I engage in science and law, [You] conflate philosophizing (reasoning independent of falsification) with science (reason dependent upon falsification) and you conflate testimony which one must warranty with threat of punishment with self reporting which one does not. THAT IS PILPUL. “Excuse Making” THE SIMPLE ANSWER: Religion: what we can get away with? (mysticism), Philosophy: what I can get away with? (sophism), -vs- Science: What we can’t get away with (diligence and warranty). Law: What you can’t get away with (liability). Pseudorationalisms: Astrology, Theology, Numerology, Philosophy, Pilpul, Critique. -vs- Sciences: History, Economics, Accounting, Law, Science, Mathematics, logic (proper). How desperately addicts seek to preserve their lies.
Theme: Science
-
I am just extremely good at what I do: falsify pseudoscience and sophism – parti
I am just extremely good at what I do: falsify pseudoscience and sophism – particularly the feminine sophisms of Pilpul and Critique.
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-01 21:23:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1036001646499823616
Reply addressees: @Connecticutting
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035998667487039488
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035998667487039488
-
Um. You use the term ‘valid’ when you mean ‘functional’ or ‘successful’. Validit
Um. You use the term ‘valid’ when you mean ‘functional’ or ‘successful’. Validity in general is an iffy word, and certainly iffy when applied outside of its domain. 😉 But yes it is a successful strategy. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-01 12:31:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035867832058298369
Reply addressees: @xmjEE
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035859683976912896
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035859683976912896
-
I engage in science and law, You conflate philosophizing (reasoning independent
I engage in science and law, You conflate philosophizing (reasoning independent of falsification) with science (reason dependent upon falsification) and you conflate testimony which one must… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=289310538332510&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-01 12:25:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035866279335350273
-
I engage in science and law, [You] conflate philosophizing (reasoning independen
I engage in science and law, [You] conflate philosophizing (reasoning independent of falsification) with science (reason dependent upon falsification) and you conflate testimony which one must warranty with threat of punishment with self reporting which one does not.
THAT IS PILPUL. “Excuse Making”
THE SIMPLE ANSWER:
Religion: what we can get away with? (mysticism),
Philosophy: what I can get away with? (sophism),
-vs-
Science: What we can’t get away with (diligence and warranty).
Law: What you can’t get away with (liability).
Pseudorationalisms: Astrology, Theology, Numerology, Philosophy, Pilpul, Critique.
-vs-
Sciences: History, Economics, Accounting, Law, Science, Mathematics, logic (proper).
How desperately addicts seek to preserve their lies.
Manage
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-01 08:25:00 UTC
-
THE PSEUDO-SCIENTIFIC ATTACK ON CIVILIZATION. The curse of postmodern pseudoscie
THE PSEUDO-SCIENTIFIC ATTACK ON CIVILIZATION.
The curse of postmodern pseudoscience in most of the other answers. Postmodernism like Marxism was designed, like Abrahamic Religions, as an… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=289139085016322&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2018-09-01 00:05:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035679915809681408
-
Jung was not a scientist and neither was freud, although of nietzsche, jung, and
Jung was not a scientist and neither was freud, although of nietzsche, jung, and freud, at least jung tried to correct freud. However … a good relationship between archetypes and personality traits, and between traits and reward systems, vs brain structure – good intuition.
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 23:33:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035672043239469057
Reply addressees: @Roo12883907
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035649982878179328
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1035649982878179328
-
The Pseudo-Scientific Attack on Civilization.
The curse of postmodern pseudoscience in most of the other answers. Postmodernism like Marxism was designed, like Abrahamic Religions, as an attack on European Peoples (civilization), to eradicate our civlization in the modern world just as Abrahamic religion was used to eradicate the five great civilizations of the ancient world: Roman New Europe), Byzantine (old europe), Anatolian, Persian (Iranic), Egyptian, and North African. All those civilizations were destroyed by the last attempt at cultural destruction. Why? Marxism/Postmodernism in the modern world, and Abrahamic Religion in the ancient world foster dysgenic rapid reproduction of the underclasses reversing genetic domestication under small farm mixed agrarianism, effectively weaponizing reproduction and ignorance and superstition against civilization. There are reasons that the Han, Koreans,Japanese and Europeans succeeded and other civilizations failed to maintain rates of innovation. The reason is that the Han, Koreans and Japanese remained insular and homogeneous, and whites succeed as long as they also remain homogeneous and practice eugenic reproduction through manorialism (meritocracy). The rest of the world did the opposite and the sizes of their underclasses pose such a burden that they cannot produce sufficient middle and upper classes to produce high trust commercially successful political orders.
-
The Pseudo-Scientific Attack on Civilization.
The curse of postmodern pseudoscience in most of the other answers. Postmodernism like Marxism was designed, like Abrahamic Religions, as an attack on European Peoples (civilization), to eradicate our civlization in the modern world just as Abrahamic religion was used to eradicate the five great civilizations of the ancient world: Roman New Europe), Byzantine (old europe), Anatolian, Persian (Iranic), Egyptian, and North African. All those civilizations were destroyed by the last attempt at cultural destruction. Why? Marxism/Postmodernism in the modern world, and Abrahamic Religion in the ancient world foster dysgenic rapid reproduction of the underclasses reversing genetic domestication under small farm mixed agrarianism, effectively weaponizing reproduction and ignorance and superstition against civilization. There are reasons that the Han, Koreans,Japanese and Europeans succeeded and other civilizations failed to maintain rates of innovation. The reason is that the Han, Koreans and Japanese remained insular and homogeneous, and whites succeed as long as they also remain homogeneous and practice eugenic reproduction through manorialism (meritocracy). The rest of the world did the opposite and the sizes of their underclasses pose such a burden that they cannot produce sufficient middle and upper classes to produce high trust commercially successful political orders.
-
As a test of agency (man) vs the lack of it (animal) reason, science, and law do
As a test of agency (man) vs the lack of it (animal) reason, science, and law does demarcate those of us who are fully human from those of us who are still principally animal. We are not equal. Speech does not qualify one as human no matter how sophisticated the parrot.