What is the difference between male and female competency in taking, holding, and demonstrating successful responsibility?
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-19 19:22:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670874670596255747
Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670873467749638145
THE FORMULA FOR RECIPROCITY BETWEEN THE SEXES: RELATIONSHIPS
Men should be dominant (responsible) regardless of context and seek recovery in the affection of women’s respect and ‘care’.
Women should be dominant (responsible) only when and where they wish to and seek recovery in the dominance (responsibility) of men’s respect and ‘care’.
A relationship consists of the echange of putting the other person’s interests at peer or above your own, whenever and wherever it is possible to do so, and the exchange of that priority for mutual gain. By combining the best of each sex, by the only criteria for which we have reason to place one person above the other: care, mating, and reproduction.
You will notice that our organization focuses our attention on first principles, and responsibility is the first principle that most separates the sexes. Why? Male predator bias to control territory and resources with other men, and female prey bias to protect offspring in the sharing of caretaking with other women. It’s baked into our genes.
We are happiest when we figure out how to make the other person feel ‘safe’ (secure, loved), and we each fulfill those responsibilities we can because we can fulfill them most successfully and with the least stress.
Respect and responsibility are two terms that have gone out of tradition and fashion because the left promises self-indulgence and irresponsibility, meaning evasion of conformity to Western high investment commons, and high trust manners, ethics, and morals.
What I notice most in the sequence of generations is the decline in responsibility, respect, reciprocity, suppression of attention seeking, and self-indulgence, in favor of creating a high trust commons whose purpose is creating an environment optimized for the raising of children – instead of the indulgence of consumption by irresponsible hyperconsumptive adults.
I don’t make the rules – Nature does. Evolution did. I just explain the consequences of violating those rules and the tragic cumulative cost of doing so.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-19 18:52:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670867208283488280
The Eugenics program was successful when limited to constraint on reproduction (single child, or sterilization), and hanging of serial criminals (elimination). That is ‘soft’ eugenics that we have practiced since we began domesticating animals. The industrial revolution eliminated the constraint on dysgenic reproduction and this is why our genetics are declining and one of the two reasons IQ is declining (other than immigration). When IQ is the single most important property of a population that affects every other aspect of life more so than any other.
There are only four factors that determine the relative quality of life of a population:
1) Homogeneity
2) Scale
3) IQ
4) Rule of law by the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity we call ‘tort’.
That’s just math. It’s inviolable
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Reply addressees: @XLColdJ @xMajorKills
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 17:29:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670121380652646400
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670120192880558080
CORRECTIONS
1 – We can adapt a population’s IQ in as few as three and no more than six generations simply by reducing the bottom and repeat criminals – and the bottom is a huge drag on society, economy, and politics, and criminals are worse.
2 – It certainly appears that education in the sciences, converting many particular rules to a few general universal rules improved not iq, but demonstrated intelligence, by a half to a full standard deviation.
3 – It certainly appears that education in our work (don’t worry about it) in logical and behavioral science does about the same as did the physical sciences.
4 – No population on earth is prohibited from near to western or eastern success if they increase their IQ by education and regulated reproduction, and the rule of law that performs natural selection as a consequence.
5 – No population can adhere to natural law and achieve economic, social, and political prosperity without either the resource curse or raising their average IQ above ~92 to 95. And the higher above 100, the better, because only people above 105 can learn by reading instructions, repair machines, or self educate. And economic complexity is increasing every year, meaning intellectual demands on a population increase every year.
I don’t make the laws of the universe. But it’s my job and the job of our organization to try to prevent people from lying about the laws of the universe, and the consequences for mankind when we try to evade them.
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Reply addressees: @dosontheshinshi @MudKevin @Barbarian_Brain
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 17:20:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670119353918926848
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670108234487586818
THE AMERICAN SPIRIT IN ECONOMIC (SCIENTIFIC) TERMS
The pursuit of status and self image through responsibility demonstrated by heroism (risk) and responsibility (risk) demonstrated through heroism as a contribution of responsibility to the commons, and contribution of responsibility to the commons creates the high trust society that reduces all transaction (cooperation), capital, and maintenance costs for all – as such exhaustive responsibility for private and common produces cooperative (economic) velocity and reduces political friction, allowing cooperative participatory government, limited to the need for rule by natural, common, concurrent law.
It’s just science. It’s also the most intellectually, psychologically, emotionally, and demanding civilization to live in, and it’s why the feminine left rebels against that responsibiliy: the purpose of the female instinct is to maximize hyperconsumption at minimum responsibility for commons, because responsibility for commons presents an opportunity for conflict, and conflict for harm, and this is contrary to feminine instinct whoch evolved for no other purpose than to extend her nervous system over a passle of children and ensure her ability to protect their fragile lives and survive into self determinant adulthood.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Reply addressees: @digitildream @realdanstilwell
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 14:27:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670075785267367936
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670071683716198400
“NO, WE AREN’T SEEKING UTOPIA”
We aren’t, seeking utopia. We’re seeking another leap in the incremental suppression of lying and crime made possible by the industrial revolution and massive increases in population. That’s all.
We don’t claim anything other than the eradication of crime produces a field of opportunities so that markets for cooperation can experiment with a multitude of potential good governments, that evolutionary pressures will subject to natural selection, and we will learn EMPIRICALLY what is superior and not, instead of hypothetically what is superior and not.
Utopians propose the good. We don’t and can’t know it. Instead, empiricists eliminate the bad, and let the people, market and evolution decide. Anything not bad is good. Anything that survives and is good is the best that we humans can do.
Reply addressees: @LibertarianTrap @digitildream @realdanstilwell
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 14:07:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670070697324838914
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670069333181988864
Q: WHY DOES CONSERVATIVE INTUITION AND TRADITION IN ARGUMENT FAIL?
The reason conservative arugments fail is the tendency of conservatives (intertemporal, responsibile, capitalizers, empiricists) to use reductive (simple) language, largely reduced to moral claim, with one single cause, rather than enumerating the full set of the left’s crimes, and explaining their origin in means of correction.
The left is just the feminine instinct applied at scale to the detriminent of genetics, knnowledge, norms traditions values, society, economy, polity, grand strategy, and the civilization as a whole.
Women evolved for unregulated hyperconsumption limted by the means of male supply of female demands. Using religion, government, ideology and the academy, this feminine strategy seeks to undermine the male instinct intuition and traditions and engage in herdlike hyperconsumption regardless of teh devastating costs of the end of meritocracy and natural selection both of individuals, groups, civilzations, and the knowledge they convey.
Our organization teaches ‘aruguing from first principles(causes), using disambiguation by enumeration, serialization, and operationalization producing a universally commensurable value neutral language of not only ethics, economics, politics, grand strategy, and evolutoin itself, but all disciplines known and possible to know, by man.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 14:02:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670069433430048768
Dan is a good simple soul, with military experience, and probably an overly enthusiastic christian who is speaking from instinct and indoctrinated faith and not from responsibility and understanding.
Some of us must choose responsibility or the decline of the country into…
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 13:31:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670061626010091520
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1670053889251368960
You dont cut anyone – you constrain their reproduction.
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 04:21:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669923166997577729
Reply addressees: @xMajorKills
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669913853772152833
Relationships: Its not asymmetric submission but symmetric deference to domains of responsibility.
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-17 00:57:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1669871968592490496