Theme: Responsibility

Constitution: Rights and Obligation
Constitution: Natural Rights and Obligations
Article III

Natural Rights and Obligations

Under The Natural Law of Reciprocity
[W]hereas;
( … ) (only incentive)
And Whereas;
The Natural Law consists in Sovereignty (via-positiva) and Reciprocity (via-negativa), in display, word and deed, including Reciprocity in Speech (truthful speech) regardless of cost to the Status (dominance, competence hierarchy), within the limits of Proportionality (in-group defection) within the limits of the utility of cooperation (out groups).

Reciprocity requires limiting our display, word, and deed to: – Fully informed (truthful and complete); – – Regardless of cost to the status, competence, or dominance hierarchy. – Productive and; – Voluntary transfer (or exchange, or imposition of costs upon); – The Demonstrated interests of Others; – Either directly or indirectly (by externality) – Within the limit of possible due diligence; – Within the limit of incentive for in-group defection; – Within The Limit of the Utility of future out-group Cooperation; – And liable and warrantied, within the limits of restitutability; – Eliminating the incentive of retaliation and retaliation cycles, – And imposition of costs upon the commons of trust by which all ingroup cooperate.

Reciprocity In Display, Word, and Deed

Regarding Truthful Speech;
Definition;
Truth: “Testimony that Satisfies Demand for Infallibility”
Where Truth consists of the series:
1. Tautological Truth: That testimony you give when promising the equality of two statements using different terms: A circular definition, a statement of equality or a statement of identity.
  
  Analytic Truth: The testimony you give promising the internal consistency of one or more statements used in the construction of a proof in an axiomatic(declarative) system. (a Logical Truth).
  
  Ideal Truth: That testimony (description) you would give, if your knowledge (information) was complete, your language was sufficient, stated without error, cleansed of bias, and absent deceit, within the scope of precision limited to the context of the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possessed of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony. (Ideal Truth = Perfect Parsimony.)
  
  Truthfulness: that testimony (description) you give if your knowledge (information) is incomplete, your language is insufficient, you have performed due diligence in the elimination of error, imaginary content, wishful thinking, bias, fictionalism, and deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and which you warranty to be so; and the promise that another possessed of the knowledge, performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.
  
  Reasonableness: that testimony (description) you give, as justification for your reporting of your belief, justification, preference, coice, or actions with full knowledge that knowledge is incomplete, your language is insufficient, but you have not performed due diligence in the elimination of error and bias, but which you warranty is free of deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possess of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.
  
  Honesty: that testimony (description) you give with full knowledge that knowledge is incomplete, your language is insufficient, but you have not performed due diligence in the elimination of error and bias, but which you warranty is free of deceit; within the scope of precision limited to the question you wish to answer; and the promise that another possess of the same knowledge (information), performing the same due diligence, having the same experiences, would provide the same testimony.
Where;
1. Truthful Speech Satisfies the Demand for Increasing Infallibility of Decidability
Where; Demand for Decidability Consists In:
1. In the REVERSE: a question (statement) is DECIDABLE if an algorithm (set of operations) exists within the limits of the system (rules, axioms, theories) that can produce a decision (choice). In other words, if information sufficient for the decision is present (ie: is decidable) within the system(ie: grammar) in the absence of appeal (default to) intuition.
  
  In the OBVERSE: Instead, we should determine if there is a means of choosing without the need for additional information supplied from outside the system (ie: not discretionary).
Or; If DISCRETION, by appeal to (default to) intuition or preference, is necessary then the question is undecidable, and if discretion is unnecessary, a proposition is decidable. This separates reasoning (in the narrow sense) from calculation (in the wider sense) from computation (algorithm).
Given the Spectrum of Demand for Decidability:
1. Intelligible: Decidable enough to imagine a conceptual relationship
  
  Reasonable: Decidable enough for me to feel confident that my decision will satisfy my needs, and is not a waste of time, energy, resources.
  
  Actionable: Decidable enough for me to take actions given time, effort, knowledge, resources.
  
  Ethical and Moral: Decidable enough for me to not impose risk or costs upon the interests of others, or cause others to retaliate against me, if they have knowledge of and transparency into my actions.
  
  Normative: Decidable enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion among my fellow people with similar values.
  
  Judicial: Decidable enough to resolve a conflict without subjective opinion across different peoples with different knowledge, comprehension and values.
  
  Scientific: Decidable regardless of all opinions or perspectives (True)
  
  Logical: Decidable out of physical or logical necessity
  
  Tautological: Decidedly identical in properties (referents) if not references (terms). So to borrow the one of many terms from Economics, we can see in this series (list) a market demand for increasingly infallible decidability.
Given the Human Faculties:
1. Sense (stimuli) … … Perception (composition) … … … Association
  
  Logic Facility (constant relations) … … Imagination Facility (prediction) … … … Reason Facility (comparison, permutation)
  
  Grammar facility (statements) … … Paradigms (‘metaphysics’, ‘dimensions’) … … Vocabulary … … … Sounds … … … Signs (acts, actions) … … … Marks (records) … … … … accidental … … … … intentional … … … … … Mark … … … … … Symbol … … … … … … Glyph … … … … … Pictogram … … … … … Picture … … … … … Picture Series … … … … … Animation
  
  Communication Facility (“Language”) … Truths … … .Formal Science … … … Logics (deflationary Grammars) … … … Mathematics … … … Algorithms … … Physical Sciences … … … Physics … … … Chemistry … … … Biology … … … Sentience (Consciousness) … … Behavioral Sciences … … … Metaphysics (Language) … … … Psychology … … … Sociology … Disciplines (Applied) … … … Medicine (Repair and Maintenance) … … … Engineering (Transformation) … … … Accounting, Finance, Economics (Measurement) … … … Economics (Cooperation) … … … History (Categorization and Summation) … … … Law (Dispute Resolution) … Communication … … Testimony (warrantied by due diligence … … Rhetorics (argumentative, persuasive Grammars) … … Written (Formal) Language … … ORDINARY LANGUAGE (Informal, colloquial, and Idiomatic) … … Narrative (description) … Education … … Narrations (inflationary Grammars) … … Storytelling (loading, framing) … Deceits … … Fictionalism … … … Pseudoscience -> Magic … … … Idealism-> Surrealism, and … … … Supernaturalism->Occult … … Obscurantism (Obscuring, Overloading) … … … Misdirection (Deceit) … … … Propaganda … … … Disinformation … … … Social Construction … … Fraud (for gain) … … Harm (Evil, for harm regardless of gain)
Where Truthful Speech Consists of:
1. Complete Sentences
  
  In promissory form
  
  In testimonial form
  
  In operational vocabulary (as actions)
  
  absent the verb to-be (is, are, was, were…)
  
  including all changes in state
  
  including all consequences of change in state
  
  from an observer’s point of view
  
  producing a series of testable transactions.
Where the Criteria for Truthful Speech Consists in:
Coherence Across the Dimensions Testifiable by Man, in The Series:
1. Existential > The Physical Laws of the Universe … 1. Realism > … 2. Naturalism >
  
  Possible > The Formal Laws of the Universe … 7. Operational – Demonstrable Sequence > … 8. Empirical – Externally Correspondent > … 9. Logical – Categorically Consistent
  
  Rational > Behavioral (Natural) Laws of the Universe … 10. Rational Choice – Demonstrated Preference > … … 11. Incentives – Demonstrated Interest > … … … 12. Body, Mind, Memory, Effort, Time … … … 13. Mates, Offspring, Kin … … … 14. Status, Reputation, Kith … … … 15. Several Interests (in many forms) … … … 16. Common Interests (in many forms) … 17. Reciprocal > … … 18. Productive (reciprocal increase in capital) … … 19. Exhaustively Informed (due diligence gainst deceit) … … 20. Voluntary Transfer > … … 20. Free of Negative Externality > … 21. Organizable > … … 22. Power Distribution of Law > … … 23. Pareto Distribution of Assets > … … 24. Nash Distribution of Rewards >
  
  Survivable > Evolutionary Laws of the Universe … 25. Prevents Regression to the Mean (loss of biological capital) … 25. Preserves Natural Selection (selection by merit) … 27. Increases Adaptivity (biological capital)
  
  Complete > … 26. Limits, Completeness, Full Accounting, … 27. Consistency, Coherence, Parsimony
  
  Competitive – in the market for theories … 29. Sufficient – Satisfies the Demand For Infallibility … 30. Parsimony – In competition with other testimonies
  
  Warrantable > … 32. (i)as having performed due diligence in the above dimensions; … 33. (ii)where due diligence is sufficient to satisfy the demand for infallibility; … 34. (iii)and where one entertains no risk that one cannot perform restitution for.
As a Defense Against the Series:
1. Ignorance and Willful Ignorance;
  
  Error and failure of Due Diligence;
  
  Bias and Wishful Thinking;
  
  And the many Deceits of: … (a) Loading and Framing; … (b) Suggestion, Obscurantism, and … (c) Overloading, Propaganda and Social Construction … (d) Fictionalisms of … … i) Idealism -> Pseudorationalism, and … … ii) Magic -> Pseudoscience, and … … iii) Occult -> Supernaturalism; … (e) Sophistry … (f) and outright Fabrications (fictions).
In Defense or Advocacy Of:
Any transfer of demonstrated interests that is irreciprocal, as measured by the tests of: … (a) productive … (b) exhaustively informed and exhaustively accounted … (c) voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests … (d) free of externality of the same criteria … (e) warrantied and within the limits of liability
Including but Not Limited To the Spectrum Of:
… (a) murder, … (b) harm, damage, theft, … (c) fraud, fraud by omission, fraud by indirection, baiting into hazard … (d) free riding, socialization of losses, privatization of commons, … (e) rent seeking, monopoly seeking, conspiracy, statism/corporatism, … (f) conversion(religion/pseudoscience), … (g) displacement(immigration/overbreeding), … (h) conquest (war).
Where Demonstrated Interest Includes:
1. Existential (or Natural) Interests:

Definition:

Existential (or Natural) Interests: Interests inherent in physical existence, self-determination, mindfulness, reproduction, and exit of and insulation from the commons.

Where; Existential (or Natural) Interests include:

1. Self: Life, Body, Genes, Mind, Attention, Memories, Time, and Action, Stimulation, Experience, Knowledge,

2. Privacy: Sexual Preference and Activity Letters and Records Home (nest, rest)

3. Kin and Interpersonal (Relationship) Interests Mates (access to sex/reproduction), and Marriage Children (genetic reproduction) Consanguineous Relations (family, kin, clan, tribal and national relations)

AND; 2. Cooperative Interests:

Definition:

( … )

Where; Cooperative Interests Include:

4. Status and Class (reputation, honor) Self-Image, Status, Reputation Social, Sexual, Economic, Political, and Military Market Value

5. Sustainable Patterns of Association, Cooperation, Insurance, Reproduction, Production, Distribution and Trade Friends, Acquaintances, Neighbors, Cooperative Relations, Commercial Relations, Political Relations, and Military Relations.

Therefore;

Right, Obligation, Defense, and Inalienabiilty of participation in the markets for cooperation:

1. Association,

( … )

2. Cooperation,

( … )

3. Insurance,?????

( … )

4. Reproduction,

( … )

5. Investment, Entrepreneurship, Invention, Production, Distribution and Trade

( … )

6. Commons

( … )

7. Polities

( … )

AND Obtained Interests:

Definition:

Obtained Interest: Interests that are obtained by bearing a cost of opportunity, time, effort, resources, to obtain that interest without imposing upon the previously born costs of others.

Where; Obtained Interests Include:

6. Several (Personal) Interests Personal property: “Things an individual has a Monopoly Of Control over the use of.”

7. Shareholder (Fractional) Interests Shares in property: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (claims for partial ownership)

8. Title Interests (Weights and Measures) Trademarks and Brands (prohibitions on fraudulent transfers within a geography).

9. Artificial Interests (Privileges) Letters of Marque, Patents, Copyrights, Grants of License.

10. Common Interests, or “Commons” (Community Property)

(i) Institutional Property: “Those objects into which we have invested our forgone opportunities, our efforts, or our material assets, in order to aggregate capital from multiple individuals for mutual gain.”

(ii) Informational commons: knowledge. Information.

(iii) Informal (Normative) Institutions: Our norms: habits, manners, ethics and morals. Informal institutional property is nearly impossible to quantify and price. The costs are subjective and consist of forgone opportunities.

