Theme: Science

  • SOME FEMALE PHYSICS MS SAYS NO SUCH THING EXISTS? I use ‘frothy’ universe, and K

    SOME FEMALE PHYSICS MS SAYS NO SUCH THING EXISTS?

    I use ‘frothy’ universe, and Kaku uses ‘bubbly’ universe but the principle same and it’s the only one that I can make sense of…. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496035764326652&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 16:13:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189575961936826369

  • THE CURRENT CONDITION OF PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE AND WESTERN CIVILIZATION (important

    THE CURRENT CONDITION OF PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE AND WESTERN CIVILIZATION
    (important)(profound)

    —“The best practical use of analytic philosophy was rooting out methodological problems in… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496031450993750&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 16:05:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189574031877509120

  • THERE IS NO FERMI PARADOX As in all things there is no paradox, just an open que

    THERE IS NO FERMI PARADOX

    As in all things there is no paradox, just an open question, no paradoxes exist.

    One can falsify the fermi question. It is falsifiable.We have failed to falsify… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496026190994276&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:57:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189571993164812290

  • RED QUEEN? —“I’m still not exactly sure what do you mean by defeating the red

    RED QUEEN?

    —“I’m still not exactly sure what do you mean by defeating the red queen because to me, red queen is part of the natural law (or rather one of its causes) and defeating nature is something leftists think they can do.”—Martin Štěpán

    Hmm. i mean staying ahead of the red queen?

    —“So, staying ahead of whoever happens to be in competition with you at the moment.”—Martin Štěpán

    Hmm broader. This planet is really dangerous and we are in a very ‘quiet’ period.

    This solar system is pretty dangerous and we are in a quiet period.

    This galaxy is in a pretty dangerous, and we are in a quiet period.

    I mean, until we are able to run around the universe we are kinda in competition with the red queen.

    After that WE ARE THE RED QUEEN.

    —“Okay, now I see. “You have to keep moving to stay in the same place.” I don’t think we can ever afford to stop moving so to me, ever defeating it remains out of the question. Staying ahead is right.”—Martin Štěpán


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:53:00 UTC

  • WE TRADED SUPERNATURALISM FOR NUMEROLOGY Good science is rarely publicized outsi

    WE TRADED SUPERNATURALISM FOR NUMEROLOGY

    Good science is rarely publicized outside of the field,because it requires specialized knowledge to comprehend. Conversely, much of what passes for… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=496015707661991&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:32:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189565840645152768

  • THERE IS NO FERMI PARADOX

    THERE IS NO FERMI PARADOX… https://t.co/hwHRu2Sc31


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 15:17:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189561887442247681

  • MONKEY SUPREMACIST? —“We can’t evolve away from an evolutionary branch. We did

    MONKEY SUPREMACIST?
    —“We can’t evolve away from an evolutionary branch. We didn’t just evolve from monkeys, we are monkeys. And I refused to be ashamed of that. In fact, I am a monkey supremacist.”—Martin Štěpán


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 14:14:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1189546118281154560

  • MORE FUN WITH CHRISTIANS —“Darwin doesn’t even agree with macro evolution. DNA

    MORE FUN WITH CHRISTIANS

    —“Darwin doesn’t even agree with macro evolution. DNA, the eye, Cambrian explosion all disprove any macro evolution not to mention that species actually show just as much entropy as positive gains over time just look at how many useless dogs exist today. To pretend things get better and more organized over time is simply false.”—Charles Schiavo

    Did you just try to make sense? Because you didn’t. I’m perfectly able to narrate, almost without checking first, the history of the development of the eye, in at least the two times it evolved. I don’t know how many times blood evolved but I know of two. Darwin didn’t know about DNA, but we do, that’s no argument. DNA merely explains why Darwin was right (massive parallelization, niche exploitation, favoring nothing but increased complexity. The Cambrian explosion is the result of bottlenecking, creating opportunity, increase in oxygen levels increasing available energy – particularly by increasing surface area, and the cliff effect of a new generation of genetic grammars making possible more rapid evolution. So, Energy Density > Entropy > fundamental structure(Tetrahedron?) > fundamental forces > quantum fields > particles > atoms > chemistry > biochemistry > biology > neurons > memory > sentience > consciousness > language > calculation. The same applies for the complexity of biochemical constructions, especially proteins, which function as mechanical devices at the molecular level whose changes in state are powered by changing of charges produced by attachment and detachment of molecules. So there was a Cambrian explosion just as there was a bronze age, steel age, science age, and technological age, and now computational age revolution. Just as the first generations of stars contained little, but made the higher elements, and distributed them through explosion, and laying the seeds for the development of future permutations upon those elements. In evolutionary biology this is called ‘punctuated equilibrium’ where there are periods of explosive growth due to some particular innovation. For example the Indo europeans conquered much of Eurasia in no small part because they developed the ability to drink milk, giving them 40% more calories for the same effort of production. The same for business, economic, state, and civilizational cycles. The entire universe follows the same simple rules from it’s most basic foundations through our most complex inventions.

    And what on earth would make you think you’re smart enough, knowledgeable enough, intellectually honest enough to make such an argument when the greatest minds of our age make the opposite.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:21:00 UTC

  • BELOW THE QUANTUM (worth repeating) … At present we deduce that a difference i

    BELOW THE QUANTUM

    (worth repeating)

    … At present we deduce that a difference in fundamental charges is producing a subsequent difference in fundamental charge distributions that we call quantum fields, and a distribution of temporary density of that quantum field we call a particle.

    And by repeating this process of a difference in the pattern of charges, particles form combinations we call atoms or elements, elements form chemicals ,chemicals form molecules, molecules that include carbon produce biochemical molecules, biochemical molecules form proteins, proteins produce molecules necessary for cells, cells produce other cells, cells produce organs, organs produce organisms, organisms produce nervous systems, nervous systems produce memories, memories produce predictions, predictions product choices, and there we go.

    The entirety of the ‘grammar’ of the universe is – similar to binary or ternary logic – a difference in charges, whose change we call entropy: the tendency of all charges to equilibrate from order caused by differences in charges, to the disorder – the minimum difference in charges possible. …


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:16:00 UTC

  • SOME FEMALE PHYSICS MS SAYS NO SUCH THING EXISTS? I use ‘frothy’ universe, and K

    SOME FEMALE PHYSICS MS SAYS NO SUCH THING EXISTS?

    I use ‘frothy’ universe, and Kaku uses ‘bubbly’ universe but the principle same and it’s the only one that I can make sense of.

    —“springy’ ‘stringy’ ‘wavey’ all similar descriptions that have been thrown around but none that don’t rely on appeals to analogy, yet.”—John Smith ‘

    i use: the underlying structure of the universe always and everywhere is geometric, and therefore all waves describe the reorganization of geometric first-structure of the universe, as altered as energy moves through it, changing charges, and releasing charges, with what we call atoms, steady states of those charges moving through the underlying geometry.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-30 12:12:00 UTC