(FB 1550796209 Timestamp) A BLACK PILL Here is the harder question. What if all knowledge that begins with the scientific revolution – a term which means ‘that which is beyond human scales of ordinary perception’ – is past the means of comprehension of average people, … And (a) it is no longer possible for people to comprehend any of the sciences – and now, with P, even the social sciences. And that (b) the reason for the postwar conquest of our people by Abrahamism version 2 (marxism/postmodernism) is because they cannot tolerate tolerate a world beyond their comprehension and therefore are susceptible to the pseudosciences of marxism, the sophisms of postmodernism, and the pseudoscience and sophism of feminism and outright denialism. In other words, what If, by completing the sciences, including language(metaphysics), psychology, and social science, and by providing a single commensurable language of all sciences, means that without education (training) it is no longer possible for ordinary people to understand ANY OF THE SCIENCES, not just the physical sciences. And so it is not possible to obtain their consent on a constitution of those sciences, only on the policy that results from them – and one’s (my,our, ruling class’s) warranty of those sciences…. So what if we are just recovering to the level of civic development of Roman civilization today and we are repeating the peak. And without harnessing hydrocarbons we would not have surpassed them. And that without rapid and extensive eugenics, humans can never evolved past the limits of those unable to reason beyond human scale of perception. And so devolution is necessary in the present world as it was in the past, and dark ages are going to continue not end. And with each cycle we lose more and more of our hunter-gatherer reserves, until the genome is exhausted and we devolve like the middle east in to ever decreasing genetic ability.
Theme: Science
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550841555 Timestamp) —“Curt, I don’t hold an objective view of empiricism as, in my understanding the facts are temporary until the community gains further knowledge, which is a long way of saying subjective by my ken. Who do I need to read to understand the objective viewpoint? Am I even wrong in my understanding?”—- Jarrod Marma I cannot quite be sure I’m answering you correctly, but if your statement means that:
- All premises are forever contingent;
- that all theories serve to search for opportunity fields;
- that the application of the theory to transformative action – tests the precision of the opportunity field, and the search;
- and that survival of that application of actions increases the persuasive power of the theory (search and field),
- Cheers
Then yes. But they that’s just the scientific method right? This is the 20th century’s lesson: “Mathiness is a proofy thing and contingency is a truthy thing, and never the two shall meet.” Which has been the curse of mathiness since the greeks. Empiricism doesn’t PROVE anything it ELIMINATES ERROR by compensating for limitations in our perception and cognition. The question is,how do we do we apply those rules to speech ABOUT those theories? And then we need a system of measurement to test it. That system is P’s testimonialism. And when you say “Objective” I assume you mean ‘Operational’ and so yes you will need the “Point of View” in Operational grammar. What I suspect (from my observations of your argument) is that you already praxeologically (operationally) walk through any given model. As such I suspect that you do not need the ‘training’ that Operational speech provides. Op speech is just a completion of praxeology.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1550796209 Timestamp) A BLACK PILL Here is the harder question. What if all knowledge that begins with the scientific revolution – a term which means ‘that which is beyond human scales of ordinary perception’ – is past the means of comprehension of average people, … And (a) it is no longer possible for people to comprehend any of the sciences – and now, with P, even the social sciences. And that (b) the reason for the postwar conquest of our people by Abrahamism version 2 (marxism/postmodernism) is because they cannot tolerate tolerate a world beyond their comprehension and therefore are susceptible to the pseudosciences of marxism, the sophisms of postmodernism, and the pseudoscience and sophism of feminism and outright denialism. In other words, what If, by completing the sciences, including language(metaphysics), psychology, and social science, and by providing a single commensurable language of all sciences, means that without education (training) it is no longer possible for ordinary people to understand ANY OF THE SCIENCES, not just the physical sciences. And so it is not possible to obtain their consent on a constitution of those sciences, only on the policy that results from them – and one’s (my,our, ruling class’s) warranty of those sciences…. So what if we are just recovering to the level of civic development of Roman civilization today and we are repeating the peak. And without harnessing hydrocarbons we would not have surpassed them. And that without rapid and extensive eugenics, humans can never evolved past the limits of those unable to reason beyond human scale of perception. And so devolution is necessary in the present world as it was in the past, and dark ages are going to continue not end. And with each cycle we lose more and more of our hunter-gatherer reserves, until the genome is exhausted and we devolve like the middle east in to ever decreasing genetic ability.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551019022 Timestamp) ANSWERING A COMMON CRITICISM OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION —“Whenever I read something like “disproportionate success of western civilization in the ancient” I think of the cult of Dionysus and their ritualized cannibalism, the Athenians and their practice of choosing -by popular vote! – a human “scapegoat” for their collective sins to banish to certain death, the fact that the Romans only rarely performed human sacrifice in situations like the wars with the Carthaginians, the fact that one of the most revered figures from the Ancient Greek philosophical tradition was a man – Diogenes – who masturbated in public and slept in a barrel, that the Spartans used to leave infants to die in the wild of exposure if they weren’t deemed “fit” as future soldiers, that Plato was a proponent of – in his “The Republic” – a totalitarian dystopia as the ideal society, that pederasty was considered a good thing by many of their “greatest” thinkers, and that they – Romans – then deteriorated into a state where the main public pastime was watching slaves murder each other and be eaten alive by animals, it makes me wonder how this could possibly be considered a success.”