October 19th, 2018 7:28 AM THE SPECTRUM OF INTERPRETABILITY (ERROR) [T]hus the problem of literature vs philosophy, vs science vs mathematics : a decline in ‘interpretation’ due to the increasing precision of the vocabulary and grammar. Unfortunately humans (children) are most accessible and suggestible at the left of that scale, and least suggestible but least accessible at the right. || LIterary analogy > rational philosophy > economics > cognitive science > physics > mathematics.
Theme: Science
-
Living in a scientific culture
October 18th, 2018 7:52 PM
“Adults living in a scientific culture are more rational (and intelligent) than adults living in pre-modern cultures. For example, according to studies conducted in the 1960s and 1970s, even educated adults living in Papua New Guinea did not reach the formal stage. Australian Aborigines who were still living a traditional lifestyle barely developed beyond a preoperational stage in their adult years. Without a population that has mentally developed to the level of formal operations, which entails a capacity to think about abstract relationships and symbols without concrete forms, a capacity to grasp syllogistic reasoning, comprehend algebra, formulate hypotheses, there can be no modernization”
Or a concept of reciprocal, negotiated sovereignty! Conceptualising and operating in such a paradigm is as foreign as colonising mars! h/tip Curt Doolittle (No idea who posted this)
-
Living in a scientific culture
October 18th, 2018 7:52 PM
“Adults living in a scientific culture are more rational (and intelligent) than adults living in pre-modern cultures. For example, according to studies conducted in the 1960s and 1970s, even educated adults living in Papua New Guinea did not reach the formal stage. Australian Aborigines who were still living a traditional lifestyle barely developed beyond a preoperational stage in their adult years. Without a population that has mentally developed to the level of formal operations, which entails a capacity to think about abstract relationships and symbols without concrete forms, a capacity to grasp syllogistic reasoning, comprehend algebra, formulate hypotheses, there can be no modernization”
Or a concept of reciprocal, negotiated sovereignty! Conceptualising and operating in such a paradigm is as foreign as colonising mars! h/tip Curt Doolittle (No idea who posted this)
-
Testimonialism Is the Core Insight of Propertarianism
October 19th, 2018 3:29 PM TESTIMONIALISM IS THE CORE INSIGHT OF PROPERTARIANISM [M]ost of the work is dependent upon the completion of the scientific method, and its restatement as due diligence in the production of testimony such that one can (and by law) must, provide a warrant of due diligence for one’s speech. This allows us to extend the demand for involuntary warranty of due diligence from goods and services to information (speech) ending the industrialization of lying that we know as marxism-feminism-postmodernism of the academy-state-media complex. The this ‘checklist’ and the ‘grammars’ are a substantial innovation, and they are unfortunately a bit harder to grasp and internalize than acquisitionism (psychology restated as desire to acquire property in toto), and propertarianism (ethics restated as voluntary transfer of property). The rest, (operational law, rule of law, and perfect government) are not that complicated.
-
Testimonialism Is the Core Insight of Propertarianism
October 19th, 2018 3:29 PM TESTIMONIALISM IS THE CORE INSIGHT OF PROPERTARIANISM [M]ost of the work is dependent upon the completion of the scientific method, and its restatement as due diligence in the production of testimony such that one can (and by law) must, provide a warrant of due diligence for one’s speech. This allows us to extend the demand for involuntary warranty of due diligence from goods and services to information (speech) ending the industrialization of lying that we know as marxism-feminism-postmodernism of the academy-state-media complex. The this ‘checklist’ and the ‘grammars’ are a substantial innovation, and they are unfortunately a bit harder to grasp and internalize than acquisitionism (psychology restated as desire to acquire property in toto), and propertarianism (ethics restated as voluntary transfer of property). The rest, (operational law, rule of law, and perfect government) are not that complicated.
-
I don’t do chemistry and biology. It requires doing lots of dishes. Really
I don’t do chemistry and biology. It requires doing lots of dishes. Really.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-19 18:10:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1053347781698576384
-
THE SPECTRUM OF INTERPRETABILITY (ERROR) Thus the problem of literature vs philo
THE SPECTRUM OF INTERPRETABILITY (ERROR)
Thus the problem of literature vs philosophy, vs science vs mathematics : a decline in ‘interpretation’ due to the increasing precision of the vocabulary and grammar.
