Curt Doolittle

Theme: Responsibility

  • Consequences of Lower Verbal Ability (Crime)

    LOWER VERBAL ABILITY AND THE CONSEQUENCES by Liam Eddy Lower verbal ability is due to the structure of the brain. The recognition of feeling occurs in the left hemisphere while the ability to speak is governed in the right. When there is a little cross over between the hemispheres alexithymia is common.

    Common in the people who demonstrate alexithymia are executive function defects. What happens when a person who cannot label their emotions, with little executive function (Impulse control etc), is in a public environment? Opportunity leads to crime. Frustration leads to aggression. —- ALEXITHYMIA: the inability to identify and describe one’s emotions. Dysfunction in emotional awareness, social attachment, and interpersonal relations.

  • “Female morality is impossible. Morality requires negation of resource extractio

    —“Female morality is impossible. Morality requires negation of resource extraction and social discomfort, both of which are anathema to women. While certainly a woman can feign morality for the sake of social cohesion, in her heart of hearts she is not so.”— Kevin Wu

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-27 13:29:00 UTC

  • YES, STUPID PEOPLE CREATE MORE CRIME People commit crimes across the spectrum. S

    YES, STUPID PEOPLE CREATE MORE CRIME

    People commit crimes across the spectrum.

    State and Local IQ corresponds to crime rates.

    Stupid people get caught more often.

    Stupid people tend to pursue low risk low reward crimes. (those requiring little planning and high opportunism)

    When it comes to murder a surprisingly high percentage of murderers are caught.

    I use the term evil 80’s but the average criminal has an IQ of 93, which only serves to confirm my position that while the median of the distribution is 100, the medium of the distribution needs to be above 106, and closer to 110, leaving a full standard deviation between the median and the border of criminality 95 to preserve a high trust society.

    But in general the evil 80’s (probably up to 95) demographic (a) is universally outcast, (b) undesirable even to each other, (c) cannot trust information, particularly from each other, (d) personalizes it to ‘oppression’ rather than “avoidance”, (e) justifies his behavior as retaliation for that treatment (f) is still smart enough to profit from immorality if not smart enough to profit from morality. (g) this includes the ability to practice all forms of criminal behavior and develop skill at avoiding being caught.

    Not surprisingly (which is worth noting) criminals consistently measure with lower verbal ability. Hence my arguments that I’m not sure that the primary evolution out of africa is almost entirely verbal.

    —“Lower verbal ability is due to the structure of the brain. The recognition of feeling occurs in the left hemisphere while the ability to speak is governed in the right. When there is a little cross over between the hemispheres alexithymia is common. Common in the people who demonstrate alexithymia are executive function defects.”— Liam Eddy

    So just as you see greater verbal ability in ashkenazi, greater spatial in east asians, a balance in whites, you see deficiencies in every other group. But out of these deficiencies, (a) personality defects (b) cultural reinforcement of those defects, and (c) lower verbal IQ – exaggerate the problem.

    Worse, the ‘multiplier’ is aggression. Meaning that the higher the aggression in the personality the more expressed is the criminality of low IQ. Again, this is why I’m a critic of adding peoples who have not undergone the manorial transformation (filter) to the european gene pool, and social and political orders. They bring with them permanently defective genes.

    We forget that the primary difference between whites and ashkenazi of same ability is aggression, and that this aggression is as much or more responsible for their ability to carry intellectual workloads as well as make use of their intelligence competitively.

    African americans are highly pro social (extroverted), but very negatively distributed, and even in that distribution they are negatively biased in verbal ability, AND they mature much earlier, faster, and deeper.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-27 07:25:00 UTC

  • Nassim: a) Substitute “Warranty and Liability” for “Skin in the Game” and you sw

    Nassim: a) Substitute “Warranty and Liability” for “Skin in the Game” and you switch from discourse under colloquial, rhetorical, propter-hoc, low trust, heterogeneous, bazaars, to scientific post-hoc, high trust, homogenous, rule-of-law ‘markets’ proper.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 14:30:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989512005244674048

    Reply addressees: @nntaleb @bryan_caplan @tylercowen

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989481241337614336

    IN REPLY TO:

    @nntaleb

    EDUCATION.
    Distilling the conversation with @bryan_caplan hosted by @tylercowen
    1) There has been a traditional separation between:
    + “liberal education” for free men, (liber), who didn’t work for a living, &
    +”technical education”, for those who labor.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989481241337614336

