Theme: Science

  • “In the case of Lindsay, I’ve described elsewhere, that New Discourses is an enc

    –“In the case of Lindsay, I’ve described elsewhere, that New Discourses is an encyclopedic demonstration that Critical Theory is pseudoscience.”– Alan Post

    The entire marxist sequence is pseudoscience.
    The jewish-abrahamic synthesis of european systematizing with semitic magical thinking was a novelty and the world was victimized by it. The marxist sequence just repeats the abrahamic sequence and is doing the same: detroying the world.

    Masculine systematizing is persuasive but falsifiable. Feminine empathizing, magical thinking, and mythologizing, and social construction is too. But combine the two techniques in either Abrahamic theology or Marxist pseudoscience, and in both cases you end up with a religion of death.

    Like I said.
    I don’t know if a god exists.
    I know that if a devil exists,
    We know his name.
    It’s Abraham.
    And he was from Ur.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 20:18:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640085894035128320

  • “In the case of Lindsay, I’ve described elsewhere, that New Discourses is an enc

    –“In the case of Lindsay, I’ve described elsewhere, that New Discourses is an encyclopedic demonstration that Critical Theory is pseudoscience.”– Alan Post

    The entire marxist sequence is pseudoscience.
    The jewish-abrahamic synthesis of european systematizing with semitic magical thinking was a novelty and the world was victimized by it. The marxist sequence just repeats the abrahamic sequence and is doing the same: detroying the world.

    Masculine systematizing is persuasive but falsifiable. Feminine empathizing, magical thinking, and mythologizing, and social construction is too. But combine the two techniques in either Abrahamic theology or Marxist pseudoscience, and in both cases you end up with a religion of death.

    Like I said.
    I don’t know if a god exists.
    I know that if a devil exists,
    We know his name.
    It’s Abraham.
    And he was from Ur.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 20:18:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640085894169329664

  • LET’S SCIENCE JAMES LINDSAY’S “CRITICAL CONSCIOUSNESS”. (@ConceptualJames) So, h

    LET’S SCIENCE JAMES LINDSAY’S “CRITICAL CONSCIOUSNESS”. (@ConceptualJames)
    So, how do we convert nonsense leftism to sensible religio-philosophical prose. Well, James has done a good job. How do we convert James’ religio-philosophical prose to scientific language?
    Why do that?… https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1640078455701135363


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 19:53:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640079604852445185

  • “James: Woke is critical consciousness. Audience: That’s too hard. Dumb it down.

    –“James: Woke is critical consciousness. Audience: That’s too hard. Dumb it down.”–

    I’ll dumb it down further for James’ audience:

    Q: DEFINE SCIENTIFICALLY “critical constructivist epistemology, ethics, and activism.”

    SUMMARY: “Feminine Undermining that you see every single… https://t.co/zDIM1RCQ2d


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 19:49:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640078455701135363

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637487849472761856

  • I don’t know why you would imagine I don’t work from primary research. Or why yo

    I don’t know why you would imagine I don’t work from primary research. Or why you’d think I don’t know Lynn, Flynn, and Norberg’s work and in Lynn’s case, the man personally. And why do you think military bases show that data, and how do military bases measure vs how IQ tests and SAT scores measure? I mean, the fact that you’d even say such a thing is pretty … hard to imagine, and immediately illustrates that you’re not really capable of this conversation.

    Race and IQ are connected in part because of neotenic evolution (domestication syndrome), and part because of class sizes given the distribution of selection effects by the climate and food stuffs of the different geographies.

    In fact Race, Ethnicity, Class, Sex are superdeterminants of intelligence. That said as I’ve written extensively, DEMONSTRATED intelligence also includes personality, family, peer group, culture, civilization etc, because each can IMPEDE expression. of intelligence. That’s important. You are more dependent upon the IQ of your people than you are on your own.

    Reply addressees: @enigma3078 @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 17:28:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639318399451906050

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639301311169454080

  • I don’t know why you would imagine I don’t work from primary research. Or why yo

    I don’t know why you would imagine I don’t work from primary research. Or why you’d think I don’t know Lynn, Flynn, and Norberg’s work and in Lynn’s case, the man personally. And why do you think military bases show that data, and how do military bases measure vs how IQ tests and SAT scores measure? I mean, the fact that you’d even say such a thing is pretty … hard to imagine, and immediately illustrates that you’re not really capable of this conversation.

    Race and IQ are connected in part because of neotenic evolution (domestication syndrome), and part because of class sizes given the distribution of selection effects by the climate and food stuffs of the different geographies.

