the continent was invented to counter it. Marxism-Postmodernism-Feminism were invented to counter it. Genetics > Geography > Means of Production > Military Strategy > Military Order > Political Order > Social Order > intellectual justification of that group strategy.

  • When Someone Uses The Term “Reductionism” They”re Admitting They Have No Argument.

    WHEN SOMEONE USES THE TERM “REDUCTIONISM” THEY”RE ADMITTING THEY HAVE NO ARGUMENT. —“The notion that “ancient western man lifted mankind out of ignorance” is a biased and parochial view of philosophical history. There was and is a global network. “— You have an unscientific (and non-operational) undrestanding of history. Why is it that each kin group aggressively preserved it’s grammars and semantics? Their group evolutionary strategies? Truth was invented precisely once. Militia > Heroism > Sovereignty > Reciprocity > Natural Law > Truth regardless of impact on the status quo > Reason > Rationalism > Science > Markets in Everything — was developed precisely once. Those people in that global network actively sought, and actively seek, to circumvent that unique western individualism (sovereignty). Man has resisted it at every single opportunity. the closest movement – that of the chinese – was a reaction to it. The original development of religion as we understand it was in reaction to it (indo-iranian vs european divide) That vast system of fraud we call the abrahamic religions was invented to counter it. Rousseau-Kant and the counter-enlightenment that continues today on the continent was invented to counter it. Marxism-Postmodernism-Feminism were invented to counter it. Genetics > Geography > Means of Production > Military Strategy > Military Order > Political Order > Social Order > intellectual justification of that group strategy.

  • WHEN SOMEONE USES THE TERM “REDUCTIONISM” THEY”RE ADMITTING THEY HAVE NO ARGUMEN

    WHEN SOMEONE USES THE TERM “REDUCTIONISM” THEY”RE ADMITTING THEY HAVE NO ARGUMENT.

    —“The notion that “ancient western man lifted mankind out of ignorance” is a biased and parochial view of philosophical history. There was and is a global network. “—

    You have an unscientific (and non-operational) undrestanding of history.

    Why is it that each kin group aggressively preserved it’s grammars and semantics? Their group evolutionary strategies?

    Truth was invented precisely once.

    Militia > Heroism > Sovereignty > Reciprocity > Natural Law > Truth regardless of impact on the status quo > Reason > Rationalism > Science > Markets in Everything — was developed precisely once.

    Those people in that global network actively sought, and actively seek, to circumvent that unique western individualism (sovereignty).

    Man has resisted it at every single opportunity. the closest movement – that of the chinese – was a reaction to it.

    The original development of religion as we understand it was in reaction to it (indo-iranian vs european divide)

    That vast system of fraud we call the abrahamic religions was invented to counter it.

    Rousseau-Kant and the counter-enlightenment that continues today on the continent was invented to counter it.

    Marxism-Postmodernism-Feminism were invented to counter it.

    Genetics > Geography > Means of Production > Military Strategy > Military Order > Political Order > Social Order > intellectual justification of that group strategy.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-22 09:56:00 UTC

  • “It sounds to me like reduction-ism.”— (a friend) Well that’s not a criticism,

    —“It sounds to me like reduction-ism.”— (a friend) Well that’s not a criticism, since the entire universe operates on a (scarily) small set extremely simple rules (forces) that produce all of existence. All human behavior, likewise, is quite simple. It’s the vast set of justifications and deceits that we use to preserve our negotiating position that are complicated. I mean, there are what? 1000-1500 ideas in toto? There are how many narrative structures? twelve to thirty? There are how many group evolutionary strategies? Maybe six? In technology we call them ‘design patterns’ or ‘patterns’, but in science we call them physics, chemistry, biology, sentience. So in my narrative, which is the causal narrative all scientists seek, It’s called historicization – the science of history. And while in the past we used justificationary (reported) history (what people write) we have instead transformed to analysis by incentives (demonstrated actions) using economics, political economy (institutions), justificationary mythos (what people write), and Comparative civilizations (group evolutionary strategies). But there is a long lag – because the justificationism cannot imagine that all authors ever do is create moral license to pursue an opportunity that already exists.

  • “It sounds to me like reduction-ism.”— (a friend) Well that’s not a criticism,

    —“It sounds to me like reduction-ism.”— (a friend)

    Well that’s not a criticism, since the entire universe operates on a (scarily) small set extremely simple rules (forces) that produce all of existence. All human behavior, likewise, is quite simple. It’s the vast set of justifications and deceits that we use to preserve our negotiating position that are complicated.

