Curt Doolittle

Theme: Responsibility

  • QUESTION: Why are women who will not bear two children any different from men wh

    QUESTION: Why are women who will not bear two children any different from men who will not perform military, emergency, and civic service?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-29 08:08:00 UTC

  • OATH: “I shall not lie, cheat, steal, impose costs upon others or the commons, n

    OATH: “I shall not lie, cheat, steal, impose costs upon others or the commons, nor shall I let go unpunished those who do.” #NewRight

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-28 06:34:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725573818069164032

  • OATH: “I shall not lie, cheat, steal, impose costs upon others or the commons, n

    OATH: “I shall not lie, cheat, steal, impose costs upon others or the commons, nor shall I let go unpunished those who do.” #NewRight

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-28 02:34:00 UTC

  • SO NOW I HAVE COME FULL CIRCLE Now that I understand that the ‘good’ aryan man p

    SO NOW I HAVE COME FULL CIRCLE

    Now that I understand that the ‘good’ aryan man produces is rule, and that we have profited from this rule, and failed when we no longer ruled morally, but commercially, I have come full circle.

    We must rule. It is our chief product. It is our highest art. It is our greatest good.

    We must rule morally, and not commercially, and not exploitatively.

    Tax is our commission on our rule.

    As long as we rule morally, seek to minmize the cost (comission) and maximize the commons – meaning consume as little as possible ourselves, then we rule well.

    Our goal then is to move as many of our people into rule as possible, and rule with small numbers as we have in the past.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 08:59:00 UTC

  • RESTORING LIBERTY Restoring Liberty required that I restore the requirement for

    RESTORING LIBERTY

    Restoring Liberty required that I restore the requirement for violence.

    To possess Liberty requires the ability to construct it against desires of the naturally parasitic hordes, and to maintain it in the face of their over reproduction and temporal consumption.

    For one cannot posess a condition of Liberty by permission. And without the ability to use violence to require forcibly create and maintain Liberty one cannot possess Liberty but only permission.

    So this is the purpose of my emphasis on violence. Our efforts to first seize power from the martial aristocracy, then to justify our commercial colonialism, then to mollify our women, then to allow virtue signaling by the academy, state, and media’s recruitment of the immoral hordes, resulted in the incremental loss of our violence, our Liberty, and our civilization.

    We must rule. If not out of moral obligation to the rest of humanity that is incapable of it, but our if nothing more than self defense.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 01:21:00 UTC

  • RULE requires only adherence to The Oath:”I shall not lie, cheat, steal, impose

    RULE requires only adherence to The Oath:”I shall not lie, cheat, steal, impose costs, tolerate, or leave unpunished those who do.”#NewRight

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-25 11:18:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/724558072333643776

  • Because martial epistemology = the ultimate ‘skin in the game’: If we err, we di

    Because martial epistemology = the ultimate ‘skin in the game’: If we err, we die. if we ‘color’ we die. if we lie, we die. Truth = Life.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-25 08:53:00 UTC

  • If we slept on our watch, then the fault is still ours

    If we slept on our watch, then the fault is still ours.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-25 08:41:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/724518589118701568

    Reply addressees: @etraditionalist @RichardBSpencer @skiguru @FreddyNEPM @WhiteMansDurden @lfrmolloy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/724505843404791808

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/724505843404791808

  • RULE requires only adherence to The Oath:”I shall not lie, cheat, steal, impose

    RULE requires only adherence to The Oath:”I shall not lie, cheat, steal, impose costs, tolerate, or leave unpunished those who do.”#NewRight

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-25 07:18:00 UTC

  • Putting Degenerates in the Place

    (by Eli Harman) [N]o man is born free. Rights must be won, and rights must be defended. (All rights are property rights.) No man can do that alone. So you accept limits on your freedom in order to confederate, to cooperate, and win what you may. As a practical matter, we can say that liberty will be successfully won and defended only by those who desire to exercise it within limits deemed reasonable by their fellows. “No limits” is not a reasonable, nor realistic standard. What we (right propertarians) are trying to do with the TECHNOLOGY of property rights and rule of law (as distinct from “legistation”) is to minimize the imposition of costs, and the involuntary transfer of benefits, to enforce productivity, and suppress parasitism, and to create the conditions necessary for voluntary cooperation. What you (degenerate libertine) are trying to do in asserting absolute and unlimited “rights” is to LICENSE and JUSTIFY your own antisocial parasitism. If you run a flop house, say, or a crack house, in a decent neighborhood, you are imposing costs on your neighbors, destroying their property value and threatening their safety and calm. You may insist that it’s your “right,” but your neighbors will not agree. Conflict will be the inevitable result. That is parasitic behavior, profiting privately from imposing social costs. It is in our interests to agree to refrain from such behvior and to suppress those who do not so agree.