So I like your framing of the problem within the existing paradigm. But it is those mathematical methods that created the problem. Babbage was as important as einstein but failed to produce what the war generations did. We lost a century because econ lacked computation.
Reply addressees: @TaylorPearsonMe @ole_b_peters @nature
Theme: Science
-
So I like your framing of the problem within the existing paradigm. But it is th
-
Yes, I’ve worked on this problem for the past ten or more years, “Mathematics ca
Yes, I’ve worked on this problem for the past ten or more years, “Mathematics cannot achieve what computation can achieve, and the failure of economics is a failure of mathematics, which is ‘archaic’ compared to computer simulations. ie: the age of symbolic math in econ is over.”
Reply addressees: @TaylorPearsonMe -
Yes, I’ve worked on this problem for the past ten or more years, “Mathematics ca
Yes, I’ve worked on this problem for the past ten or more years, “Mathematics cannot achieve what computation can achieve, and the failure of economics is a failure of mathematics, which is ‘archaic’ compared to computer simulations. ie: the age of symbolic math in econ is over.”
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-14 14:23:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1283044523715821569
Reply addressees: @TaylorPearsonMe
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282815081009602561
-
(What’s good for us, because Ethnocentrism and self-determination, is good for e
(What’s good for us, because Ethnocentrism and self-determination, is good for everyone. I avoid moral mud wrestling. My work is just science. So I argue on the science and for everyone rather than the moralizing and preference just for us.)
Reply addressees: @artislife14 -
(What’s good for us, because Ethnocentrism and self-determination, is good for e
(What’s good for us, because Ethnocentrism and self-determination, is good for everyone. I avoid moral mud wrestling. My work is just science. So I argue on the science and for everyone rather than the moralizing and preference just for us.)
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-13 19:02:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282752157817679872
Reply addressees: @artislife14
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282734495226003457
-
Everyone on the Right wants to ride the coattails of my work as if it justifies
Everyone on the Right wants to ride the coattails of my work as if it justifies their priors, and everyone on the Left opposes it because it defeats theirs. But it’s just social science stated in the formal logic of law. TRUTH IS ENOUGH TO STOP THE HATE.
Reply addressees: @45April30 @artislife14 -
Everyone on the Right wants to ride the coattails of my work as if it justifies
Everyone on the Right wants to ride the coattails of my work as if it justifies their priors, and everyone on the Left opposes it because it defeats theirs. But it’s just social science stated in the formal logic of law. TRUTH IS ENOUGH TO STOP THE HATE.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-13 18:56:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282750695431700482
Reply addressees: @45April30 @artislife14
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282749519067832322
-
Let me help you. Your system of lies is dependent upon justification of priors a
Let me help you. Your system of lies is dependent upon justification of priors and conflation of truth with preference.
I use adversarialism (science, logic, and law).
Boom. 😉
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420 @RadSecretary -
Let me help you. Your system of lies is dependent upon justification of priors a
Let me help you. Your system of lies is dependent upon justification of priors and conflation of truth with preference.
I use adversarialism (science, logic, and law).
Boom. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-12 22:14:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282438260434894853
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420 @RadSecretary
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282437556928483333
-
I don’t do religion. I science, testimony, law. The reason you don’t answer is t
I don’t do religion. I science, testimony, law. The reason you don’t answer is that if you even try it will falsify your frame.
AFAIK I am the current specialist the Abrahamic (theology), Marxist (pseudoscience), postmodern (Sophistry), technique of lying by false promise.
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420