Curt Doolittle

Theme: Responsibility

  • YOU CANNOT APPROPRIATE P OR CLIMB ON P’S BUS IN DEFENSE OF YOUR LYING. —“I thi

    YOU CANNOT APPROPRIATE P OR CLIMB ON P’S BUS IN DEFENSE OF YOUR LYING.

    —“I think he is saying that you are gossip rallying yourself in this instance and that it is relatively well placed on the irony scale.”—Jay Thompson

    I thought RECIPROCITY was moral.

    And that ‘he’ is using pilpul to create a false equivalency between argument vs argument and ridicule vs ridicule. Which is sophistry or dishonesty or ignorance, or stupidity.

    THE ARGUMENTATIVE PROCESS

    If ridiculed, return it, and then restate the central argument.

    If that process doesn’t return to argument, repeat.

    If repetition doesn’t work, the return to violence.

    Never let GSRRM go unanswered.

    Identify it.

    Return it.

    Restate the central argument. (inform thru repetition)

    Repeat.

    Hardly requires restating the central argument with Kinsella.

    THERE IS NO ROOM ON THE BUS FOR LIES

    This is why I don’t see hope for y’all. You are all dependent upon the use of avoidance of the central argument like women, jews, and muslims, which demonstrates that christianity is a vehicle for the deceits of women, jews, and muslims and therefore you cannot ‘earn the franchise’ by reciprocity of truthful speech.

    Every time you make one of these childish bits of nonsense all you do is confirm: you are not able to evolve past that level of infantilism we equate to women and children or that level of dishonesty we call abrahamism.

    So please stop wasting my time.

    We cannot cooperate, because we cannot agree to reciprocity, and we cannot agree to reciprocity because we cannot agree to truthful speech that would end abrahamic deception in supernatural, ideal, sophomoric, and pseudoscientific terms, that gave us judaism, christianity, islam, marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism, using the very means of fraudulent discourse you are using with me.

    It’s not complicated.

    Just not worth talking about.

    Xians must find a way on their own.

    I can’t help those who are allies of the enemy.

    And christians are allies of the enemy of our people.

    Because christians are more allied to jews, christians, and muslims than they are to their people, their science and their law and their history.

    Solve your own problem. There is no ride on P for christians in alliance with the enemy on the preservation of lying.

    Truth is my way and the original way of our people before the dark ages of abrahamic ignorance and submission.

    Find your own way.

    There is no way of appropriating P in defense of lying.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-20 10:31:00 UTC

  • KOHLBER’S MORAL DEVELOPMENT (h/t: Rosenborg Predmetsky) Level 1. Preconventional

    KOHLBER’S MORAL DEVELOPMENT

    (h/t: Rosenborg Predmetsky)

    Level 1. Preconventional Morality

    The earliest stage of moral development, obedience, and punishment is especially common in young children, but adults are also capable of expressing this type of reasoning. At this stage, Kohlberg says, children see rules as fixed and absolute. Obeying the rules is important because it is a means to avoid punishment.

    At the individualism and exchange stage of moral development, children account for individual points of view and judge actions based on how they serve individual needs. In the Heinz dilemma, children argued that the best course of action was the choice that best-served Heinz’s needs. Reciprocity is possible at this point in moral development, but only if it serves one’s own interests.

    Level 2. Conventional Morality

    Often referred to as the “good boy-good girl” orientation, the interpersonal relationships stage of moral development is focused on living up to social expectations and roles. There is an emphasis on conformity, being “nice,” and consideration of how choices influence relationships.

    This stage is focused on maintaining social order. At this stage of moral development, people begin to consider society as a whole when making judgments. The focus is on maintaining law and order by following the rules, doing one’s duty and respecting authority.

    Level 3. Postconventional Morality

    The ideas of a social contract and individual rights cause people in the next stage to begin to account for the differing values, opinions, and beliefs of other people. Rules of law are important for maintaining a society, but members of the society should agree upon these standards.

    Kohlberg’s final level of moral reasoning is based on universal ethical principles and abstract reasoning. At this stage, people follow these internalized principles of justice, even if they conflict with laws and rules.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-16 13:19:00 UTC

  • yes but how do you establish duty in the first place?

    yes but how do you establish duty in the first place?

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-15 15:45:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096435258373955585

    Reply addressees: @xmjEE

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096405129039962113

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1096405129039962113

  • TERMINAL MORONITUDE —“FWIW: “There is no ‘wrong’. There is only what people wi

    TERMINAL MORONITUDE

    —“FWIW: “There is no ‘wrong’. There is only what people will retaliate against you for doing.” They retaliate against you for some reason. That reason is the imposition of costs upon that which they have born costs to obtain an interest. it’s that simple. Propertarianism isn’t excuses making for priors. It’s just empirical evidence of the accumulated history of mankind across all civilizations.”— CURTD

    —“Moral relativism is always a red flag.”—Moron

    Um, it’s MORAL ABSOLUTISM. You silly git. it’s EMPIRICAL moral absolutism.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 19:51:00 UTC

  • NO PEDOPHILIACS ON MY PAGE PLEASE There are true arguments that are bad argument

    NO PEDOPHILIACS ON MY PAGE PLEASE

    There are true arguments that are bad arguments. There are true arguments I don’t want to be associated with – largely permissiveness of impulse.

