Curt Doolittle

Theme: Responsibility

  • WHAT MEANEST THOU? 😉 —I need no faith. I need only the necessity of action. F

    WHAT MEANEST THOU? 😉

    —I need no faith. I need only the necessity of action. Faith is for those so poor in assets, character,agency,and will that they seek excuses for action, inaction, success and failure. That cowardice is for The Herd. Men satisfy the need for action & consequence and learn from it.—

    Deflation: Decidability > Confidence > Trust > Belief > Faith

    – belief: Meaning “conviction of the truth of a proposition or alleged fact without knowledge” is by 1530s; it is also “sometimes used to include the absolute conviction or certainty which accompanies knowledge”

    – faith: From early 14c. as “assent of the mind to the truth of a statement for which there is incomplete evidence,” especially “belief in religious matters” (matched with hope and charity). Since mid-14c. in reference to the Christian church or religion; from late 14c. in reference to any religious persuasion.

    – trust: from Old Norse traust “help, confidence, protection, support,” from Proto-Germanic abstract noun *traustam (source also of Old Frisian trast, Dutch troost “comfort, consolation,” Old High German trost “trust, fidelity,” German Trost “comfort, co…See More

    – confidence: From mid-15c. as “reliance on one’s own powers, resources, or circumstances, self-assurance.” Meaning “certainty of a proposition or assertion, sureness with regard to a fact” is from 1550s.

    Deconflation into series allows us to see the insane precision ofthe huge vocabulary in the english language

    Decidability > Confidence(self) > Trust(other) > Belief(possibility) > Faith(religion-higher power, beyond ken)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 16:56:00 UTC

  • I need no faith. I need only the necessity of action. Faith is for those so poor

    I need no faith. I need only the necessity of action. Faith is for those so poor in assets, character,agency,and will that they seek excuses for action, inaction, success and failure. That cowardice is for The Herd. Men satisfy the need for action & consequence and learn from it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 16:27:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071803511107710977

  • I need no faith. I need only the necessity of action. Faith is for those so poor

    I need no faith. I need only the necessity of action. Faith is for those so poor in assets, character,agency,and will that they seek excuses for action, inaction, success and failure. That cowardice is for The Herd. Men satisfy the need for action & consequence and learn from it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-09 16:26:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071803406749233153

    Reply addressees: @RaduBT

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071792934444548101

    IN REPLY TO:

    @RaduBT

    @curtdoolittle The Universe has Order. It is Coherent (isotropic universe). Otherwise it could not Exist. The “laws” of the nature are unchanged, but as Planck said, we should not assume they will stay the same. Nothing in this Universe could prove they will stay the same. He have to have faith

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1071792934444548101

  • WE BEAR THE BURDEN Under our constitution we are all just ordinary peers (equals

    WE BEAR THE BURDEN

    Under our constitution we are all just ordinary peers (equals) contracting the services of government from one another and we are all responsible for one another under that rule of traditional english, anglo saxon, germanic proto germanic, common law we call tort under nomocracy. Government without rulers: rule of law.

    We bear the burden.

    We bear that burden in order to prevent the redevelopment of Rule

    (worth repeating)

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-08 17:33:00 UTC

  • We understand perfectly well why you choose equalitarianism over kin selection –

    We understand perfectly well why you choose equalitarianism over kin selection – at an unrecoverable cost to your kin. They are not worthy of your doing otherwise.

    The most important choices in history are those that increase or decrease kin.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-03 15:25:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1069613567748517890

  • We understand perfectly well why you choose equalitarianism over kin selection –

    We understand perfectly well why you choose equalitarianism over kin selection – at an unrecoverable cost to your kin. They are not worthy of your doing otherwise.

    The most important choices in history are those that increase or decrease kin.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-03 10:25:00 UTC

  • “LYING” IN THE WHITE LAW (PROPERTARIANISM) by Daniel Roland Anderson —“I (we)

    “LYING” IN THE WHITE LAW (PROPERTARIANISM)

    by Daniel Roland Anderson

    —“I (we) require you to perform due diligence before making a truth claim. In other words, we have a higher standard of not lying. This prevents people (as we do in law) from claiming ignorance.”—Curt Doolittle

    This is the first time I’ve seen you explain why you use the term “lie” the way you do.

    I’m glad I randomly scroll through comment sections like this looking for gold.

    I’m thinking another couple paragraphs, and this is a post that resolves some angst with IQs all the way down to 95.

    The rest of this discussion on the relationship between truth, meaning, and lying is more important for a lot of us though because it seems to cause a lot of confusion—more so the truth and meaning thing.