(iv) Formal (Physical) Commons: the territory, it’s waterways, parks, buildings, improvements and infrastructure.

(v) Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion, Education, Banking, Treasury, Government, Laws, Courts.

(vi) Monuments (art and artifacts). Monuments claim territory, demonstrate wealth, and provide one of the longest most invariable normative and economic returns that any culture can construct as a demonstration of conspicuous production (wealth), and as such, conspicuous excellence. (hence why competing monuments represent an invasion. Temples, Churches, Museums, Sculptures being the most obvious examples of cultural claim or conquest. )

(vii) Common Opportunity Interests When people come together in proximity, and suppress impositions of costs upon the interests of others through the incremental evolution of the law of reciprocity, they decrease the time and effort required to produce voluntary association, cooperation and exchange. As such polities decrease opportunity costs, and generate opportunities. These opportunities are un-homesteaded (opportunities) until invested in by individuals either by expenditure of time effort and resources, or by forgoing opportunities for consumption. As such the proximity of people and the institution of reciprocity under law produce a commons of opportunities that we seize (homestead) by competition. As such no one may claim interest in an opportunity without conducting and exchange by which to seize it.

(viii) (human capital)

11. Common Future Interests

( .. ) (Self Determination within the limits of reciprocity, …)
And; Where;
The ( …. knowledge, epistemology … ) life cycle: (a) observation (Experience) (b) *Free association* (c) test of reasonability (d) *Hypothesis* (e) Perform Due Diligence. (f) *Theory* (g) Survival in the market for application (h) *Law* (i) Survival in the market for refutation (j) *Habituation into metaphysical assumptions* (k) Falsification and reformation
And; Where;
Facts (theories of observations) vs Theories vs Laws ( … )
Therefore;
1 – No right to Untruthful or Ir-reciprocal speech in public to the public in matters public shall exist for any reason either directly or indirectly.

( Counsel: While we may not violate an individual’s right to his or her thoughts, we have the obligation to prevent harm by display word and deed that produces evidence of those thoughts in the commons, where demand for desirable falsehoods spreads among those with the least agency to resist them. )

2. And all Speech to the Public, in Public in matters Public by display, word, and deed, shall be involuntarily warrantied, as are all other goods, services, and information, to be free of untruthful speech and irreciprocity, directly or indirectly, or by accumulated consequence of externality.

3 – The Right to be free of, the obligation to refrain from, and the obligation to defend against untruthful and irreciprocal speech in public to the public in matters public in display word and deed shall not be infringed; and to Obligation stop, demand restitution for, punish, and prevent repetition of untruthful and irreciprocal speech shall not be infringed.

4 – The Right to be free of, the Obligation to refrain from, and the Obligation to defend against, suppression of truthful and reciprocal public speech in public to the public in matters public, and to Obligation stop, demand restitution for, punish, and prevent repetition of suppression of such truthful and reciprocal speech shall not be infringed.

(Counsel: the technique of suppressing truthful and reciprocal speech shall be prohibited.)

5 – Specific Prohibitions:

1 – The right to be free of Defamation in by libel and slander shall not be infringed; and the obligation that one speak truthfully, and that the person, group, or organization committed a crime punishable under law, shall not be limited.

(a) The offended party need not demonstrate damage. The offending party need demonstrate the statements are not false, either in expression or implication.

(b) The practice of “Trial by Gossip” and “Trial By Media” shall be prohibited.

(Counsel: Having opened the Court to standing in matters of the commons, all disputes public and private can have recourse of action and voice).

2 – The Right to be free of Sedition in entertainment, arts, and letters, shall include;

(a) fiction shall be labeled and structured as a fiction, and obviously so; (b) dramatization of public figures directly or implied shall be prohibited; (c) Attempts at creation of a false history (historical fictionalism) shall be prohibited; (d) Framing of the un-heroic as heroic, immoral as moral, and unethical as ethical, shall be prohibited; (e) Any attempt to ( …. )

(Counsel: The Abrahamic practice of using the permissiveness of the arts and letters to harm the informational commons by the diminution of our ancestors and heroes shall be prohibited.)

3 – The Right to be free of sedition by criticism of European people, their history, their achievements, ….. their religion…. traditions…. Culture … the obligation to…

4 – The Specific Right to be free of The First and Second Jewish wars against European people and the restoration of the Islamic war against the world peoples by:

i) The First Semitic War of sedition by Judaism revolt against truth, reason, science, market meritocracy, and the natural transcendence of man out of ignorance and poverty, by the false promises to bait peoples in to hazard by use of the deceits of supernatural religions.

ii) The Second Semitic War of Sedition by Judaism’s revolt against truth, reason, science, market meritocracy, and the natural transcendence of man by the false promises to of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws; specifically the pseudosciences of Boasian anthropology, Freudian psychology, Marxist Economics and Sociology, Marxist-socialism’s economics and politics, Gramsci, Adorno, and Fromm’s culture, values, and aesthetics; the sophistry of Derrida, Foucault and ____’s attack on truth – the foundation of our civilization. Friedan’s undermining of marriage and family. Mises’, Rand’s, And Rothbard’s undermining of our Morality and Law. Trotsky, Sch—-, and Kristol’s undermining of our political institutions. And the 100M world dead by their hands, and the irreversible damage to our civilization by their sedition.

iii) The Restoration and Continuation of the Islamic war on human civilization, and their 1400 year attack on Western civilization, and their destruction of all the great civilizations of the ancient world: north African, Egyptian, Levantine, Mesopotamian, Anatolian, Byzantine-Greek, old Europe-Balkans, the great civilization of Persia, and the foundations of Hindu Civilization in the the Indus river valleys. The one billion dead, the loss of great cultures, their arts, their letters, their knowledge, and worst of all, their genetics.

5 – The Right to be free of Sedition by competition against, or argument against, or criticism of the natural law, the law of the European peoples, and this constitution, and the Obligation to refrain from sedition, and Obligation to defend and prosecute sedition shall not be infringed.

6 – Specific Licenses:

(Christianity) (compatible with natural law) (extension of natural law)

Regarding Symbols
( … )
Regarding Privacy ( … )
Regarding Attention
( … )
Regarding Interference

1 – The Right of Transit in commercial and public spaces shall not be infringed. Therefore, the obligation to refrain from impediment or obstruction of ways, including doors, aisles, paths, roads and their likenesses in land, water, air, space shall not be diminished.

Regarding Several Property Interests
( … )
Regarding Artificial Property Interests
Whereas;
The purpose of copyright, trademark, brand, patent, and natural patent is to prevent profit without contribution to research, development, and production – it is a prohibition on free riding.
Therefore;
1 – The purpose of Trademark is the production of a weight and measure, and all such marks shall constitute a weight and measure. As such the right of the people to register trademarks, and prohibit violations of those trademarks shall not be infringed.The purpose of the practice of “branding” using the full range of visible properties available to man, shall constitute a weight and measure.

2 – The purpose of Copyright is to prevent profit from the productivity of an author in the market for goods, services, and information. Copyright shall be reduced to the Creative Commons that disallows profiting from the distribution of works by others but permits copying for personal and non-commercial use. (Defund Entertainment through elimination of market subsidy via copyright, yet preserve rights of creators from profiting from their efforts without compensation. This shall not be construed beyond the original intent of this clause which is the free distribution of all creative works but the requirement to negotiate compensation from the use of such works for commercial purposes. In other words, a radio station may play music for free and a civic festival show a video for free, but the use of any works in acts of marketing, advertising, or branding, or reproduction for sale require negotiation with the creator.

3 – The purpose of Patents is to subsidize BASIC technological research and investment such that the rewards for basic research are substantive.Patents are not a vehicle depriving the market of innovations, or depriving the market of goods services or information, or creating rents, but for providing compensation and reward for investment in basic research.As such, the scope of patents shall be limited to basic research in materials and processes of physical transformation and construction, and in particular neither logical nor aesthetic patents shall be issued. They shall be protected under copyright and trademark.

4 – The purpose of Natural Patents is to provide compensation to individuals for the production of innovation whether by design or accident. A natural patent shall apply to the use of an individual’s genome or any other biological product for commercial use.

5 – The durability of copyright, trademark, brand, patent, and natural patents:
- The durability of Copyright shall be the lifetime of the creators and living offspring at the time of production.
  
  The durability of trademark shall be the continued production of the good, service, or information plus three years.
  
  The durability of a brand shall be the continued production of the good plus three years.
  
  The durability of a patent shall be the direct cost of investment times five, the duration of the production, distribution, and sale plus eighteen months.Patents may be sold, but only for the purpose of production. Patents may not be held either to deny the market, nor to farm the patent for dividends, nor to pursue profit for patent infringement independent of production.
  
  The durability of a natural patent shall be the lifetime of the individual, his offspring whether living or yet to be.
Regarding Common Property Interests

1 – The right of Transit, including driving, on existing routes, shall not be infringed for any reason other than for the past imposition on risk of others by means of recklessness, impairment driving, or interference in other’s driving, whether by display, word, or deed.

2 – All laws regarding the use of private and common spaces and all within them shall enumerate which rights are granted and if unenumerated shall be deemed ‘Sacred’; meaning that one has none of the rights listed below, whatsoever.

Those rights shall be:
- Sacred: no rights.
  
  Transit – passage by walking through 3d space, without mechanical or other aid, limited to what you can carry, on existing paths.
  
  Transport – passage of other than body and what you can carry without aid through space, on existing paths.
  
  Wander – movement over outside of existing paths.
  
  Loiter – Enumerated as ‘Rest’, Sleep, ‘Stay’
  
  Congregation – of more than one person.
  
  Observation – may observe others, or merely watch whereyou ‘re walking – this is to limit both people observing, image capture, and drone activity.
  
  Recording – by any means.
  
  Display – including dress, appearance, and behavior
  
  Sound – other that whispers from one person to another
  
  Approach – right of approaching others
  
  Greeting – Acknowledgement of one another’s presence.
  
  Speech (Word), and shall enumerate to include
  
  …. …. …. “Acknowledgement“,
  
  …. …. …. “Introduction“,
  
  …. …. …. “Conversation“,
  
  …. …. …. “Solicitation“, “Begging“
  
  …. …. …. “Promotion“,
  
  …. …. …. “Listed Topics, Listed Prohibited Topics“
  
  Action –‘Movement’, ‘Touch’, ‘Play’
  
  Usus – Use: setting up a stall, holding meeting.
  
  Fructus – Fruits: (blackberries, wood, profits)
  
  Emancipation – Emancipation: (sale, transfer)
  
  Homestead – Homesteading: Convert an opportunity into property through bearing a cost of transformation.
  
  Abusus – Abuse: (Consumption, harm or Destruction)
Regarding Informal Institutions

( … )
Regarding The Construction, Maintenance, Preservation, and Epansion of Trust Whereas; Therefore; Obligation to perform, right to recieve,
The Natural European ethic

Beauty in mastery in craftsmanship, elegance in design, virtues in meaning Excellence demonstrated by achievement in adversarial competition Heroism – direction of dominance, and suffering of burdens to the production of commons, Capitalization – in leaving the world improved in capital progressing to an eden for having lived in it Truth – Truth Before Face, Personal, Familial, competence, dominance hierarchy Respect – a reward to be earned not a presumption to be granted ??? – Public Compliment and Accolade and Private Criticism. ??? – The treatment of members of the polity as customers in all markets of cooperation

The Christian European Ethic

The eradication of hatred from the human heart The oath of non aggression against others The extension of kinship love to all in the polity The exhaustion of forgiveness before abandonment, ostracization or punishment. The demand for personal act of material charity, and the prohibition on unearned or symbolic virtue signaling The reward in calm mind, virtous heart, and confident soul by surrender of responsibility and absolution from failure, criticism or blame for having done so.

The Heathen Ethic

The Celebration of Debt to Universe, Nature, Ancestors, and Heroes, whose inheritance we enjoy. The Sacredness of the Family, The Faith, The Law, and the People, whose contributions we enjoy The Public Celebration of Joy, Private Suffering of Complaint, whose happiness we all enjoy

Regarding Freedom from (normative etc) Competition (cost)
( … )
Regarding Language of Speech Whereas;
( … ) (Differences in language : high precision, low context, the relation to truth and operational speech, the metaphysical content of languages, and the costs of frictions from competing other speech.)
Therefore;
1 – The language shall be English and exclusively English in all public speech, including display word and deed, with no accommodation, tolerance or exception.

