Theme: Science

  • Ending the Education Debate (Stem=Science vs Else Religion)

    ENDING THE EDUCATION DEBATE (STEM=SCIENCE vs ELSE RELIGION)

    Math -> Science -> Tech -> Engineering + Behavioral Econ + Econ > Law (Decidability) Science is just Law – Law Produces Decidability Across the Spectrum 1) Mathematics (measurements, facts) 2) Operationallanguage (causes, first causes) 3) RepeatableResults (evidence) 4) Due diligence (warranty) – against ignorance-error, bias-wishful thinking, loading-framing, suggestion-obscurantism, fictionalism-deceit. The Prediction Fallacy: theories must either predict deliberately constructed test data OR explain randomly (organically) discovered evidentiary data. Predictability decreases with causal dimensions.

    ie: (physical processes -> behavioral processes -> cognitive processes) However, explanatory power can be constructed from measurements regardless of the dimensions of causality. General rules of behavior manifest in general rules in economics, just as general rules of gas molecules manifest in general rules of gasses.

  • Ending the Education Debate (Stem=Science vs Else Religion)

    ENDING THE EDUCATION DEBATE (STEM=SCIENCE vs ELSE RELIGION)

    Math -> Science -> Tech -> Engineering + Behavioral Econ + Econ > Law (Decidability) Science is just Law – Law Produces Decidability Across the Spectrum 1) Mathematics (measurements, facts) 2) Operationallanguage (causes, first causes) 3) RepeatableResults (evidence) 4) Due diligence (warranty) – against ignorance-error, bias-wishful thinking, loading-framing, suggestion-obscurantism, fictionalism-deceit. The Prediction Fallacy: theories must either predict deliberately constructed test data OR explain randomly (organically) discovered evidentiary data. Predictability decreases with causal dimensions.

    ie: (physical processes -> behavioral processes -> cognitive processes) However, explanatory power can be constructed from measurements regardless of the dimensions of causality. General rules of behavior manifest in general rules in economics, just as general rules of gas molecules manifest in general rules of gasses.

  • The demarcation between logics, sciences, histories, myths, and deceits is one o

    The demarcation between logics, sciences, histories, myths, and deceits is one of my areas of specialization. I use religion to refer to “Social construction of a mythology by false promise of freedom from formal, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws using fictionalisms.”


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 16:21:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358088421500194818

    Reply addressees: @SarahGrynpas @AlanLevinovitz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358079019212750850

  • And if you were skilled in physics, economics, cognitive science, and not yourse

    And if you were skilled in physics, economics, cognitive science, and not yourself indoctrinated into the social construction of false promises of freedom from the laws of the unverse you would know this. But your keep perpetuating these lies like a priesthood justifying faith.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 16:09:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358085385491017730

    Reply addressees: @SarahGrynpas @ChrisJKennedy @AlanLevinovitz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358084998625189889


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @SarahGrynpas @ChrisJKennedy @AlanLevinovitz And that’s BEFORE we talk aobut he fact that colleges are teaching a secular religion of false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe: marxism-postmodernis-pc/woke – that is marching through the institutions of cultural production and maintenance.Why? to feed higher ed.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1358084998625189889

  • The measure of any discipline is (a) reproducibility of research (b) survivabili

    The measure of any discipline is (a) reproducibility of research (b) survivability of claims and skills in time (c) demonstrated evidence of resulting productivity (d) improvement or decline in competency per person (e) non- substitutability by apprenticeship.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 16:01:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358083402537324547

    Reply addressees: @SarahGrynpas @ChrisJKennedy @AlanLevinovitz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358080253558747136

  • Again you’re making a statement of relativism for that which is demonstrably not

    Again you’re making a statement of relativism for that which is demonstrably not relativisitic. The argument you CAN make is that science produces a market for rapid adaptation to and exploitation of the laws of the universe – but those laws are tragic for man.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 15:44:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358079170081865729

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @ThruTheHayes @Airmanareiks

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1357736909737451522

  • ENDING THE EDUCATION DEBATE (STEM=SCIENCE vs ELSE RELIGION) Math -> Science -> T

    ENDING THE EDUCATION DEBATE (STEM=SCIENCE vs ELSE RELIGION)

    Math -> Science -> Tech -> Engineering + Behavioral Econ + Econ > Law (Decidability)

    Science is just Law – Law Produces Decidability Across the Spectrum
    1) Mathematics (measurements, facts)
    2) Operational language (causes, first causes)
    3) Repeatable results (evidence)
    4) Due diligence (warranty) – against ignorance-error, bias-wishful thinking, loading-framing, suggestion-obscurantism, fictionalism-deceit.

    The Prediction Fallacy: theories must either predict deliberately constructed test data OR explain randomly (organically) discovered evidentiary data. Predictability decreases with causal dimensions.

    ie: (physical processes -> behavioral processes -> cognitive processes)

    However, explanatory power can be constructed from mesurements regardless of the dimensions of causality. General rules of behavior manifest in general rules in economics, just as general rules of gas molecules manifest in general rules of gasses.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 13:36:10 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105684570570401044

  • There is never, ever a comparison between a conversation with an physicist, engi

    There is never, ever a comparison between a conversation with an physicist, engineer, or economist that is vapid as someone in the humanities. It is however, more pleasant going through life in secular theology of the humanities, just as more blissful in supernatural theology.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 12:56:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358036878201651202

    Reply addressees: @AlanLevinovitz

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358036241489551362


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @AlanLevinovitz Because 1) humanities grads must learn on the job, the skills that are taught in STEM fields- and eventually do 2) must ‘unlearn’ what they were taught was false – and eventually do 3) and the net difference is that non-STEM education cost was a LOSS, and STEM students earned it.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1358036241489551362

  • @NLD888 @Fwango (a) we have no evidence of a creator. (b) we have evidence of th

    @NLD888@Fwango (a) we have no evidence of a creator. (b) we have evidence of the laws of the universe whether there is a creator or no. (c) we have evidence that every single claim attributed to a creator is false. (d) we have a deep understanding of the methods by which humans are succeptible to lies, defend lies, and become addicted to lies.

    The evidence is this: we have discovered the formal (logical), Testimonial, Physical(material), Natural(Behavioral), and Evolutionary(survival and adaptation) laws of the universe. These laws are evident in the structure of the universe.

    We have evidence that gods are an emergent phenomenon in this universe, just as man, animal, plant, rock, and elements are emergent phenomena.

    We have evidence that the untainted words of Jesus are the solution to the problem of behavioral laws.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-05 20:02:20 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105680426771537930

  • UPDATE: 0. Formal Sci.(Logic) _ Reasoning _ _ Thinking _ _ _ Sophistry->Idealism

    UPDATE:
    0. Formal Sci.(Logic)
    _ Reasoning
    _ _ Thinking
    _ _ _ Sophistry->Idealism(Philosophy)
    1. Testimonial Sci.
    _ History
    _ _ Mythology
    _ _ _ Occult->Theology(Religion)
    2. Physical Sci.
    _ Math
    _ _ Magic->Pseudoscience
    3. Behavioral Sci.
    _ Law
    _ _ Econ.
    4. Evolutionary Sci.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-05 18:50:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1357763660123426822