    INCREASE IN THE SCOPE OF LYING RESULTS FROM AN INCREASE IN THE SCOPE OF WARRANTY, DUE TO AN INCREASE IN THE SCOPE OF DUE DILIGENCE

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-30 13:00:00 UTC

  • “If your speech does not satisfy the categories necessary to demonstrate due dil

    —“If your speech does not satisfy the categories necessary to demonstrate due diligence or establish warrantee against fraud, bias, or error, why on earth would I take you seriously?”—Micah Pezdirtz

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-30 09:41:00 UTC

  • ZERO TOLERANCE. THE WHITE LAW IS ABSOLUTE – INCLUDING IN JUDGEMENT OF THE CHURCH

    ZERO TOLERANCE. THE WHITE LAW IS ABSOLUTE – INCLUDING IN JUDGEMENT OF THE CHURCH.

    —“… but the church did [x good thing], right?”—

    (Regarding the prohibition on cousin marriage)

    Oh yeah. Sure. But the reason they did so was to break up the great aristocratic families, so that they in turn could appropriate their land incrementally and cheaply. Which led to half the capital in europe being dead assets of rent seekers against the interests of our people. So it’s not that the church was doing good. It’s that it produced a good by doing an evil. Even then, it’s the corporation under manorialism that produced the good since we were an homogenous peoples in europe along atlantic, germanic, finnic, southern, and slavic lines: the children of the Aryan Conquest of Europe.

    Again, deflating the church into Content Taught (ideas), Method of Teaching (sophism (ABRAHAMISM)), and Governance by Teachers (action), and Consequences (externalities) – as a governor the church consisted of men who governed reasonably well.

    A broken clock is right twice a day. Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot did good things as well, marxists, postmodernists, and feminists each contributed at least one non-bad idea. Jews and Gypsies did things that weren’t entirely destructive or evil.

    They church was terrible for western civilization compared to the greco-roman civilization. The church was imposed by violence upon our people via an underclass revolt started by the jews (justifiably), and as an act of war by the underclass old europeans (remains of the greek empire). Hellenic greece was european until Alexander’s conquest infected us – and him. But there is and was nothing western about the eastern empire. There was and is nothing european about the church. The uniqueness of western civilization is our natural religion, natural law, law of nature, law of men, and markets in everything that rose from them. Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Duty, Natural Law and Markets In Everything, producing truthful speech, reason, logic, empiricism, science, and now – Testimonialism (complete science).

    So no, I do not look at the great evil that is the semitic revolt and conquest of our people by that plague we call the abrahamic cults, as a replacement for our ancient unique order that is the envy of all humanity. I do not ‘forgive’ a dark age, the destruction of the great civilizations, and a billion deaths.

    I have one purpose: to rediscover, write down for eternity, that which is uniquely ours, which has dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of all it’s primitivism – including that ocean of semitic evils – and to exterminate every remnant of those evils from our people, lands, histories, and even memories – if not (with the help of the far east (our only peers)) from this earth.

    Is that clear enough?

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-29 11:48:00 UTC

  • WHAT ABOUT SLAVERY? —“Curt; Are you opposed to slavery?”— Um. “Opposed” is a

    WHAT ABOUT SLAVERY?

    —“Curt; Are you opposed to slavery?”—

    Um. “Opposed” is an opinion. My opinion is irrelevant. My job is the Law. This is how I understand The Law:

    If you mean voluntary or indentured servitude in its many forms, then no, it’s within the law. It’s just a contract. In fact I would advocate for its restoration since it’s just a good way of absorbing labor and taking good care of our people who are less able. I mean, room, clothing, board, healthcare is expensive enough and paying someone to maintain a household unnecessarily isn’t good. There are plenty of people for whom household management is not a preference but a burden.

    If you mean civic-slavery (military service) then of course I advocate it – and I don’t think militaries can function otherwise.

    If you mean prisoner-slavery (putting prisoners to work on the commons) then yes, of course, I advocate as much of it as possible. On the other hand the law recommends a return to as much capital punishment as possible.

    But If you mean chattel slavery (what most people think of) the Law would say that it is always harmful to your people and their genome (unless you sterilize them), it is is too expensive for the meagre returns, and it violates the one law, with which we must force those able to transcend to do so, rather than leave them as undomesticated wild animals so to speak.

    In general, chattel slavery is bad. It’s worse if its with aliens. It’s much worse if it’s with devolutionary aliens. And it’s much, much worse if it’s common whatsoever. The externalities are some of the worst possible.

    Slavery was an agrarian utility that is no longer of any utility.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-28 19:29:00 UTC