( Counsel: whereas English is a precise legal and scientific language suitable for operational speech; and whereas the commonality of language reinforces a commonality and subtlety of meaning, and the associated premiums therefrom, no one has the right to impose costs on that commons we call language by competition. )
Regarding Manners, Ethics and morals (is this here or a separate page?) ( … ) Regarding Norms
( … ) (integration) (the spectrum of religions)
Regarding Traditions
( … )

Regarding Formal Institutions

( … )

( … ) This constitution

( … ) (is all govt here?)
Regarding Standards of Weights and Measures
( … )

-Regarding Association, Disassociation, Exit, and Secession-

1 – The right of the people to exit from any political order and its territory without cost or penalty shall not be infringed.

(Counsel: The right of association is meaningless without rights of disassociation (exclusion). The right of disassociation for any reason whatsoever shall be restored, and no forcible interactions shall be imposed upon people. This ends the forced association of peoples against their will)

2. The right of the people to freedom of association, disassociation, and exit, for any reason, in matters private, commercial, and political shall not be infringed. The people shall have the right to form gatherings, organizations, enterprises, neighborhoods, regions or realms by any criteria they choose without exception.

3. All members of any organization, whether Religious, Intellectual, Political, Civic, Commercial, or Criminal; and whether formal or informal, shall insure the display, word, and deed of all other members, and shall be be accountable for the display word and deed of all other members in actions of common interests.

(Counsel: The practice of fringe members of any organization to take criminal, unethical, and immoral actions that advance common interests while preserving the activities of the group unchanged, shall end.)

4. The right to be free of harassment shall not be infringed. Therefore the right of Transit of the Commons shall be granted reciprocally, but no other rights shall exist between one person and another without consent, and all possible rights are prohibited when expressly rejected. Therefore Stalking, Paparazzi, Protesting, Activism, Journalism, Recruiting, Preaching, Selling, and Begging alike are prohibited.

(Counsel: The courts give us all necessary means of resolution and the tolerance for harassment, particularly of public figures shall be terminated.)

5. The Right of Preservation of Attention, and to be free of Interruption shall not be infringed (obligation not to interrupt draw attention)

-Regarding Borders and Territory-

1. Any aliens who attempt to enter the territory by any means other than those prescribed to Visitors shall be subject to extra-judicial punishment or execution without trial or appeal, by any of the people, at any time, at their sole discretion.

2. Any people, government, religion, or other organization unable to contain their people from continuous flight such that they pose border risks to the Territory shall have implicitly declared war, and shall lose rights of sovereignty, reciprocity, rule and governance, and any actions necessary to prevent such continued warfare shall be used to restore borders and order, including conquest, subjugation, and rule.

Regarding Organization

( family, clan, tribe, religious, commercial political )

Prohibition on sedition, treason, undermining, by intention, by

everyone in the chain of responsibility end of indemnity
Regarding Defense of Interests, Rights, Obligations, and Inalienabilities

1 – The Right and Obligation to Keep, Bear, and Use Arms

i – The right and obligation of all citizens to keep, bear, and use, any and all arms individually preferred, functionally sufficient, or strategically necessary for personal, familial, common, commercial, civil, and military defense, at all times, without exception, shall not be infringed.

ii – The obligation of all able male citizens between 16 and 65 to keep and bear necessary and sufficient arms and ammunition, and to remain disciplined in their use, and fit to use them in defense of the people and their interests, whether by personal initiative, civic request, militial or military service shall not be infringed.

iii. The inalienability of the citizen’s right and obligation to keep arms, bear arms, and use arms, and obligation to remain fit for, perform service in, the citizen’s militia shall not be infringed.

iiii. Any and all attempts by display word or deed to alienate a citizen or citizens, or attempt at alienation by a citizen or citizens from the right and obligation to keep and bear those arms, remain fit for and perform services in the citizen’s militia, shall constitute an act of treason punishable by death.

2. The right to Stand One’s Ground shall not be infringed. All men’s intentions shall be taken by their display word and deed, and all threats immediate and actionable.

3. The right of citizens to Castle in one’s Home shall not be infringed with the exceptions of murder, kidnapping, hostage-taking, imminent physical harm, explosives large enough to damage neighboring property, and other weapons of mass destruction.

( Counsel: Every Sovereign man is his own legislature, but as such, bears the consequences of his own legislation. )

4. The right to Defend Marriage from interference, and Self, Spouse, Children, Kin, and one’s Private Property from harm and loss shall not be infringed.

(Counsel: Crimes of passion in the face of present evidence are warranted in defense of self, mates, and kin. )

5. The right to Demand Apology and Restitution (duel) in defense of reputation and honor, to self, mate, family, kin, and nation; to engage hand to hand fighting if unsatisfied; to delay the restitution, or appeal to the People or the Court for satisfaction shall not be infringed. The obligation to cease upon submission, to refrain from striking when down, and prohibit kicking of the head, shall be preserved; and the violation of this obligation shall be a crime of attempted murder, which may be adjudicated by Seconds immediately or at any time thereafter.

(Counsel: A duel ends upon submission. )

(a) Action by any third party or parties that interferes with a duel, other than to cease it, by causing distraction or harm, shall be a crime of attempted murder which may be adjudicated by Seconds immediately or at any time thereafter.

6 – The right to be free of ir-reciprocity or escalation in matters of defense and duel; and the right o be free of retaliation against proxies (feud), and obligation not to retaliate by proxies (feud), shall not be infringed.

( Counsel: —“The Sovereign’s ready answer to ridicule, shaming, rallying, gossiping, scolding, fictionalism and deceit, is violence: the duel.”— )
Regarding Duty to the Defense of the Commons
7 – The Obligation To Defend and Demand Defense …

(every man a sheriff) (crime)

( Counsel: —“By the Statute of Winchester of 1285, 13 Edw. I cc. 1 and 4, it was provided that anyone, either a constable or a private citizen, who witnessed a crime shall make hue and cry, and that the hue and cry must be kept up against the fleeing criminal from town to town and from county to county, until the felon is apprehended and delivered to the sheriff.

All able-bodied men, upon hearing the shouts, were obliged to assist in the pursuit of the criminal, which makes it comparable to the posse comitatus.

Men who failed to join the posse “the whole hundred … shall be answerable” for the theft or robbery committed, in effect a form of collective punishment for failing to uphold the law. Those who raised a hue and cry falsely were themselves guilty of a crime.”— )

7.1 Obligation to surrender (crime)

( … )

8 – Obligation to Discipline and Demand Discipline …(manners ethics and morals)

( … escalation of discipline: expression-display, private word, public word, public cry, public strike, public restraint … )

(counsel: Shall be delivered calmly as advisor, and shall not be means by which private frustrations are escalated to public catharsis. )

8.1 – Obligation to Accept Discipline …

( cease, acknowledge, calm, apologize, cease discipline )

Regarding Redress of Grievances
( … ) (the failure, scale, necessity of actionabiity by actors), (access to courts of the commons – administrative courts)
Regarding Judicial (Juridical) Defense
1. Reciprocity of Juridical Defense under the law

2. Reciprocity of Due Process in Juridical Defense

3. Reciprocity of equality of application and treatment under the law

4. Reciprocity of equality of rights, obligations, defense(insurance), and inalienability under the law

5. Reciprocity of equality of freedom from the presumption of guilt, and all shall be presumed innocent.

6. Reciprocity of equality of freedom from retroactivity of acts of legislation, regulation, findings of the court, or command.

(Counsel: No Law, No Crime)

7. Reciprocity of equality of freedom from arbitrary accusation, arrest, detention, interrogation, prosecution, imposition, punishment harm or exile.

8. Reciprocity of freedom from torture and torturous display, word, and deed save for inescapable urgency of life and death in by hostage, treason, or war.

9. Reciprocity of sovereignty by adversarial trial before a Jury of peers of neutral disposition to the accused regarding all traits and aspects thereto; before a Judge of the Law; facing accusers; with urgency unbound by court resources, only by the preparedness of the defense for trial.

10. Reciprocity in right and obligation of Remedy by and restitution and the court obligated to provide the incentive to prevent repetition or imitation, by punishment, or other constraints within those limits provided by the legislature.

7. Reciprocity in Restitution, Punishment, and Prevention

( … )
Regarding Extra-Judicial Discipline, Cessation, Restitution, and Punishment
1. The right of Citizens to employ Extra Judicial Prevention, Cessation, Discipline, Punishment, Binding, and Detention when witness to Crimes of irreciprocal, and predatory violence against people, property, or commons.

(Counsel: Specifically restore ‘street justice’ when performed by that category Citizens (not the people), where our the purpose of the law is to prohibit abuses by the state, not limit the citizens, or the people via citizens, from their right and obligation of defense of persons and intersets private and common.)

2. The right of the people to Extra-judicial Capture, Detention, Binding, Prosecution and Punishment of perpetrators of repeated crimes of predation, with the presence and consent of no less than twenty five citizens, shall not be infringed.

(i) Whereas the court must prohibit itself and those before it from abuses of procedure and law, which leaves open the possibility of release of the guilty. Therefore the right of the people to act when due process fails, shall not be infringed.

(Counsel: this produces the optimum incentives for all parties)

(ii) Whereas it is in the nature of the people to grant excessive sympathy, the right of the people to hanging of pedophiles and rapists, and to the whipping of scolds and shrills shall not be infringed.

2. (Sheriff, Deputy, and Militia)

Regarding Limitless Restitution, punishment, and prevention
( … ) our people shall be free of harm anywhere they tread.

If given entry into a domain, he shall be constrained under our laws, and no other, and he remains insured by our people, under our law,

Regarding Reformation (Judicial, Legislative, Political, Reform)

3 – Prohibition on Treason (in display word and deed)

(a) Whoever, owing allegiance to the people and this constitution thereof, assists in war by violence, immigration, conversion, information, or trade or any other means of harm against them or advances the interests of their competitors, giving them information, or aid or comfort within or without, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than one half of the median income; shall be reduced to Resident, shall be incapable of holding any office, or to engage in public speech.

(b) Whoever, owing allegiance to the people and this constitution thereof, and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to a officer of the military, or to a governor or to some judge or justice, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

4 – Rights and Obligations of Sedition

Except in restitution of the terms of this constitution, if two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the political institutions of the people, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. Conversely, it is the right and obligation of the people, the militia, and the military, to restore this constitution by any and all means possible, save none.

5 – Rights and Obligation of Revolt

Except in restitution of the terms of this constitution, whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the institutions of this constitution, or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. Conversely, it is the right and obligation of the people, the militia, and the military, to restore this constitution by any and all means possible, save none.

Reciprocity in Inalienation
( … ) Our People shall be Sovereign Individually and Collectively
Self Determination

Self Defense

Self Rule by Rule of Law

Self Government

Territory

Self Sufficiency

Self Development

Agency

(Treason to submit)

Rights and Obligations Under Legislative Contracts of The Commons

Rights and Obligations Under Military Command (catastrophe, emergency/catastrophe, and medical)

Rights and Obligations Under Monarchical Edict

. . .

