Theme: Science

  • Note that it’s a feminist opinion piece (essay not paper) free of any science. A

    Note that it’s a feminist opinion piece (essay not paper) free of any science. And continues the feminist pseudoscientific claim that observable measurable physical structures (other than amygdala and corpus callosum) do not show brain differences like genitals show differences. However, this is childlike pseudoscience because it is connectivity and weights that determine sex differences in brain organization, and we can easily tell the sex of the individual in increasingly sophisticated variations on fMRI imaging.
    You would know that if you were even vaguely familiar with the literature (which you aren’t).
    BUt like all women you double down and never admit y you’re wrong, you just pretend otherwise, continue your magical thinking, and demonstrate how right I am with every word you think, speak or write.

    Reply addressees: @helenfromhel @Barbarian_Brain @dosontheshinshi @MudKevin


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 22:00:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670189796637958145

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670177934093561858

  • It’s not a dodgy subject at all. As the audience here can easily observe, you’ve

    It’s not a dodgy subject at all. As the audience here can easily observe, you’ve done nothing but read pop sci articles and propaganda.
    We solved the question of IQ in the 80s, the nature over nuture debate by 2000, sex differences in intelligence and personality by 2012, and race differences by 2018.

    We now the direction of human evolution from chimps and it’s relatively simple (noteny) and that evolution has been accelerating – at least until the industrial revolution’s reversal of natural selection.

    All we are doing is slowly accumulating the polygenic scores to try to determine if we can identify enough of the causally dense contributions to intelligence, personality and cognitive development.

    Now, if you know anything at all you would state it.

    I’m pretty rock solid on brain development beginning with neural tube formation, and migration of stem cells to different parts of the body, and from there the incremental evolutionary development of our brains.

    I can discuss every single function in the process of the organization of the brain and resulting cognition and I’ve made educational videos on the subject, and have a handful left to produce.

    So I know you’re a nitwit and I know you have psychological problems, because a full third of women have psychological problems (which we were warned about prior to women’s entry into the franchise). Of the remaining two thirds of women who lack mental problems, more than half demonstrate feminine proglems with cognition and I’ve documented the I’m painful detail, by explaining how the science of female antisocial behavior originates in neurological structure. In fact as far as I know I’m one of the top single digits of experts in the subject despite not wanting to be.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @helenfromhel @Barbarian_Brain @dosontheshinshi @MudKevin


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 20:57:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670173763990614016

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670171159239745538

  • So you don’t know the neuroscience, you don’t know the psychometrics, and you’ve

    So you don’t know the neuroscience, you don’t know the psychometrics, and you’ve never hired or worked on a team that works on the various test contents, and you’re claiming you’re knowledgeable because you read a manual instead of decades of literature on the subject? I mean… https://t.co/Kmjo0glmX9


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 20:33:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670167723744043013

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670158275592028160

  • Q: “DO YOU EVER FIND IT WEIRD BEING A YANK AND A MONARCHIST?” I was surprised, y

    Q: “DO YOU EVER FIND IT WEIRD BEING A YANK AND A MONARCHIST?”

    I was surprised, yes. But I’ve come to undrestand it’s just the result of doing the science.

    I just follow the evidence. It was rather late in life that I understood that the english completed the restoration of greek reason and politics and roman legislation and administration in the british invention of the modern empirical (scientific) dutiful rule of law state.

    And that the USA as a british colony, had created a constitution that codified that invention, completing Aristotle’s project of a scientific (natural) government, but failed to include the presumptions inherent in that innovation: the rule of law by the natural law by commonality and concurrency as the science of cooperation, and the government as a hierarchy of courts to limit us to the science of cooperation by that law, commonality, and concurrency, and the reason being to prohibit authority by the maximization of individual responsibility, with participation in self determination by evidence of taking and demonstrating that responsibility.

    They had only an intuition of the existence of evolution but for all intents and purposes our ancient ancestors created the most evolutionary society and government with the least resistance to discoverty, innovation, application, adaptation, and evolution in human history, or that is humanly possible.

    As such the west evolved faster than the rest combined in the bronze, iron, and steel ages.

    However, we failed to learn that we cannot domesticate rule, or cooperate with peoples who are inferior in institutions and development becuse of their demographics and tradition.

    So there is a conflict between the ancestral desire to create empires to profit from trade, and the natural tendency of man to desire federations of states that all profit from trade but distribute the cost of government and war and in doing so resists empires -as we are having to resist three imperial civilizations today.

