I don’t get a lot of cites because I don’t publish papers. But they always amaze me when I do. Lol. Especially math.
Source date (UTC): 2022-06-17 16:50:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1537840052205932544
Theme: Science
-
Simple: Heatwave. No shade. No water. Dead cows. Always the same: some=lightning
Simple: Heatwave. No shade. No water. Dead cows.
Always the same: some=lightning. Lots=heat.
Source date (UTC): 2022-06-17 16:19:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1537832339241373701
Reply addressees: @bryanbrey
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1537500391797141506
-
Quite the opposite. The evolution of political ideas and arguments is as easily
Quite the opposite. The evolution of political ideas and arguments is as easily traced as the sciences, technologies, and even linguistics. To make the claims you have, use the arguments you have, you would have to hold true, those falsehoods, that such claims depend upon.
Source date (UTC): 2022-06-17 00:53:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1537599260631367686
Reply addressees: @kathleenwattle
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1537598356746227712
-
Thanks to RetractonWatch for your work. I don’t see retractions as failures, but
Thanks to RetractonWatch for your work.
I don’t see retractions as failures, but as success in defending against natural human tendencies to err, bias, and on occasion, decieve. We all gain more confidence every time we see professionalism when errors are found.
Source date (UTC): 2022-06-14 16:21:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1536745551961763840
Reply addressees: @RetractionWatch
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1536739210799067136
-
I’m not sufficiently knowlegeable to comment. All I can say is that aside from o
I’m not sufficiently knowlegeable to comment. All I can say is that aside from overreach and bias to ideology over evidence, what might have worked, maybe, might have.
Source date (UTC): 2022-06-14 03:07:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1536545891385065474
Reply addressees: @hivetyrant36
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1536544324548165633
-
Interesting if you compare Deutsch to Tim Maudlin to Gerard T’ Hooft, to Joscha
Interesting if you compare Deutsch to Tim Maudlin to Gerard T’ Hooft, to Joscha Bach to Wolfram and to me. I refer to Deutsch often, but that’s just because his emphasis on falsification is better than most. But if you understand Maudlin, wolfram, bach and i, that’s current.
Source date (UTC): 2022-06-14 02:40:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1536539027670720512
Reply addressees: @kdotldn @DavidDeutschOxf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1536482833165852677
-
2022 06 11 Ep 2025 Chat – Falsifiable and yet Not Falsified
2022 06 11 Ep 2025 Chat – Falsifiable and yet Not Falsified
https://youtu.be/sNUXgg1U5Mo
Source date (UTC): 2022-06-11 17:58:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1535683001492942848
-
This merger of feminine evasion of responsibility for adaptation and masculine (
This merger of feminine evasion of responsibility for adaptation and masculine (social) systematizing in Marxist pseudoscience, is even more interesting than the german phenominalist attempt thru Heidegger of inverting existence (reality) with individual perception(experience). https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1535324828554649602
Source date (UTC): 2022-06-10 18:18:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1535325446937665536
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1535324828554649602
-
“Feynman is reported as saying “Philosophy of science is about as useful to scie
“Feynman is reported as saying “Philosophy of science is about as useful to scientists as ornithology is to birds.” [But] no one points out that ornithology would indeed be a great use to birds—if they could ask the ornithologists for advice, and understand it”. – Tim Maudlin
Source date (UTC): 2022-06-10 15:18:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1535280244717932547
-
“The physicist Richard Feynman is widely reported as saying “Philosophy of scien
“The physicist Richard Feynman is widely reported as saying “Philosophy of science is about as useful to scientists as ornithology is to birds.” No one points out that ornithology would indeed be a great use to birds.” – Tim Maudlin
Source date (UTC): 2022-06-10 15:16:48 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1535279820627660800