Acts

Declaration of Intentions

Declaration of privileges

Policy

– ( … ) Media / movie inventory
September 27, 2018
Constitution: Man
Constitution: Man
Article I

Man

Man
Definition: ( … ) Whereas Man Demonstrates: Agency (self determination)(will to power)(positive and negative freedom) Definition:
—“Agency consists in the capacity of individuals to act independently and to make their own choices subject to both personal and external limitations.”—

( Counsel: —“Agency refers to the absence of impediment, the same way that truth refers to the absence of falsehood. We do not know what the unknown impediments and falsehoods consists of, we only know that they are removable by science, technology, time, effort and resources.”—- )
Perfect agency would consist in perfect knowledge (omniscience), perfect reason, perfect emotions, perfect mental and emotional discipline (mindfulness), perfect ability to act (omnipotence), unlimited resources, and no competition, no need to cooperate, and therefore no need for conventions, laws, institutions, or infrastructure. As humans we have imperfect knowledge, imperfect reason, imperfect mindfulness, imperfect emotions, limited range of actions, limited resources, and we live in a world where we must compete, must cooperate to compete, and to do so require conventions, laws, institutions, and infrastructure. A host of factors that increase or limit an individual and his or her Agency, such as age, gender, social class, ethnicity, religion, customs, education, economic institutions, government, propaganda, ability, knowledge, ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, and deceit. Meaning that one’s agency is determined by the combination of beneficial institutions, abilities, and knowledge and inhibiting institutions, abilities, and knowledge. Therefore Agency consists in the degree to which one approaches perfect ability to act, when not limited by knowledge, reason, emotions, mindfulness, range of action, available instrumentation, available resources, competition, cooperation, conventions, laws, institutions and infrastructure. Given we can never have unlimited knowledge, unlimited resources, and we have limited ability to be free of competition, need for cooperation, conventions, laws, institutions, and infrastructure, we can seek largely to improve our knowledge, reason, mindfulness, and assets so that we maximize our agency within the available limits. We are ignorant of the future limitations we might encounter, but we are impeded (limited) in mental capacity, mindfulness, knowledge, physical ability, resources, time, social, political, our physical world, and the laws of nature. So we face limits to imagination, thought, independence from emotions, impulses and biases, knowledge, models of knowledge, the rate of knowledge accumulated, physical size, strength, speed, perception, health, cellular degeneration, biological composition, energy, physical resources, time, limits of imposed upon us by others, and the limits of controlling of others, and the limited abilities of others, and the limitations of the environment and the physical universe. Individuals and groups have evolved a distribution of biological potential for agency, and a distribution of habits, manners, ethics, morals, laws, traditions, and institutions (Culture) suitable to their agency. And the cumulative result of both biological and cultural is the their rate of development and means of group competition, survival, and evolution. AND Action (Display, Word, and Deed) ( … ) ( … Action is possible because of memory … Memory permits forecasting …. ) Subjectively testable sequence of actions Observable sequence of actions AND Acquisition; Where; Man acts to acquire. Life is an expensive means of defeating entropy. Acting improves acquisition – at additional cost. Memory improves acquisition – at additional cost. Reason improves acquisition – at additional cost. Cooperation improves acquisition – at additional cost.
- Life: Man is an expensive life form.
- Time: (time here) ( … )
- Action: Man has three sets of faculties: physical, intuitionistic, and rational; with them he can Sense (physical), Memorize (knowledge), Intuit (emotional), Reason (cognitive, calculative), Communicate (display, word, and deed), and Act (move).
- Acquisition: Man must act to defeat the continuous cost of existence in time, by continuous acquisition of information, opportunities, associations, resources, goods, and services to survive, prosper, and reproduce.
—‘the social object of skilled investment should be to defeat the dark forces of time and ignorance which envelope our future,’—
- Incentive: It is in man’s interest to seek:
  
  The greatest return;
  
  With the least effort;
  
  In the least time;
  
  Using the least resources;
  
  With the least uncertainty;
  
  With the least risk;
  
  With the least negative externalities;
- Discounts … Premiums … ( … )
- Cost: Man pays costs consisting of the difference between the one choice and the next best choice – the next best choice including inaction. All costs are costs of opportunity.
AND Interests;
Definition; 1. Interest: Having born a cost, by action, or forgone action (inaction), in order to obtain Advantage (utility), in an asset (anything providing an advantage (utility)), until consumed (destroyed), converted (into something else), exchanged, or discarded. 2. Demonstrated Interests, (Demonstrated Property, “Property-In-Toto”): The set of that which man acts, or forgoes opportunities for action, (satisfaction) to acquire, preserve, accumulate, use and consume. Given; One bears costs of existing and persisting (Natural Interest). One bears costs of acting (Demonstrated Action). One bears costs of acquiring goods, services, information, opportunity by action or forgone opportunity for action.(Demonstrated Cost) One demonstrates an interest by bearing a cost on that which no other has born a cost to demonstrate an interest (Demonstrated Interest). One consents to a portfolio of reciprocally insured property (normative property interest) with others. One consents or is forced to comply with an institutional means of reciprocally insuring property with others (title interest). Therefore; Demonstrated interest without imposing upon others demonstrated interests is a fact. Possession is a fact. Property requires an an agreement. Property rights require an institutional means of enforcement. 2. Capital, “Capital-in-Toto”: The Scope of Possible Demonstrated Interests (Capital-in-Toto), and Portfolio of accumulated Demonstrated Interests (Capital). Where; Demonstrated Interests include the Existential (Natural), Obtained, and Common 1. Existential (or Natural) Interests: Definition ( … ) Where; Existential (Or Natural) Interests Include: 1. Self: Life, Body, Genes, Memories, Mind, Attention Time, and Action Stimulation, Experience 2. Kin and Interpersonal (Relationship) Interests Mates (access to sex/reproduction), and Marriage Children (genetic reproduction) Consanguineous Relations (family, kin, clan, tribal and national relations) 3. Reputation, Status and Class (reputation, honor) Self-Image, Status, Reputation Social, Sexual, Economic, Political, and Military Market Value 4. Sustainable Patterns of Association, Cooperation, Insurance, Reproduction, Production, Distribution and Trade Friends, Acquaintances, Neighbors, Cooperative Relations, Commercial Relations, Political Relations, and Military Relations. 2. Obtained Interests include: Definition: Obtained Interest: Interests that are obtained by bearing a cost of opportunity, time, effort, resources, to obtain that interest without imposing upon the previously born costs of others. Where; Obtained Interests Include:
6. Several (Personal, Monopoly) Interests Several Property: Those things we claim a monopoly of control over.

7. Shareholder (Fractional) Interests Shares in property: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (claims for partial ownership).

8. Title Interests (Weights and Measures) Trademarks and Brands (prohibitions on fraudulent transfers within a geography).

9. Artificial Interests (Privileges) Letters of Marque, Patents, Copyrights, Grants of License.
Common (Fractional) Interests, or “Commons” (Common Property). Definition; An Interest, in which all members of an organization, whether familial, social, commercial, or political, share an equal interest, by virtue of paying costs of membership in the organization. Where; Common interests include: 1. Common Physical (Fractional) Interests
(1) Formal (Physical) Commons: Territorial, Resources: natural resources. It’s waterways, improvements and infrastructure.

(2) Buildings, Halls, Markets, Squares, Parks

(3) Monuments (art and artifacts). Monuments claim territory, demonstrate wealth, and provide one of the longest most invariable normative and economic returns that any culture can construct as a demonstration of conspicuous production (wealth), and as such, conspicuous excellence. (Hence why competing monuments represent an invasion. Temples, Churches, Museums, Sculptures being the most obvious examples of cultural claim or conquest.)
2. Common Institutional (Fractional) Interests “Those interests into which we have invested our forgone opportunities, our efforts, or our material assets, in order to aggregate capital from multiple individuals for mutual gain.”
(1) Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion, Education, Banking, Treasury, Government, Laws, Courts.

(2) Calculative (Strategic) Institutions: Strategy, Myths, Traditions, Grammars, Arguments, Face vs Truth

(3) Informal (Normative) Institutions: Norms, morals, ethics, manners, and habits.

(4) Informational Institutions: Knowledge. Information.
3. Common Human Capital (Fractional) Interests
(1) Indoctrination (Tacit knowledge) (2) Skills (Explicit Knowledge) (3) Cooperative Commons: Trust (4) Population and Distribution: The distribution of our classes (5) Genetic Interests: Our Genome

4. Common Opportunity (Fractional) Interests
Definition:
Opportunities to homestead (convert by cost) an Advantage into a Demonstrated Interest.

Whereas;

When people come together in proximity, and suppress impositions of costs upon the interests of others through the incremental evolution of the law of reciprocity, they decrease the time and effort required to produce voluntary association, cooperation and exchange. As such polities decrease opportunity costs, and in doing so generate accessible opportunities. These opportunities are un-homsesteaded (opportunities), lacking demonstrated interest, until invested in by individuals either by expenditure of time effort and resources, or by forgoing opportunities for consumption. As such the proximity of people and the institution of reciprocity under law produce a commons of opportunities that we seize (homestead) by competition. As such no one may claim interest in an opportunity without conducting an competitive exchange by which to seize it.
Therefore;
As such no one may claim interest in an opportunity without conducting a voluntary market exchange by which to seize it.
AND; Traits;
personality and intelligence
AND; Instincts;
THREE INSTINCTS (Haidt, biology) Reciprocate, Contract, Disgust, and Familial Priority, and Kin Selection.
AND; Emotions; Where;
- Emotions: Emotions are a reflection of change in state of our anticipated, existing, and past inventory of the spectrum of our demonstrated interests.
AND; Reason, Calculation, and Computation;

( … )
AND; Cognitive Bias; Where;
Cognitive biases arise from too much information, the limits of memory, insufficient meaning, the need to act quickly, and the need to preserve confidence sufficient to act in continuous uncertainty. These biases vary between individuals, and some can be trained, but all humans are affected by them.
They include:
- Memory biases that either enhance or impair the recall of a memory (either the chances that the memory will be recalled at all, or the amount of time it takes for it to be recalled, or both), or that alters the content of a reported memory.
  
  Attributional biases in effect perceptions of relations between the self and others;
  
  Decision Making biases effect Decidability, belief, and behavior;
AND; Frustration;
( … )

(do neural economy here)
AND Gender Bias;
(herd vs pack)
Whereas;
1 – Males mature rather slowly, and may not speak for two years after females, and in the absence of dominance play, even more slowly – maturing from late childhood to fourteen, and then from fourteen to their early twenties. Females mature rather quickly, and increasingly quickly, and are generally mature by 16-18, although cognitive maturity (agency) seems to appear in mid thirties, where cognitive agency in males appears in late teens to early twenties.

2 – Females bear a higher cost of reproduction and are more dependent for others, during long years of child caring and defense.  Males have a near zero cost of reproduction. However, in general, females and males favor female choice of mate – but after mating males appear to exhibit some form of ownership over females for a number of years.

3 – Male aggression is frequent and short term, seeking negotiation for position in the hierarchy of antagonists.

Males use dominance expression, threats and violence.

In general, male aggressors are given status by males as long as they are creating order rather than threat.

Female aggression is infrequent and never ending, seeking total destruction of antagonists.

Women use disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossip, and reputation destruction to cause panic and vulnerability in other females.

Female aggressors are granted social status by females less aggressive.

4 – Female cognitive bias is equalitarian, and male cognitive bias hierarchical.  This is evident in our moral biases, where females tend to more exclusively favor harm,care, and proportionality, and males tend to also favor reciprocity, sacredness, and hierarchy.   These biases correspond to property rights today, and property rights correspond to political preferences.

Liberals/Females favor individual property rights (Consumption):

(a) Care/harm for others, protecting them from harm. (The asset of life and body.) (b) Proportionality/cheating, Justice, treating others in proportion to their actions. (The asset of goods.) (c) Liberty/Oppression, characterizes judgments in terms of whether subjects are tyrannized. (The asset of time, opportunity.)

Conservatives/Males ALSO Favor Community property rights (Saving, Denying Consumption to others):

(d) In-Group Loyalty/In-Group Betrayal to/of your group, family, nation, polity. (e) Respect/Authority/Subversion for tradition and legitimate authority. (f) Purity/Sanctity/Degradation/Disgust, avoiding disgusting things, foods, actions.

The male reproductive strategy among chimpanzees as well as humans evolved to kill off males in opposing groups and collect females and territory. And that females evolved to place greater emphasis on children and females than the (fungible) tribe – precisely because they could be captured and then reduced to lower status and possibly death under the females of another tribe – this is the origin of female behavior. Female attachment may exist but throughout history females have exposed more children to the elements than men have killed in war.

Hierarchy (A Pack) requires only that you seek your position. There is no fear of exclusion, only change in position. Equality (A Herd) has no position so one is either in and conforming our out for not.

Packs survive by fighting together and protecting each other, regardless of position in the hierarchy. Herds survive by fleeing and leaving the weak behind.

This is the origin of differences in male (conservative), female (progressive) minds, and their cognitive, moral, and political biases.

In other words, females evolved the herd cognitive and moral biases, and males evolved the pack cognitive and moral biases, and through evolutionary history we have unevenly distributed these intuitions along with the brain, endocrine, and developmental processes between the genders.

