CONSIDER SIGNING
“Declaration of Military Accountability”
https://www.militaryaccountability.com/
Via Mark Bradshaw
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-10 18:01:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745143889311170669
CONSIDER SIGNING
“Declaration of Military Accountability”
https://www.militaryaccountability.com/
Via Mark Bradshaw
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-10 18:01:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745143889311170669
The persians tried three times to escape the mandatory ignorance of Islam. They were defeated all three times.
This is the fundamental problem. Islam is a religion of irresponsibility as a means of limiting conflict – not a means of resonsibility and resolution of conflict.
So this is why it is and has always been a cancer. Becuase there are always more humans seeking irresponsibility than those seeking responsibility.
Reply addressees: @DaArmChairRebel
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-10 17:07:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745130328295915520
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745129628941844896
We can be equal to our duty to one another against harms, even if we are not equal to for one another in our ability and capacity to produce goods.
Both are necessary. The first produces equality. The second produces hieararcy. And together they produce meritocracy andβ¦
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-10 17:05:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1745129781459321210
That just means the few of us that are capable of facts need to be more responsible for those who are not.
I don’t like that arrangement…. lol
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-09 20:58:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744826080710496645
Reply addressees: @TADDADtruth
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744824582312542401

Haidts Moral Foundations as Property Rights
Many of you have become aware of Haidt’s Moral Foundations, which are a parallel to big five personality traits. Sex, IQ, IQ Composition, Personality Traits, and Moral Traits are pretty solid descriptors of the totality of a person,β¦ https://t.co/hwIhUKK1wa

Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 16:44:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744399790077510000
Again. Victim theory. Blame avoidance.
There is no reason you can’t, like hungary has, or like poland just did, end asylum, and prohibit further immigration, or engage in forcible repatriation, and withdrawal of all support and subidy, and criminalize employment, housing, or protecting those people.
That isn’t an EU or a NATO or a USA problem it’s a Czech problem. So why aren’t you blaming the man in the mirror, and every other man in the mirror letting it happen?
We have to clean our own houses (rooms, countries, civilizations).
Reply addressees: @AutistocratMS
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-08 01:13:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744165304777797632
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1744164213113667652
OUR SOLUTION TO ENDING PATERNAL CHILD SUPPORT EASILY, AND ENDING THE HATE MACHINE OF FAMILY COURT
In 2021, the child support program in the United States collected a total of $32.7 billion. That $32 billion represents approximately 0.47% of the U.S. federal budget for the fiscal year 2021, which was about $6.8 trillion. This indicates that the total child support collected is a relatively small fraction of the overall federal budget.
Our recommended solution? Cut the Department of Ed, and use it’s $79.6B budget to directly pay alimony and child support. It is the most destructive federal institution. End the endless court battles and family crisis, and let the voter’s decide. And let the budget pressure cause the governmet to take responsibility for the crisis it created by intervening in an ancient institution that is necessary for human capital formation and worse- giving us common interests, because as families we have almost everything in common but as individuals we have almost nothing in common but self interest.
FEDERAL BUDGET
– Discretionary Spending: About $1.5 trillion, with a significant portion allocated to defense.
– Mandatory Spending: Around $4.6 trillion, driven largely by Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.
– Military Spending: Included in discretionary spending, the defense budget was about $753 billion.
Reasoning
1) the state enacted a) no fault divorce b) ending liabilty for interference in a marriage, c) child support d) alimony. This has created the incentive for women to divorce for a long list of reasons from boredom to grass-is-greener magical thinking with women vastly overrepresented in initiating divorce.
2) The primary economic benefit of marriage is the shared cost of household cost and maintenance. So divorced or single parent households of necessity impoverishes both parties, but more importantly impoverishes men.
3) women are no longer disadvantaged in the workplace but advantaged in the workplace, because of the gradual transformation to a service economy. And women are no longer disadvantaged in income making more than males until males mature into later age.
4) Men mature later, occuply riskier professions, accumulate more cellular damage, and weaken and die earlier, with shorter possible work lives. As such men are being impoverished, unable to obtain new marriage and care and rates of suicide continue to escalate.
5) Men are evading marriage out of economic fear of legal impoverishment whenever possible and women are delaying marriage to maximize attention and consumption.
6) Single motherhood has become endemic, and while it’s politically sensitive to say so, single motherhood is a principle cause of social externalities – and surprisingly men are better single parents than women – and for reasons we’ve just begun to undersetand. Women infantilize offspring to maintain control via manipulation. Men seek to make children independent (adults),
7) The reason for the decrease in household income is largely due to the delay in marriage, delay in childbirth, reduction of children born to below replacement (sustainable) levels necessary to maintain redistribution, medicare, medicaid, social security.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-07 03:33:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743838349641572352
Majorities can’t make such decisions because (a) at most half can, and (b) that’s of men. Therefore ‘the men that can’ must make the decisions, take the action, and bear the cost, so that those that can’t don’t cause all of us to suffer for their failings. π
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-05 15:34:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743294858788229316
Reply addressees: @teodoriancu14
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1743291251552555196
Empirical evidence from southern culture disagrees with you. The fact that someone can be taught manners, may not in fact, produce infinte resistance to antisocial or criminal impulse, nor does success in adopting those manners guarrantee literacy, reading comprehension, learning without excessive repetition, the capacity to use logic of even the first order, or the learning of abstact concepts. It’s just imitation. I would say that many of the southern blacks raised in teh church with stable families have far better manners than self congratulatory whites.
Perhaps this is yet another example of my capacity to disambiguate a class into a specrum of qualities, which is, in itself a capacity of observation, evidence, reason and the occasional application of basic logic. But that does not mean that we should, as does the left, engage in INFLATION (lying) to claim a general principle of a class is specific to all members of the class. Just because more whites are over 115IQ (which is probably the beginning of the smart fraction), does not mean that all whites are capable of 115IQ, suppression of impulse, self regulation, avoidance of antisocial or criminal, seditious, or treasonous behavior. π
(not that I don’t respect your leadership for those who lack the ability to judge such things, but that is different from resspecting my audience of those who possess that aability to judge such things. π
Love you brother. But we only need to head in the same genral direction to save our people, not follow the same exact route. And some of us seek to save the rest of mankind as well. (Or at least most of them.) π
Reply addressees: @radiofreenw
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 22:13:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742670501896429568
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742653382601646150
Empirical evidence from southern culture disagrees with you. The fact that someone can be taught manners, may not in fact, produce infinte resistance to antisocial or criminal impulse, nor does success in adopting those manners guarrantee literacy, reading comprehension, learning without excessive repetition, the capacity to use logic of even the first order, or the learning of abstact concepts. It’s just imitation. I would say that many of the southern blacks raised in teh church with stable families have far better manners than self congratulatory whites.
Perhaps this is yet another example of my capacity to disambiguate a class into a specrum of qualities, which is, in itself a capacity of observation, evidence, reason and the occasional application of basic logic. But that does not mean that we should, as does the left, engage in INFLATION (lying) to claim a general principle of a class is specific to all members of the class. Just because more whites are over 115IQ (which is probably the beginning of the smart fraction), does not mean that all whites are capable of 115IQ, suppression of impulse, self regulation, avoidance of antisocial or criminal, seditious, or treasonous behavior. π
(not that I don’t respect your leadership for those who lack the ability to judge such things, but that is different from resspecting my audience of those who possess that aability to judge such things. π
Love you brother. But we only need to head in the same genral direction to save our people, not follow the same exact route. And some of us seek to save the rest of mankind as well. (Or at least most of them.) π
Source date (UTC): 2024-01-03 22:13:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742670501401559040
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1742653382601646150