Theme: Science

  • We need to restore selection pressure (evolution) so that we can continue to dra

    We need to restore selection pressure (evolution) so that we can continue to drag you proto-humans into humanity, and out of your superstition, ignorance, and dysgenia, so that we prevent your construction of anther dark age of false promise, baiting into hazard and deceit.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-10 14:25:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270723668402860033

    Reply addressees: @niceprinter12 @Nationalist7346

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270723341926535168

  • PURGE NON-STEM FROM THE ACADEMY!! Purge Marxism, Neo-Marxism, Postmodernism, Fem

    PURGE NON-STEM FROM THE ACADEMY!!
    Purge Marxism, Neo-Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism, Human Denialism.

    Racism is a code word for Communism.
    Communism is a code word for dark ages.
    Ancient World or Modern World:
    Women, Immigrants, and Slaves.
    Use a new cult.

    #ShutDownSTEM

  • PURGE NON-STEM FROM THE ACADEMY!! Purge Marxism, Neo-Marxism, Postmodernism, Fem

    PURGE NON-STEM FROM THE ACADEMY!!
    Purge Marxism, Neo-Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism, Human Denialism.

    Racism is a code word for Communism.
    Communism is a code word for dark ages.
    Ancient World or Modern World:
    Women, Immigrants, and Slaves.
    Use a new cult.

    #ShutDownSTEM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 20:11:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270448550841929729

  • If you’re not in STEM you’re not in academia. You’re in superstition, sophistry,

    If you’re not in STEM you’re not in academia.

    You’re in superstition, sophistry, pseudoscience, and lies.

    What are we going to do?
    Purge non stem from the academy.

    Reply addressees: @ximenaccid1

  • If you’re not in STEM you’re not in academia. You’re in superstition, sophistry,

    If you’re not in STEM you’re not in academia.

    You’re in superstition, sophistry, pseudoscience, and lies.

    What are we going to do?
    Purge non stem from the academy.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 20:09:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270447900712189952

    Reply addressees: @ximenaccid1

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1269318634469376006

  • RT @callynt: To all the fake scientists and researchers who are participating in

    RT @callynt: To all the fake scientists and researchers who are participating in #ShutDownSTEM , please stop using black people as an excus…

  • RT @callynt: To all the fake scientists and researchers who are participating in

    RT @callynt: To all the fake scientists and researchers who are participating in #ShutDownSTEM , please stop using black people as an excus…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 20:08:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270447622050979847

  • RT @IronEconomist: The evidence base for this claim is very weak. The evidence i

    RT @IronEconomist: The evidence base for this claim is very weak. The evidence is that virtually all relative attainment effects fade out p…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-09 15:37:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1270379538791497732

  • A scientist testifies A philosopher opines A theologian recites Testimony: The s

    A scientist testifies

    A philosopher opines

    A theologian recites

    Testimony: The secret of western civilization.

    ===

    Andrew M Gilmour So what are the prerequisites for honest/truthful testimony?

    Ontic: Realism (Domain, Category, property/quality, Genea)

    Epistemic: Empirical (external verification)

    Logical: correspondent (comparison, relational)

    Grammatical: Etymologically consistent

    Rhetorical: Honesty (witnessing, due diligence)

    I think i’m getting closer.

    ===

    Andrew ; you’re getting stuck because you’re trying to map law (realism, action ) to philosophy (idealism, words) and philosophy is insufficient for the task.

    TRY THIS:

    Metaphysics: Premises (Action, Actionability)

    … Ontology: realism/naturalism, soft determinism, three faculties: physical, intuition, and reason, and mind as motion (no name for it in philosophical terms: experience consists of continuous recursive hierarchical temporal memory – memory of memory continuously constructed by continuous prediction from sequences of sense perception.) the problem is getting people from the observer to perception consisting of change (action) not state.

    Grammars: Communication, Speech: (Actions)

    … Meaning,

    … Stories, Explanation, Justification,

    … [List: Deflationary, Descriptive, Inflationary Grammars]

    Epistemology: Adversarialism (Actions)

    … Falsification, Due Dilligence

    … Three phases,

    … … 1 – discovery,

    … … 2 – due diligence,

    … … 3 – testimony:

    … 1. Epistemology – Discovery process):

    … Free association > Test ( Reason) > NextOrFail

    … … Hypothesis > Test (Calculation) > NextOrFail

    … … … Theory > Test (Action) > NextOrFail

    … … … … Theory > Test (Market) > NextOrFail

    … … … … … Law > Fail

    … 2. Epistemology – Due Diligence process)

    … Adversarial Survival by tests of

    … … Complete Sentences

    … … In promissory form

    … … In operational vocabulary (as actions)

    … … absent the verb to-be (is, are, was, were…)

    … … including all changes in state

    … … including all consequences of change in state

    … … from an observer’s point of view

    … … producing a series of testable transactions.

    … Where the Criteria for Truthful Speech Is:

    … Coherence Across the Dimensions Testifiable by Man,

    … in The Series:

    … … Categorically Consistent (Non-conflationary, Differences)

    … … Internally Consistent (Logical)

    … … Externally Correspondent (Empirical)

    … … Operationally Consistent (Consisting of Operational Terms that are Repeatable and Testable)

    … … Rational Choice (Consisting of Rational choice, in available time frame)

    … … Reciprocal (Consisting of Reciprocally Rational Choice)

    … With Stated Limits and Fully Accounted (Defense against cherry picking and inflation)

    … Warrantied

    … … (i)as having performed due diligence in the above dimensions;

    … … (ii)where due diligence is sufficient to satisfy the demand for infallibility;

    … … (iii)and where one entertains no risk that one cannot perform restitution for.

    As a Defense Against the Series:

    … Ignorance and Willful Ignorance;

    … Error and failure of Due Diligence;

    … Bias and Wishful Thinking;

    … And the many Deceits of:

    … … (a) Loading and Framing;

    … … (b) Suggestion, Obscurantism, and Overloading and Propaganda;

    … … (c) Fictionalisms of Sophisms, Pseudorationalisms, Pseudoscience, and Supernaturalism;

    … … (d) and outright Fabrications (fictions).

    … In Defense or Advocacy Of:

    … Any transfer that is not reciprocal, the tests of:

    … … (a) productive

    … … (b) fully informed, fully accounted

    … … (c) warrantied and within the limits of liability

    … … (d) voluntary

    … … (e) free of externality of the same criteria

    … Including but Not Limited To

    … The Series of:

    … … (a) murder,

    … … (b) harm, damage, theft,

    … … (c) fraud, fraud by omission, fraud by indirection,baiting into hazard

    … … (d) free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons,

    … … (e) rent seeking, monopoly seeking, conspiracy, statism/corporatism,

    … … (f) conversion(religion/pseudoscience),

    … … (g) displacement(immigration/overbreeding),

    … … (h) conquest (war).

    … 3. Epistemology – Testimony process.

    … … Adversarial competition between Search and Test.

    … … Search Criteria

    … … … Narrative

    … … Test Criteria

    … … … Operationalism: Actions

    … … … … Testimony in operational terms (one continuous consistent commensurable system of falsifiable measurement, consisting of a fully accounting, of a series of transactions (stories) of changes in state.)


    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-08 15:19:00 UTC

  • Why do you even have an opinion? If you knew the material you could easily off y

    Why do you even have an opinion? If you knew the material you could easily off your head, cite any of the major researchers (say, baron-cohen) or the populists (Haidt), brain differences, IQ, personality, moral bias, fear, disgust, cognitive bias. But you don’t. You “Outrage”.

    Reply addressees: @patacar