Theme: Science

  • It’s true. It’s documented. I list the major pseudoscientists and frauds. But de

    It’s true. It’s documented. I list the major pseudoscientists and frauds. But devoting public effort to that single purpose would be a bad idea. Making that a ‘single issue’ would harm the broader aspects of my work that do not seek to single out any group of people for the ‘criminality’ of their group strategy, given that many groups often intuit something criminal and immoral is moral and virtuous. My purpose is not to punish a people for their group strategy (beliefs, traditions, norms, institutions) but to produce laws that prevent those crimes that they facilitate no matter how virtuous people believe them to be. The same is true of women. The fact that we are experiencing the high cost of introducing women into the economy and politics without laws that limit female intuition does not necessitate the punishment of women, only that we produce laws that prevent their natural criminality which it turns out is pervasive. Men’s criminality is simply more visible and urgent so we have, like any technology, suppressed it incrementally first and less urgent and less perceptible crimes more slowly. My work creates a science of decidability to solve this problem, so that we may forever outlaw not individual crimes, but all crimes, present and future.

    Reply addressees: @FarajRashi93307 @mysteriouskat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-29 13:45:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1685285371926462464

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1685211044405198848

  • List the masters of fraud. List the abusers of lawfare. List the pseudoscientist

    List the masters of fraud.
    List the abusers of lawfare.
    List the pseudoscientists. (nearly exclusively jewish)
    List the marxist, neoMarxist, postmodern, anti-family feminist, anti-rule of law libertarians, neocons, pc and woke.
    The problem is jewish creation of, participation in, and contribution to funding of, ‘the march thru the institutions of western cultural production’ of individual responsibility.
    The awareness of this is increasing rapidly.
    I gave a speech, I think it was in the early 2000s in NY stating that if the community didn’t police it’s own, “it would happen again”, and I explained why jewish culture isn’t revolutionary but seditious because of the conflict between jewish separatist ethics evading responsibility ofr the commons, and western ethics of responsibility for the commons, by demand for maximum individual responsibility.

    Reply addressees: @mysteriouskat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-29 06:05:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1685169625200197632

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1684733239737643008

  • RT @SovereigntyKing: @LukeWeinhagen @curtdoolittle Nature/Universe produces limi

    RT @SovereigntyKing: @LukeWeinhagen @curtdoolittle Nature/Universe produces limits (distributions).

    Loop(
    Understanding those limits = Ex…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-28 19:55:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1685016170607284225

  • (responding by request) Matthew is asserting that a common question in evolution

    (responding by request)
    Matthew is asserting that a common question in evolutionary theory (evolutionary computation) exposes a flaw rather than an unsettled uncertainty.

    This uncertainty is usually stated as “a genome contains a history of sucesses in a vast sequence of the results of massively parallel computations, that for some reason narrows the possibility of meaningful error in development, survival and reproduction, while permissively allowing errors in copying sufficient for identification of innovations in adaptation.”

    This argument is rather logical given that the increase in complexity is an increase in tolerance, and complexity is the only substative direction of evolution.

    It’s more logical given the intra-cellular computation by supply and demand, intercellular supply and demand, inter organ supply and demand, orgaism’s supply and demand with the evironment, mates, and social cooperators.

    So the tendency to think of genetics like deterministic mechanical manufacturing instead of a highly fault tolerant system of cooperation at all scales, persisting a record of successes that can be expressed upon need (think “backward copatibility”) is a common mistake.

    As for matematics, this process lke all economic (cooperative) processes, is computationally reducible whith sifficient information th do so, but is very unlikely to be mathematically reducible.

    This is why we can measure aggregate change in evolutionary velocity, but little else, just as we are limited to general measures in an economy, and even then only loosely explicable not statistically predictable.

    The oversimplification is: “Molecules interact, but life cooperates”. This means physics is mathematical and life is computational. This is why life can do so much more complexity.

    Just like us.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @MattPirkowski


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-28 19:54:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1685015869204701184

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1684974328751034369

  • Possibly. I think it is more likely that luke is approaching the problem as a pa

    Possibly. I think it is more likely that luke is approaching the problem as a participant, and I’m doing so as an observer, just stating the ‘physics’. This is a common difference in our applications of the method to the categories of problems we each try to solve.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-28 15:15:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1684945770015866880

    Reply addressees: @SovereigntyKing @LukeWeinhagen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1684942792559415296

  • RT @EricsElectrons: Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) on the recent political tr

    RT @EricsElectrons: Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) on the recent political trend of scientific journals: “Editorial policy has swung to…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-28 02:47:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1684757472521699328

  • RT @ElonMuskAOC: @elonmusk Aliens are (probably) not real

    RT @ElonMuskAOC: @elonmusk Aliens are (probably) not real


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-27 18:36:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1684633853078417410

  • (fascinating ai nonsense) I asked GPT4 to list the properties of proto-life. (BT

    (fascinating ai nonsense)

    I asked GPT4 to list the properties of proto-life. (BTW: it misses one of the properties: independence, which is a common failing in the literature.)