    They can only do so if they all adhere to natural law.

    The Natural Government consists of a hierarchy of Juries (courts):
    The Four Sets of the Laws of Nature (Logical, Physical, Behavioral, Evolutionary)
    … < The Natural Law of Cooperation
    … … < A Constitution Producing that Hierarchy of Courts under that natural law
    … … … < A Monarchy as judge of Last Resort , above the law in the restoration of the law.
    … … … … < A Cabinet for the Administation of the Commons
    … … … … … < A Parliament of houses or Regions and Class as a Political Court (Negativa) and Market between the Regions and Classes (Positiva)
    … … … … … … < The Courts for the Resolution of Substantive Harms
    … … … … … … … < A Nobility for the resolution of common conflicts
    … … … … … … … … < A Church for the restolution of moral disputes
    … … … … … … … … … < Every man as his own legislature for himself and his family in federation with all other men in the polity.
    … … … … … … … … … … < Every woman as the legislature for herself and her childen.

    This is a hierarchy of responsibility given domains of DEMONSTRATED (empirical) interest and comptency

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 17:47:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670126036057571329

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @digitildream @realdanstilwell Nature, of which man is a memb

    RT @curtdoolittle: @digitildream @realdanstilwell Nature, of which man is a member, judges everything – over some period of time. And it i…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 13:27:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670060649005608965

  • Bad science produces more citations than good science. 🙁

    Bad science produces more citations than good science. 🙁 https://twitter.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1669508373212016641

  • I’m tediously empirical, and not ideological about it, and I’m deservedly skepti

    I’m tediously empirical, and not ideological about it, and I’m deservedly skeptical about most health claims. I eliminate something, eat clean, try it again, then observe the results and eliminate it. Nearly everything I’ve eliminated is due to it containing any form of chemistry whatsoever, including that chemistry we call fermentation which, unfortunately, is in nearly everything: cheese, sauces, etc. All preservatives are horrific. Anything with sulfites (everything) is horrible. MSG might as well be anesthesia, it’s such a strong sedative with such harsh allergic reactions. The only other thing that’s obvious is red meat is irreplaceable with anything, and that milk, butter, eggs, red meat and green vegetables, water and coffee are pretty much the limit. If I eat clean, inflammation goes down, so does my asthma, I sleep better, and my energy is better. And sunlight is perhaps the best curative. I’ve tried all sorts of vitamins and supplements, and nothing has any effect at all that’s positive.

    Reply addressees: @StevePender


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-14 18:56:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669056280986542082

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669047581983268895

  • RT @curtdoolittle: @AlvaroMorono @whatifalthist THE SIMPLE LOGIC OF THE SCIENCE

    RT @curtdoolittle: @AlvaroMorono @whatifalthist THE SIMPLE LOGIC OF THE SCIENCE OF ALL HUMAN BEHAVIOR
    1. All behavior is reducible to the…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-14 16:07:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669013652333109248

  • THE SIMPLE LOGIC OF THE SCIENCE OF ALL HUMAN BEHAVIOR 1. All behavior is reducib

    THE SIMPLE LOGIC OF THE SCIENCE OF ALL HUMAN BEHAVIOR
    1. All behavior is reducible to the spectrum of acquisition: acquisition, retention, conversion, exchange, consumption, and loss aversion.
    2. All sex differences are reducible to differences in responsibility (prey, empathizing, in time) vs (predatory, systematizing, over time)
    3. All individual differences are reducible to the admixture of sex differences and quality of biological(physical) and neurological development (personality and iq).
    4. All individual differences in performance are due to age, environment, and idiosyncratic experience.
    5. All human sexual, social, economic, and political market value (class) is determined by the above.
    6. All human status seeking is simply the search for opportunity discounts on cooperation in various market values.
    7. Because cooperation is so disproportionately productive compared to individual action that survival is all but impossible without it.
    8. Most thought and speech is ‘wayfinding’ negotiation on cooperation on the individual’s terms.
    9. Ergo man evolved to negotiate with humans, not testify about existence.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @AlvaroMorono @whatifalthist


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-14 16:06:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669013549190922245

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669010065116782593

  • Falsehoods Underlying Communism @whatifalthist on message: the anti science of c

    Falsehoods Underlying Communism https://youtube.com/shorts/REr_mzbc0Ik
    @whatifalthist on message: the anti science of communism.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-14 15:56:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669010892615303169