Selfishness and irresponsibility is understandable.
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-02 17:37:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720133033158701192
Reply addressees: @smugalongsmugly
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1720130107241590930
–“Evil men are punished for their bad behavior to a far greater extent than evil women are punished for their bad behavior. Both Machiavellian men and Machiavellian women exist, but men are held accountable more than women. We need to resolve the problem from both ends.”–@taylorburrowes
Yes you are correct. But men’s antisocial behavior is immediately dangerous and women’s antisocial beahvior is cumulatively harmful.
As far as I know I’ve done more work on this subect than anyone else past or present. And the only question that I simply can’t find a comfortable answer to is why do westerners in particular (W.E.I.R.D. culture) tolerate women’s antisocial behavior (undermining to sedition by social warfare), when other civilizations don’t. And when the Common Law did prohibit these behaviors prior to the constitutional era. Gossiping (undermining), and Shrilling (Karens), or anything that ‘disturbed the king’s peace’ by sewing discord was criminalized and we have some interesting records of punishment for it throughout the medieval period.
So women are only recently (since given the vote and entry into the work force) able to use politics and economics to scale their intutions. Yet these intuitions are the polar opposite of those that have made european civilization so disproportionately successful vs the rest. If not for women’s votes – or at least, single women’s votes – we would not have the crisis of the age.
Now, women’s behavior differs from men by a very simple set of variables that are rather obvious in differences in brain organization, neurochemistry, and behavior. Largely, the sexes evolved a division of labor in time, or what we call feminine empathizing in time vs masculine systematizing over time. This resulted in the feminine prey dominance in cognition and the masculine predator dominance in cognition. And together these resulted in masculine search for status and reproductive advantage by seeking responsibilty for private an common capital despite the risks of doing so, versus the feminine search for hyperconsumption, hypergamy, and irresponsibilty for common capital because of the risk involved in conflict and settlement of disputes over common capital.
Thats really the difference and that’s all of it. And that’s also what’s evidenced in sex differences in antisocial behavior, as well as sex differences in moral intution, and sex differences in political bias. Men for for maximizing individual responsibility and women vote for minimizing individual responsibility. For the reasons I’ve stated.
This only changes when women have three or more children, and then they carry the burden of the behavior of children the way men carry the burden of behavior of all of society – including the dangerous men.
It’s really that simple. 😉
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Reply addressees: @Josh_Ebner @taylorburrowes @NoahRevoy
Source date (UTC): 2023-11-01 18:36:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719785589673689088
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719774736018747769
Because you cannot sell responsibility any more than you can sell anti-criminality. You prohibit criminality, antisocial behavior and irresponsibility. It’s all that’s possible.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-31 22:45:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719485772695265467
Reply addressees: @YYRedfeminist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719482300813983766
THE “I THINKS” OF WHY WE LOST
I think the pill, abortion, ending liability for the interference in a marriage, enacting involuntary marriage (common law marriage, state imposed marrage), no fault divorce, common property, alimony, and child support, especially child support for non-biological children was a catastrophe and there is no escaping it.
I think giving women the vote without giving them a separate lower house of government was a catastrophe because women think speak and act (and vote) against responsibility in everything they do – despite that our civilization’s success is almost entirely cauased by our maximization of individual responsibility in exchange for individual rights. Multi-house government exists to produce and test concurrency between the regions and classes. We neede another house for the sexes. This would create a market for the production of commons that preserved the interests of the minority (productive men in this case) from mob rule (women).
I think introgression of women into the workforce displaced men from the more family-friendly jobs more than added a contribution, and then offshoring male jobs displaced those displaced. Immigration has only exacerbated that problem dramatically.
I think all productivity contributed by women’s addition to the workforce has been consumed by increases in taxation. An I know for certain that it’s destroying our rates of reproduction necessary to maintain benefits and services.
I think we misunderstand our failure to make good use of and prevent bad use of fiat currency, and we tend to throw the baby out with the bathwater. I think the abuse of the pretense of eternal growth to rely on intergenerational redistribution via the benefits system, instead of using the singapore method of saving and investing is the bigger problem. I think interest on consumer purchase of capital like homes and durable goods is a crime. (I’m correct). I think taxation that’ contributed to the general pool and isn’t itemized as expense, debt, and repayment, is a crime.
When I say “I think” It really means “I know”. 😉 I’m just being polite. 😉
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
Reply addressees: @Jake64533383814 @JohnArthurRyan
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-31 18:03:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719414855109603328
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1719409976748462501
RT @LukeWeinhagen: Active vs Passive
Honor (active)
– demonstration of merited respect
– keen awareness of and adherence to ethical conduc…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-28 20:07:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1718358892134945251
We have (I have, our organization has) done the work to equally constrain female antisocial behavior as we have male antisocial behavior. It’s law. It will work. And it applies to all whether male or female. The problem we face is that women have less control over their impulses than do men. So women need social proof and social reinforcement to ensure that women follow the ‘good women’ rather than the ‘mean girls’ so to speak.
Reply addressees: @boxkicker2191 @BOB37702515
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-24 15:14:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716835537342832640
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716833032848527786
–“Q: Curt: What Feminized Society? “–
It’s not complicated really – if you understand female instinct. Feminization consists of responsibilty evasion. It’s that simple.
What feminized society? (a) giving women the vote without a separate house of government for women that would preserve the multiple houses of government as a market for trades between classes – and then sexes. (b) the neomarxist march throug our institutions, (c) the pill and abortion (d) divorce laws (divorce r*pe), (e) women in the ‘clerical’ workplace while men’s material work was shipped overseas (f) women consuming 70% of government resources, spending 70% of household income, and funding 90% of left wing course material in university to indoctrinate them (g) women’s natural tendency to hyperconsume while evading all responsibilty for any aspect of the commons, and as such incrementally voting in favor of authority and parasitism that allows them to allow others as well, avoid responsibilty for everything from self regulation of emotions to preservation of truth before face, to policing and teaching responsibility for all, to all.
That’s the correct and nearly complete answer. There is a foolish tendency on the Right to try to identify one simple cause so that they can rally people to a simple solution – but that’s false. Hard problems are hard because of multi-causality creating causal density requiring a substantial sequence of reforms to overcome.
Cheers.
Reply addressees: @BOB37702515
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-24 14:00:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716816884539199488
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716814460676112667
Christianity – in the germanicized christianity of the west – is a lot of nonsense to convey a very simple principle of treating all non-kin as kin, while demanding individual responsibilty on the other. This prepares us for a higher trust society and especially for military,…
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-24 12:38:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716796298534289648
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716726936431415742
–“Nearly all of your political or philosophical views are manifestations of your selfish genes.”–
Yes. But what responsibilty are you trying to bear for yourself and for that of others. What responsibilty are you asking others to bear for themselves and others. And what responsibilty are others seeking to evade?
You will find that the right seeks responsibilty (male) and the left seeks irresponsibility (female). And that there is nothing else to be understood other than those who seek irresponsibilty, seek to cause those who seek responsibilty to pay for them and their irresponsibilities.
Then you will come to the coclusion that while there is overlap in the behavior of the sexes, with some cognitively and morally feminine males, and masculine females, that by and large the crisis of the age is the introduction of women into the polity and economy given their universal evasion of responsibility for the commons.
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-24 00:02:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1716606053813465088
Hyper attention seekig AND Hyperconsumption AND Hypergamy AND Evasion of Responsiblity
Source date (UTC): 2023-10-17 13:11:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714267872938066011
Reply addressees: @RemttidAcul @whatifalthist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1714141401049395614