Unfortunately humnans (children) are most accessible and suggestible at the left of that scale, and least suggestible but least accessible at the right.
|| LIterary analogy > rational philosophy > economics > cognitive science > physics > mathematics.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-19 07:28:00 UTC
-
“Adults living in a scientific culture are more rational (and intelligent) than
“Adults living in a scientific culture are more rational (and intelligent) than adults living in pre-modern cultures. For example, according to studies conducted in the 1960s and 1970s, even educated adults living in Papua New Guinea did not reach the formal stage. Australian Aborigines who were still living a traditional lifestyle barely developed beyond a preoperational stage in their adult years. Without a population that has mentally developed to the level of formal operations, which entails a capacity to think about abstract relationships and symbols without concrete forms, a capacity to grasp syllogistic reasoning, comprehend algebra, formulate hypotheses, there can be no modernization”
Or a concept of reciprocal, negotiated sovereignty!
Conceptualising and operating in such a paradigm is as foreign as colonising mars!
https://www.counter-currents.com/…/jean-piaget-the-superio…/
h/tip Curt Doolittle
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-18 19:52:00 UTC
-
The Science of Why People Are NPCs or PCs.
October 18th, 2018 10:43 AM THE SCIENCE OF WHY PEOPLE ARE NPCs OR PCs. @Dylan Thomas (TrueDilTom) put out a wonderful podcast on the NPC meme (before it went viral). But most importantly, inside that discussion he reminds us that the origin of the thought is the research showing that the vast majority of people do not rely on language to ‘calculate’ with their internal voice. Language is a form of calculation consisting of categories, religions and values, and with language we can produce frames of different scales of coherence using internal consistency, external correspondence, and existential possibility. Instead they are driven entirely by experience and intuition – they were insufficiently trained, such that they cannot even use LANGUAGE for measurement of their thoughts: that’s before we get to Reason, Logic, Calculation, and Computation. In this sense, people really are NPC’s who are somewhat capable of speech to express intuitive reactions, but lack the agency to calculate with language and therefore speak in argument and reason. This is why I say that there is a vast difference between declaring people HUMAN just because they can speak, instead of declaring people HUMAN because they have AGENCY. Speech is an insufficient test of sufficient agency to enter into a contract, for the same reason that children lack sufficient agency to enter into contract. You can only cooperate with whom you can cooperate, and you cannot enter into contract with people who lack agency. They are not yet domesticated (fully human). So it is one thing to have your human potential BLOCKED (addiction to supernatural religions); and another lack the TRAINING to transition from primate to human; and another to seek to circumvent the LABOR of exercising agency; and another to possess agency because you have the ability, training, and WILL to possess and therefore demonstrate agency. (This paragraph was important, so read it again.) We cannot cooperate with those who cannot cooperate because cooperation on means and ends that require calculation require members of the contract be able to calculate. THEY CAN’T. Ergo we can’t. Therefore Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.
-
The Science of Why People Are NPCs or PCs.
October 18th, 2018 10:43 AM THE SCIENCE OF WHY PEOPLE ARE NPCs OR PCs. @Dylan Thomas (TrueDilTom) put out a wonderful podcast on the NPC meme (before it went viral). But most importantly, inside that discussion he reminds us that the origin of the thought is the research showing that the vast majority of people do not rely on language to ‘calculate’ with their internal voice. Language is a form of calculation consisting of categories, religions and values, and with language we can produce frames of different scales of coherence using internal consistency, external correspondence, and existential possibility. Instead they are driven entirely by experience and intuition – they were insufficiently trained, such that they cannot even use LANGUAGE for measurement of their thoughts: that’s before we get to Reason, Logic, Calculation, and Computation. In this sense, people really are NPC’s who are somewhat capable of speech to express intuitive reactions, but lack the agency to calculate with language and therefore speak in argument and reason. This is why I say that there is a vast difference between declaring people HUMAN just because they can speak, instead of declaring people HUMAN because they have AGENCY. Speech is an insufficient test of sufficient agency to enter into a contract, for the same reason that children lack sufficient agency to enter into contract. You can only cooperate with whom you can cooperate, and you cannot enter into contract with people who lack agency. They are not yet domesticated (fully human). So it is one thing to have your human potential BLOCKED (addiction to supernatural religions); and another lack the TRAINING to transition from primate to human; and another to seek to circumvent the LABOR of exercising agency; and another to possess agency because you have the ability, training, and WILL to possess and therefore demonstrate agency. (This paragraph was important, so read it again.) We cannot cooperate with those who cannot cooperate because cooperation on means and ends that require calculation require members of the contract be able to calculate. THEY CAN’T. Ergo we can’t. Therefore Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.