Theme: Science

  • 1 – Peter: I am trying to solve, or have solved, a profoundly difficult problem,

    1 – Peter: I am trying to solve, or have solved, a profoundly difficult problem, across the full scope of disciplines, completing the scientific revolution – the purpose of which is to insulate us against past present and future fictionalisms, by strict construction of law.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-08 15:45:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983008028143312897

    Reply addressees: @PeterBoettke @pavelkuchar @FerlitoCarmelo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983005370657501184


    IN REPLY TO:

    @PeterBoettke

    @curtdoolittle @pavelkuchar @FerlitoCarmelo Austrian economics is much more vibrant and varied within the scientific community that you are recognizing Curt. I believe this is because you are looking at it through a certain window, a window I would argue is the least productive of plausible readings of a tradition.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/983005370657501184

  • Given my current understanding, Mises failed to develop operationalism in econom

    Given my current understanding, Mises failed to develop operationalism in economics – which is unfortunately the one discipline outside of Law where it is most necessary. The remaining questions in economics are moral, institutional, and empirical. As far as I know AE is done.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-08 14:11:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982984321039560704

    Reply addressees: @pavelkuchar @PeterBoettke @FerlitoCarmelo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982978716069441536


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982978716069441536

  • Well, when you show me some data rather than nonsense opinion we can have a disc

    Well, when you show me some data rather than nonsense opinion we can have a discussion, but as it stands you’ve made three strikes and I have a long standing policy against wasting my time with idiots who don’t use data. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-08 01:21:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982790444210733056

    Reply addressees: @Danethy2 @SAStillSucks @Steve_Sailer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982788783182577664


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982788783182577664

  • That’s strike two. Um. Study archaeology, economic history, genetics. Particular

    That’s strike two. Um. Study archaeology, economic history, genetics. Particularly neolithic-atlantic copper, Mesolithic civilization, and the conquest by the celts. And the economy of the celts. The Romans destroyed the celts for WEALTH.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-08 01:14:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982788759539167232

    Reply addressees: @Danethy2 @SAStillSucks @Steve_Sailer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982787620857176064


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982787620857176064

  • We get what we measure. When we start over in economics by measuring the full su

    We get what we measure. When we start over in economics by measuring the full suite of capital instead of how fast we burn it down, then economics will be a science rather than an excuse by which to substitute consumption for morality in the production of policy. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-07 22:55:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982753663230840840

    Reply addressees: @pavelkuchar @PeterBoettke

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982706412412440578


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982706412412440578

  • We get what we measure. When we start over in economics by measuring the full su

    We get what we measure. When we start over in economics by measuring the full suite of capital instead of how fast we burn it down, then economics will be a science rather than an excuse by which to substitute consumption for morality in the production of policy. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-07 18:55:00 UTC

  • The Science of Christianity (really)

      —-“What is the overall message of the bible?”— (“Salvation”) It is: “If you submit (abandon) your reason, and surrender (abandon) your will to the commands of an evil omnipotent and omniscient fictional character, and imitate the life of another very benevolent and charitable fictional character, that you will find salvation (be saved) in a non existent afterlife, after you die.” Scientifically: Now scientifically speaking, christianity is reducible to:1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, imprisonment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. And this turns out to be the optimum strategy for producing persistent high trust cooperation. It’s just counter intuitive since we evolved very aggressive altruistic punishment. And functionally: More than 1/3 if not 1/2 of people are lack the agency both internal and environmental, and or the intelligence, and or the resources to contrive a means of successfully competing in market civilization, when ones self worth and status are determined by by that success. As such providing an alternative method by which people of limited agency, ability, and resources can develop virtuous behavior, and personal mindfulness, and therefore happiness with their self image, through merely extension of kinship love, forgiveness, and charity is a successful strategy. Moreover, the externalities produced in a market civilization by large numbers of these people constructs the trust necessary for prosperity in a market civilization. And Politically: Despite lacking agency, ability, knowledge, education, and resources, people are able to use ‘faith’ and the ‘christian strategy’ to defend against threats to their strategy, their self image, and the good they do to society, are impervious to corruption, to persuasion, to coercion, and to abandonment of that strategy (hence why intelligence agencies love to hire christians). The problem is that there is an ever declining percentage of the population willing to use this strategy by faith, even if there is an ever expanding population willing to use this strategy if stated as scientifically as I have here. So while a demand for ‘church’ remains, a demand for the primitivism of semitic underclasses, has been replaced by a demand for the advance reason of european middle classes. The already devoted are irrelevant. It’s those who are not open to devotion that don’t need a religion of faith, but a religion of reason, that need mindfulness.

