Theme: Science

  • WHAT DEMARCATES SCIENCE FROM NON-SCIENCE? Now what demarcates science (due dilig

    WHAT DEMARCATES SCIENCE FROM NON-SCIENCE?

    Now what demarcates science (due diligence) from non-science(failure of due diligence)?

    *Testifiability*

    Try to falsify that statement.

    ( Let me help you: you won’t. Science has simply been a branch of the law all along. )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-26 23:09:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1089299339124584448

  • WHAT DEMARCATES SCIENCE FROM NON-SCIENCE? Now what demarcates science (due dilig

    WHAT DEMARCATES SCIENCE FROM NON-SCIENCE?

    Now what demarcates science (due diligence) from non-science (failure of due diligence)?

    *Testifiability*

    Try to falsify that statement.

    ( Let me help you: you won’t. Science has simply been a branch of the law all along. )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-26 18:09:00 UTC

  • On the other hand the scope of this work is huge, because it begins with the com

    On the other hand the scope of this work is huge, because it begins with the completion of the scientific method and applies it to every single field at some level or other in order to create a commensurable and therefore testable language. So, on average 6m-2y to learn it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-25 16:08:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088830999973298178

    Reply addressees: @mediocrecroat

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088824696425070592


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1088824696425070592

  • “Lake Toba is the site of a massive supervolcanic eruption estimated at VEI 8 th

    —“Lake Toba is the site of a massive supervolcanic eruption estimated at VEI 8 that occurred 69,000 to 77,000 years ago,[2][3][4] representing a climate-changing event.

    It is the largest-known explosive eruption on Earth in the last 25 million years.

    According to the Toba catastrophe theory, it had global consequences for human populations; it killed most humans living at that time and is believed to have created a population bottleneck in central east Africa and India, which affects the genetic make-up of the human worldwide population to the present.[6]

    It has been accepted that the eruption of Toba led to a volcanic winter with a worldwide decrease in temperature between 3 to 5 °C (5.4 to 9.0 °F), and up to 15 °C (27 °F) in higher latitudes. Additional studies in Lake Malawi in East Africa show significant amounts of ash being deposited from the Toba eruptions, even at that great distance, but little indication of a significant climatic effect in East Africa.[7]”

    Lake Toba (Indonesian: Danau Toba) is a large natural lake in Indonesia occupying the caldera of a supervolcano. The lake is about 100 kilometres (62 miles) long, 30 kilometres (19 mi) wide, and up to 505 metres (1,657 ft) deep.

    Located in the middle of the northern part of the Indonesian island of Sumatra, with a surface elevation of about 900 metres (2,953 ft), the lake stretches from 2.88°N 98.52°E to 2.35°N 99.1°E. It is the largest lake in Indonesia and the largest volcanic lake in the world.[1]

    Recent advances in dating methods suggest a more accurate identification of 74,000 years ago as the date.[5] “—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-23 15:38:00 UTC

  • via Brandon Hayes and Rosenborg Predmetsky This is super interesting “Culture–ge

    via Brandon Hayes and Rosenborg Predmetsky

    This is super interesting

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842692/

    “Culture–gene coevolutionary theory posits that cultural values have evolved, are adaptive and influence the social and physical environments under which genetic selection operates. Here, we examined the association between cultural values of individualism–collectivism and allelic frequency of the serotonin transporter functional polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) as well as the role this culture–gene association may play in explaining global variability in prevalence of pathogens and affective disorders. We found evidence that collectivistic cultures were significantly more likely to comprise individuals carrying the short (S) allele of the 5-HTTLPR across 29 nations.

    Results further show that historical pathogen prevalence predicts cultural variability in individualism–collectivism owing to genetic selection of the S allele. Additionally, cultural values and frequency of S allele carriers negatively predict global prevalence of anxiety and mood disorder. Finally, mediation analyses further indicate that increased frequency of S allele carriers predicted decreased anxiety and mood disorder prevalence owing to increased collectivistic cultural values.