—-Abu Ayoub Someone on my management team defended me once by saying —-“Curt fails like the rest of us, the difference is we do a few things and some fail, he does ten thousand things, and some fail.”— I do not confuse perfect with THE BEST. Meanwhile most civilizations cannot produce anything resembling a western commons or polity, because they cannot cull or rule the underclasses, cannot produce a competitive aristocracy, cannot produce truth, trust, commons, defense of commons, and break the limits of family, clan, and tribe to produce goods. Only japanese and Koreans. They applied truth, they created naturalism and reason culminating in roman law, and by archimedes were on the verge of the industrial revolution in just a few hundred years – and we dragged mankind out of superstition, ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, and vicisitudes of nature. Why? They preserve competition in all walks of life, and deem it heroic. All the great civilizations of the ancient world are lost but east asia. Europe was rebuilt itself from the north. Harappan didn’t make it, but did it’s best from the east. And Judaism, christianity, and islam are a cancer that destroys all before it by reversing eugenic progress. The secret to success for a people is shrinking the lower classes until the middle classes are productive enough to carry what remains, without constant decline. the problem is it is preferable for rulers to keep people poor can concentrate wealth – everywhere except for far east and far west. China had Reason-lite and order before face but face before truth, the west had Reason, and truth before all and markets. With christianity as the cancer that we are still (some of us) struggling to escape. Africa, the pacific, and america had too little time. The middle east over extended and islam destroyed all the great civilizations as a cancer of uncontrolled underclass growth. ANd we simply see this in the data. That said, your criticisms are legit. they are just immaterial in relation to the successes. If you were ruled, were you better off under any rule than you are under western? There is no comparison of rule between civilizations even between chinese rule and western rule. The the greatest mistake my people made was expanding aristocratic egalitarianism (aristocracy of everyone) beyond the possible. The second greatest mistake my people made was the white man’s burden. It is true. But we should never have tried to carry that burden. The third greatest mistake my people made was trying to preserve the ‘market’ of the balance of powers, rather than letting the russians retake constantinople, and the germans eastern europe. The fourth greatest mistake my people made was the sequence of falure to return the slaves to africa, liberating our ancient enemy the jews, not prosecuting the communists with an inquisition, and the postwar immigration act – these are christian errors. All of these are the same mistake – optimism about mankind – and virtue signaling.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551064050 Timestamp) The model for the physical world is physics, the model for the human world is economics, for the simple reason that the physical world can’t remember, predict, and choose to outwit the course of events.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551064050 Timestamp) The model for the physical world is physics, the model for the human world is economics, for the simple reason that the physical world can’t remember, predict, and choose to outwit the course of events.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551204493 Timestamp) NO WOO WOO. UNIVERSE MOST LIKELY PRESERVES INFORMATION BY MULTI-OSCILLATION 1) I don’t accept anything. it’s simply that I can’t falsify any of these theories or the category of theories all of them belong to and I can falsify every other category of theories that all other alternatives belong to. 2) Secondly, given that the universe appears to consist of nothing more than information, and that such information has no other method of retention than the universe itself, nothing can exist other than the universe as the store of information. 3) As such space time (whatever the universe consists of) consists in one of the three theoretical constructions (oscillating, multi-oscilating, or or curvilinearly infinite (self referential) with multi-oscilating providing means of preserving information between states. That’s my best guess with knowledge at our disposal – only because it is the only option that does not survive falsification at this moment in time
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1551204493 Timestamp) NO WOO WOO. UNIVERSE MOST LIKELY PRESERVES INFORMATION BY MULTI-OSCILLATION 1) I don’t accept anything. it’s simply that I can’t falsify any of these theories or the category of theories all of them belong to and I can falsify every other category of theories that all other alternatives belong to. 2) Secondly, given that the universe appears to consist of nothing more than information, and that such information has no other method of retention than the universe itself, nothing can exist other than the universe as the store of information. 3) As such space time (whatever the universe consists of) consists in one of the three theoretical constructions (oscillating, multi-oscilating, or or curvilinearly infinite (self referential) with multi-oscilating providing means of preserving information between states. That’s my best guess with knowledge at our disposal – only because it is the only option that does not survive falsification at this moment in time
-
(FB 1551194839 Timestamp)
(FB 1551194839 Timestamp) https://you.23andme.com/published/reports/d38d18567cd94a91/? https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7a6b/ad93d88b0158d449881e56749d5443b3ff80.pdf
-
(FB 1551194839 Timestamp)
(FB 1551194839 Timestamp) https://you.23andme.com/published/reports/d38d18567cd94a91/? https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7a6b/ad93d88b0158d449881e56749d5443b3ff80.pdf