Theme: Science

  • (Diary) Spent the majority of the day thinking about a single problem that is ce

    (Diary)
    Spent the majority of the day thinking about a single problem that is central to the premise of the physical sciences, and aside from having to take a nap, it’s just slow going. A lot of the time, ‘work’ in these matters consists of finding some administrivia or housework to do while you try to find some way of explaining the impossible to explain.

    In this case there is a reason everything in the universe is discreet, despite the influence of mathematics attempting to describe it as continuous. Now, this is one of those problems akin to ‘why does the universe have three plus one dimensions’ when the answer is it can’t have more, and the reason is quite trivial – but developing the intuition so that you can understand that triviality isn’t terribly easy.

    The same is true of discreteness and for approximately the same reason. And I’m fairly certain this is one of those problems where the philosopher-scientist writes down that answer, but only some small percentage of theose that read the work can develop the intuition to truly comprehend the meaning of it.

    So I’m sitting here closing in on midnight doing a bit of disk maintenance including cleaning up duplicates in Itunes and such, while I wrestle with what is likely to be one of those problems where I just have to let the autistic steam engine in my head do the work until the answer pops into my head while emptying the dryer, or doing dishes, or taking a shower…. sigh.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-09 04:31:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744577702336565248

  • I keep a list of the pseudoscientific ‘contrabutions’ of the jews and I explain

    I keep a list of the pseudoscientific ‘contrabutions’ of the jews and I explain the cause of their cognitive divergence elsewhere, but in general their harms vastly outweigh their contributions by orders of magnitude. worse, even einstein and bohr who are the ‘golden children’ simply beat Hilbert, and in doing so advanced micro and macro physics but at the same time destroyed the intellectual competency of the field by re-platonizing mathematics and physics despite the tremendous restoration made by Descartes.

    Reply addressees: @DerrickLefleur @diegocaleiro


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-09 00:50:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744521926159093760

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744519051903209917

  • Two Races Not One: Genetics Falsifies the Category “Caucasian” There are two dis

    Two Races Not One: Genetics Falsifies the Category “Caucasian”
    There are two distinct populations, European (spain to urals), and West Asian (or South Eurasian, or Southwest Eurasian, consisting of North Africa, the Middle east)

    –“The West Eurasian splits into European and West Asian. The latter is labeled as such (rather than the usual Middle-Eastern-North-African) because this ancestry component likely originated in West Asia before spreading to North Africa via an ‘into Africa’ return migration.”–

    I use the term “South eurasian” I adopted from Lynn instead of “west asian” for clarity.

    Now, technically speaking, that group still consists of at least the north africans, the middle easterners (see below), the iranic-caucasians, and the iranic-indians. And sometimes we include the turkic people (iranic-turkic) of central asia because they are also muslims.

    So despite west islamic civilization consisting of north africa, the levant, the arabian peninsula, mesopotamia, anatolia, iran, and the central asian countries, and the west indus countries captured as pakistan, and parts of afghanistan, we, in the west genrally just group all of islamic civilization into the term “Middle East”.

    Disambiguation
    In General this terminology helps disambiguate:

    Islamic Civilizations: (West Islamic Civilization or MENA > (Semitic (North African < Middle Eastern) > IndoEuropean( Iranic > Indo-Iranic) > Turkic(Iranic-Turkic(central asia, anatolia)) > East Islamic Civilization (Indonesia, Malasia, Brunei, parts of Phillipines and Thailand))

    The Middle East?
    What is the correct name for that territory between the mediterranean, the black sea, the caspian sea, the indus river valley, the persian gulf, the arabian sea, the gulf of aden, and the red sea – in other words, that area that is the arabian peninsula, iraq, syria, lebanon, israel, jordan etc. We call it the middle east but isn’t there a more specific name for that subregion?

    The region encompassing the Arabian Peninsula, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Jordan, and surrounding areas, is commonly referred to as the Middle East.

    However, the term “Middle East” is broad and can be used to include a wider area extending into parts of North Africa and Central Asia.

    MENA (middle east, north africa) generally includes Iran but not necessarily all Iranic peoples, especially those outside the Middle Eastern and North African region.

    There isn’t a universally agreed-upon name that is more precise than “Middle East,” but there are a few terms that are sometimes used:

    Near East: Historically, this term was used by Europeans to describe the region closer to them, including the Balkans and the Ottoman Empire, but also extending to the Arabian Peninsula and the Levant. Over time, its usage has become less common, and it has largely been replaced by “Middle East.”

    Levant: This term specifically refers to the Eastern Mediterranean region, which includes Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Jordan, and sometimes extending to parts of Turkey and Iraq. It’s a more precise term for the eastern Mediterranean part of your described area.

    Mesopotamia: This historical term refers specifically to the area between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, largely corresponding to modern-day Iraq and parts of Syria and Turkey. It’s well-known as a cradle of civilization.

