Theme: Responsibility

  • On baiting into moral hazards

    On baiting into moral hazards https://propertarianism.com/2019/10/03/on-baiting-into-moral-hazards/


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 20:59:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179863612325797888

  • On baiting into moral hazards

    —“Can anyone elaborate on the baiting into moral hazards via pilpul please? Is that to use philosophy and morality as an argument as opposed to utility, reciprocity based on empirical?”—

    0) A woman implies access to friendship, affection, or sex, which she will never deliver. 1) I promise you life after death if you obey and undermine the upper classes. (abrahamism) 2) I promise you power and equality if you undermine the political system (marx) 3) I promise you equality if you undermine men (feminism) 4) I promise you status if you undermine the status hierarchy (postmodernism) 5) I lend you money at usurious prices that will entrap you. 6) I lend you money or extend you credit to gamble. 7) I lend you money or extend you credit to buy alcohol or drugs. 8) I appeal to your morality and pass the hart cellar immigration act. How long do you want this list to go on? Because those are just the easy ones. These are all lies that bait you into hazard (risk and loss).

  • On baiting into moral hazards

    —“Can anyone elaborate on the baiting into moral hazards via pilpul please? Is that to use philosophy and morality as an argument as opposed to utility, reciprocity based on empirical?”—

    0) A woman implies access to friendship, affection, or sex, which she will never deliver. 1) I promise you life after death if you obey and undermine the upper classes. (abrahamism) 2) I promise you power and equality if you undermine the political system (marx) 3) I promise you equality if you undermine men (feminism) 4) I promise you status if you undermine the status hierarchy (postmodernism) 5) I lend you money at usurious prices that will entrap you. 6) I lend you money or extend you credit to gamble. 7) I lend you money or extend you credit to buy alcohol or drugs. 8) I appeal to your morality and pass the hart cellar immigration act. How long do you want this list to go on? Because those are just the easy ones. These are all lies that bait you into hazard (risk and loss).

  • (b) rule of law and involuntary warranty must be extended from commercial goods

    (b) rule of law and involuntary warranty must be extended from commercial goods and services to all information in the marketplace. yes that’s right. We gave license to people to not warranty their words in the 20th, and that’s the reason we are where we are today. Period.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 15:38:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179782863631376385

    Reply addressees: @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179782650346819585


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @clairlemon So let me reduce Taleb’s life’s work as an essayist in ridicule of western civilization to its foundations: (a) Mandelbrot was right that the stock market is just noise so w/o inside information just invest in funds. … (and here comes the big one) …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179782650346819585


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @clairlemon So let me reduce Taleb’s life’s work as an essayist in ridicule of western civilization to its foundations: (a) Mandelbrot was right that the stock market is just noise so w/o inside information just invest in funds. … (and here comes the big one) …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179782650346819585

  • 1. Via Positiva: ……. The Golden Rule. Do unto others as you would have done

    1. Via Positiva: ……. The Golden Rule.

    Do unto others as you would have done unto you

    2. Via Negativa: ….. The Silver Rule.

    Do not unto others as you would not have done unto you.

    3. Via Empathia : …….The Copper Rule

    Do not unto others as they would not have done unto them.

    3. Via Logica: ……….The Natural Law of Sovereignty and Reciprocity.

    Limit your actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfers, of the demonstrated interest of others, free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality.

    4. Via Existentia: …. Rule of Law,

    ………………………….. … The Jury, and

    ………………………….. … Markets in everything.

    5. The Iron Rule: …. Might Makes Right.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-02 17:27:00 UTC

  • TRAINING THE MORAL INTUITION I suppose that like many people, you assume man is

    TRAINING THE MORAL INTUITION

    I suppose that like many people, you assume man is moral, rather than amoral – merely choosing between the moral and immoral as incentives provide.

    We can in… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=476234889640073&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 19:13:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179112009314504706

  • I don’t know what lawful means, but unaccountability, lack of warranty and liabi

    I don’t know what lawful means, but unaccountability, lack of warranty and liability, is just free riding on risk born by others. As such it’s a violation of reciprocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 16:47:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179075254737608709

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179073856407003136


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179073856407003136

  • place is that any act must include its means of restitution and means of insurin

    … place is that any act must include its means of restitution and means of insuring restitution is possible.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 16:39:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179073307959840768

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179073196982767616


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @fryskefilosoof The ballot overturns governments (if we should have them, and I’m not sure we should) and the court overturns individuals. The difference is that overturning a government simply fires people. The court PUNISHES THEM and extracts restitution. One of the rules of law I put in …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179073196982767616


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @fryskefilosoof The ballot overturns governments (if we should have them, and I’m not sure we should) and the court overturns individuals. The difference is that overturning a government simply fires people. The court PUNISHES THEM and extracts restitution. One of the rules of law I put in …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179073196982767616

  • Most of my work is operationalizing law and government so that there are no cond

    Most of my work is operationalizing law and government so that there are no conditions that lack accountability – meaning warranty and liability.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 16:36:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179072693536210945

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179072328896000001


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @fryskefilosoof Well we are all liable for the contracts we make on behalf of others, so it’s not so much deposing the government as requiring signatories tot he contract warranty it (and remain liable for it) for the duration of its cause and consequence.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179072328896000001


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @fryskefilosoof Well we are all liable for the contracts we make on behalf of others, so it’s not so much deposing the government as requiring signatories tot he contract warranty it (and remain liable for it) for the duration of its cause and consequence.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1179072328896000001

  • Well we are all liable for the contracts we make on behalf of others, so it’s no

    Well we are all liable for the contracts we make on behalf of others, so it’s not so much deposing the government as requiring signatories tot he contract warranty it (and remain liable for it) for the duration of its cause and consequence.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-01 16:35:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179072328896000001

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179071966025793541


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179071966025793541