    Taken together, our findings suggest culture–gene coevolution between allelic frequency of 5-HTTLPR and cultural values of individualism–collectivism and support the notion that cultural values buffer genetically susceptible populations from increased prevalence of affective disorders.

    Implications of the current findings for understanding culture–gene coevolution of human brain and behaviour as well as how this coevolutionary process may contribute to global variation in pathogen prevalence and epidemiology of affective disorders, such as anxiety and depression, are discussed.”


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-23 13:41:00 UTC

  • WHY WE FAILED So you see, the reasons the west could not defeat the rise of pseu

    WHY WE FAILED

    So you see, the reasons the west could not defeat the rise of pseudoscience (marxism) and sophism (postmodernism) and denialism (feminism) is because of:

    (1) we spoke in religious, philosophical, and moral middle class language, and;

    (2) because our group strategy and reason for success is eugenic,;

    (3) our organizing principle is actually our law (martial and judicial class) and tripartism, not our philosophy(middle class) universal or religion (administrative class) universal;

    (4) we lacked understanding of our organizing principle and its difference from other civilizations; had no practice in using it against administrative and middle class moralisms, sophims, supernaturalisms, and pseudosciences, and;

    (5) universal enfranchisement in a single house majoritarian democracy is logically and empirically counter to the tradition of our law (sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty), our group strategy (sovereignty, tripartism, commons and eugenic evolution).

    In retrospect it isn’t complicated but in the process it was chaos.

    But now we know. Truth is enough.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-23 13:07:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50628601_10156934194387264_658979654

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50628601_10156934194387264_658979654

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/50628601_10156934194387264_6589796544482902016_n_10156934194377264.jpg DO I GET A PRIZE FOR BEING BLOCKED BY TALEB?

    (@[510991678:2048:Stefan Molyneux] )Steve SlonkyDid you get any engagement at all?Jan 22, 2019, 1:37 PMCurt Doolittlehe knows who I am. but no.Jan 22, 2019, 1:37 PMRosenborg PredmetskyFor someone who has often pontificated accurately on the IYI, he is certainly acting like one by blocking people he disagrees withJan 22, 2019, 1:40 PMVengefül BobmoranLooking at his recent tweets.

    He’s going full Semite.

    Never go full Semite.Jan 22, 2019, 1:50 PMMichael D HaasHe blocked me years ago. Over one of his posts and my responses about man made climate change ironically. He doesn’t tolerate opposing views.Jan 22, 2019, 2:02 PMRadu M OleniucHe blocked me too.. 🙂

