—“Plato is just like quantum woo except it’s “Euclidean geometry woo”.”—Don Miguel
(priceless)
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-03 21:40:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1135662598731382784
Theme: Science
-
“Plato is just like quantum woo except it’s “Euclidean geometry woo”.”—Don Mig
-
“The word Sin is non-existent in the sciences. The word morality needs to be red
—“The word Sin is non-existent in the sciences. The word morality needs to be reduced to the same level of meaninglessness.”–Alba Rising
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-01 12:57:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1134806148178206721
-
People perceive Morality, Law, and Science as via-positiva’s but it’s only the w
People perceive Morality, Law, and Science as via-positiva’s but it’s only the words and the promise of those words that’s positive. Morality, Law, and Science are and must be, via-negativas.
Source date (UTC): 2019-06-01 12:11:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1134794571223896066
-
9) We have just finished, as Hayek warned, a century of social pseudoscience (Ma
9) We have just finished, as Hayek warned, a century of social pseudoscience (Marxism-socialism) and socio-political sophism (postmodernism). We don’t need more ‘libertarian sophism’ to further impede the restoration of our rights as anglo saxons: Sovereignty and Rule of Law.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-31 16:14:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1134493437452017664
Reply addressees: @SgtD_isBack @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1134473337873158144
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1134473337873158144
-
5) And while most of us have know this for a long time, science has ended nature
5) And while most of us have know this for a long time, science has ended nature-nurture, inheritability, equality of ability and merit, and we’re ending group genetic differences. (See Reich’s article in the NYT and Sullivan’s Reinforcement). Ethnocentrism is the optimum order.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-31 16:07:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1134491642625478657
Reply addressees: @SgtD_isBack @StefanMolyneux
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1134473337873158144
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1134473337873158144
-
The evidence is consistently coalescing on our perception of the world as excell
The evidence is consistently coalescing on our perception of the world as excellent, with minor differences in color spectrum, vibration, sound, smell, temperature, between species clearly identifiable as the same perception of reality, with greater or less dependence on senses.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-28 17:02:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133418338632327175
Reply addressees: @2ndofhisname86
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133392409348497408
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133392409348497408
-
“I didn’t give the vax anti vax issue much of thought before. I think I need to
—“I didn’t give the vax anti vax issue much of thought before. I think I need to know more.”—
That’s why I brought it up. I didn’t have to work hard at it tho. I should keep it alive for a bit then write up the law on it. But I think it’s rather obvious at this point. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-28 15:28:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1133394702533824512
-
3) Same for machine learning. Search(discover opportunity), Predict, Reinforce w
3) Same for machine learning. Search(discover opportunity), Predict, Reinforce what survives, and Prune(die off). Nature can’t predict. It uses numbers. Advanced life can’t predict. It Mates. Sentients can predict. Pruning neurons is cheaper. Same for ML/AI. Econ in everything.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-25 23:51:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1132434001749250048
Reply addressees: @aulderic
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1129804974903291904
IN REPLY TO:
@ericauld
A similar question is why sexual reproduction has outperformed asexual reproduction. (This has connections to machine learning.) https://t.co/UOJpGsAXHs
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1129804974903291904
-
2) So test is of the field (colony)of a life form not the individuals. Bacteria
2) So test is of the field (colony)of a life form not the individuals. Bacteria split (they are cheap) and advanced life forms mate(expensive). greater variation in calculation of opportunity while preserving opportunity for genetic correction.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-25 23:50:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1132433769686818816
Reply addressees: @aulderic
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1129804974903291904
IN REPLY TO:
@ericauld
A similar question is why sexual reproduction has outperformed asexual reproduction. (This has connections to machine learning.) https://t.co/UOJpGsAXHs
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1129804974903291904
-
1) Fitness as you describe it provides stasis rather than continual adaptation.
1) Fitness as you describe it provides stasis rather than continual adaptation. In other words, it is more useful for an organism to continuously express variation (limit testing), in search of new niches than it is to create a vulnerability to shocks by stasis.
Source date (UTC): 2019-05-25 23:42:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1132431665068957697
Reply addressees: @aulderic
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1129804974903291904
IN REPLY TO:
@ericauld
A similar question is why sexual reproduction has outperformed asexual reproduction. (This has connections to machine learning.) https://t.co/UOJpGsAXHs
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1129804974903291904