1 – Sex differences in physicality are HUGE. 2 – Sex differences in Personality LARGE 3 – Sex differences in Cognition are SIGNIFICANT. 4 – Sex differences in workforce TASK intelligence are LIMITED. Our differences demonstrated in TASK intelligence are caused by the accumulated application of our brains by differences in physicality and in personality and cognition. 5 – Sex differences in intelligence in NON-TASK intelligence, are HUGE because of Differences in Physicality, Personality, Cognition, and Application.
Theme: Science
-
Sex Differences Have Been “settled Science” Since 2012
1 – Sex differences in physicality are HUGE. 2 – Sex differences in Personality LARGE 3 – Sex differences in Cognition are SIGNIFICANT. 4 – Sex differences in workforce TASK intelligence are LIMITED. Our differences demonstrated in TASK intelligence are caused by the accumulated application of our brains by differences in physicality and in personality and cognition. 5 – Sex differences in intelligence in NON-TASK intelligence, are HUGE because of Differences in Physicality, Personality, Cognition, and Application.
-
0ur European Natural Religion
0ur European Natural Religion We evolved technology (magic), and not astrology(occult) and found ourselves with dominion over man (others) and nature (gods) – so our natural religion is and always was philosophy(all choice is ours to make), with sacrifice and ritual (debt payment) to gods (archetypal forces) as our ‘literature’. The problem we faced is that the Church – like Judaism and Islam – closed down our stoic schools (academies) and epicurean communes (monasteries), and killed or outcast our philosophers (teachers), to DESTROY OUR NATURAL RELIGION of philosophy (real vs. theology – unreal), and archetypes (market vs. monopoly monotheism). There is no evil in this world remaining other than Abrahamism – I am not sure there ever has been.
-
They have no f-king idea really
They have no f-king idea really. https://t.co/545YdmIX9D
-
They have no f-king idea really
They have no f-king idea really. https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/30/they-have-no-f-king-idea-really/
Source date (UTC): 2020-05-30 22:43:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1266862837013643274
-
They have no f-king idea really.
Nov 26, 2019, 9:32 AM
- String Theory
- Loop Quantum Gravity
- Asymptotically Safe Gravity
- Causal Dynamical Triangulations and
- Emergent gravity
They have no fking idea really.
-
They have no f-king idea really.
Nov 26, 2019, 9:32 AM
- String Theory
- Loop Quantum Gravity
- Asymptotically Safe Gravity
- Causal Dynamical Triangulations and
- Emergent gravity
They have no fking idea really.
-
Western Action and Realism vs Eastern Verbalism and Mysticism.
Hayek didn’t correct Keynes, Hilbert didn’t correct Einstein. Poincare didn’t correct Cantor. Brouwer failed to correct mathematics Bridgman did try to correct the sciences. Doolittle does correct Mises. Same F—king Problem: Western Action and Realism vs Eastern Verbalism and Mysticism. Masculine vs Feminine cognition. Real is real vs Words are real.
-
Western Action and Realism vs Eastern Verbalism and Mysticism.
Hayek didn’t correct Keynes, Hilbert didn’t correct Einstein. Poincare didn’t correct Cantor. Brouwer failed to correct mathematics Bridgman did try to correct the sciences. Doolittle does correct Mises. Same F—king Problem: Western Action and Realism vs Eastern Verbalism and Mysticism. Masculine vs Feminine cognition. Real is real vs Words are real.
-
On Mises: Needs Repeating
Mises’ Praxeology As The Failure To Develop Economic Operationalism Mises was a raging clown claiming economics was constructivist ALONE. A fellow autist for certain, he didn’t grasp his discovery for reasons I’ve illustrated at length elsewhere. Mises is important for his membership in the great failure of the 20th century, which was a Jewish construction – reversing Descartes rescue of western mathematics from Semitic superstition. Short versions PRAXEOLOGY AS A FAILURE TO DEVELOP OPERATIONALISM https://propertarianinstitute.com/2014/06/21/mises-praxeology-as-the-failure-to-develop-economic-operationalism-yes/ MISES POSITION IN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY https://propertarianinstitute.com/2014/10/17/mises-position-in-intellectual-history/ ROTHBARDIAN FALLACIES https://propertarianinstitute.com/2014/06/20/rendering-rothbardian-fallacies-intellectually-embarrassing-and-argumentatively-impossible/ HOPPE’S ERRORS https://propertarianinstitute.com/2015/07/31/a-list-of-hans-hermann-hoppes-errors/ If you can find an error in there it’d be a miracle. If it weren’t for rothbardians we might have been able to reform mises by rewriting human action in scientific prose. At this point there is no point.