This gradual division of perception, cognition, memory, labor, advocacy, coercion, and demand for satisfaction of such, along with our ability to voluntarily cooperate when we can and involuntarily be coerced when we must, has evolved a specialization of the feminine psychotic to solipsistic to compassionate to considerate to the rational to the analytical, to the mildly autistic, to the entirely autistic masculine on one axis, the agency we call intelligence and industriousness on the other axis.

This division has resulted not only in a division of labor across the reproductive biases, but across the physical, cooperative, and cognitive spectrum of our abilities, and across the short term, medium term, and long term spectrum of time.

Using these divisions of perception, cognition, labor, advocacy, and coercion; physical, social, and cognitive labor; and short term, medium term, and long term focus, we can adapt to nearly any long term environment by little more than the combined utility of those traits. This requires no substantial genetic mutation, only voluntary reproductive bias for traits that produce social, economic, and political status in that environment.

We gradually ameliorated our sex differences in strategy, cognition, and moral intuition, by pairing-off, and then controlling alphas. This compromise was generally in favor of females since the majority of females reproduced, and the minority of males reproduced.  This persisted until (it appears) agrarianism where we developed marriage out of pairing off in order to preserve the advantage of scarce property (capital) within an intergenerational family, and improve our division of labor between the genders.

Some groups evolved to specialize more in the male biases, and some more so in the female biases.
Therefore;
( … )
AND; Moral Bias;
Definition

Moral (Proper) (Universal): Moral Norm (Group): Moral Intuition (Personal):
Where;
There exist three moral, and political biases that constitute our different moral intuitions, each which reflects our reproductive strategy (our terms; our criteria of demand for cooperation):

1 – the dysgenic, proportional, immediate, sentimental (socialist, liberal, female and underclass), herd strategy.

2 – the eugenic, reciprocal, temporal (libertarian, ascendant male), inclusive pack strategy, and;

3 – the eugenic, reciprocal, intertemporal (aristocratic, conservative, established male) exclusive pack strategy.

Which constitutes a spectrum of consumption and redistribution to concentration in quality. In other words the debate between EQUALITY and QUALITY is an expression of dysgenic proportionality and equality, and eugenic reciprocity and quality, which is the difference between the male GROUP strategy of their collective offspring vs the individual female strategy of their individual offspring – counter intuitive but many fundamental truths are – which is why we need to understand them.
AND; Faculties, Abilities; (ranges) ( … ) physical, intuitionistic, rational, speech Man has four sets of faculties:
1. intuitionistic (intuitable), 2. reasonable (justifiable, explicable), and; 3. physical-material (action, decidable, true). 4. speech
AND; Speech (Communication);
(Display word deed)

Public Speech ( … )

Private Speech ( … )
AND; Negotiation; Where;
Language consists of justificationary negotiation in furtherance of our acquisition by these three means (LIST THE THREE AGAIN). ergo: All ‘belief’ is justification to the self and others in furtherance of acquisition. It is meaningless. Statements of justification only provide us with information necessary to deduce what it is that we wish to acquire.
AND; Truthfulness and Deceit;
( … )

( … Grammars etc here … )

( … Fictionalisms here …. )
AND Divisions of Perception, Cognition, Memory, Labor, Advocacy, and Negotiation;
( … )
AND; Cooperation; Where;
- Man has only three choices in how to act in relation to others:
  
  Avoidance (Boycott, Deprivation of cooperation)
  
  Cooperation (Productive Exchange), or;
  
  Conflict (Parasitism, Predation, or War)
  
  Man can voluntarily cooperate because he can sympathize with the intentions of others, communicate, and negotiate terms of cooperation, and determine the returns on cooperation, and choose whether and which actions to take with his limited time, effort, resources, and will.
  
  Man has only one incentive to cooperate: the value of doing so is greater than the alternatives of avoidance and conflict.
  
  Cooperation is a disproportionately more productive means of acquisition than individual production.
  
  Continuous cooperation in a division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, advocacy, negotiation, and trade informed by prices is ….
AND; Rational, Reciprocal, Ethical, Moral, and Good Action; Where;
We seek discounts in our acquisitions. Some of these discounts are productive and moral and encourage cooperation, and some of them are unproductive and immoral, discourage cooperation, and encourage retaliation.
- Only voluntary transfer is rational and non-coercive without creating demand for retaliation and decline of future opportunity for returns on cooperation.
  
  Only productive voluntary exchange is reciprocally rational.
  
  Only fully informed and warrantied productive voluntary exchange is ethical.
  
  Only fully informed and warrantied productive voluntary exchange free of imposition of costs upon the interests of other members of the group by externality is moral.
  
  Any transfer (GOOD = VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTION)
The only ethical and moral acquisition is one in which one either homesteads an interest by act of transformation (investment), or obtains that interest by productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, where any external, involuntary transfers (externalities) are not unproductive (losses).
AND; Rational, Irreciprocal, Unethical, Immoral, and Evil Action; Where;
- Man must act to preserve and extend cooperation to preserve the disproportionate rewards of acquisition through cooperation.
- Man acts to preserve and extend cooperation by the suppression of parasitism that creates the disincentive to cooperate, and therefore decreases the disproportionate rewards of acquisition through cooperation.
- Man conducts free riding, parasitism, and predation by:
[insert page=’widget-crimes’ display=’content’]
AND; Suppression of Free Riding, Parasitism, and Predation; Where; AND; Man suppresses Free Riding, Parasitism, and Predation by:
1 – Violence: threats of interpersonal violence, and interpersonal violence, and organized violence; 2 – Boycott: threats of interpersonal ostracization from cooperation, interpersonal ostracization, organized ostracization from cooperation; 3 –Remuneration: Promises of individual remuneration, or deprivation from remuneration, organized remuneration, or deprivation from remuneration,

(list institutions of suppression of free riding, parasitism, and predation)

Common Law: Incremental, Evolutionary, Suppression:

( … )
AND; Competition; Where; Man competes for status because status provides discounts on opportunities to acquire interests – especially mates, insurance, cooperation, and allies.
1. social (status desirability),
  
  economic (wealth desirability),
  
  reproductive (genetic desirability),
  
  political and military (competitive desirability) – as well as their undesirable opposites.
Reproductive Competition; Where;
- Man acts in furtherance of his reproductive strategy.
  
  Male and Female reproductive strategies are in conflict.
  
  The Female seeks to breed where it benefits her lineage; to force the cost of her offspring on the tribe through moral hazard; to further her offspring regardless of merit; to generalize to preserve adaptability to changing group dynamics; to preserve soft her soft-power by seeking safety in consensus, non conflict, and numbers, at the expense of Male interests. To limit accumulated cellular damage on behalf of the herd; To ostracize (kill) competitors through endless reputation destruction; As such Females act to produce sufficient equality to reduce conflict. This consists in the Herd strategy and Instincts.
  
  The Male seeks to breed impulsively wherever it does not harm his lineage; to use violence most frequently in defense of access to a female; to preserve hard power by creating a tribe capable of resisting dominance by other Males at the expense of Female interests; to specialize in the group at the cost of adaptability to changes in group dynamics; to seek safety in the company of a hierarchy of men capable of coordinating (hunting) by similar interests; to demonstrate hierarchy and loyalty; to absorb accumulated cellular damage on behalf of the females and children. As such Males act meritocratically; This consists in the Pack strategy and Instincts.
  
  Males and Females overlap in their uses of each other’s reproductive strategies, due to variations in dimorphism and reverse dimorphism present under evolutionary neoteny.
  
  Without limits to both Male and Female behavior in favor of their strategies, the compromise between the strategies fails, and the extremes of each force costs upon the other.
  
  Men evolved degrees of pairing-off in multiple relations, serial relations, and monogamy; and degrees of ‘cheating’ from frequent to infrequent, as is in their ability and interest.
  
  The institution of marriage of increasing length in response to the increase in productive capital under control of the family, produced an Equilibrium under which all do the best they can without imposing harm upon others, at the expense of producing an optimum for any.
AND; Trust; ( … ) AND; Signaling;
( … ) Signal Fraud.

( … ) Signal Spirals
AND; Transformation (Production); Where; AND; Specialization in a division of knowledge, labor, …..;
Physical, Organizational, Intellectual
AND; Classes; ( …. ) social econ… etc Where;
Hierarchies must form to produce decidability, and always and everywhere form because the Pareto law (power law) is required to organize the voluntary organization of the suite of markets we call society: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, and polities. The costs of organizing people involuntarily rise rapidly with the number, and availability of choices; can only be applied to relatively simple projects; and requires continuous monitoring of the people for defection, escape, corruption, and black markets. The costs of producing markets using voluntary cooperation requires only the suppression of defectors, which in turn causes the polity to self police defectors.
AND; Coercion; Where; There exist only three means of coercing other humans to cooperate with on one means or end vs cooperate with others on different means or ends.
- Man has only three means of coercion (influence):
  
  Remuneration (payment, trade)
  
  Force, Loss of Life, Experience, Liberty, …..
  
  Undermining, Ostracization, Reputation Destruction, Loss of Status and Opportunity.
- Man Specializes in three means of coercion:
  
  Remuneration: Finance, Commerce, Caretaking (or Bribery)
  
  Force: Military, Police, Law (or murder, violence, theft)
  
  Undermining: Ostracization, Gossip, Religion, Education, Propaganda (reputation destruction, deprivation of opportunity, information, deception)
  
  Man Evolves classes we call ‘elites’ to specialize in each of these means of coercion.
  
  The dominance of one group of specialists over another is historical and demographic.
  
  Elites are necessary for decidability in coordination.
  
  Man follows elites …..
These three means of coercion can be used to construct three vertical axis of class specialization: coercion by force (conservatism/masculine), coercion by gossip (progressivism/feminine), coercion by remuneration (libertarianism/neutral masculine). Human elites are formed by those who specialize in one or more of these means of coercion: gossip: public intellectuals and priests. force: military and political. exchange: voluntary organizations, including the voluntary organization of production. AND; Conflict;
( … )
AND; Organization into Groups;
( … ) Esp discounts from proximity
AND; Organization by Kin Group (Bias; (at all scales));
( … )

many discounts on everything from ingoup especially from signals
AND; Organization into Generations (shared experiences, predictable cycles)
(cycles of generations, credit and debt, seeking opportunity by subsequent generations)
AND; Organization into Institutions (family, clan, tribe etc and nation vs corporation vs cult)
( … )

Kin (Genetics)

Family

Clan

Tribe

Nation

Race

Cult (religion)

Corporation (Economy)

Possession (Military)
AND; Organization into Markets (of all kinds) and counter markets (of all kinds) The Market as A Means of Survival
1. (1) One gains Dividends from the construction and maintenance of the voluntary organization of production, distribution, and trade paid for by forgoing opportunities for parasitic consumption (acting ethically and morally).
  
  (2) One gains access to opportunity for cooperation and consumption in the market.
  
  (3) One gains earnings from the personal production of goods and services in the market for goods and services. (income from profits)
  
  (4) Dividends for maintenance of the commons in all its forms.
  
  (5) Dividends for the policing (defense) of the commons in all its forms.
Markets into Cycles The Inability of Some To Participate in the Market
(creating defense of the order of cooperation)
AND; Demand for Organization into Monopolies;
( … )
AND; Organization into Political Orders (Markets for Commons)
Communist —- Socialist — Kin —- Capitalist —- Anarchist
AND; Bias to Outgroup Trade; AND Organization to engage in Outgroup free riding, parasitism and predation OR Organization to engage in Productive Trade.
( … )
AND Domestication and Eugenic Evolution, or Failures of Domestication and Dysgenic Evolution
( … )
AND Organization by Group Evolutionary Strategy — Differences in Group Evolutionary Strategies — ( … ) parasitic and productive etc Organizing by use of grammar in support of group evolutionary strategy There is only one strategy that does not force others to bear the cost: reciprocity (trade) between kin groups. AND Dysgenia and Eugenia;
( … )
AND Demand for Orders Suiting Group Strategy
( … )

AND; Speciation – Organization into Species;
Definition
|Differences|Human Species (Macro Races) > Major Races (subspecies) > Races > Tribes > Clans > Classes > Families > Sexes > Individuals > Stage of Development (age) > Traits > Knowledge > Skills
Where;
The influential differences between races are due to (a) degree of neoteny due to climate, (b) size of the underclass due to both climate and means of production, (c) distribution of male and female biases (traits) between the genders in the group; and (d) the norms, traditions, customs, formal and informal institutions that were necessary for those traits in that distribution in that region.
Where;
Meaningful Variation in the Human Species is limited to the following Traits:

1 – Degree of Neoteny (Asian, white, Indian, Iranic, Semitic, Pacific, African – testosterone levels, in that order)

2 – Rate and Depth of Maturity. (Same as above)

3 – Size of the Underclass through reproductive suppression and upward redistribution. (IQ levels and beneficial personality traits.)

