https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeYR0H3DzXgWE CAN SOLVE OUR PROBLEMS BY MATURING POST HASTE
by Brandon Hayes
[Stop making justificatory arguments about feelings]
The convergence points of the brightest minds are obvious to anyone that is looking (an example below):
—“It’s the women who are going to stand-up to the women who are just trying to destroy conversation; and I think that that is something where, Jordan has talked about it; none of the men want to make this argument, it would be better optically if it were women saying “Hey, some of us are out of line! this is too much and it’s too aggressive and you can’t say “mansplaining” about EVERYTHING.” — Eric Weinstein
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeYR0H3DzXg
———–
“WHY DO WOMEN ENGAGE IN NAXALT?”
—“Question – why do women hate generalizations more than men? Women far more inclined to say “yes but not all X are like that!”, where as men get the idea that trends exist, even if some individuals are outliers to this trend. Is it to do with the risk or social ostracism or one of these female power plays?”— A Friend
It’s not complicated:
Herd Instinct: Fear of being ostracized, ‘left behind’, or ‘left out of resource consumption’, or having her children face the same, because despite their children’s empirical value to the tribe,women want their children to have the best opportunities for social, economic, and reproductive success.
Men think of the tribe (generalization) women think of themselves (solipsism) and their offspring (individualism).
Female Herd “who will be harmed by this truth”,
-vs-
Male Pack “what opportunity can be seized by this truth”
Hence why monogamy was a compromise that succeeded by dividing labor, and while no one had perfection each person had a ‘chance’ of benefitting from the division of labor between the genders.
The question is, now that women are at least marginally as capable in the workforce within the boundaries of the majority of jobs ‘in the middle’ (easy jobs), we are returning to serial marriage, or single motherhood (maternalism).
To men, everything is a distribution (bell curve). To women everything is a flat line in the making.
– Curt Doolittle
—-
We ought not destroy competing packs to benefit the herds. Herds can’t respond efficiently to rapidly changing environments; what you get instead of problem solving is panic.
Panic among animals shortens their time horizons (they make quicker decisions less thought through) for shorter term gains. This mistake accumulates until the day of reckoning comes about. The day all of your “not planning for the future” comes back to haunt you.
Strong feelings are not the equivalent to being correct. There isn’t a feel good substitute for truth; no matter how much we’d like there to be!
https://www.facebook.com/brandon.hayes.5851/posts/10103416983160261Updated Aug 31, 2018, 9:56 AM
Source date (UTC): 2018-08-31 09:56:00 UTC