The Scientific Method is definable. https://t.co/Wez5l7MWcS

Source date (UTC): 2022-02-20 09:07:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1495324168975491075
The Scientific Method is definable. https://t.co/Wez5l7MWcS

Source date (UTC): 2022-02-20 09:07:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1495324168975491075
So I’m thrilled if someone (you) produces an entry level book. Because the work that my organization and I produce turns out to be science, and it’s not entry level, some of it’s painful truth, and conservative masses tend to be anti intellectual. So we are limited in reach.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-19 20:19:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1495130843295199233
Reply addressees: @BrandonWarmke @Invisibleman817 @routledgebooks
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1495124560936681472
I wasn’t going to go here, but philosophy(reason) and science(decidability) are different things. Rule of law can consist of theology, philosophy, ideology, or science. Turns out that conservatism is closest to a science of human development of agency, responsibility, adaptation.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-19 20:16:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1495130259930460167
Reply addressees: @BrandonWarmke @Invisibleman817 @routledgebooks
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1495124560936681472
@fluke030 “The purpose of the scientific method, just as is the purpose of adversarial prosecution in court before the jury from which science evolved, is to continuously recursively eliminate ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fiction, the fictionalisms, deceit, fraud, free riding, rent-seeking, corruption, denial, undermining, reputation destruction, social construction from any and all claims, leaving only that which is consistent with: unambiguity (identity), realism and naturalism (causality), internal consistency (logic), operational possibility (operationalism), external correspondence (observability), rational choice (incentives, motives), reciprocal rational choice (morality, ethics), and within stated limits, of full accounting within those limits, having demonstrated due diligence in all of the above, and within the limits of restitutabiity and liability. By this method, we discover human responsibility and human incentives, and we discover the first principles of the four sets of laws of the universe: formal logical, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws; and from this set of first principles, we can construct a formal logic of falsification, that universally tests all truth claims regardless of person or context. The end result of scientific investigation is a formal logic of falsification (error and lie detection).”
This process of falsification, discovery of first principles (irreducible causality) constitutes the scientific method.
This process applied to Christianity results in exactly the first principles that I stated. And as usual, I am correct.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-19 14:38:51 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107825170451748995
@fluke030 Well, fortunately you don’t get to make that determination. Science is. I Scienced christianity. The rest is stories for children and simpletons.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-19 04:17:12 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107822726002952189
@Zaklog I would have to find one smart enough and intellectually honest enough to have the discussion. Eliminating all the fraud and deceit from christian teaching, I’ve ‘scienced’ christianity to it’s behavioral first principles. But that’s ok. You aren’t intellectually honest enough to understand. Because you’re an addict.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-19 04:15:28 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107822719209592772
RT @vdare: 200th Birthday Of Francis Galton – @Steve_Sailer celebrates a man modernity is trying to erase
https://vdare.com/posts/200th-birthday-of-francis-galton
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-18 01:34:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1494485524286951428
THE SCIENTIFIC COLLAPSE VIA MATHINESS
— “Their symbol-performances (writing symbols on paper) become psychologically addictive and I don’t believe they can remember what life was like before they “had their first drink”– Michael
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-18 01:23:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1494482562290528267
It’s exactly the reason. And now we know the entire biological reason why it’s true. And we know that these jobs are ‘inhuman’. Though, truth is, that we learned from the japanese that working in teams sharing jobs in an assembly line radically reduces the negatives.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-17 17:22:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1494361703575961600
Reply addressees: @_Akhaten
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1494359637830909953
Does time stop or does the rate of transformation of physical processes stop?
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-16 21:54:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1494067578825756674
Reply addressees: @onwardmyhawkmen
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1494057491696607247