  • Ending the Libertarian Fallacies of Argumentation and Estoppel

    ENDING FALLACIES OF ARGUMENTATION AND ESTOPPEL: THE LESSON 1) You cannot OWN anything without an insurer (violence) capable of insuring it against all *anticipatable* alternatives. 2) You can possess something in fact without an insurer (numbers). 3) You cannot possess a right of enforcement (property right) without an insurer. 4) Ownership consists of a normative and institutional contract (or demand) for the suppression of parasitism, and the insurance thereof. 5) Therefore ownership can only exist as a social and political construction, with ownership in fact and property ‘rights’ agreed to among the members of the society and polity. This is why terms matter so much when making arguments. If your premises are false so will be your conclusions. The premise of self ownership is false. Your body possesses your mind, and your mind exerts control over your body. But whomever owns your body and your mind is determine by those who possess the force necessary to do so. It can’t be otherwise. As Eli Says: —“non-aggression is a ground rule of argument. (If someone commits aggression it’s no longer an argument, but something else)”– In other words by cooperating in argument rather than boycotting argument, and forgoing violence, you are demonstrating cooperation. There exist only three possible relations (avoidance, cooperation, conflict). The problem is that people largely engage in falsehood in argument, so in that case are we cooperating, or are we in conflict at lower cost. Hoppe is stating a TAUTOLOGY (a circular definition). So again, hoppe is stating a requirement (law) that is necessary in the construction of Law proper. It’s entirely circular. It’s a SHOULD argument not an IS argument. Eli is showing that if you make an IS argument, (one that is externally correspondent, rather than only internally consistent) then you can only create a polity with liberty with violence, and economic necessity dictates that you can only produce sufficient violence to repel competitors with sufficient wealth, and you can only produce sufficient wealth with commons. And you can only produce commons if people cannot defect from payment for those commons in both service (fighting) and resources. In other words, you can’t produce a libertarian polity that can survive market competition for territory with other polities, which is why there have never existed such polities except on the frontier of a state powerful enough to prohibit competitors to the territory, yet insufficient wealth to settle, police, govern, and provide infrastructure for it. hence why the only examples of antyng approaching a libertarian fantasy are borderlands of empires. As such one only possesses liberty by permission of powers, who grant such liberties to excess population in exchange for the labor and investment of settlement of borderland territories. in other words, all libertarianism is just another (((diasporic))) people’s fantasy of preserving (((pastoralism))) and a normative and cultural bias in favor of consumption rather than investment in the commons. So just as communism eliminates private property by wishful thinking, libertarianism eliminates required common property by wishful thinking. The Militia produces sovereignty in fact, not liberty by permission for its members, if sufficient investment in commons and sufficient prevention of defection is produced. Thus Endeth The Lesson. Apr 23, 2018 11:43am

  • Yes we are being colonized. But The Only Enemy Is In The Mirror

    THE ONLY ENEMY IS IN THE MIRROR Never let people get away with irreciprocal judgement of others. Start complaining about others only after you have exhausted analysis of your own failings. This is what I tell to white people as well. We are unhappy because we expect others to do other than pursue their reproductive strategies – yet this in itself is illogical. The question is always, not why does a competitor harm you, but why are you too weak and incompetent to fend off a competitor? The only enemy is in the mirror. The strong and capable have no enemies because they have defended against those enemies. 0 – Yes the asian states are (filthy) dirty places, which is why westerners must (a) get shots, (b) are told “not touch anything that isn’t you”, and (c) are told not to eat or drink anything that a ‘Mohammed’s hands could touch’, and (d) india in particular but china as well produces such an extraordinary range of birth defects that are not due to inbreeding and incest – which are the cause of extraordinary birth defects in the arab and muslim worlds. 1 – yes these states are backward by nature. Hence the difference in corruption between ukraine, russia, india, and china. They are all very corrupt. 2 – Anglo revenue is from (a) reliable (non-corrupt) courts and the social and political superiority that arises from non-corrupt courts, (b) technological superiority that arises from the wealth of superior social and juridical non-corruption, (c) consumer consumption, and particularly consumer consumption of of housing. Our military is a money-losing proposition other than for preventing a non-market volatility of petroleum which has replaced agrarian territory as the most influential determinant of the wealth of advanced nation states. 3 – Anglos have made a great deal of their wealth dragging the primitive world out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, hard labor, hunger, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature. Anglos have spent a great deal of their wealth (a) preventing communism, (b) and now preventing islamism, and (c) we will probably have to prevent chinese authoritarianism if we are not careful. And worse we have committed near self destruction out of foolish charitability in immigration. 4 – The question is, since we have seen chinese colonization, russian colonization, french colonization, spanish colonization, dutch colonization, and inter-african colonization, and it was possible to conquer the world or even commit genocide on the entire planet – that is the opportunity cost. In other words, you could be colonized by the chinese, russians, mongols, turks, muslims. The question is not why these people colonize you. It is why you are so weak demographically, culturally, economically, politically, and militarily, that they can? Which is what I say to white men. If we are being colonized the only reason we are colonized is because we are too weak to prevent it.

