Theme: Science

  • There Are No Caucasians Remaining in India?

    September 22nd, 2018 12:46 PM THERE ARE NO CAUCASIANS REMAINING IN INDIA?

    —“India has been underrepresented in genome-wide surveys of human variation. We analyze 25 diverse groups to provide strong evidence for two ancient populations, genetically divergent, that are ancestral to most Indians today. One, the “Ancestral North Indians” (ANI), is genetically close to Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans, while the other, the “Ancestral South Indians” (ASI), is as distinct from ANI and East Asians as they are from each other. By introducing methods that can estimate ancestry without accurate ancestral populations, we show that ANI ancestry ranges from 39-71% in India, and is higher in traditionally upper caste and Indo-European speakers. Groups with only ASI ancestry may no longer exist in mainland India. However, the Andamanese are an ASI-related group without ANI ancestry, showing that the peopling of the islands must have occurred before ANI-ASI gene flow on the mainland. Allele frequency differences between groups in India are larger than in Europe, reflecting strong founder effects whose signatures have been maintained for thousands of years due to endogamy. We therefore predict that there will be an excess of recessive diseases in India, different in each group, which should be possible to screen and map genetically.”—

  • THE STANDARD MODEL

    THE STANDARD MODEL


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-21 20:06:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1043230017742950400

  • “I hope everyone who reads these posts on natural law realizes how precious this

    —“I hope everyone who reads these posts on natural law realizes how precious this wisdom is.”— John Mark

    The idea that natural law is discovered science the result of which produces a formal logic of decidability in all matters of sentience is very hard to grasp given our history of moral variation in relation to geography, demographics, and economy, and the multitude of falsehoods we have invented to justify one order or another given those same constraints.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-21 12:08:00 UTC

  • September 21st, 2018 8:04 PM —“It is suggested that IQ makes an individual lik

    September 21st, 2018 8:04 PM

    —“It is suggested that IQ makes an individual likely to gravitate toward a denomination and level of achievement that best fit his or hers particular level of cognitive complexity. Ontogenetically speaking this means that contemporary denominations are rank ordered by largely hereditary variations in brain efficiency (i.e. IQ). In terms of evolution, modern Atheists are reacting rationally to cognitive and emotional challenges, whereas Liberals and, in particular Dogmatics, still rely on ancient, pre-rational, supernatural and wishful thinking.”—-

  • September 21st, 2018 11:01 AM —“There is a significant error in Peterson’s cal

    September 21st, 2018 11:01 AM

    —“There is a significant error in Peterson’s calculation. He claims that Jews with IQ’s of 145 or above are, in percentage terms, commensurate with their proportion of millionaires / billionaires. However his baseline for the total is merely the Jewish and White population. However, White Americans now make up little over 60% of the overall population. His baseline thus comprises only 63% of the total US population. To use the entire US population as a baseline would reduce millionaire numbers to 25% of the total. Peterson’s calculation therefore only adds up if he assumes that there exist no 145+ outside of the US’ White and Jewish populations. Although it might be argued that US adult population demographics are likely to increase the accuracy of Peterson’s baseline, it nevertheless remains considerably off.”— Aaron Kahland

    (by Curt:
    As far as I know the jews just have a wider distribution than we do, just as I suspect east asians have a narrower distribution than we do. So this means that the Ashkenazi produce outliers just as the upper caste anglos doe. But that little difference means 2x 130+ and 1×140+ for every one of ours. And we tend to think of mathematics as calculation (it is) but language is also a form of calculation, and we have just (or I have just) begun to understand that language is a means of calculating (transforming inputs and outputs) in a market (competition) for signaling and influence, that produces continuous improvements in knowledge IF not impeded by error (supernatural, magical, ideal) all of which prohibit precision and increase error counter to the natural, scientific, and operational descriptions. Hence white performance in the physical era and jewish performance in the verbal era. )

  • My Favorite Find of The Year:

    September 20th, 2018 7:07 AM MY FAVORITE FIND OF THE YEAR:
    via #SteveStuWill
    http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15923a/jdm15923a.pdf

  • My Favorite Find of The Year:

    September 20th, 2018 7:07 AM MY FAVORITE FIND OF THE YEAR:
    via #SteveStuWill
    http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15923a/jdm15923a.pdf

  • LADIES, IT’S ALL NATURE AND NO NURTURE Mothers need to feel it’s nurture. But la

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ng.3285SORRY LADIES, IT’S ALL NATURE AND NO NURTURE

    Mothers need to feel it’s nurture. But largely you can make your kids worse, but not better. So nurture is largely an effort not to let kids play in traffic. Otherwise it’s just genes.

    —“For a majority (69%) of traits, the observed twin correlations are consistent with a simple and parsimonious model where twin resemblance is solely due to additive genetic variation. The data are inconsistent with substantial influences from shared environment or non-additive genetic variation.”—

    THIS IS A HUGE STUDY

    —“We report a meta-analysis of twin correlations and reported variance components for 17,804 traits from 2,748 publications including 14,558,903 partly dependent twin pairs, virtually all published twin studies of complex traits. “—

    I’m gonna amplify this a bit and say that your extra attention is making kids more fragile and literally driving them mad.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ng.3285


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-20 07:17:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/42128091_10156650118592264_391460442

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/42128091_10156650118592264_3914604425330556928_o_10156650118587264.jpg MY FAVORITE FIND OF THE YEAR:

    via #SteveStuWill

    http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15923a/jdm15923a.pdfChris CantrellTwitter, they are talking about Twitter. Twitter is a breeding ground for P-PBS, and if it rhymes holy shit, people will start a cult over it.Sep 20, 2018, 8:37 AMMY FAVORITE FIND OF THE YEAR:

    via #SteveStuWill

    http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15923a/jdm15923a.pdf


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-20 07:07:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/42128091_10156650118592264_39146044

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/42128091_10156650118592264_3914604425330556928_o_10156650118587264.jpg MY FAVORITE FIND OF THE YEAR:

    via #SteveStuWill

    http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15923a/jdm15923a.pdfChris CantrellTwitter, they are talking about Twitter. Twitter is a breeding ground for P-PBS, and if it rhymes holy shit, people will start a cult over it.Sep 20, 2018 8:37amMY FAVORITE FIND OF THE YEAR:

    via #SteveStuWill

    http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15923a/jdm15923a.pdf


    Source date (UTC): 2018-09-20 07:07:00 UTC