Theme: Responsibility

THE END OF MARRIAGE AND RESPONSIBILITIES TO ONE ANOTHER
Men only leave for one reason because all then need is respect feeding and sex to be happy.
Men have no responsibility or necessity of responsibility external to the want of one a woman’s company in fulfilling that need.
Marx claimed we have responsibility to society – but we dont. We either benefit or leave.
Women claim men have responsibility to women – we dont. We either benefit or leave.
Relationships are a trade. They are reciprocal or not. If men leave it is not reciprocal.
Women end 80-90% of relationships. The vast majority because they are bored. And because they can extract alimony and child support without that reciprocity to entertain themselves.
There is an odd childish intuition common in women that men have the same dedication to women and children as do women – and its not true. Even male gorillas will protect any and all children, more so than their their females. Thats one of the driving forces toward neoteny: more neotenous females provoke a greater protection, dominance and sex instinct in males, and those females have more children. I mean a 5’3-4″ brunette is just going to have more kids than a 5’7-9″ woman. (odd, right?)
The purpose of marriage other that interference between mates is the primary reason men kill, is to gain committment and insurance from the polity for non interferece in the marriage, and prohibition on the voluntary dissolution of the marriage to protect the polity and woman’s family from the burden of single mothers when mouths to feed was the principle risk.
We have ended the requrement of the public and individuals to insure society agains the impulses of those in and out of the marriage. This insuance and incentive and protection doesnt exist any longer.
Women are more economically independent than men today – at least in the white collar work force, are more adaptive to changes in workplace personnel, and fill the occupations with the least accumulation of cellular damage. So women are employable for longer work lives.
Women claim and demonstrate they have no need of men – at least directly. That’s despite that men make it possible for them to be so indirectly. And despite that white men over 35 are the only net contributors to taxation, and despite that women consume 70% of benefits, and spend 70% of income, and accumulate most debt.
Women can effectively engage in polyamory and hypergamic gene capture because men take indirect responsibility for women via division of labor (occupations), markets and taxation, instead of direct responsibility.
So the “Responsibility” of either party for the other has ended, and the legal system has not yet caught up — but will do so within a decade. Lifetime alimony ended. alimony will shortly end. Common property and Child support not long after.
In most of our history divorce meant women kept their young children, men their older, anf the responsibility for the woman returned to her father – to protect the community from the cost of her and her children. This is the direction we will naturally evolve to with marriage returning to a property of the elites.
The pre-agrarian relationship was that bloodlines lived together around the female line of certainty of parentage with uncles and brothers and sisters and aunts all dividing labor. Human nature is serial monogamy of five to seven years max. Again that is the natural evolutionary direction.
Marriage and monogamy are a product of the agrarian age, capital necessary for farming, marginal productivity of farming, and the need to preserve that capital in the family by inheritance over generations. And we are no longer in that age.
The feminists set out to destroy marriage the family, and the ritual compromise between the sexes for mutual benefit in a division of labor that decreased the cost of the household for each, and ensured their later support by the shared investment in offspring.
Women succeeded in destroying family, education, economy, goverment and even the gene pool.
The only question of interest is why did men allow women to do so? But we know because we are repeating the fall of rome by the same means: its in the interest of men who will pander to women to organize the society through social construction of false promises that satisfy female magical thinking, gaining temporary benefit of status despite long term consequences to the civilization.
In other words status seeking for sex.
(sigh….)

Reply addressees: @lovelywhite110