    I guess he didn’t appreciate the fact I blew his metrics in pieces when I used the Gulag example, where every single intellectual having some honesty and integrity was deported exactly for their merits and high IQ. These things are seen as a threat in any totalitarian / collectivist culture where force, not reason, is the only argument that counts.Jan 22, 2019, 2:11 PMRadu M OleniucJan 22, 2019, 2:37 PMRadu M OleniucJan 22, 2019, 2:38 PMRadu M OleniucJan 22, 2019, 2:38 PMSingular SpeechSteve Slonky There’s an old Curtpost that Taleb liked and there was this guy which Taleb followed on twitter who used to post here, so he is aware of Curt.Jan 22, 2019, 2:49 PMSteve PenderI can’t imagine the sort of stunted mind who would block you. I remember the very first instance I saw your content, and it was on a Stephen Kinsella post I believe. Usually when people write a lot, it’s mostly junk because there seems to be an inverse relation between quantity and quality, but I realized I couldn’t find any error so rather than dismissing your long content as junk, I realized I needed to read more.Jan 22, 2019, 3:07 PMJaromír MiškovskýIs it Jefferson Pepe? Or Frenklin Pepe?Jan 22, 2019, 3:10 PMRadu M OleniucCartesian (Descartes) Wojak on Twitter. Plus Founding Fathers Pepe (Jefferson on FB), of course.Jan 22, 2019, 3:11 PMRadu M OleniucJan 22, 2019, 3:13 PMCurt DoolittleRadu M Oleniuc You are making a wonderful argument really. It’s unfortunate that twitter favors his idiocy and not your reason.Jan 22, 2019, 3:18 PMRadu M OleniucHe could not stand the pressure. :DJan 22, 2019, 3:25 PMRadu M OleniucKinsella blocked me as well. 4 years ago, I think it was a debate about intellectual property rights, if I remember well.Jan 22, 2019, 3:58 PMJaromír MiškovskýAbrahmic obsetion with bread Is amazing Insight. Well old food pyramid favours cereals…Jan 22, 2019, 4:21 PMJames Holidaydamn he has devolved into a little bitch who cant take contrary opinionsJan 22, 2019, 4:22 PMRadu M OleniucBread is basically sugar, complex polysaccharides with long chains of starch. The insulin response is the same. But at the same time, you get mycotoxins, fungus affecting cereals and so on. In the Roman Empire, the whole wheat was eaten only by the slaves.Jan 22, 2019, 4:26 PMPaul BardJan 22, 2019, 5:16 PMJaromír MiškovskýYes go.. fellow European eat bread! No protein. Meat Is bad.

    *Hand tuning*Jan 22, 2019, 5:23 PMCurt Doolittleum. He blocks 100% of the people who fight with him.Jan 22, 2019, 5:26 PMPaul BardCurt Doolittle that’s clear from the way the remaining commenters suck up to him.Jan 22, 2019, 5:29 PMNikola Dzhilvidzhievhttps://bloodyshovel.wordpress.com/2019/01/02/nassim-taleb-is-retarded/

    He was a useful ally in the fight against antinomian forces. Regrettably, he now prefers to be in their good graces.

    Either that, or those pesky ME genes reasserting themselves and he’s kissing up to the prevailing orthodoxy.Jan 22, 2019, 5:31 PMJoJo OlGold starJan 22, 2019, 6:20 PMRosenborg PredmetskyThe concept of blocking someone because of disagreement is totally foreign to my mentality. Sometimes I get bored with an argument and stop responding, but never block.

    Democrats more likely to unfriend – http://fortune.com/2016/12/19/social-media-election/

    Democratic women especially, because of political differences – https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article121831983.html

    And just women in general – https://www.pri.org/stories/2012-02-24/women-unfriend-more-regret-less-social-media-facebook-twitter-study

    He needs to stop acting like a womanJan 22, 2019, 6:33 PMRosenborg PredmetskyI’m starting to notice a pattern here… ;pJan 22, 2019, 6:33 PMBenjamin Wood.01% of all living humansJan 22, 2019, 7:42 PMZach MattoBlocking on the web because of an argument is the equivalent of plugging your ears and going “lalala”. That’s the white flag.Jan 22, 2019, 8:01 PMTrevor ValescuA new level of triggering achieved. Well done sir.Jan 22, 2019, 8:28 PMJohn ReevesSix years ago Taleb called me “you fucking idiot” because I was winning a Twitter debate with him and I put that on my resume. The bank manager I was interviewing with thought it was great and I was hired.Jan 22, 2019, 8:34 PMSteve PenderJohn Reeves screenshot? I’d like to see what the argument wasJan 22, 2019, 8:36 PMJohn ReevesSteve Pender it was back when I was an autistic anarcho capitalist, but I still stand by my argument today. Basically he was saying it’s a terrible idea to allow private individuals to own fresh water reservoirs. I was arguing that they’ll set the price of water to a level that maximizes their profit, and that level will be far below what would cause water shortages (because conservation kicks in at a certain point, and people can recycle water themselves).Jan 22, 2019, 8:40 PMJohn ReevesI wish I had the screenshots but I don’t. I might be able to find it if I searched enough.Jan 22, 2019, 8:40 PMArt RoddamSteve I didn’t realize you and Stephe were FB friends.Jan 22, 2019, 10:19 PMSteve PenderArt Roddam I don’t follow his stuff for years nowJan 22, 2019, 10:20 PMDO I GET A PRIZE FOR BEING BLOCKED BY TALEB?

