RT @WiringTheBrain: So much hype. So little evidence.
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-17 12:45:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680921553733668870
RT @WiringTheBrain: So much hype. So little evidence.
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-17 12:45:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680921553733668870
RT @DeblockBlock: “Two different people independently faked data for two different studies in a paper about dishonesty.”
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-17 12:30:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680917893985320960
RT @ChrisStringer65: Human subsistence and signatures of selection on chemosensory genes https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-023-05047-y
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-17 12:11:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680913037132283904
I have been working this problem for four decades and all we have found over time is that unless otherwise something goes wrong developmentally, IQ is 80% genetic and we don’t know where the rest of the 20% variation comes from – but it’s not nurture. Probably genetic…
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-16 19:31:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680661475902324737
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680659785945960450
Correct. It is applied science.
Basic Science vs Applied Science
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-16 16:21:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680613705258508288
Reply addressees: @WalterIII
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680600273956515847
I just report on data. The source is escaping me at the moment, but it’s an official report … once the coffee hits I might remember. It was only yesterday I think that I came across it and read it.
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-16 10:44:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680528811543199745
Reply addressees: @FarajRashi93307
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680443071278772227
You are mistaken. Though it is not uncommon that those unfamiliar with the scientific method haven’t learned yet.
Given the hierarchy of certainty:
unknown > incomprehensible > undecidable > possibly true > false.
(a) all premises are contingent
(b) so justificationism is false
(c) so all logic is falsificationary
(d) so all truth claims must satisfy survival from adversarial competition, consisting of tests of: realism, categorical identity, internal consistency, operational possibility, external correspondence, rational choice, reciprocal rational choice (ethical), and fully accounted, within stated limits, and within the limits of restitutabilty. Because one cannot make a truth claim without satisfying those criteria.
In other words:
A mathematical proof tells us that something is possible.
An argumentative proof tells us only that all alternatives are eliminated.
A testimonial truth tells us only that something is testifiable given the knowledge available.
All other truth claims ARE LIES.
And yes, as far as I know, I understand this as well or better than anyone living or dead. And almost certainly anyone at all. 😉
Reply addressees: @RocMurdoch @AdvInteritus @KUHoopes @W9746024628651 @Logos_Elect @Lord__Sousa
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-16 03:33:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680420238968463360
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680411656730427392
Languages are biased to different emphases:
– English for science and law
– German for engineering and psychology
– Italian for emotion and art.
That’s about all you need to know.
Oh, and you don’t need to read trash philosophy so french is unnecessary. 😉
(See what I did…
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 21:16:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680325451561029632
There is only one law in the unverse:
1. the universe is under pressure
2. it can relieve pressure by dissipation or concentration
3. It can dissipate into expansion. It can concentrate in ‘whirlpools’, dipoles, waves, protoparticles, particles, elements, molecules etc: by recombination.
4. This process is random (physics) until it isn’t (biology), and unconscious until it isn’t (sentience).
5. Because this is a simple process of of charge(spin) (-) and (+) and because any interaction can produce a stable relations (=) or collapse (!=), we call this process ‘Evolutionary computation of stable relations by continuous recursive disambiguation of disorder(Entropy) into order (negative entropy).”
Evolutionary Computation: The universe is that simple. Just one simple rule.
Reply addressees: @FarajRashi93307 @TechRobot4K
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 20:19:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680311251589648384
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680308815957196801
The Science:
1) The universe is absurdly simple once we understand it.
2) Sex differences are the origin of all human differences.
3) Human differences are very simple in origin.
(a) female strategy is in-time, vs male is over time.
(b) female empathizing in-time, vs male systematizing over time
(c) female devotion in time , vs male loyalty over time
(d) female hyperconsumption in time, vs male hypercapitalization over time.
(e) female evasion of cellular damage (risk), vs male tolerance for cellular damage (risk)
(f) female evasion of responsibility for commons in time and male seeking responsibility for commons over time.
(g) female consumption via male responsibility for commons, male reproduction by female responsibility for offspring.
AND
(h) Europeans are the least racist race, but the highest status race. (Even though Race Status ~= Neotenic Evolution and East Asians are more neotenous than europeans (though we should be equal – because we were – if not for farmer and steppe introgression)
In other words all female vs male behavior is reducible to responsibility for self vs commons, and status by consumption vs capitalization. As such all female behavior ex explicable by evasion of responsibility rather than caretaking. Caretaking is the means by which they defend against their irresponsibility. In other words, it’s peacock feathers: signaling.
Happy to answer all reasonably intelligent, intellectually honest questions.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @TechRobot4K
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 19:38:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680300771487670272
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680297465818279936