    Arabian Peninsula: This term specifically denotes the large peninsula in Western Asia that includes Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Oman, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait.

    Fertile Crescent: This is a historical term that describes a region that includes modern-day Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Palestine, Jordan, and parts of Turkey and Egypt. It’s known for its historically fertile land and is considered the birthplace of agriculture and early civilizations.

    Each of these terms captures a part of the area but not the entirety. The lack of a single, more specific term is partly due to the region’s complex history and the fluidity of its geographic and political boundaries over time. “Middle East,” despite its vagueness, remains the most commonly used term for the entire region.

    It’s about time we forced the federal government to separate european and south eurasian populations in surveys so that our data is learer and we don’t confate peoples.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-09 00:44:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744520435096555520

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @99MO23 Use DNA. N Africans are a westward migration of south

    RT @curtdoolittle: @99MO23 Use DNA. N Africans are a westward migration of south eurasians. There are no mediterraneans because that is a s…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 23:54:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744507782001283166

  • Native Americans are east asian siberians with minor contribution from Ancestral

    Native Americans are east asian siberians with minor contribution from Ancestral North Eurasians (the Western, Northern, Eastern European, and Ancestral North Eurasian spectrum along the ice. )

    Australians are Early Out of Africa with some admixture from that coastal migration.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 23:09:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744496556705710262

    Reply addressees: @Molly85224872

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744493962155397601

  • Whether you buy it or not has no bearing on the overwhelming evidence. Sorry. We

    Whether you buy it or not has no bearing on the overwhelming evidence. Sorry. We even know how far they migrated every year and the caloric density determinined that rate.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 18:48:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744430935716569401

    Reply addressees: @Gyeff0

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744429782656278770

  • Use DNA. N Africans are a westward migration of south eurasians. There are no me

    Use DNA. N Africans are a westward migration of south eurasians. There are no me

    Use DNA. N Africans are a westward migration of south eurasians. There are no mediterraneans because that is a sea. 😉 There are populations that surround the mediterranean and those populations are as I stated them. Yes there is some admixture. But it’s less than expected. There… https://t.co/87YbRwJBKS


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 18:25:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744424994220724427

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744410576246165989

  • I would like to understand why you think Wolfram was naive when as far as I know

    I would like to understand why you think Wolfram was naive when as far as I know, no one comes close to his understanding – which is demonstrated in multiple fields of mathematics, computer science, and physics.. His only weakness is his rather challenging inability to articulate those ideas with clarity to a broader audience. Something I sympathize with given the difficulty in my own work which is distantly related.

    Both Joscha Bach and I have stated that if wolfram had not solved the problem we woud have had to because we were both aware of it. The interesting approach that wolfram has taken with his use of Ruliads is to NOT include sequences, but to use evolutionary survival as an adversarial competiton between teh rule sets. This is why he was able with some certaitny to explain tht the universe is not ‘fine tunde’ but instead, is the only set of relations that can survive.

    Reply addressees: @RussellJohnston @Zamicol @LiminalRev @cryptogeni


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 18:06:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744420310529540096

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744418517292896543

  • No that is not the point of the intuitionistic movement. The intuitionistic move

    No that is not the point of the intuitionistic movement. The intuitionistic movement is better thought of as a reaction to the re-platonization of math and physics in physics exemplified by the einstein bohr problem.

    –“In the philosophy of mathematics, intuitionism, or neointuitionism (opposed to preintuitionism), is an approach where mathematics is considered to be purely the result of the constructive mental activity of humans rather than the discovery of fundamental principles claimed to exist in an objective reality.

    The fundamental distinguishing characteristic of intuitionism is its interpretation of what it means for a mathematical statement to be true. In Brouwer’s original intuitionism, the truth of a mathematical statement is a subjective claim: a mathematical statement corresponds to a mental construction, and a mathematician can assert the truth of a statement only by verifying the validity of that construction by intuition.”–

    The meaning of this is rather important because it describes a large part of why physicists are failing to advance the discipline – they treat mathematical references as real rather than imagining a model and trying to determine if it is possible to express mathematically.

    Math is just another language. Like all languages it follows the universal grammar of continuous recursive disambiguation. However, it is the simplest (dumbest) possible grammar, because it has only one noun (number, where are all numbers are functions), very few verbs (operations, all of which are functions) and very few agreements (tests), and therefore is context and scale independent, and as such a non-conflationary, non-inflationary (mostly) system of logic (language).

    Reply addressees: @LiminalRev @RussellJohnston @Zamicol @cryptogeni


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 16:17:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744392931681632263

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744390591633396120

  • And I would say that this is true, but that science is merely an application of

    And I would say that this is true, but that science is merely an application of testimony from the law to other disciplines. (Cause that really is how it evolved in the west)


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 04:39:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744217240038220250

    Reply addressees: @LiminalRev @RussellJohnston @Zamicol @cryptogeni

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744216605729366477