And the more subtle perverse bias to evade responsibility.
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-10 14:43:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678414659970269188
Reply addressees: @StevePender
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678414205374935041
—“Couple’s therapy is designed to tell the woman she is doing everything right, and for the therapist to tell the man he’s a f—-g a—hole”– Scott Adams
Well, that’s a very coarse way of saying, that in the Nietzsche-masculine, Jungian-equilibrial, Freudian-feminine spectrum of psychology, revenue potential from female patients, self-selection of therapy providers, and the Marxist-to-woke capture of the academy have ensured that psychology and therapy are feminine, and like Christianity, universalizing of the feminine, meaning all therapy is infantilizing – coddling the female mind and emotions. And as such, we are working (myself included) to reform the behavioral sciences out of “monopoly feminine irresponsibility” into the equilibration between feminine irresponsibility and lack of agency, and male responsibility and command of agency.
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-10 14:22:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678409436224712704
That’s not true at all. That’s an excuse.
You only need the confidence and will to tolerate the risk in order to take responsibility
This is why I call the right-wing cowards.
Willing to bear responsibility.
Not willing to take responsibility.
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-09 17:28:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678093741008080898
Reply addressees: @Erik_Vaner
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678026306271707137
They don’t want to understand.
They don’t’ want that responsibility.
Instead they seek evasion of that responsibility like the seek evasion of all others.
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-09 02:47:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677872077825515520
Reply addressees: @1776Sic
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677870084419723266
You’re either responsible for your civilization, or you’re not. It’s rather easy to distinguish between the convenience of responsibility evasion and the costs of responsibility demonstration.
Clock’s ticking.
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-09 02:32:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677868183355551745
Free will only means you can choose between moral and immoral actions, and therefore can be held accountable for your actions by others. That’s all it means.
Every other definition is a question of determinism not free will.
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-08 17:46:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677736023046905857
Reply addressees: @FarajRashi93307
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677734181164441601
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Tolerance was the vector.
If you are unwilling to forbear the behavior and take responsibility for your…
Source date (UTC): 2023-07-02 00:21:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1675298591471009795
I know your insecurity is offended and that you’re trying desperately impose altruisitc punishment to satisfy it -it’s an animal instinct and you can’t really resist. And you can’t succeed because I’m immune to feminine shaming, just as I’m immune to the criticism of children, because I’m immune to demand for equality, because any equality would be a pretense – a lie.
As for your rather sophomoric attempt to criticize my previous explanation of the first rule of grammar, which is “continuous recursive disambiguation” satisfied by unambiguous and therefore complete sentences. And in that violation leaving undefined the term, where I gave an operational (causal) explanation of the term, I attempted to illustrate (a) how to solve ambiguity (b) how must sophistries of deception, by inflation and conflaition, are achieved by such non-operational incomplete disambiguation, and (c) for those knowledgeable enough to recognize that this is the means by which all pseudointellectual claims in theology and philosophy are constructed, including my mose favored: the non paradox of the liar’s paradox.
Now you don’t know this but there is a greater difference between you and I than between you and a kindergardener. That’s not an insult to you. It’s a statement that you’re normal. But you have no idea to whom you speak, and while my staff and followers no doubt find this tete a tete an opportunity for recreational humor, the understanding I have of pretty much everything in the formal and behavioral sciences is inconceivable to you.
You are confused by the fact that very few people like me devote time to any social media forum, even though some of my peers in the physical sciences and mathematics can be found on Quora and Stack Overflow.
Whether fortunately or unfortunately, one of the utilities of social media was it’s provision of endless linguistic analysis and costless tests of running experiments that provoke demonstrated rather than reported behavior. This helped us overcome the problem of pseudoscience in the behavioral sciences, and uniting compputational linguistics, cognitive science, behavioral economics, and law. The search for coherence across those disciplines created a means of falsification of each allowing us to produce a universally commensurable value neutral paradigm, vocabulary, grammar, and logic of all disciplines, thereby solving the Wilsonian Synthesis by a means that was purely accidental.
Now, we will publish this year or next. It takes much longer than we think. But we work as a team seven days a week and make steady progress. And Like Darwin, I have not we have not published incrementally, but waited until the work was complete.
Good luck in your journey. But I woud suggest you keep your moral outrage to yourself. 😉 And do as I do, which is educate the willing whenever possible, and suggest a bit of wisdom when it might be of use to some.
It’s the moral thing to do.
Cheers
Reply addressees: @NafetsNez @KonstantinKisin
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-30 23:45:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674927212913471490
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674921130979893249
I’m not optimistic just empirical. I expect the pseudointellectual marxist-sequence cult to continue to seek to destroy the institutions of cultural production of responsibility that have made the west possible, and I expect that the anti-intellectual right will continue their moralizing and opposition by whatever nonsense means possible.
And I suspect the ‘great sort’ will continue.
And I suspect devolution of increasing powers back to the states.
And I suspect national divorce will be a necessity if that doesn’t happen.
Because we have a small number of absurdly dense, immigration-heavy, irresponsible cities acting like city-states, and a large territory of less densely populated folks who want nothing to do with them, and visa versa.
If Twitter profiles included location, occupation or income, sex, and age, the pattern would be rather obvious.
Reply addressees: @JerbalKeb @JessicaInsanity @RyanShead
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-30 18:59:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674855259150114845
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674853890972606465
(NLI, Followers)
Minor Tweak: Increase in Dominance of Responsibility in Behavioral Causality, expressed as sex differences in responsibility. ie: further reduction of sex differences in behavior to responsibility.
So far this year, the work has led to increasingly deeper understanding of the sex differences in responsibility seeking or evading. And this in turn has led to the explanation of female behavior and the past century of decline institutionalized by the introgression of women into economy, education, and polity.
In other words, all political differences are reducible to sex differences, and all sex differences are reducible to sex differences in pursuit or evasion of responsibility, and sex differences in pursuit and evasion of responsibility are due to sex differences in status seeking by female hyperconsumption and evasion of responsibility for capital to limit risk of conflict and benefit of dependency, vs male status seeking by accumulating responsibility for capital at the cost of risk of conflict and benefit opportunity, and these sex differences in status-seeking are reducible to sex difference in reproductive demands, and sex differences in responsibility for self and fragile offspring in time (prey) versus responsibility for resources: territory, resources, assets, men, women, and children over time.
Entropy
… Time
… … Acquisition
… … … Demonstrated Interests
… … Cooperation
… … … Reciprocity
… … … … Truth
… … … … … Productive
… … … … … Fully Informed
… … … … … Voluntary Transfer
… … … … … … (of demonstrated interests)
… … … … … Free of Imposition of costs
… … … … … … (by externality on the interests of others)
… … … … … In the limits of Warranty and Liability
… … … … … … Responsibility (-)
… … … … … … … Male Over Time and Space (Predator)
… … … … … … … Female In Time and Space (Prey)
… … 3 Means of Influence to Coercion
… … … Force/Defense
… … … Boycott/Remuneration
… … … Undermining/Seduction
… … Organizations (Scale)
… … … Elites (Leadership)
… … … … Institutions (persistence)
… … … … … Sequence of Institutions (Dependency)
… … Group Evolutionary Strategy
Source date (UTC): 2023-06-29 05:18:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1674286302471114752