Theme: Science

  • So you mean you’re using Fear Uncertainty and Doubt despite you’re avoidance of

    So you mean you’re using Fear Uncertainty and Doubt despite you’re avoidance of testing the theory? Are you denying that we don’t do this already? ARe you denying the theory wont work in EVERY SINGLE real world scenario just as math does in physical science? It will.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-13 03:50:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360436104240001030

    Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @PROPERTARYAN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360435776060801024

  • Most of you have an amateurish understanding of the philosophical counter-revolu

    Most of you have an amateurish understanding of the philosophical counter-revolution against empiricism, not law or econ. You can’t handle the burden of math and the sciences so you retreat to sophistry or theology.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-13 03:40:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360433603587543040

    Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @PROPERTARYAN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360432188207095810

  • Now test your theory, rather than arguing from idealism (sophistry). Give me a s

    Now test your theory, rather than arguing from idealism (sophistry). Give me a single example that fails. (You can’t. I know. I’ve tried).

    Again, you’re arguing from certainty but it’s just typical ignorance and immaturity.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-13 03:31:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360431309542346755

    Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @PROPERTARYAN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360430947431284738

  • Another example of how you are punching above your weight. Nothing is proven. Th

    Another example of how you are punching above your weight. Nothing is proven. That’s justification. instead, arguments survive adversarial competition., That’s science and law.

    This conversation is above your pay grade.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-13 03:28:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360430723849719808

    Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @PROPERTARYAN

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360428371373621248

  • One would only read continental philosophy if one was not competent to read cont

    One would only read continental philosophy if one was not competent to read contemporary algorithmic logic, genetics, cognitive science, behavioral economics. Philosophy as a paradigm, as knowledge, and truth rather than just choice (preferencde) was exhausted before the 20th, and has gone the way of theology as a footnote in the history of thought. If you invest in the frame provided by the French(Rousseau, Voltaire et al), Germans (Kant et all), or the Ashkenazi (Freud, boas, Marx, et al) then you create an impediment to knowledge, not knowledge. Every single one of those thinkers was trying to deny anglo empiricism and legalism, and to create a secular theology to replace the church – because most if not all people who are indoctrinated into the Abrahamic faiths are left vulnerable to lack of sufficient confidence and resulting mindfulness to bear the continuous struggle of continuous learning, reorganization, and adaptation that adversarial empiricism demands. Or said differently, continental philosophy serves as a psudoscientific range from Russian, to German, to french, to Ashkenazi that seeks to avoid the responsibility of the restoration of Aristotelianism and classical thought. The weak west is addicted to the false promise of false explanations because we lack a narrative or mythos that provides mindfulness in the face of continuous adaptation to the discovery of, application of, and consequences of our increasing correspondence with the laws of the universe. This is why we require military training to compensate for Christian doctrine. And is why the Greeks invented tragedy so that we could tolerate it. And why Jesus of Nazareth discovered and taught the only means of getting over that tragedy for the bottom: the extension of kinship love to all in the polity. But the Paulians abused that message by wrapping it in false promise of freedom from those laws, rather than the use of love and compassion to tolerate them. In other words, this video is yet another exercise in justifying western man’s Christian addiction to submission and cowardice as a pretense of conviction rather than a convenience of not taking responsibility for dragging one’s self, and one’s people out of superstition, ignorance, dysgenia, and decline. So the people who are weak seek pseudoscience and sophistry as sedation against the stress of the recognition of their unfitness to survive because they cannot or will not evolve along with the state of human knowledge in our long journey from beast, to man, to godhood ourselves. The reason the white disenfranchised are alienated, conquered, and defeated is their Christian cowardice masquerading as false pride and conviction – but nothing more than addicts to a frame of lies, and spending down a civilization built by better men.

  • One would only read continental philosophy if one was not competent to read cont

    One would only read continental philosophy if one was not competent to read contemporary algorithmic logic, genetics, cognitive science, behavioral economics. Philosophy as a paradigm, as knowledge, and truth rather than just choice (preferencde) was exhausted before the 20th, and has gone the way of theology as a footnote in the history of thought. If you invest in the frame provided by the French(Rousseau, Voltaire et al), Germans (Kant et all), or the Ashkenazi (Freud, boas, Marx, et al) then you create an impediment to knowledge, not knowledge. Every single one of those thinkers was trying to deny anglo empiricism and legalism, and to create a secular theology to replace the church – because most if not all people who are indoctrinated into the Abrahamic faiths are left vulnerable to lack of sufficient confidence and resulting mindfulness to bear the continuous struggle of continuous learning, reorganization, and adaptation that adversarial empiricism demands. Or said differently, continental philosophy serves as a psudoscientific range from Russian, to German, to french, to Ashkenazi that seeks to avoid the responsibility of the restoration of Aristotelianism and classical thought. The weak west is addicted to the false promise of false explanations because we lack a narrative or mythos that provides mindfulness in the face of continuous adaptation to the discovery of, application of, and consequences of our increasing correspondence with the laws of the universe. This is why we require military training to compensate for Christian doctrine. And is why the Greeks invented tragedy so that we could tolerate it. And why Jesus of Nazareth discovered and taught the only means of getting over that tragedy for the bottom: the extension of kinship love to all in the polity. But the Paulians abused that message by wrapping it in false promise of freedom from those laws, rather than the use of love and compassion to tolerate them. In other words, this video is yet another exercise in justifying western man’s Christian addiction to submission and cowardice as a pretense of conviction rather than a convenience of not taking responsibility for dragging one’s self, and one’s people out of superstition, ignorance, dysgenia, and decline. So the people who are weak seek pseudoscience and sophistry as sedation against the stress of the recognition of their unfitness to survive because they cannot or will not evolve along with the state of human knowledge in our long journey from beast, to man, to godhood ourselves. The reason the white disenfranchised are alienated, conquered, and defeated is their Christian cowardice masquerading as false pride and conviction – but nothing more than addicts to a frame of lies, and spending down a civilization built by better men.

  • well done. (fitness over what time period?)

    well done.

    (fitness over what time period?)


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-12 05:52:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360104528297807876

    Reply addressees: @wakeupworld15 @PatrickGanel555 @WorMartiN @WesternRenaiss2 @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1360103937769103362

  • The left only Trusts the science that empowers them. Deny the science that disem

    The left only Trusts the science that empowers them. Deny the science that disempower them. Christians deny original cause cause in physical science but not existence or consequence. Wokes deny consequences: economics, behavioral science, biological differences.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-11 11:20:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1359824668690165761

    Reply addressees: @EPoe187

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1359645078684389376

  • You know, it’s much ‘easier’ to work on the logics than it is on their applicati

    You know, it’s much ‘easier’ to work on the logics than it is on their application in behavioral, cooperative, and adversarial sciences – especially the law – because everyone wnats to preserve their little petty privilege of yet unregulated crime. But it’s less valuable to man.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-10 04:10:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1359354031618031623

  • It took greeks for geometry, descartes to restore math to measure, and newton-le

    It took greeks for geometry, descartes to restore math to measure, and newton-leibnitz for the calculus of change. It took the economists to apply calculus to equilibrium. It took Darwin to apply it to adversarial evolution, and AI for adversarial networks – ending our journey.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-10 04:01:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1359351815712747521