  • The Science of Christianity (really)

      —-“What is the overall message of the bible?”— (“Salvation”) It is: “If you submit (abandon) your reason, and surrender (abandon) your will to the commands of an evil omnipotent and omniscient fictional character, and imitate the life of another very benevolent and charitable fictional character, that you will find salvation (be saved) in a non existent afterlife, after you die.” Scientifically: Now scientifically speaking, christianity is reducible to:1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, imprisonment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. And this turns out to be the optimum strategy for producing persistent high trust cooperation. It’s just counter intuitive since we evolved very aggressive altruistic punishment. And functionally: More than 1/3 if not 1/2 of people are lack the agency both internal and environmental, and or the intelligence, and or the resources to contrive a means of successfully competing in market civilization, when ones self worth and status are determined by by that success. As such providing an alternative method by which people of limited agency, ability, and resources can develop virtuous behavior, and personal mindfulness, and therefore happiness with their self image, through merely extension of kinship love, forgiveness, and charity is a successful strategy. Moreover, the externalities produced in a market civilization by large numbers of these people constructs the trust necessary for prosperity in a market civilization. And Politically: Despite lacking agency, ability, knowledge, education, and resources, people are able to use ‘faith’ and the ‘christian strategy’ to defend against threats to their strategy, their self image, and the good they do to society, are impervious to corruption, to persuasion, to coercion, and to abandonment of that strategy (hence why intelligence agencies love to hire christians). The problem is that there is an ever declining percentage of the population willing to use this strategy by faith, even if there is an ever expanding population willing to use this strategy if stated as scientifically as I have here. So while a demand for ‘church’ remains, a demand for the primitivism of semitic underclasses, has been replaced by a demand for the advance reason of european middle classes. The already devoted are irrelevant. It’s those who are not open to devotion that don’t need a religion of faith, but a religion of reason, that need mindfulness.

  • Not that We Needed Proof, But … The Cost of Inbreeding.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4196914/ —“We found significant decline in child cognitive abilities due to inbreeding and high frequency of mental retardation among offspring from inbred families. The mean differences (95% C.I.) were reported for the VIQ, being −22.00 (−24.82, −19.17), PIQ −26.92 (−29.96, −23.87) and FSIQ −24.47 (−27.35, −21.59) for inbred as compared to non-inbred children (p>0.001). The higher risk of being mentally retarded was found to be more obvious among inbred categories corresponding to the degree of inbreeding and the same accounts least for non-inbred children (p<0.0001). We observed an increase in the difference in mean values for VIQ, PIQ and FSIQ with the increase of inbreeding coefficient and these were found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). The regression analysis showed a fitness decline (depression) for VIQ (R2 = 0.436), PIQ (R2 = 0.468) and FSIQ (R2 = 0.464) with increasing inbreeding coefficients (p<0.01).”—
  • Not that We Needed Proof, But … The Cost of Inbreeding.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4196914/ —“We found significant decline in child cognitive abilities due to inbreeding and high frequency of mental retardation among offspring from inbred families. The mean differences (95% C.I.) were reported for the VIQ, being −22.00 (−24.82, −19.17), PIQ −26.92 (−29.96, −23.87) and FSIQ −24.47 (−27.35, −21.59) for inbred as compared to non-inbred children (p>0.001). The higher risk of being mentally retarded was found to be more obvious among inbred categories corresponding to the degree of inbreeding and the same accounts least for non-inbred children (p<0.0001). We observed an increase in the difference in mean values for VIQ, PIQ and FSIQ with the increase of inbreeding coefficient and these were found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). The regression analysis showed a fitness decline (depression) for VIQ (R2 = 0.436), PIQ (R2 = 0.468) and FSIQ (R2 = 0.464) with increasing inbreeding coefficients (p<0.01).”—