4 – Distribution of Gender Traits (emphasis vs reversal) both morphological, intuitive, cognitive, and behavioral.

Including:

1 – Distribution of Moral Intuition between female herd and male pack, because of distribution of Gender Traits.

2 – Distribution of Personality Traits in the group of which Intelligence and Industriousness matters for both genders, and negative-agreeableness (decisiveness) matters for males.

3 – Distribution of Cognitive Bias between female herd and male pack.

(Note: AFAIK personality traits correspond to both stages of the prey drive, the modification of the prey drive for sex role, and our reward systems that produce the effects.)

5 – Distribution of Age and Generations. (And cyclical bias of generations)

6 – Group evolutionary Strategy using Gender Traits (Semitic maternal, Asian paternal, Western compromise). Including the manners, ethics, morals, norms, traditions, institutions public and private, and especially method of decidability, consequential logic, grammar, and vocabulary by which all such habits are expressed.
Therefore;
Human groups differ substantially in their distributions on these axis.

Human variation produces different demands from the markets for association, cooperation, production, reproduction, and the production of commons.

Political orders can favor kin or corporation, equality or meritocracy, with the optimum order being kin meritocracy, which will produce equality by externality of kin selection.

The only reason to refrain from conquest, decimation, genocide is reciprocity under nation states. And the justification of conquest, rule, decimation and genocide is the export of costs of domestication or failures of domestication upon others.
THEREFORE;
Heterogeneity – Settled – Diversity is a bad
Where;
( … )

(Pay your own costs of domestication)

AND; Ethnocentrism – Settled

1 – Ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy if for no other reason than reciprocal trust, investment and insurance without sacrifice to kin selection. There is no competitor to it, whatsoever. People are more gregarious to their own, and more redistributive, with less fear of political competition, because all competition is internal and by class or faction rather than kin group. The problem has traditionally been that many ethic groups were not able to concentrate sufficient capital to create self governance, or had to be captured to prevent capture by others, or were of sufficient hazard to neighbors they were ruled. (The exception is people lower on the ladder who look for allies against their betters, and to have ‘someone below them’ which appears very important to humans.)

2 – Ethnocentrism eliminates race and tribe conflict in the suppression of expansion of underclasses through soft eugenics (paying the unproductive not to have children). There is no value in internal competitors. none.

( … )

The result of these conditions, is that man seeks Agency, within the limits of his abilities, frustrations and comforts, with only so much reciprocity as he can get away with paying the costs of.
—“The Will To Power”—
(Self determination)
September 27, 2018
Constitution: Man
Constitution: Man
Article I

Man

Man
Definition: ( … ) Whereas Man Demonstrates: Agency (self determination)(will to power)(positive and negative freedom) Definition:
—“Agency consists in the capacity of individuals to act independently and to make their own choices subject to both personal and external limitations.”—

( Counsel: —“Agency refers to the absence of impediment, the same way that truth refers to the absence of falsehood. We do not know what the unknown impediments and falsehoods consists of, we only know that they are removable by science, technology, time, effort and resources.”—- )
Perfect agency would consist in perfect knowledge (omniscience), perfect reason, perfect emotions, perfect mental and emotional discipline (mindfulness), perfect ability to act (omnipotence), unlimited resources, and no competition, no need to cooperate, and therefore no need for conventions, laws, institutions, or infrastructure. As humans we have imperfect knowledge, imperfect reason, imperfect mindfulness, imperfect emotions, limited range of actions, limited resources, and we live in a world where we must compete, must cooperate to compete, and to do so require conventions, laws, institutions, and infrastructure. A host of factors that increase or limit an individual and his or her Agency, such as age, gender, social class, ethnicity, religion, customs, education, economic institutions, government, propaganda, ability, knowledge, ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, and deceit. Meaning that one’s agency is determined by the combination of beneficial institutions, abilities, and knowledge and inhibiting institutions, abilities, and knowledge. Therefore Agency consists in the degree to which one approaches perfect ability to act, when not limited by knowledge, reason, emotions, mindfulness, range of action, available instrumentation, available resources, competition, cooperation, conventions, laws, institutions and infrastructure. Given we can never have unlimited knowledge, unlimited resources, and we have limited ability to be free of competition, need for cooperation, conventions, laws, institutions, and infrastructure, we can seek largely to improve our knowledge, reason, mindfulness, and assets so that we maximize our agency within the available limits. We are ignorant of the future limitations we might encounter, but we are impeded (limited) in mental capacity, mindfulness, knowledge, physical ability, resources, time, social, political, our physical world, and the laws of nature. So we face limits to imagination, thought, independence from emotions, impulses and biases, knowledge, models of knowledge, the rate of knowledge accumulated, physical size, strength, speed, perception, health, cellular degeneration, biological composition, energy, physical resources, time, limits of imposed upon us by others, and the limits of controlling of others, and the limited abilities of others, and the limitations of the environment and the physical universe. Individuals and groups have evolved a distribution of biological potential for agency, and a distribution of habits, manners, ethics, morals, laws, traditions, and institutions (Culture) suitable to their agency. And the cumulative result of both biological and cultural is the their rate of development and means of group competition, survival, and evolution. AND Action (Display, Word, and Deed) ( … ) ( … Action is possible because of memory … Memory permits forecasting …. ) Subjectively testable sequence of actions Observable sequence of actions AND Acquisition; Where; Man acts to acquire. Life is an expensive means of defeating entropy. Acting improves acquisition – at additional cost. Memory improves acquisition – at additional cost. Reason improves acquisition – at additional cost. Cooperation improves acquisition – at additional cost.
- Life: Man is an expensive life form.
- Time: (time here) ( … )
- Action: Man has three sets of faculties: physical, intuitionistic, and rational; with them he can Sense (physical), Memorize (knowledge), Intuit (emotional), Reason (cognitive, calculative), Communicate (display, word, and deed), and Act (move).
- Acquisition: Man must act to defeat the continuous cost of existence in time, by continuous acquisition of information, opportunities, associations, resources, goods, and services to survive, prosper, and reproduce.
—‘the social object of skilled investment should be to defeat the dark forces of time and ignorance which envelope our future,’—
- Incentive: It is in man’s interest to seek:
  
  The greatest return;
  
  With the least effort;
  
  In the least time;
  
  Using the least resources;
  
  With the least uncertainty;
  
  With the least risk;
  
  With the least negative externalities;
- Discounts … Premiums … ( … )
- Cost: Man pays costs consisting of the difference between the one choice and the next best choice – the next best choice including inaction. All costs are costs of opportunity.
AND Interests;
Definition; 1. Interest: Having born a cost, by action, or forgone action (inaction), in order to obtain Advantage (utility), in an asset (anything providing an advantage (utility)), until consumed (destroyed), converted (into something else), exchanged, or discarded. 2. Demonstrated Interests, (Demonstrated Property, “Property-In-Toto”): The set of that which man acts, or forgoes opportunities for action, (satisfaction) to acquire, preserve, accumulate, use and consume. Given; One bears costs of existing and persisting (Natural Interest). One bears costs of acting (Demonstrated Action). One bears costs of acquiring goods, services, information, opportunity by action or forgone opportunity for action.(Demonstrated Cost) One demonstrates an interest by bearing a cost on that which no other has born a cost to demonstrate an interest (Demonstrated Interest). One consents to a portfolio of reciprocally insured property (normative property interest) with others. One consents or is forced to comply with an institutional means of reciprocally insuring property with others (title interest). Therefore; Demonstrated interest without imposing upon others demonstrated interests is a fact. Possession is a fact. Property requires an an agreement. Property rights require an institutional means of enforcement. 2. Capital, “Capital-in-Toto”: The Scope of Possible Demonstrated Interests (Capital-in-Toto), and Portfolio of accumulated Demonstrated Interests (Capital). Where; Demonstrated Interests include the Existential (Natural), Obtained, and Common 1. Existential (or Natural) Interests: Definition ( … ) Where; Existential (Or Natural) Interests Include: 1. Self: Life, Body, Genes, Memories, Mind, Attention Time, and Action Stimulation, Experience 2. Kin and Interpersonal (Relationship) Interests Mates (access to sex/reproduction), and Marriage Children (genetic reproduction) Consanguineous Relations (family, kin, clan, tribal and national relations) 3. Reputation, Status and Class (reputation, honor) Self-Image, Status, Reputation Social, Sexual, Economic, Political, and Military Market Value 4. Sustainable Patterns of Association, Cooperation, Insurance, Reproduction, Production, Distribution and Trade Friends, Acquaintances, Neighbors, Cooperative Relations, Commercial Relations, Political Relations, and Military Relations. 2. Obtained Interests include: Definition: Obtained Interest: Interests that are obtained by bearing a cost of opportunity, time, effort, resources, to obtain that interest without imposing upon the previously born costs of others. Where; Obtained Interests Include:
6. Several (Personal, Monopoly) Interests Several Property: Those things we claim a monopoly of control over.

7. Shareholder (Fractional) Interests Shares in property: Recorded And Quantified Shareholder Property (claims for partial ownership).

8. Title Interests (Weights and Measures) Trademarks and Brands (prohibitions on fraudulent transfers within a geography).

9. Artificial Interests (Privileges) Letters of Marque, Patents, Copyrights, Grants of License.
Common (Fractional) Interests, or “Commons” (Common Property). Definition; An Interest, in which all members of an organization, whether familial, social, commercial, or political, share an equal interest, by virtue of paying costs of membership in the organization. Where; Common interests include: 1. Common Physical (Fractional) Interests
(1) Formal (Physical) Commons: Territorial, Resources: natural resources. It’s waterways, improvements and infrastructure.

(2) Buildings, Halls, Markets, Squares, Parks

(3) Monuments (art and artifacts). Monuments claim territory, demonstrate wealth, and provide one of the longest most invariable normative and economic returns that any culture can construct as a demonstration of conspicuous production (wealth), and as such, conspicuous excellence. (Hence why competing monuments represent an invasion. Temples, Churches, Museums, Sculptures being the most obvious examples of cultural claim or conquest.)
2. Common Institutional (Fractional) Interests “Those interests into which we have invested our forgone opportunities, our efforts, or our material assets, in order to aggregate capital from multiple individuals for mutual gain.”
(1) Formal (Procedural) Institutions: Our institutions: Religion, Education, Banking, Treasury, Government, Laws, Courts.

(2) Calculative (Strategic) Institutions: Strategy, Myths, Traditions, Grammars, Arguments, Face vs Truth

(3) Informal (Normative) Institutions: Norms, morals, ethics, manners, and habits.

(4) Informational Institutions: Knowledge. Information.
3. Common Human Capital (Fractional) Interests
(1) Indoctrination (Tacit knowledge) (2) Skills (Explicit Knowledge) (3) Cooperative Commons: Trust (4) Population and Distribution: The distribution of our classes (5) Genetic Interests: Our Genome

4. Common Opportunity (Fractional) Interests
Definition:
Opportunities to homestead (convert by cost) an Advantage into a Demonstrated Interest.

Whereas;

When people come together in proximity, and suppress impositions of costs upon the interests of others through the incremental evolution of the law of reciprocity, they decrease the time and effort required to produce voluntary association, cooperation and exchange. As such polities decrease opportunity costs, and in doing so generate accessible opportunities. These opportunities are un-homsesteaded (opportunities), lacking demonstrated interest, until invested in by individuals either by expenditure of time effort and resources, or by forgoing opportunities for consumption. As such the proximity of people and the institution of reciprocity under law produce a commons of opportunities that we seize (homestead) by competition. As such no one may claim interest in an opportunity without conducting an competitive exchange by which to seize it.
Therefore;
As such no one may claim interest in an opportunity without conducting a voluntary market exchange by which to seize it.
AND; Traits;
personality and intelligence
AND; Instincts;
THREE INSTINCTS (Haidt, biology) Reciprocate, Contract, Disgust, and Familial Priority, and Kin Selection.
AND; Emotions; Where;
- Emotions: Emotions are a reflection of change in state of our anticipated, existing, and past inventory of the spectrum of our demonstrated interests.
AND; Reason, Calculation, and Computation;

( … )
AND; Cognitive Bias; Where;
Cognitive biases arise from too much information, the limits of memory, insufficient meaning, the need to act quickly, and the need to preserve confidence sufficient to act in continuous uncertainty. These biases vary between individuals, and some can be trained, but all humans are affected by them.
They include:
- Memory biases that either enhance or impair the recall of a memory (either the chances that the memory will be recalled at all, or the amount of time it takes for it to be recalled, or both), or that alters the content of a reported memory.
  