    In fact Race, Ethnicity, Class, Sex are superdeterminants of intelligence. That said as I’ve written extensively, DEMONSTRATED intelligence also includes personality, family, peer group, culture, civilization etc, because each can IMPEDE expression. of intelligence. That’s important. You are more dependent upon the IQ of your people than you are on your own.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 17:28:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639318399569346585

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639301311169454080

  • Positional Names (counting) vs Arithmetic vs Mathematics. Yes. 😉

    Positional Names (counting) vs Arithmetic vs Mathematics. Yes. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 22:04:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639025398309593088

    Reply addressees: @Chuck__Sargent

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639023917531803650

  • RE: –“not understanding 1, 2, 3.”– RE: SIX/TEN REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN

    RE: –“not understanding 1, 2, 3.”–
    RE: SIX/TEN REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
    https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1638602036370456576

    1) a) all logic is falsificationary: proofs test survival. b) we learn about the universe through incremental removal of human error. c) All human error originates…


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    SIX REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
    1. The search for justification(proof) rather than falsification(survival).
    2. The search for inconsistent utilities (paradigms) rather than a hierarchy of consistent first principles (universal paradigm).
    3. The search for the ideal person, behavior, wants, means, and ends, rather than means of cooperation between male and female opposites.
    4. The search for positive law of thou shall, limiting possibilities, vs negative laws of though shall-not, leaving open infinite possibilities.
    5. The search for the good instead of the true, from which we choose possible goods.
    6. The search for political uniformity as a static optimum rather than competing diversities as an evolutionary optimum – the search for predictable certainty rather than evolutionary and adaptive uncertainty.

    Every one of these falsehoods is hostile to the first principle of the universe: evolutionary computation, and our condition in the capture and transformation of energy per person, yielding us the greatest prosperity with which to make the greatest range of choices that will as a consequence, repeat the cycle, of evolutionary computation, and the improvement of our condition by increasing the capture and transformation of energy.

    “NO MORE ERRORS, FALSEHOODS, AND LIES”

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1638602036370456576

  • RE: –“not understanding 1, 2, 3.”– RE: SIX/TEN REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN

    RE: –“not understanding 1, 2, 3.”–
    RE: SIX/TEN REMAINING GREAT FLAWS IN HUMAN THOUGHT
    https://t.co/abAcaXY3jF

    1) a) all logic is falsificationary: proofs test survival. b) we learn about the universe through incremental removal of human error. c) All human error originates with the the consequences of embodiment, anthropomorphism, and the problem of mathiness (ideal) vs computation (real).

    2) There is one law to the universe and using constructive proofs (falsification of all alternatives), by this one law (evolutionary computation), we can test for deviations from this rule, that allows us to create universally commensurability as a single science (unification of the sciences) rather than the crisis of today, which is specialization in those deviations from universal commensurability – ie: why physics, cog sci, psychy, soc, econ, fail. (Note that as an example, we don’t think of geometry, which is reducible to the laws of the triangle, as a constructive logic of falsification, but it is and it is consistent with the ternary logicl of evolutionary computation.)

    3) All human behavior originates in sex differences. Most of human history consists of solving political (male) questions in the public sphere while reserving familial and interpersonal (female) questions to the private sphere. As such cog sci, psych, soc, econ, pol are based on the false premise of variation from the male mean. However, with the introgression of women, we have admized female cognitive and male biases without a means of creating a market for the resolutoin of conflicts between the opposites of female in time empathizing, vs male over time systematizing. As such the purpose of all behavioral sciences is not gender neutrality, or gender priority, but gender EXCHANGE. This is a huge leap in moral thought from golden mean to behavioral supply and demand between polar opposites. And where the opposites and the spectrum between them create a field of evolutionary computation across time and space that maxmizes human innovation cooperation and trade, maximizing human evolution. Where seeking the ideal person like any other ‘false aggregate’ will result in stagnation and decline – which is the lesson of both abrahamic-series religions and marxist-series ideologies.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 13:55:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638902272963870722

  • NO MATH ISN’T UNREASONABLY EFFECTIVE Math = Logic of Ratios. Universal Laws = Ra

    NO MATH ISN’T UNREASONABLY EFFECTIVE
    Math = Logic of Ratios. Universal Laws = Ratios.
    Ergo the logic of ratios can describe the existential ratios. ie: math isn’t unreasonably effectve, it’s obviously effective, because it’s deterministic that it would be effective, because…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 23:16:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638681110057041922