    —“…marriage and sex limits on age need to be eliminated. …. I made a logical argument … you aren’t open to criticism like you claim…”— A Member of the Tribe.

    Actually, you’re lying right?

    1) I made the argument that you’re making at true but BAD argument that is not one I want made in my territory so to speak. (and I asked you to stop repeatedly.)

    2) I’m saying you may possess a genetic defect that is fairly common in certain sub-groups that occurs comorbidly with higher risk of sexual identity problems, higher risk of sexual predation, higher affinity for engaging in pornography, gambling, moral hazard, and higher risk of schizotypal personality disorders.

    3) I’m saying that by not dropping this argument you are demonstrating that (2*) is not only likely, but certain.

    4) And you’re banned. Goodbye.

    It doesn’t matter if its true and I agree. I don’t want it here any more than I want a dog scratching its ass on my carpet It’s a dog. Dogs will do that. However, I don’t want to talk about it.

    Please take warnings seriously.

    Thanks

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 17:55:00 UTC

  • WE DON’T NEED YOU IF YOU’RE COSTLY – AND HONESTLY, THERE AREN’T ANY OTHER BUMPER

    WE DON’T NEED YOU IF YOU’RE COSTLY – AND HONESTLY, THERE AREN’T ANY OTHER BUMPER CARS TO RIDE AT THE MOMENT.

    —“You guys are going to have to learn how to be more resilient people if you want to grow your educational program. You can’t handle every dissenter this way and it reflect well. Anyways, it’s fine if you’re set in your ways for now. I’ll just take a break and see if I can answer any questions in the future.”— Josh Jeppson

    We don’t need numbers, we need quality. Once we have sufficient quality, then numbers are useful. But educating a dead weight of large numbers for whom the content is simply too difficult is a waste of time.

    We will very likely end up leading some population of people for the simple reason that (a) we will have a solution (b) we will have the smart folk, (c) our solution appeals across the middle of the laboring, working, middle, and professional classes, against the parasitic top and bottom.

    In other words one of our central discussions is why don’t we just leave mouth-breathers behind entirely, and like the frankfurt school and the marxists focus on the talent, which generate all the positive propaganda (information and persuasion).

    Men who will fight will fight for self interest alone, and all we need to do is provide the many (not the fringe) with reason for providing pressure out of simple self interst, using the least disruption to the social, economic, and political order, with the most natural means of reorganization.

    I mean, you guys are the third rail of guaranteed failure, not an opportunity for success. It’s not like you’re all gonna sit home if an opportunity presents itself. But you haven’t got a snowball’s chance in hell of generating an opportunity.

    I’ll take everyone who wants to fight. and learn how to fight, whether argumentatively socially or militarily. But I”m not interesting in fighting internally.

    We need men, not boys.

    Get on the train, or off it, and join another, or make your own.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 17:27:00 UTC

  • RT @DegenRolf: Some individuals act consistently more morally than others, acros

    RT @DegenRolf: Some individuals act consistently more morally than others, across time and situations. http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/the-sage-handbook-of-personality-and-individual-differences-v2/i2222.xml https://t.co…

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-12 17:26:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1095373703528017926

  • There is a difference between intelligence and cunning. Intelligence is the mora

    There is a difference between intelligence and cunning. Intelligence is the moral application of one’s ability, and cunning the immoral application of one’s ability. Unfortunately the academy specializes in teaching the practice of cunning rather than the practice of intelligence. Why? The size of the market for immoral persuasion is greater than the size of market for moral persuasion.

    (Albeit we all screw up. Me certainly and often.)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-10 15:50:00 UTC

  • THE COMMON MAN’S DUTY OF CAUTION Elites (by meritocracy) is to not interfere in

    THE COMMON MAN’S DUTY OF CAUTION

    Elites (by meritocracy) is to not interfere in the elite’s production of that order of production we call family, society, economy, polity, and war upon which all of us depend.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-10 13:44:00 UTC

  • NOBLESSE OBLIGE: THE DUTY OF THE ELITE: A RECIPROCITY “Noblesse oblige” is gener

    NOBLESSE OBLIGE: THE DUTY OF THE ELITE: A RECIPROCITY

    “Noblesse oblige” is generally used to imply that with wealth, power, and prestige come responsibilities.

    In ethical discussion, “Noblesse oblige” summarizes a moral economy wherein privilege (ability and achievement) must be balanced by duty towards those who lack such privilege ability and (achievement) or who cannot perform such duty.

    Finally, it has been used recently primarily to refer to public responsibilities of the rich, famous and powerful, notably to provide good examples of behaviour or to exceed minimal standards of decency.

    It has also been used to describe a person taking the blame for something in order to solve an issue or save someone else.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-10 13:35:00 UTC