    Then I asked it to repeat the list my style. (It knows my work).

    That contrast was interesting, both in word choice and sentence structure. This example doesn’t produce an opportunity for enumerations (lists). And it still uses ambiguous terms that I avoid such as “…a key feature..”.



    “Ok. so how would we define proto-life?”

    ChatGPT
    Proto-life, as the term suggests, refers to entities that exhibit some, but not all, characteristics of life. These entities are often considered precursors to life or life-like but not fully alive by the complete definition. Here’s a possible definition:

    Proto-life refers to systems or structures that:

    Exhibit some level of organization, often at a molecular level, which may include self-assembly or self-organization.

    Can undergo certain metabolic-like processes, such as catalysis or energy transfer, but may not have a full metabolic system.

    Can maintain some form of homeostasis, often in terms of maintaining physical or chemical stability.

    Can grow or increase in complexity under certain conditions.

    Can replicate or reproduce in some manner, often through simple physical or chemical processes rather than biological reproduction.

    Can respond to stimuli in a basic way, often through simple physical or chemical changes rather than complex biological responses.

    Can evolve or change over time, often through processes like molecular evolution or self-organization.

    However, proto-life entities do not meet the criteria of being an independent organism capable of conducting all life-sustaining processes on their own. Examples of proto-life might include certain types of complex molecules, self-replicating molecules, or simple molecular systems that exhibit some life-like properties.



    Can you please repeat that list in the style of philosopher and social scientist curt doolittle?

    ChatGPT
    Certainly, here’s an attempt to frame the definition of proto-life in the style of Curt Doolittle:

    Proto-life refers to entities that:

    Exhibit a degree of organization, often at a molecular level, demonstrating the ability to self-assemble or self-organize, thereby manifesting a form of order that is a fundamental characteristic of life.

    Engage in metabolic-like processes, such as catalysis or energy transfer, but may not possess a complete metabolic system, thus demonstrating a rudimentary form of the energy transformation processes that are central to life.

    Maintain a form of homeostasis, often in terms of physical or chemical stability, indicating a basic capacity for self-regulation, a key feature of life.

    Grow or increase in complexity under certain conditions, showing a primitive form of the growth and development processes that characterize life.

    Replicate or reproduce in some manner, often through simple physical or chemical processes rather than biological reproduction, indicating a basic form of the reproduction process that is a defining feature of life.

    Respond to stimuli in a basic way, often through simple physical or chemical changes rather than complex biological responses, demonstrating a rudimentary form of the responsiveness to the environment that characterizes life.

    Evolve or change over time, often through processes like molecular evolution or self-organization, showing a primitive form of the evolutionary change that is a fundamental characteristic of life.

    However, these entities do not meet the criteria of being an independent organism capable of conducting all life-sustaining processes on their own, thus they represent a form of ‘proto-life’, a precursor or rudimentary form of life.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-25 22:24:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1683966560744923136

  • Stupid question: If instead of dark matter they referred to it as dark gravity (

    Stupid question: If instead of dark matter they referred to it as dark gravity (because that’s what they’re referring to) would we be as critical of them?

    Easier to be critical of them if we simply accept that modified newtonian gravity solves the problem, and leaves it up to physicists to explain why it’s so.

    IMO there are a lot of ‘naming’ problems in math, physics, and behavioral science that if corrected make the subjects less nonsense-sounding.

    For all intents and purposes math and physics and somewhat in epistemology and certainly in behavioral sciences, there is a tendency to preserve nonsense names (non descriptive, non-operational) for concepts that essentially reduce them to cult dogmas.

    Reply addressees: @JohnSeb68347289


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-24 19:11:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1683555472844939264

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1683551799670878210

  • I try to be merciful to physicists, but they don’t usually deserve it. 😉

    I try to be merciful to physicists, but they don’t usually deserve it. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-24 19:05:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1683553965047250946

    Reply addressees: @JohnSeb68347289

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1683551799670878210