    I mean, there are what? 1000-1500 ideas in toto? There are how many narrative structures? twelve to thirty? There are how many group evolutionary strategies? Maybe six?

    In technology we call them ‘design patterns’ or ‘patterns’, but in science we call them physics, chemistry, biology, sentience.

    So in my narrative, which is the causal narrative all scientists seek, It’s called historicization – the science of history. And while in the past we used justificationary (reported) history (what people write) we have instead transformed to analysis by incentives (demonstrated actions) using economics, political economy (institutions), justificationary mythos (what people write), and Comparative civilizations (group evolutionary strategies).

    But there is a long lag – because the justificationism cannot imagine that all authors ever do is create moral license to pursue an opportunity that already exists.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-22 09:37:00 UTC

  • “It sounds to me like reduction-ism.”— (a friend) Well that’s not a criticism,

    —“It sounds to me like reduction-ism.”— (a friend) Well that’s not a criticism, since the entire universe operates on a (scarily) small set extremely simple rules (forces) that produce all of existence. All human behavior, likewise, is quite simple. It’s the vast set of justifications and deceits that we use to preserve our negotiating position that are complicated. I mean, there are what? 1000-1500 ideas in toto? There are how many narrative structures? twelve to thirty? There are how many group evolutionary strategies? Maybe six? In technology we call them ‘design patterns’ or ‘patterns’, but in science we call them physics, chemistry, biology, sentience. So in my narrative, which is the causal narrative all scientists seek, It’s called historicization – the science of history. And while in the past we used justificationary (reported) history (what people write) we have instead transformed to analysis by incentives (demonstrated actions) using economics, political economy (institutions), justificationary mythos (what people write), and Comparative civilizations (group evolutionary strategies). But there is a long lag – because the justificationism cannot imagine that all authors ever do is create moral license to pursue an opportunity that already exists.

  • The Abrahamic Supernatural Dark Age (The ancient world) , and the Abrahamic Pseu

    The Abrahamic Supernatural Dark Age (The ancient world) , and the Abrahamic Pseudo Scientific Dark Age (Now). The method of narration and argument is the same. Read Kevin’s Books #Trump

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-20 14:09:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/965951632600190977

    Reply addressees: @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/965595318912888832

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/965595318912888832

  • Alexander Zavialov Aside from looking morphologically different, all we know is

    Alexander Zavialov Aside from looking morphologically different, all we know is that he lacked the light skin colour-associated alleles in modern Europeans and that his skin colour-associated DNA accounted for 40% of the variation between Europeans and Africans. In other words, he was at least half as dark as depicted. Darker than modern Europeans but lighter than Indians. Any time. Keep in mind that your average North European is almost 60% Cheddar Man (WHG), so these deluded fantasies of low IQ journalists aren’t even remotely true. Unfortunately, some people on the right have taken this opportunity to badmouth and cast doubt on the scientific research that the faulty reconstruction was based on. There was nothing wrong with the research, only the politically motivated reconstruction and the journalist swine who propogated it.

  • Alexander Zavialov Aside from looking morphologically different, all we know is

    Alexander Zavialov

    Aside from looking morphologically different, all we know is that he lacked the light skin colour-associated alleles in modern Europeans and that his skin colour-associated DNA accounted for 40% of the variation between Europeans and Africans. In other words, he was at least half as dark as depicted. Darker than modern Europeans but lighter than Indians.

    Any time. Keep in mind that your average North European is almost 60% Cheddar Man (WHG), so these deluded fantasies of low IQ journalists aren’t even remotely true.

    Unfortunately, some people on the right have taken this opportunity to badmouth and cast doubt on the scientific research that the faulty reconstruction was based on. There was nothing wrong with the research, only the politically motivated reconstruction and the journalist swine who propogated it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-19 09:51:00 UTC

  • Alexander Zavialov Aside from looking morphologically different, all we know is

    Alexander Zavialov Aside from looking morphologically different, all we know is that he lacked the light skin colour-associated alleles in modern Europeans and that his skin colour-associated DNA accounted for 40% of the variation between Europeans and Africans. In other words, he was at least half as dark as depicted. Darker than modern Europeans but lighter than Indians. Any time. Keep in mind that your average North European is almost 60% Cheddar Man (WHG), so these deluded fantasies of low IQ journalists aren’t even remotely true. Unfortunately, some people on the right have taken this opportunity to badmouth and cast doubt on the scientific research that the faulty reconstruction was based on. There was nothing wrong with the research, only the politically motivated reconstruction and the journalist swine who propogated it.