    (Stefan Molyneux )


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-22 13:32:00 UTC

  • “The idea of applying the scientific method to law is so foreign to this toxic p

    —“The idea of applying the scientific method to law is so foreign to this toxic political climate, the ideologues will undoubtedly try and burn you as a heretic for this.”— Kevin Wu


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-21 23:41:00 UTC

  • PROPERTARIANISM FALSIFIES DOGMAS, IDEOLOGIES, PHILOSOPHIES, AND RELIGIONS. (wort

    PROPERTARIANISM FALSIFIES DOGMAS, IDEOLOGIES, PHILOSOPHIES, AND RELIGIONS.

    (worth repeating)

    Dogma requires a via positiva. Science and law are only via-negativas. Like many people, y’all want a religion or a philosophy instead of a science, logic, and law. I don’t do via-positivas like philosophy and religion. I just do via negativa: what is false and immoral. That leaves universes of non-false, non-immoral possibilities. The question is, why do you want false and immoral possibilities?

    Science(actions), logic(words), and mathematics (measurements) are not dogmas. THEY FALSIFY THEM.

    Propertarianism (vitruvianism, acquisitionism, propertarianism, testimonialism, and the algorithmic natural law) is not a religion, a philosophy, or an ideology or a but a science, logic, system of measurement, and body of law – and not a dogma. IT FALSIFIES THEM.

    YOU MIGHT THINK SCIENCE IS A POSITIVA. IT ISN’T. IT’S A NEGATIVA: A MARKET COMPETITION FOR SURVIVAL FROM FALSIFICATION.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-20 12:20:00 UTC

  • DO YOU KNOW THE DIFFERENCE? RELIGION VS IDEOLOGY VS PHILOSOPHY VS LOGIC VS MATHE

    DO YOU KNOW THE DIFFERENCE? RELIGION VS IDEOLOGY VS PHILOSOPHY VS LOGIC VS MATHEMATICS VS SCIENCE

    (worth repeating)

    – A RELIGION consists of any set of ideas of justification which require belief in, testimony to, or action according to, one or more falsehoods as a cost of inclusion and use.

    – AN IDEOLOGY consist of any set of ideas that agitate, motivate, or inspire achievement of political ends under majoritarian (monopoly) democracy. An ideology need not be internally consistent externally correspondent, or existentially possible. It need only motivate individuals to act in furtherance of policy.

    – A PHILOSOPHY consists of any set of internally consistent ideas of decidability which justify pursuit of personal preferences or group goods.

    – A LOGIC consists of any deflationary grammar of decidability that assists in the falsification by competition of one or more constant relations between states. (Note that one proves nothing logically other than internal consistency, because all premises of external correspondence are forever contingent.)

    – MATHEMATICS consists of a deflationary grammar of decidability consisting purely of competition between positional names under the preservation of ratios providing a single axis of decidability: position, but in N dimensions, providing commensurability between any set of positional relations of any number of dimensions.

    – A SCIENCE consists of any set of ideas that provide decidability independent of personal preference or group goods, by the systematic elimination of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit, by the use of measurement and record of actions – demonstrations versus words.

    – NATURAL LAW of RECIPROCITY (Tort), was produced scientifically (empirically) by trial and error, through the resolution of disputes across personal preferences, group goods, norms, traditions, and intuitions, cumulating always and everywhere that decidability is provided by property, and property consists in the demonstrated investment of human action or inaction anything whether genetic, material, behavioral, or informational.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-01-20 05:19:00 UTC