  Attributional biases in effect perceptions of relations between the self and others;
  
  Decision Making biases effect Decidability, belief, and behavior;
AND; Frustration;
( … )

(do neural economy here)
AND Gender Bias;
(herd vs pack)
Whereas;
1 – Males mature rather slowly, and may not speak for two years after females, and in the absence of dominance play, even more slowly – maturing from late childhood to fourteen, and then from fourteen to their early twenties. Females mature rather quickly, and increasingly quickly, and are generally mature by 16-18, although cognitive maturity (agency) seems to appear in mid thirties, where cognitive agency in males appears in late teens to early twenties.

2 – Females bear a higher cost of reproduction and are more dependent for others, during long years of child caring and defense.  Males have a near zero cost of reproduction. However, in general, females and males favor female choice of mate – but after mating males appear to exhibit some form of ownership over females for a number of years.

3 – Male aggression is frequent and short term, seeking negotiation for position in the hierarchy of antagonists.

Males use dominance expression, threats and violence.

In general, male aggressors are given status by males as long as they are creating order rather than threat.

Female aggression is infrequent and never ending, seeking total destruction of antagonists.

Women use disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossip, and reputation destruction to cause panic and vulnerability in other females.

Female aggressors are granted social status by females less aggressive.

4 – Female cognitive bias is equalitarian, and male cognitive bias hierarchical.  This is evident in our moral biases, where females tend to more exclusively favor harm,care, and proportionality, and males tend to also favor reciprocity, sacredness, and hierarchy.   These biases correspond to property rights today, and property rights correspond to political preferences.

Liberals/Females favor individual property rights (Consumption):

(a) Care/harm for others, protecting them from harm. (The asset of life and body.) (b) Proportionality/cheating, Justice, treating others in proportion to their actions. (The asset of goods.) (c) Liberty/Oppression, characterizes judgments in terms of whether subjects are tyrannized. (The asset of time, opportunity.)

Conservatives/Males ALSO Favor Community property rights (Saving, Denying Consumption to others):

(d) In-Group Loyalty/In-Group Betrayal to/of your group, family, nation, polity. (e) Respect/Authority/Subversion for tradition and legitimate authority. (f) Purity/Sanctity/Degradation/Disgust, avoiding disgusting things, foods, actions.

The male reproductive strategy among chimpanzees as well as humans evolved to kill off males in opposing groups and collect females and territory. And that females evolved to place greater emphasis on children and females than the (fungible) tribe – precisely because they could be captured and then reduced to lower status and possibly death under the females of another tribe – this is the origin of female behavior. Female attachment may exist but throughout history females have exposed more children to the elements than men have killed in war.

Hierarchy (A Pack) requires only that you seek your position. There is no fear of exclusion, only change in position. Equality (A Herd) has no position so one is either in and conforming our out for not.

Packs survive by fighting together and protecting each other, regardless of position in the hierarchy. Herds survive by fleeing and leaving the weak behind.

This is the origin of differences in male (conservative), female (progressive) minds, and their cognitive, moral, and political biases.

In other words, females evolved the herd cognitive and moral biases, and males evolved the pack cognitive and moral biases, and through evolutionary history we have unevenly distributed these intuitions along with the brain, endocrine, and developmental processes between the genders.

This gradual division of perception, cognition, memory, labor, advocacy, coercion, and demand for satisfaction of such, along with our ability to voluntarily cooperate when we can and involuntarily be coerced when we must, has evolved a specialization of the feminine psychotic to solipsistic to compassionate to considerate to the rational to the analytical, to the mildly autistic, to the entirely autistic masculine on one axis, the agency we call intelligence and industriousness on the other axis.

This division has resulted not only in a division of labor across the reproductive biases, but across the physical, cooperative, and cognitive spectrum of our abilities, and across the short term, medium term, and long term spectrum of time.

Using these divisions of perception, cognition, labor, advocacy, and coercion; physical, social, and cognitive labor; and short term, medium term, and long term focus, we can adapt to nearly any long term environment by little more than the combined utility of those traits. This requires no substantial genetic mutation, only voluntary reproductive bias for traits that produce social, economic, and political status in that environment.

We gradually ameliorated our sex differences in strategy, cognition, and moral intuition, by pairing-off, and then controlling alphas. This compromise was generally in favor of females since the majority of females reproduced, and the minority of males reproduced.  This persisted until (it appears) agrarianism where we developed marriage out of pairing off in order to preserve the advantage of scarce property (capital) within an intergenerational family, and improve our division of labor between the genders.

Some groups evolved to specialize more in the male biases, and some more so in the female biases.
Therefore;
( … )
AND; Moral Bias;
Definition

Moral (Proper) (Universal): Moral Norm (Group): Moral Intuition (Personal):
Where;
There exist three moral, and political biases that constitute our different moral intuitions, each which reflects our reproductive strategy (our terms; our criteria of demand for cooperation):

1 – the dysgenic, proportional, immediate, sentimental (socialist, liberal, female and underclass), herd strategy.

2 – the eugenic, reciprocal, temporal (libertarian, ascendant male), inclusive pack strategy, and;

3 – the eugenic, reciprocal, intertemporal (aristocratic, conservative, established male) exclusive pack strategy.

Which constitutes a spectrum of consumption and redistribution to concentration in quality. In other words the debate between EQUALITY and QUALITY is an expression of dysgenic proportionality and equality, and eugenic reciprocity and quality, which is the difference between the male GROUP strategy of their collective offspring vs the individual female strategy of their individual offspring – counter intuitive but many fundamental truths are – which is why we need to understand them.
AND; Faculties, Abilities; (ranges) ( … ) physical, intuitionistic, rational, speech Man has four sets of faculties:
1. intuitionistic (intuitable), 2. reasonable (justifiable, explicable), and; 3. physical-material (action, decidable, true). 4. speech
AND; Speech (Communication);
(Display word deed)

Public Speech ( … )

Private Speech ( … )
AND; Negotiation; Where;
Language consists of justificationary negotiation in furtherance of our acquisition by these three means (LIST THE THREE AGAIN). ergo: All ‘belief’ is justification to the self and others in furtherance of acquisition. It is meaningless. Statements of justification only provide us with information necessary to deduce what it is that we wish to acquire.
AND; Truthfulness and Deceit;
( … )

( … Grammars etc here … )

( … Fictionalisms here …. )
AND Divisions of Perception, Cognition, Memory, Labor, Advocacy, and Negotiation;
( … )
AND; Cooperation; Where;
- Man has only three choices in how to act in relation to others:
  
  Avoidance (Boycott, Deprivation of cooperation)
  
  Cooperation (Productive Exchange), or;
  
  Conflict (Parasitism, Predation, or War)
  
  Man can voluntarily cooperate because he can sympathize with the intentions of others, communicate, and negotiate terms of cooperation, and determine the returns on cooperation, and choose whether and which actions to take with his limited time, effort, resources, and will.
  
  Man has only one incentive to cooperate: the value of doing so is greater than the alternatives of avoidance and conflict.
  
  Cooperation is a disproportionately more productive means of acquisition than individual production.
  
  Continuous cooperation in a division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, advocacy, negotiation, and trade informed by prices is ….
AND; Rational, Reciprocal, Ethical, Moral, and Good Action; Where;
We seek discounts in our acquisitions. Some of these discounts are productive and moral and encourage cooperation, and some of them are unproductive and immoral, discourage cooperation, and encourage retaliation.
- Only voluntary transfer is rational and non-coercive without creating demand for retaliation and decline of future opportunity for returns on cooperation.
  
  Only productive voluntary exchange is reciprocally rational.
  
  Only fully informed and warrantied productive voluntary exchange is ethical.
  
  Only fully informed and warrantied productive voluntary exchange free of imposition of costs upon the interests of other members of the group by externality is moral.
  
  Any transfer (GOOD = VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTION)
The only ethical and moral acquisition is one in which one either homesteads an interest by act of transformation (investment), or obtains that interest by productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary exchange, where any external, involuntary transfers (externalities) are not unproductive (losses).
AND; Rational, Irreciprocal, Unethical, Immoral, and Evil Action; Where;
- Man must act to preserve and extend cooperation to preserve the disproportionate rewards of acquisition through cooperation.
- Man acts to preserve and extend cooperation by the suppression of parasitism that creates the disincentive to cooperate, and therefore decreases the disproportionate rewards of acquisition through cooperation.
- Man conducts free riding, parasitism, and predation by:
[insert page=’widget-crimes’ display=’content’]
AND; Suppression of Free Riding, Parasitism, and Predation; Where; AND; Man suppresses Free Riding, Parasitism, and Predation by:
1 – Violence: threats of interpersonal violence, and interpersonal violence, and organized violence; 2 – Boycott: threats of interpersonal ostracization from cooperation, interpersonal ostracization, organized ostracization from cooperation; 3 –Remuneration: Promises of individual remuneration, or deprivation from remuneration, organized remuneration, or deprivation from remuneration,

(list institutions of suppression of free riding, parasitism, and predation)

Common Law: Incremental, Evolutionary, Suppression:

( … )
AND; Competition; Where; Man competes for status because status provides discounts on opportunities to acquire interests – especially mates, insurance, cooperation, and allies.
1. social (status desirability),
  
  economic (wealth desirability),
  
  reproductive (genetic desirability),
  
  political and military (competitive desirability) – as well as their undesirable opposites.
Reproductive Competition; Where;
- Man acts in furtherance of his reproductive strategy.
  
  Male and Female reproductive strategies are in conflict.
  
  The Female seeks to breed where it benefits her lineage; to force the cost of her offspring on the tribe through moral hazard; to further her offspring regardless of merit; to generalize to preserve adaptability to changing group dynamics; to preserve soft her soft-power by seeking safety in consensus, non conflict, and numbers, at the expense of Male interests. To limit accumulated cellular damage on behalf of the herd; To ostracize (kill) competitors through endless reputation destruction; As such Females act to produce sufficient equality to reduce conflict. This consists in the Herd strategy and Instincts.
  
  The Male seeks to breed impulsively wherever it does not harm his lineage; to use violence most frequently in defense of access to a female; to preserve hard power by creating a tribe capable of resisting dominance by other Males at the expense of Female interests; to specialize in the group at the cost of adaptability to changes in group dynamics; to seek safety in the company of a hierarchy of men capable of coordinating (hunting) by similar interests; to demonstrate hierarchy and loyalty; to absorb accumulated cellular damage on behalf of the females and children. As such Males act meritocratically; This consists in the Pack strategy and Instincts.
  
  Males and Females overlap in their uses of each other’s reproductive strategies, due to variations in dimorphism and reverse dimorphism present under evolutionary neoteny.
  
  Without limits to both Male and Female behavior in favor of their strategies, the compromise between the strategies fails, and the extremes of each force costs upon the other.
  
  Men evolved degrees of pairing-off in multiple relations, serial relations, and monogamy; and degrees of ‘cheating’ from frequent to infrequent, as is in their ability and interest.
  
  The institution of marriage of increasing length in response to the increase in productive capital under control of the family, produced an Equilibrium under which all do the best they can without imposing harm upon others, at the expense of producing an optimum for any.
AND; Trust; ( … ) AND; Signaling;
( … ) Signal Fraud.

( … ) Signal Spirals
AND; Transformation (Production); Where; AND; Specialization in a division of knowledge, labor, …..;
Physical, Organizational, Intellectual
AND; Classes; ( …. ) social econ… etc Where;
Hierarchies must form to produce decidability, and always and everywhere form because the Pareto law (power law) is required to organize the voluntary organization of the suite of markets we call society: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, and polities. The costs of organizing people involuntarily rise rapidly with the number, and availability of choices; can only be applied to relatively simple projects; and requires continuous monitoring of the people for defection, escape, corruption, and black markets. The costs of producing markets using voluntary cooperation requires only the suppression of defectors, which in turn causes the polity to self police defectors.
AND; Coercion; Where; There exist only three means of coercing other humans to cooperate with on one means or end vs cooperate with others on different means or ends.
- Man has only three means of coercion (influence):
  
  Remuneration (payment, trade)
  
  Force, Loss of Life, Experience, Liberty, …..
  
