Only an individual can be at fault, hence the context of law is the individual.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-20 15:35:00 UTC
FAILURE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE – PUNISHMENT
(a) forced restitution is always the best solution (enslavement)
(b) hanging is the cheapest solution.
(c) prison camps (work camps) are the next cheapest solution
(d) minimum survival prisons the next cheapest solution.
(e) maximum survival prisons (today’s prisons) are the next cheapest
(f) aggressive ‘mental restructuring’ prisons are the next cheapest solution
(g) letting petty crime escalate is the highest cost solution.
We don’t hang our mentally ill, sex offenders, murderers, and serial violent felons. We incarcerate the underclass for seeking refuge in drugs instead of sterilizing them. We punish the laboring and working classes for being too poor to pay administrative fines and costs. We punish common men for child support and alimony payments that should never exist. We punish all sorts of people for tax crimes that are ridiculous.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-19 14:43:00 UTC
CHRISTIAN ETHICS IN FIVE RULES (IN ORDER)
1) Do nothing unto others that you would not have done unto you.
2) Do unto others, only what they desire done unto them.
3) Exhaust forgiveness for that which they do unto you, before retaliating.
4) Retaliate only to the minimum extent necessary to prevent harms to you and others – do not seek revenge.
5) Extirpate all hatred from your heart.
This is the optimum strategy humans can adopt in order to construct cooperation despite differences.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-15 10:29:00 UTC
THE RECIPROCITY OF THE RIGHT OF ASSOCIATION AND ASSEMBLY
You are responsible for the members of your family. Of your organization. Of your religion. Of your political campaign. Of your political party. Period.
Thou shalt not create hazard. Thou shalt police those hazards you create.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-14 11:30:00 UTC
If you fill a 30 story skyscraper with third worlders, you will get a third world skyscraper fire. These primitive people have not learned how to live responsibly. “We” don’t have these problems. They do.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-13 22:36:00 UTC
Eli Harman:
—“What’s the basis for prosecuting the purveyors of perverse and pernicious entertainment fiction, such as that which has proliferated lately? They use it for the purposes of ideological warfare, so there must be one…”—
I don’t think we get into true/false with fiction with any more difficulty than we get into true/false with biographies, and fiction as false history. The court is pretty good at this process.
So:
1 – We have the easy problem of whether it’s stated as fiction or not.
2 – We have the the easy problem of whether someone’s making an argument or not.
3 – We have the medium problem that someone is engaged in fraudulent representation of the narrative or not.
4 – And we have the hard problem that someone is promoting immorality or not (indirect ir-reciprocity).
5 – And we have the easy problem that someone is promoting crime or not (direct ir-reciprocity).
6 – And we have the very easy problem of someone SPEAKING OR TEACHING literature as science or truth.
I am not sure this is all that difficult.
We do most of it today. The only difference is that we don’t punish advocacy of parasitism and the teaching of it.
I mean, if you write a novel where a murderer, or a terrorist or communist is a hero I think we might get there but I think that is very hard to take seriously. That’s the only question.
I think the issue is one of authority:
Pretense of truth.
Academy, church, or state.
Eli Harman:
—“What about if you’re using fiction to teach lies, like equality. It could be that an exceptional female or minority character is just an extreme outlier. But when the DISTRIBUTION of female and minority characters is systematically shifted toward “extreme outlier” territory across ALL popular fiction, how do you prosecute any one content creator for lying?”—
I think that the only reason this is even a question is because we haven’t had our revolution yet and put the law into place, and I”m very certain that the world will change radically because it will be economically too dangerous to tread those waters.
I think that just as there are things you are careful about doing today – promoting terrorism and thievery in the classroom. And I think that there are things that we don’t do in the classroom – making arguments to supernaturalism. And I think it will be just as uncommon to make pseudo-rational, pseudo-moral, pseudoscientific, arguments in the future as it will be to make supernatural arguments in school and university today
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 18:30:00 UTC
THE SERVANT OF THE NATION: KNIGHT
The Oath is a “Sh-t Test”.
The problem isn’t taking the oath.
It’s finding insurers who will kill you if you void it.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-11 12:10:00 UTC
forced us to fight a century long war against communism, and then failing to apologize or accept responsibility for their crimes against us, eastern europe, their own people, and all mankind.
https://www.quora.com/What-exactly-has-Russia-done-to-the-U-S-to-garner-so-much-hatred-by-so-many-Americans
forced us to fight a century long war against communism, and then failing to apologize or accept responsibility for their crimes against us, eastern europe, their own people, and all mankind.
https://www.quora.com/What-exactly-has-Russia-done-to-the-U-S-to-garner-so-much-hatred-by-so-many-Americans
—“So ignorance is punishable as malice?”—
A lack of due diligence is malice, yes.
And most all law is predicated upon that. the difference is that we have not applied it to information, just to services, and products.
Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 08:03:00 UTC