Theme: Responsibility

  • You know, when you preserve hanging by community prosecution (hanging) it’s pret

    You know, when you preserve hanging by community prosecution (hanging) it’s pretty easy to eradicate crime and malfeasance over the course of a generation or two. Removing lynching and the duel was a tragedy.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-24 15:28:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1021779101256962049

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. You know, when you preserve hanging by commun

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    You know, when you preserve hanging by community prosecution (hanging) it’s pretty easy to eradicate crime and malfeasance over the course of a generation or two. Removing lynching and the duel was a tragedy.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-24 15:28:05 UTC

  • You know, when you preserve hanging by community prosecution (hanging) it’s pret

    You know, when you preserve hanging by community prosecution (hanging) it’s pretty easy to eradicate crime and malfeasance over the course of a generation or two. Removing lynching and the duel was a tragedy.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-24 11:28:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle shared a post. STAND YOUR GROUND MOVES IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION (a)

    Curt Doolittle shared a post.

    STAND YOUR GROUND MOVES IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION

    (a) man (rightly) criticizes woman in car for parking in handicapped spot.
    (b) other man (wrongly) comes from behind and shoves him to the ground.

    Correct behavior?
    (c) do not park in handicapped.
    (d) do not shove people to the ground for criticizing your behavior.

    Difference?
    (e) some of us have higher agency (self control, and insulation from impulse)
    (f) some of us have lower agency (self control and insulation from impulse)

    Anyone who is not ignorant of the the daily video releases on blacks beating whites for amusement and hatred will have a normal reaction to these consequences.

    Our different interpretations tell us nothing other than whether we have agency or lack it.

    This is why liberals (feminine) are incompatible with conservatives (masculine) – because our perception of the world, and our judgement of behavior differs meaningfully given our genetic differneces.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 23:45:46 UTC

  • STAND YOUR GROUND MOVES IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION (a) man (rightly) criticizes woma

    STAND YOUR GROUND MOVES IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION

    (a) man (rightly) criticizes woman in car for parking in handicapped spot.

    (b) other man (wrongly) comes from behind and shoves him to the ground.

    Correct behavior?

    (c) do not park in handicapped.

    (d) do not shove people to the ground for criticizing your behavior.

    Difference?

    (e) some of us have higher agency (self control, and insulation from impulse)

    (f) some of us have lower agency (self control and insulation from impulse)

    Anyone who is not ignorant of the the daily video releases on blacks beating whites for amusement and hatred will have a normal reaction to these consequences.

    Our different interpretations tell us nothing other than whether we have agency or lack it.

    This is why liberals (feminine) are incompatible with conservatives (masculine) – because our perception of the world, and our judgement of behavior differs meaningfully given our genetic differneces.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 19:45:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. DUNNING KRUGER GREATEST IN ETHICS, MORALITY,

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    DUNNING KRUGER GREATEST IN ETHICS, MORALITY, AND POLITICS

    One of the many benefits of technical discourse is that idiots watch but don’t participate.

    The Dunning Kruger effect in intuitionistic matters is logarithmically greater than technical matters because intuition requires no calculation, and calculation tends to falsify intuition.

    Meaning idiots presume that their political opinions are somehow more legitimate than their economic, scientific, and mathematical opinions.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-21 22:54:16 UTC

  • Punishing Free Riders Begins Early

    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssa
    —“… children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders … “— (Via James Santagata) “Human flourishing depends on individuals paying costs to contribute to the common good, but such arrangements are vulnerable to free riding, in which individuals benefit from others’ contributions without paying costs themselves. Systems of tracking and sanctioning free riders can stabilize cooperation, but the origin of such tendencies is not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders. Across six studies, we showed that these tendencies are robust, large in magnitude, tuned to intentional rather than unintentional noncontribution, and generally consistent across third- and first-party cases. Further, these effects cannot be accounted for by factors that frequently co-occur with free riding, such as nonconforming behaviors or the costs that free riding imposes on the group. Our findings demonstrate that from early in life, children both hold and enforce a normative expectation that individuals are intrinsically obligated to contribute to the common good.” http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssa&
  • Punishing Free Riders Begins Early

    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssa
    —“… children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders … “— (Via James Santagata) “Human flourishing depends on individuals paying costs to contribute to the common good, but such arrangements are vulnerable to free riding, in which individuals benefit from others’ contributions without paying costs themselves. Systems of tracking and sanctioning free riders can stabilize cooperation, but the origin of such tendencies is not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders. Across six studies, we showed that these tendencies are robust, large in magnitude, tuned to intentional rather than unintentional noncontribution, and generally consistent across third- and first-party cases. Further, these effects cannot be accounted for by factors that frequently co-occur with free riding, such as nonconforming behaviors or the costs that free riding imposes on the group. Our findings demonstrate that from early in life, children both hold and enforce a normative expectation that individuals are intrinsically obligated to contribute to the common good.” http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssa&
  • Curt Doolittle shared a link. PUNISHING FREE RIDERS BEGINS EARLY —“… childre

    Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    PUNISHING FREE RIDERS BEGINS EARLY

    —“… children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders … “—

    (Via James Santagata)

    “Human flourishing depends on individuals paying costs to contribute to the common good, but such arrangements are vulnerable to free riding, in which individuals benefit from others’ contributions without paying costs themselves. Systems of tracking and sanctioning free riders can stabilize cooperation, but the origin of such tendencies is not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders. Across six studies, we showed that these tendencies are robust, large in magnitude, tuned to intentional rather than unintentional noncontribution, and generally consistent across third- and first-party cases. Further, these effects cannot be accounted for by factors that frequently co-occur with free riding, such as nonconforming behaviors or the costs that free riding imposes on the group. Our findings demonstrate that from early in life, children both hold and enforce a normative expectation that individuals are intrinsically obligated to contribute to the common good.”

    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssa&


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-17 17:57:53 UTC

  • FREE RIDERS BEGINS EARLY —“… children as young as 4 years old negatively eva

    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssahttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssaPUNISHING FREE RIDERS BEGINS EARLY

    —“… children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders … “—

    (Via James Santagata)

    “Human flourishing depends on individuals paying costs to contribute to the common good, but such arrangements are vulnerable to free riding, in which individuals benefit from others’ contributions without paying costs themselves. Systems of tracking and sanctioning free riders can stabilize cooperation, but the origin of such tendencies is not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders. Across six studies, we showed that these tendencies are robust, large in magnitude, tuned to intentional rather than unintentional noncontribution, and generally consistent across third- and first-party cases. Further, these effects cannot be accounted for by factors that frequently co-occur with free riding, such as nonconforming behaviors or the costs that free riding imposes on the group. Our findings demonstrate that from early in life, children both hold and enforce a normative expectation that individuals are intrinsically obligated to contribute to the common good.”

    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssa&


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-17 13:57:00 UTC