Curt Doolittle

Theme: Responsibility

  • Did You Ever Break A Rule In Your Whole Life?

    —”Did you Ever Break A Rule In Your Life?”—

    As often as possible.

    Rules are necessary for those who need them. Why?

    1 – imitation ethics > 2 – rule ethics > 3 – outcome ethics.

    Some of us must imitate becase we have no understanding.
    Some of us follow rules because that is our understanding.
    Some of us act to produce outcomes, becasue that is our understanding.

    Some of us don’t imitate, don’t follow rules, but understand first principles and the outcomes that they produce.

    There is only one rule: “Non imposition”

    – impose no cost upon others by display, sound, word, or deed.
    – impose no use, wear, or cost upon that which is not entirely yours by voluntary exchange.
    – do not unto others as you would not have done unto you.
    – do unto others only what they wish.
    These are the only rules one need follow, because there is only one moral rule: non imposition.

    Otherwise

    There are no good rules that need saying.
    There are many bad rules that are said.

    There are many fools that need follow rules whether good or bad.

    For the same reason that we do not like bulls in china shops.

    They break things.

    https://www.quora.com/Did-you-ever-break-a-rule-in-your-whole-life

  • Your Warranty Of Due Diligence Is The Test Of Your Ethics

    Now, I’ll repeat here that there is a vast difference between telling a story and telling a series of stories. Just as there is a vast difference between a term, and a term from a series of terms. Just as there is a vast difference between a parable and its explanation (you’ll note that the victorians were certain to state the lessons of aesop’s fables in actionable prose). All of these techniques I use and advocate allow us to both narrate and give examples while continuously disambiguating (deflating, deconflating, de-fictionalizing) the narrative. I have my own narrative that is quite difficult to get across and that is just how central truth (testimony and agency ) are to western civ. And I do that by constant triangulation of examples. meaning is first, Justification is second, BUT WARRANTY OF DUE DILIGENCE IS THE RESULT OF DEFLATION. It does not matter what story you tell as long as after having achieved through association that which you now deflate via operation.

  • Your Warranty Of Due Diligence Is The Test Of Your Ethics

    Now, I’ll repeat here that there is a vast difference between telling a story and telling a series of stories. Just as there is a vast difference between a term, and a term from a series of terms. Just as there is a vast difference between a parable and its explanation (you’ll note that the victorians were certain to state the lessons of aesop’s fables in actionable prose). All of these techniques I use and advocate allow us to both narrate and give examples while continuously disambiguating (deflating, deconflating, de-fictionalizing) the narrative. I have my own narrative that is quite difficult to get across and that is just how central truth (testimony and agency ) are to western civ. And I do that by constant triangulation of examples. meaning is first, Justification is second, BUT WARRANTY OF DUE DILIGENCE IS THE RESULT OF DEFLATION. It does not matter what story you tell as long as after having achieved through association that which you now deflate via operation.

  • YOUR WARRANTY OF DUE DILIGENCE IS THE TEST OF YOUR ETHICS Now, I’ll repeat here

    YOUR WARRANTY OF DUE DILIGENCE IS THE TEST OF YOUR ETHICS

    Now, I’ll repeat here that there is a vast difference between telling a story and telling a series of stories. Just as there is a vast difference between a term, and a term from a series of terms. Just as there is a vast difference between a parable and its explanation (you’ll note that the victorians were certain to state the lessons of aesop’s fables in actionable prose).

    All of these techniques I use and advocate allow us to both narrate and give examples while continuously disambiguating (deflating, deconflating, de-fictionalizing) the narrative.

    I have my own narrative that is quite difficult to get across and that is just how central truth (testimony and agency ) are to western civ. And I do that by constant triangulation of examples.

    meaning is first, Justification is second, BUT WARRANTY OF DUE DILIGENCE IS THE RESULT OF DEFLATION.