  Undermining, Ostracization, Reputation Destruction, Loss of Status and Opportunity.
- Man Specializes in three means of coercion:
  
  Remuneration: Finance, Commerce, Caretaking (or Bribery)
  
  Force: Military, Police, Law (or murder, violence, theft)
  
  Undermining: Ostracization, Gossip, Religion, Education, Propaganda (reputation destruction, deprivation of opportunity, information, deception)
  
  Man Evolves classes we call ‘elites’ to specialize in each of these means of coercion.
  
  The dominance of one group of specialists over another is historical and demographic.
  
  Elites are necessary for decidability in coordination.
  
  Man follows elites …..
These three means of coercion can be used to construct three vertical axis of class specialization: coercion by force (conservatism/masculine), coercion by gossip (progressivism/feminine), coercion by remuneration (libertarianism/neutral masculine). Human elites are formed by those who specialize in one or more of these means of coercion: gossip: public intellectuals and priests. force: military and political. exchange: voluntary organizations, including the voluntary organization of production. AND; Conflict;
( … )
AND; Organization into Groups;
( … ) Esp discounts from proximity
AND; Organization by Kin Group (Bias; (at all scales));
( … )

many discounts on everything from ingoup especially from signals
AND; Organization into Generations (shared experiences, predictable cycles)
(cycles of generations, credit and debt, seeking opportunity by subsequent generations)
AND; Organization into Institutions (family, clan, tribe etc and nation vs corporation vs cult)
( … )

Kin (Genetics)

Family

Clan

Tribe

Nation

Race

Cult (religion)

Corporation (Economy)

Possession (Military)
AND; Organization into Markets (of all kinds) and counter markets (of all kinds) The Market as A Means of Survival
1. (1) One gains Dividends from the construction and maintenance of the voluntary organization of production, distribution, and trade paid for by forgoing opportunities for parasitic consumption (acting ethically and morally).
  
  (2) One gains access to opportunity for cooperation and consumption in the market.
  
  (3) One gains earnings from the personal production of goods and services in the market for goods and services. (income from profits)
  
  (4) Dividends for maintenance of the commons in all its forms.
  
  (5) Dividends for the policing (defense) of the commons in all its forms.
Markets into Cycles The Inability of Some To Participate in the Market
(creating defense of the order of cooperation)
AND; Demand for Organization into Monopolies;
( … )
AND; Organization into Political Orders (Markets for Commons)
Communist —- Socialist — Kin —- Capitalist —- Anarchist
AND; Bias to Outgroup Trade; AND Organization to engage in Outgroup free riding, parasitism and predation OR Organization to engage in Productive Trade.
( … )
AND Domestication and Eugenic Evolution, or Failures of Domestication and Dysgenic Evolution
( … )
AND Organization by Group Evolutionary Strategy — Differences in Group Evolutionary Strategies — ( … ) parasitic and productive etc Organizing by use of grammar in support of group evolutionary strategy There is only one strategy that does not force others to bear the cost: reciprocity (trade) between kin groups. AND Dysgenia and Eugenia;
( … )
AND Demand for Orders Suiting Group Strategy
( … )

AND; Speciation – Organization into Species;
Definition
|Differences|Human Species (Macro Races) > Major Races (subspecies) > Races > Tribes > Clans > Classes > Families > Sexes > Individuals > Stage of Development (age) > Traits > Knowledge > Skills
Where;
The influential differences between races are due to (a) degree of neoteny due to climate, (b) size of the underclass due to both climate and means of production, (c) distribution of male and female biases (traits) between the genders in the group; and (d) the norms, traditions, customs, formal and informal institutions that were necessary for those traits in that distribution in that region.
Where;
Meaningful Variation in the Human Species is limited to the following Traits:

1 – Degree of Neoteny (Asian, white, Indian, Iranic, Semitic, Pacific, African – testosterone levels, in that order)

2 – Rate and Depth of Maturity. (Same as above)

3 – Size of the Underclass through reproductive suppression and upward redistribution. (IQ levels and beneficial personality traits.)

4 – Distribution of Gender Traits (emphasis vs reversal) both morphological, intuitive, cognitive, and behavioral.

Including:

1 – Distribution of Moral Intuition between female herd and male pack, because of distribution of Gender Traits.

2 – Distribution of Personality Traits in the group of which Intelligence and Industriousness matters for both genders, and negative-agreeableness (decisiveness) matters for males.

3 – Distribution of Cognitive Bias between female herd and male pack.

(Note: AFAIK personality traits correspond to both stages of the prey drive, the modification of the prey drive for sex role, and our reward systems that produce the effects.)

5 – Distribution of Age and Generations. (And cyclical bias of generations)

6 – Group evolutionary Strategy using Gender Traits (Semitic maternal, Asian paternal, Western compromise). Including the manners, ethics, morals, norms, traditions, institutions public and private, and especially method of decidability, consequential logic, grammar, and vocabulary by which all such habits are expressed.
Therefore;
Human groups differ substantially in their distributions on these axis.

Human variation produces different demands from the markets for association, cooperation, production, reproduction, and the production of commons.

Political orders can favor kin or corporation, equality or meritocracy, with the optimum order being kin meritocracy, which will produce equality by externality of kin selection.

The only reason to refrain from conquest, decimation, genocide is reciprocity under nation states. And the justification of conquest, rule, decimation and genocide is the export of costs of domestication or failures of domestication upon others.
THEREFORE;
Heterogeneity – Settled – Diversity is a bad
Where;
( … )

(Pay your own costs of domestication)

AND; Ethnocentrism – Settled

1 – Ethnocentrism is the optimum group evolutionary strategy if for no other reason than reciprocal trust, investment and insurance without sacrifice to kin selection. There is no competitor to it, whatsoever. People are more gregarious to their own, and more redistributive, with less fear of political competition, because all competition is internal and by class or faction rather than kin group. The problem has traditionally been that many ethic groups were not able to concentrate sufficient capital to create self governance, or had to be captured to prevent capture by others, or were of sufficient hazard to neighbors they were ruled. (The exception is people lower on the ladder who look for allies against their betters, and to have ‘someone below them’ which appears very important to humans.)

2 – Ethnocentrism eliminates race and tribe conflict in the suppression of expansion of underclasses through soft eugenics (paying the unproductive not to have children). There is no value in internal competitors. none.

( … )

The result of these conditions, is that man seeks Agency, within the limits of his abilities, frustrations and comforts, with only so much reciprocity as he can get away with paying the costs of.
—“The Will To Power”—
(Self determination)
September 27, 2018
“I’d say what is actually being proven is that a man’s testimony is worth only a

–“I’d say what is actually being proven is that a man’s testimony is worth only a fraction of a woman’s in the United States, as her allegations without consistent evidence are still being valued over his innocence.”— Steven Kolpek

Source date (UTC): 2018-09-25 07:46:00 UTC

September 25, 2018
September 25th, 2018 12:18 PM I’m your huckleberry. Humans possess agency. Anima

September 25th, 2018 12:18 PM

I’m your huckleberry. Humans possess agency. Animals do not. If I say one lacks agency, it means one is insufficiently human to enter into rational debate, reason, calculation, and computation. How is it that the inverse, as you suggest – which is the descent into animal instinct – and the abandonment of agency and reason somehow human instead of animal? Or are you saying that those who possess agency and reason are post-, or super-human? ( PS: I’ve dominated in everything I’ve tried. what have you accomplished other than avoidance of success? 😉 )

September 25, 2018
“Compared to non-sex offenders released from State prisons, released sex offende

–“Compared to non-sex offenders released from State prisons, released sex offenders were 4 times more likely to be rearrested for a sex crime.”— Feds.

PERMANENT EXILE ONE WAY OR ANOTHER

Source date (UTC): 2018-09-23 16:38:39 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1043902477005983745

September 23, 2018
September 23rd, 2018 12:38 PM –“Compared to non-sex offenders released from Sta

September 23rd, 2018 12:38 PM

–“Compared to non-sex offenders released from State prisons, released sex offenders were 4 times more likely to be rearrested for a sex crime.”— Feds.PERMANENT EXILE ONE WAY OR ANOTHER

September 23, 2018
ON THE DEATH PENALTY Reposted by @[100015734649811:2048:Ryan Williams] —“The p

ON THE DEATH PENALTY

Reposted by @[100015734649811:2048:Ryan Williams]

—“The problem with the modern state is not that it uses the death penalty so much, but rather that it uses it far too little. Property in toto serves as a useful metric for what crimes merit the death penalty. if you use fraud, deceit, or some other non reciprocal criminal means of enriching yourself at the expense of the commons above some arbitrary number, say 5x the average lifetime taxes paid by an average taxpayer, you should face execution.

Under such a scheme, nearly every tech monopolist, the Walton family, Bezos, any of the financial elite, nearly every politician and most high ranking bureaucrats would be liable for death. NYT editors lie in the newspapers and it costs 5x the taxes paid of average worker? Boom. no more problem with lying editors at the NYT.

The whole West faces the double problem of a violent, dependent underclass and a parasitical, exploitative oligarchy controlling business and politics. Such measures might seem unduly harsh, but they are necessary. Brazil shows why they must be implemented, Singapore shows that they work.”—-

Source date (UTC): 2018-09-22 12:19:00 UTC

September 22, 2018
Position on Arranged Marriages?

—“Are you in favor of arranged marriages? I am, but I would love to hear your take”— Erik Lukovsky

[N]o, because I am not in favor of selling children into slavery for money which is what occurs all too often. What I prefer is veto of proposal on grounds of insufficient demonstration of compatibility and merit to produce a home, income, and support of children for those under a certain age. I am also in favor of parental monetary contribution to setting up a household and the near elimination of the marriage ‘celebration’ entirely, which has become an absurd debt with which to start a family. via-negativa in all things. There are too many malincentives at present: delayed childhood and its suppression of socialization and mating rituals. Delayed childhood and it’s suppression of work experience in the service of others, and work experience in the generation of trades. The deprivation of the young from income from labor such that they accumulate demand for consumption during the period where they wish to do the most exploration and signaling and mating rituals. The issue of credit to the young who then indebt themselves. the issue of debilitating student loans to the young who then further indebt themselves, the combination of which is to spend the most fertile years at play rather than familial production. The issue of housing interest such that it is almost impossible to pay for a home within the first generation of children, thereby freeing the parents to assist the next generation and save for retirement once the children are grown. The issue of high taxation such that two incomes are necessary for the production of a household, rather than a second income for the purpose of extra entertainment and socialization. Other people’s engagement is the optimum consumer good. The problem is sortition such that we can engage peers, and separate from inhibitors to our socialization.

September 17, 2018
Position on Arranged Marriages?

—“Are you in favor of arranged marriages? I am, but I would love to hear your take”— Erik Lukovsky

[N]o, because I am not in favor of selling children into slavery for money which is what occurs all too often. What I prefer is veto of proposal on grounds of insufficient demonstration of compatibility and merit to produce a home, income, and support of children for those under a certain age. I am also in favor of parental monetary contribution to setting up a household and the near elimination of the marriage ‘celebration’ entirely, which has become an absurd debt with which to start a family. via-negativa in all things. There are too many malincentives at present: delayed childhood and its suppression of socialization and mating rituals. Delayed childhood and it’s suppression of work experience in the service of others, and work experience in the generation of trades. The deprivation of the young from income from labor such that they accumulate demand for consumption during the period where they wish to do the most exploration and signaling and mating rituals. The issue of credit to the young who then indebt themselves. the issue of debilitating student loans to the young who then further indebt themselves, the combination of which is to spend the most fertile years at play rather than familial production. The issue of housing interest such that it is almost impossible to pay for a home within the first generation of children, thereby freeing the parents to assist the next generation and save for retirement once the children are grown. The issue of high taxation such that two incomes are necessary for the production of a household, rather than a second income for the purpose of extra entertainment and socialization. Other people’s engagement is the optimum consumer good. The problem is sortition such that we can engage peers, and separate from inhibitors to our socialization.

September 17, 2018