You know, when you preserve hanging by community prosecution (hanging) it’s pretty easy to eradicate crime and malfeasance over the course of a generation or two. Removing lynching and the duel was a tragedy.
You know, when you preserve hanging by community prosecution (hanging) it’s pretty easy to eradicate crime and malfeasance over the course of a generation or two. Removing lynching and the duel was a tragedy.
You know, when you preserve hanging by community prosecution (hanging) it’s pretty easy to eradicate crime and malfeasance over the course of a generation or two. Removing lynching and the duel was a tragedy.
(a) man (rightly) criticizes woman in car for parking in handicapped spot. (b) other man (wrongly) comes from behind and shoves him to the ground.
Correct behavior? (c) do not park in handicapped. (d) do not shove people to the ground for criticizing your behavior.
Difference? (e) some of us have higher agency (self control, and insulation from impulse) (f) some of us have lower agency (self control and insulation from impulse)
Anyone who is not ignorant of the the daily video releases on blacks beating whites for amusement and hatred will have a normal reaction to these consequences.
Our different interpretations tell us nothing other than whether we have agency or lack it.
This is why liberals (feminine) are incompatible with conservatives (masculine) – because our perception of the world, and our judgement of behavior differs meaningfully given our genetic differneces.
(a) man (rightly) criticizes woman in car for parking in handicapped spot.
(b) other man (wrongly) comes from behind and shoves him to the ground.
Correct behavior?
(c) do not park in handicapped.
(d) do not shove people to the ground for criticizing your behavior.
Difference?
(e) some of us have higher agency (self control, and insulation from impulse)
(f) some of us have lower agency (self control and insulation from impulse)
Anyone who is not ignorant of the the daily video releases on blacks beating whites for amusement and hatred will have a normal reaction to these consequences.
Our different interpretations tell us nothing other than whether we have agency or lack it.
This is why liberals (feminine) are incompatible with conservatives (masculine) – because our perception of the world, and our judgement of behavior differs meaningfully given our genetic differneces.
DUNNING KRUGER GREATEST IN ETHICS, MORALITY, AND POLITICS
One of the many benefits of technical discourse is that idiots watch but don’t participate.
The Dunning Kruger effect in intuitionistic matters is logarithmically greater than technical matters because intuition requires no calculation, and calculation tends to falsify intuition.
Meaning idiots presume that their political opinions are somehow more legitimate than their economic, scientific, and mathematical opinions.
—“… children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders … “—
(Via James Santagata)
“Human flourishing depends on individuals paying costs to contribute to the common good, but such arrangements are vulnerable to free riding, in which individuals benefit from others’ contributions without paying costs themselves. Systems of tracking and sanctioning free riders can stabilize cooperation, but the origin of such tendencies is not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders. Across six studies, we showed that these tendencies are robust, large in magnitude, tuned to intentional rather than unintentional noncontribution, and generally consistent across third- and first-party cases. Further, these effects cannot be accounted for by factors that frequently co-occur with free riding, such as nonconforming behaviors or the costs that free riding imposes on the group. Our findings demonstrate that from early in life, children both hold and enforce a normative expectation that individuals are intrinsically obligated to contribute to the common good.”
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssa&
—“… children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders … “—
(Via James Santagata)
“Human flourishing depends on individuals paying costs to contribute to the common good, but such arrangements are vulnerable to free riding, in which individuals benefit from others’ contributions without paying costs themselves. Systems of tracking and sanctioning free riders can stabilize cooperation, but the origin of such tendencies is not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders. Across six studies, we showed that these tendencies are robust, large in magnitude, tuned to intentional rather than unintentional noncontribution, and generally consistent across third- and first-party cases. Further, these effects cannot be accounted for by factors that frequently co-occur with free riding, such as nonconforming behaviors or the costs that free riding imposes on the group. Our findings demonstrate that from early in life, children both hold and enforce a normative expectation that individuals are intrinsically obligated to contribute to the common good.”
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssa&
—“… children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders … “—
(Via James Santagata)
“Human flourishing depends on individuals paying costs to contribute to the common good, but such arrangements are vulnerable to free riding, in which individuals benefit from othersâ contributions without paying costs themselves. Systems of tracking and sanctioning free riders can stabilize cooperation, but the origin of such tendencies is not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders. Across six studies, we showed that these tendencies are robust, large in magnitude, tuned to intentional rather than unintentional noncontribution, and generally consistent across third- and first-party cases. Further, these effects cannot be accounted for by factors that frequently co-occur with free riding, such as nonconforming behaviors or the costs that free riding imposes on the group. Our findings demonstrate that from early in life, children both hold and enforce a normative expectation that individuals are intrinsically obligated to contribute to the common good.”
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssahttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797618779061?journalCode=pssaPUNISHING FREE RIDERS BEGINS EARLY
—“… children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders … “—
(Via James Santagata)
“Human flourishing depends on individuals paying costs to contribute to the common good, but such arrangements are vulnerable to free riding, in which individuals benefit from others’ contributions without paying costs themselves. Systems of tracking and sanctioning free riders can stabilize cooperation, but the origin of such tendencies is not well understood. Here, we provide evidence that children as young as 4 years old negatively evaluate and sanction free riders. Across six studies, we showed that these tendencies are robust, large in magnitude, tuned to intentional rather than unintentional noncontribution, and generally consistent across third- and first-party cases. Further, these effects cannot be accounted for by factors that frequently co-occur with free riding, such as nonconforming behaviors or the costs that free riding imposes on the group. Our findings demonstrate that from early in life, children both hold and enforce a normative expectation that individuals are intrinsically obligated to contribute to the common good.”