Yes, Peterson has a self authoring course, but not the ‘framing’, and I think Massimo puts books out on the framing but not a course. Effectively speaking stocism is a scientific religion. Or rather a religious and philosophical system that does not conflict with science. In my understanding, we are trying to (by accident) recreate the stoic philosophy (religion). It was quite a while before I understood that’s what I was doing. I think Massimo is doing it intentionally. I haven’t got to peterson yet to ask if he’s knowingly doing it. I have reasons to prefer peterson’s method. My only question is whether or not he should use biblical stories or not. And my preference is ‘no’, because I want to kill abrahamism (sophism) while at the same time preserve literary analogy (wisdom literature)
Theme: Science
-
To answer the question: Yes, Westworld (Nolan and Joy) just pulled another “Lost
To answer the question: Yes, Westworld (Nolan and Joy) just pulled another “Lost”. In science fiction you only get one ‘gimme’. That’s the observation of Asimov and Clarke. And I’ve never seen it falsified. I bet I know why too – Nolan handed over writing to Joy.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 13:18:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1011961847258501120
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. To answer the question: Yes, Westworld (Nolan
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
To answer the question: Yes, Westworld (Nolan and Joy) just pulled another “Lost”. In science fiction you only get one ‘gimme’. That’s the observation of Asimov and Clarke. And I’ve never seen it falsified. The episodes varied between overly concentrated and too calm, and overly dense and too disjointed to suspend disbelief. the heaven (door) and the indians jumping off the cliff was weak. the reversal of the two women was cunning. the closure with the man in black was … lame. It would have been better to have him discover he’d already been replaced successfully and be happy with his success at transformation. I bet I know why these failures too – Nolan handed over writing to Joy and she handed over direction to women. Men create models, women create experiences. And only models survive tests in reality. Single authors create worlds. Multiple authors violate them.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 13:17:49 UTC
-
SOME ARTICLES ON FEMALE REPRODUCTION Shorter Women = More Estrogen, More Childre
SOME ARTICLES ON FEMALE REPRODUCTION
Shorter Women = More Estrogen, More Children.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2667-short-women-more-successful-with-men/
More Children = Longer Life … All The Way to 14!
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/health-care/item/11012-women-with-more-children-live-longer
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 10:39:00 UTC
-
To answer the question: Yes, Westworld (Nolan and Joy) just pulled another “Lost
To answer the question: Yes, Westworld (Nolan and Joy) just pulled another “Lost”. In science fiction you only get one ‘gimme’. That’s the observation of Asimov and Clarke. And I’ve never seen it falsified. The episodes varied between overly concentrated and too calm, and overly dense and too disjointed to suspend disbelief. the heaven (door) and the indians jumping off the cliff was weak. the reversal of the two women was cunning. the closure with the man in black was … lame. It would have been better to have him discover he’d already been replaced successfully and be happy with his success at transformation. I bet I know why these failures too – Nolan handed over writing to Joy and she handed over direction to women. Men create models, women create experiences. And only models survive tests in reality. Single authors create worlds. Multiple authors violate them.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 09:17:00 UTC
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/35972456_233604360569795_40566809212
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/35972456_233604360569795_4056680921280020480_o_233604357236462.jpg UM. What is that tear in the sky?UM. What is that tear in the sky?
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-23 21:06:00 UTC
-
Copernicus’ Children and Galileo’s Children
Copernicus’ Children Copernicus never married and is not known to have had children, but from at least 1531 until 1539 his relations with Anna Schilling, a live-in housekeeper, were seen as scandalous by two bishops of Warmia who urged him over the years to break off relations with his “mistress”. His sister Katharina married the businessman and Toruń city councilor Barthel Gertner and left five children, whom Copernicus looked after to the end of his life.