  • Yes we are being colonized. But The Only Enemy Is In The Mirror

    THE ONLY ENEMY IS IN THE MIRROR Never let people get away with irreciprocal judgement of others. Start complaining about others only after you have exhausted analysis of your own failings. This is what I tell to white people as well. We are unhappy because we expect others to do other than pursue their reproductive strategies – yet this in itself is illogical. The question is always, not why does a competitor harm you, but why are you too weak and incompetent to fend off a competitor? The only enemy is in the mirror. The strong and capable have no enemies because they have defended against those enemies. 0 – Yes the asian states are (filthy) dirty places, which is why westerners must (a) get shots, (b) are told “not touch anything that isn’t you”, and (c) are told not to eat or drink anything that a ‘Mohammed’s hands could touch’, and (d) india in particular but china as well produces such an extraordinary range of birth defects that are not due to inbreeding and incest – which are the cause of extraordinary birth defects in the arab and muslim worlds. 1 – yes these states are backward by nature. Hence the difference in corruption between ukraine, russia, india, and china. They are all very corrupt. 2 – Anglo revenue is from (a) reliable (non-corrupt) courts and the social and political superiority that arises from non-corrupt courts, (b) technological superiority that arises from the wealth of superior social and juridical non-corruption, (c) consumer consumption, and particularly consumer consumption of of housing. Our military is a money-losing proposition other than for preventing a non-market volatility of petroleum which has replaced agrarian territory as the most influential determinant of the wealth of advanced nation states. 3 – Anglos have made a great deal of their wealth dragging the primitive world out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, hard labor, hunger, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature. Anglos have spent a great deal of their wealth (a) preventing communism, (b) and now preventing islamism, and (c) we will probably have to prevent chinese authoritarianism if we are not careful. And worse we have committed near self destruction out of foolish charitability in immigration. 4 – The question is, since we have seen chinese colonization, russian colonization, french colonization, spanish colonization, dutch colonization, and inter-african colonization, and it was possible to conquer the world or even commit genocide on the entire planet – that is the opportunity cost. In other words, you could be colonized by the chinese, russians, mongols, turks, muslims. The question is not why these people colonize you. It is why you are so weak demographically, culturally, economically, politically, and militarily, that they can? Which is what I say to white men. If we are being colonized the only reason we are colonized is because we are too weak to prevent it.

  • THE ONLY ENEMY IS IN THE MIRROR Never let people get away with irreciprocal judg

    THE ONLY ENEMY IS IN THE MIRROR

    Never let people get away with irreciprocal judgement of others. Start complaining about others only after you have exhausted analysis of your own failings. This is what I tell to white people as well. We are unhappy because we expect others to do other than pursue their reproductive strategies – yet this in itself is illogical. The question is always, not why does a competitor harm you, but why are you too weak and incompetent to fend off a competitor? The only enemy is in the mirror. The strong and capable have no enemies because they have defended against those enemies.

    0 – Yes the asian states are (filthy) dirty places, which is why westerners must (a) get shots, (b) are told “not touch anything that isn’t you”, and (c) are told not to eat or drink anything that a ‘Mohammed’s hands could touch’, and (d) india in particular but china as well produces such an extraordinary range of birth defects that are not due to inbreeding and incest – which are the cause of extraordinary birth defects in the arab and muslim worlds.

    1 – yes these states are backward by nature. Hence the difference in corruption between ukraine, russia, india, and china. They are all very corrupt.

    2 – Anglo revenue is from (a) reliable (non-corrupt) courts and the social and political superiority that arises from non-corrupt courts, (b) technological superiority that arises from the wealth of superior social and juridical non-corruption, (c) consumer consumption, and particularly consumer consumption of of housing. Our military is a money-losing proposition other than for preventing a non-market volatility of petroleum which has replaced agrarian territory as the most influential determinant of the wealth of advanced nation states.

    3 – Anglos have made a great deal of their wealth dragging the primitive world out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, hard labor, hunger, starvation, disease, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of nature. Anglos have spent a great deal of their wealth (a) preventing communism, (b) and now preventing islamism, and (c) we will probably have to prevent chinese authoritarianism if we are not careful. And worse we have committed near self destruction out of foolish charitability in immigration.

    4 – The question is, since we have seen chinese colonization, russian colonization, french colonization, spanish colonization, dutch colonization, and inter-african colonization, and it was possible to conquer the world or even commit genocide on the entire planet – that is the opportunity cost.

    In other words, you could be colonized by the chinese, russians, mongols, turks, muslims. The question is not why these people colonize you. It is why you are so weak demographically, culturally, economically, politically, and militarily, that they can?

    Which is what I say to white men. If we are being colonized the only reason we are colonized is because we are too weak to prevent it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-23 12:16:00 UTC

  • GAME DAY Let’s Play A Game Today: Natural Law Court. In today’s game, pick a top

    GAME DAY

    Let’s Play A Game Today: Natural Law Court.

    In today’s game, pick a topic, event, or person that is in conflict with natural law, name who you would prosecute (can be fictional) and lets see if we can successfully prosecute that case.

    (PS: Please do not waste my time trying to be cunning or funny. you won’t be either, just tedious. lol )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-22 09:34:00 UTC

  • Understanding is overrated, and volition over-estimated. I don’t expect people t

    Understanding is overrated, and volition over-estimated. I don’t expect people to understand. I only expect them to obey natural law or bear the painful consequences.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 11:04:00 UTC