    It does not matter what story you tell as long as after having achieved through association that which you now deflate via operation.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-10 11:22:00 UTC

  • Peterson And Doolittle

    by William Benge Peterson energizes the incentives for positiva in the personal and interpersonal realm, whereas Doolittle is working to lay out the more costly and precision-bound negativa as instrument for reversing present mischief and preventing any future aberrations. Of course, there is overlap. POSITIVA FOR SELF We cannot imagine Peterson’s positiva holding capacity to level and decimate the world’s greatest culprits, the fed and CIA. Nonetheless, Peterson does inculcate condemnation and rejection of the false premises the Fed and CIA (commies) operate upon, while at the same time exciting both reason and action toward sensible positiva in the personal sphere. RECIPROCITY/SUPPRESSION NEGATIVA Whereas, Doolittle’s negativa can be employed to destroy the 1) position of every actor within these nefarious institutions (also proceed to invalidate the institutions themselves) AND the 2) position of any sympathetic supporters (commies) underneath or aside those institutions. COLLECTIVISM AS NATIONALISM Peterson and Doolittle are partnered in destroying this forever.

  • PETERSON AND DOOLITTLE by William Benge Peterson energizes the incentives for po

    PETERSON AND DOOLITTLE

    by William Benge

    Peterson energizes the incentives for positiva in the personal and interpersonal realm, whereas Doolittle is working to lay out the more costly and precision-bound negativa as instrument for reversing present mischief and preventing any future aberrations.

    Of course, there is overlap.

    POSITIVA FOR SELF

    We cannot imagine Peterson’s positiva holding capacity to level and decimate the world’s greatest culprits, the fed and CIA. Nonetheless, Peterson does inculcate condemnation and rejection of the false premises the Fed and CIA (commies) operate upon, while at the same time exciting both reason and action toward sensible positiva in the personal sphere.

    RECIPROCITY/SUPPRESSION NEGATIVA

    Whereas, Doolittle’s negativa can be employed to destroy the 1) position of every actor within these nefarious institutions (also proceed to invalidate the institutions themselves) AND the 2) position of any sympathetic supporters (commies) underneath or aside those institutions.

    COLLECTIVISM AS NATIONALISM

    Peterson and Doolittle are partnered in destroying this forever.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-06 11:49:00 UTC

  • “I reserve the ability to resist your dominance by demonstrating your incompeten

    –“I reserve the ability to resist your dominance by demonstrating your incompetence. If I can demonstrate your incompetence, but you insist I submit to your dominance, then sorry – I’m gonna gonna use my competence to develop more efficient methods to kill you.”–Nick Heywood

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 14:29:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968855563667943426

  • In general, I make painfully accurate sense. It’s my job. Now, we have rights of

    In general, I make painfully accurate sense. It’s my job. Now, we have rights of reciprocity – sure. Just as we have the right to boycott, sue,and prosecute people who commit fraud in the distribution of goods,services, and information. And that was my argument: reciprocity.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 14:00:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968848421191933953

    Reply addressees: @Anon_OMouse @paulkrugman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968846718707163141

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968846718707163141

  • What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capital measurements in economic p

    What happens when we outlaw cherry-picking of capital measurements in economic pseudoscience, and prosecute those who create moral hazards by promoting it? Will you be as equally judicious in your self-criticisms? History will judge you as it has judged Marx, Freud, and Boaz.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-02-28 13:20:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968838235374923777

    Reply addressees: @paulkrugman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968837422539821059

    IN REPLY TO:

    @paulkrugman

    Merchants of death watch, more or less literally: the reason FedEx won’t drop its special deals with the NRA is that it makes a lot of money shipping guns https://t.co/3Fd4HnXV3J

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/968837422539821059

  • Everyone wants to be the leader, manager, executive, financier, politician, gene

    Everyone wants to be the leader, manager, executive, financier, politician, general, and king – until they achieve that status. And then they realize that they hold those positions because others want them to, and those that want them to, are customers that they must keep satisfied, or they will find someone else who does treat them as customers. Why is it so hard? because all customers have different interests, and all leaders have but one fundamental job: to apply scarce resources behind the best returns. And that includes defense of the organizational capital against members since all organizations consist largely of people who seek rents on that organization.