Um. I think you mean that pejoratively but it’s just a compliment: the discovery, adaptation to, and application of the laws of nature. Evolution isn’t an option. It’s a necessity. 😉
Red queens never stop.
Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @Ozpin_88 @Nationalist7346 @TruthQuest11
Theme: Science
-
Um. I think you mean that pejoratively but it’s just a compliment: the discovery
-
Um. I think you mean that pejoratively but it’s just a compliment: the discovery
Um. I think you mean that pejoratively but it’s just a compliment: the discovery, adaptation to, and application of the laws of nature. Evolution isn’t an option. It’s a necessity. 😉
Red queens never stop.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 20:07:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286754938861883396
Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @Ozpin_88 @Nationalist7346 @TruthQuest11
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286745986518224897
-
Europeans like P because it puts into words what no one previously has, but they
Europeans like P because it puts into words what no one previously has, but they intuit, the reasons for European success (supremacy): discovery, adaptation, and application of physical (realism, naturalism, operationalism), natural (cooperative), and evolutionary (eugenic) laws
Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88 -
Europeans like P because it puts into words what no one previously has, but they
Europeans like P because it puts into words what no one previously has, but they intuit, the reasons for European success (supremacy): discovery, adaptation, and application of physical (realism, naturalism, operationalism), natural (cooperative), and evolutionary (eugenic) laws
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 11:46:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286628889415098369
Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286573149455147008
-
I like P because it creates, as intended, a universally commensurable, value-neu
I like P because it creates, as intended, a universally commensurable, value-neutral vocabulary, grammar, and logic of language, psychology, and social science and provides complete falsification of all human speech. Jung and Hegel are literary(wisdom lit), not science(testable).
Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88 -
I like P because it creates, as intended, a universally commensurable, value-neu
I like P because it creates, as intended, a universally commensurable, value-neutral vocabulary, grammar, and logic of language, psychology, and social science and provides complete falsification of all human speech. Jung and Hegel are literary(wisdom lit), not science(testable).
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-24 11:43:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286628126332801025
Reply addressees: @victorkfranco @TruthQuest11 @Nationalist7346 @Ozpin_88
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286573149455147008
-
Grammars: Theology, Ideology, Philosophy, Science, Law
Grammars: Theology, Ideology, Philosophy, Science, Law https://t.co/6QFQX0uxBL
-
Grammars: Theology, Ideology, Philosophy, Science, Law
Grammars: Theology, Ideology, Philosophy, Science, Law https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/07/23/grammars-theology-ideology-philosophy-science-law/
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-23 20:33:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1286399083201155078
-
Auto-Association and The Bridge to Religion
—“Pythagoras, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle are a kind of break away Indo-European Gothar. In the same light of Zoroaster and Buddha. But I don’t believe you can have “science” as religion as pure logic.”—Bjorn Asbrandsson
You can, you just choose different heroes of history, and understand how the brain makes auto-associations. God: tiwaz/tyr, spiritual leaders: odin-mind/thor-body, lawgiver: aristotle, statesman: aurelius, general: caesar, hero: alexander, warrior: Achilles; and debts to ancestors (spirits), nature (spirits), the universe(spirits) itself. That’s my pantheon. And my religion is painfully scientific (realism, naturalism, operationalism, auto-association) Its the auto-association that bridges science with what we call religion or faith. Took me a lot of work to figure that out.
-
Auto-Association and The Bridge to Religion
—“Pythagoras, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle are a kind of break away Indo-European Gothar. In the same light of Zoroaster and Buddha. But I don’t believe you can have “science” as religion as pure logic.”—Bjorn Asbrandsson
You can, you just choose different heroes of history, and understand how the brain makes auto-associations. God: tiwaz/tyr, spiritual leaders: odin-mind/thor-body, lawgiver: aristotle, statesman: aurelius, general: caesar, hero: alexander, warrior: Achilles; and debts to ancestors (spirits), nature (spirits), the universe(spirits) itself. That’s my pantheon. And my religion is painfully scientific (realism, naturalism, operationalism, auto-association) Its the auto-association that bridges science with what we call religion or faith. Took me a lot of work to figure that out.