Galileo’s Children Despite being a genuinely pious Roman Catholic, Galileo fathered three children out of wedlock with Marina Gamba. They had two daughters, Virginia (born in 1600) and Livia (born in 1601), and a son, Vincenzo (born in 1606). Because of their illegitimate birth, their father considered the girls unmarriageable, if not posing problems of prohibitively expensive support or dowries, which would have been similar to Galileo’s previous extensive financial problems with two of his sisters. Their only worthy alternative was the religious life. Both girls were accepted by the convent of San Matteo in Arcetri and remained there for the rest of their lives. Virginia took the name Maria Celeste upon entering the convent. She died on 2 April 1634, and is buried with Galileo at the Basilica of Santa Croce, Florence. Livia took the name Sister Arcangela and was ill for most of her life. Vincenzo was later legitimised as the legal heir of Galileo and married Sestilia Bocchineri. -
Copernicus’ Children and Galileo’s Children
Copernicus’ Children Copernicus never married and is not known to have had children, but from at least 1531 until 1539 his relations with Anna Schilling, a live-in housekeeper, were seen as scandalous by two bishops of Warmia who urged him over the years to break off relations with his “mistress”. His sister Katharina married the businessman and Toruń city councilor Barthel Gertner and left five children, whom Copernicus looked after to the end of his life.
Galileo’s Children Despite being a genuinely pious Roman Catholic, Galileo fathered three children out of wedlock with Marina Gamba. They had two daughters, Virginia (born in 1600) and Livia (born in 1601), and a son, Vincenzo (born in 1606). Because of their illegitimate birth, their father considered the girls unmarriageable, if not posing problems of prohibitively expensive support or dowries, which would have been similar to Galileo’s previous extensive financial problems with two of his sisters. Their only worthy alternative was the religious life. Both girls were accepted by the convent of San Matteo in Arcetri and remained there for the rest of their lives. Virginia took the name Maria Celeste upon entering the convent. She died on 2 April 1634, and is buried with Galileo at the Basilica of Santa Croce, Florence. Livia took the name Sister Arcangela and was ill for most of her life. Vincenzo was later legitimised as the legal heir of Galileo and married Sestilia Bocchineri. -
Define Operationalism
OPERATIONALISM? —“Define operation(alism)”— Let Me Google That For You: Scientific Method -> …. Operational Definition -> …. …. Operationalism (Physical Sciences) / …. …. Operationism (Psychology) / …. …. Intuitionism (Mathematics) / …. …. Praxeology (Economics) ie: “Actions”. See Wiki for simple versions, and Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy for advanced versions. HOWEVER, since all science must be falsificationary, all arguments to justificationism (positivism) are false. As such the value of operational language (grammar and semantics) is to force empirical (existential) description as a means of avoiding hand waving, obscurantism, suggestion, and deceit. OTHER CONCEPTS Critical Rationalism Critical Preference Justificationism Falsificationism Propertarianism (Vitruvianism, Acquisitionism, Propertarianism, Testimonialism, Natural Law) is all Falsificationary. In other words, like evolution, that which survives falsification is potentially true. And justification either is neutral or reduces the empirical (measurable) content of an argument. VIA NEGATIVA (FALSIFICATION) VS VIA POSITIVA (JUSTIFICATION) So imagine a pair of sculptors, one working in stone, subtracting (falsificationism), and the other working in clay, adding, (justificationism). The two must match, or one, the other, or both is false. In other words, just as the only test of production is a voluntary exchange, the only test of truth is survival in the market for competition. -
Define Operationalism
OPERATIONALISM? —“Define operation(alism)”— Let Me Google That For You: Scientific Method -> …. Operational Definition -> …. …. Operationalism (Physical Sciences) / …. …. Operationism (Psychology) / …. …. Intuitionism (Mathematics) / …. …. Praxeology (Economics) ie: “Actions”. See Wiki for simple versions, and Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy for advanced versions. HOWEVER, since all science must be falsificationary, all arguments to justificationism (positivism) are false. As such the value of operational language (grammar and semantics) is to force empirical (existential) description as a means of avoiding hand waving, obscurantism, suggestion, and deceit. OTHER CONCEPTS Critical Rationalism Critical Preference Justificationism Falsificationism Propertarianism (Vitruvianism, Acquisitionism, Propertarianism, Testimonialism, Natural Law) is all Falsificationary. In other words, like evolution, that which survives falsification is potentially true. And justification either is neutral or reduces the empirical (measurable) content of an argument. VIA NEGATIVA (FALSIFICATION) VS VIA POSITIVA (JUSTIFICATION) So imagine a pair of sculptors, one working in stone, subtracting (falsificationism), and the other working in clay, adding, (justificationism). The two must match, or one, the other, or both is false. In other words, just as the only test of production is a voluntary exchange, the only test of truth is survival in the market for competition.