Theme: Responsibility

  • NATURAL LAW ON MARRIAGE – FOR THE INTERESTED Marriage is a private contract yes,

    NATURAL LAW ON MARRIAGE – FOR THE INTERESTED

    Marriage is a private contract yes, but it is insured by the community, because of the consequences of broken families placing a burden via moral hazard on the community. So, a marriage contract consists (under natural law) as partnership (not corporation) constructed by the mutual exchange of powers of attorney limited only by those limitations stated, but insured by the polity, and therefore the law (judiciary), against interference that would cause harm unrestitutable harm to family members. As such interference in a marriage exposes one to liability for (very large) damages. And distribution of fault is determined court if not determined by the parties. There is no community property. The children are not property but the insurer of the children, and the polity from the children like any other domesticated animal. The law can have no position on divorce, other than empirical, which is that immature children are the responsibility of the mother in the event of a divorce. Mature children may decide which to live with if parents accept their responsibility as insurer. Upon maturity (puberty) that decision belongs to the children. But no liability exists in either direction. That means no alimony, no child support. Because marriages are transitory, and while a woman may sell her sex, affection, and caretaking the man must sell his productivity.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 22:00:00 UTC

  • RT @MartianHoplite: @curtdoolittle “First, I think of a man. Then I remove reaso

    RT @MartianHoplite: @curtdoolittle “First, I think of a man. Then I remove reason and accountability.” – Jack Nicholson


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 21:14:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186390402120728576

  • Notes: Imagine if every reporter, entertainer, politician, public intellectual,

    Notes: Imagine if every reporter, entertainer, politician, public intellectual, academic, teacher, is liable for the truth and reciprocity of every syllable. As usual the courts will go thru twenty years of building a body of findings as court, findings, and people adapt.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 21:12:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186389733670297600

    Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186389319088529409


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays 10) Anyway, those are the primary differences, and they end creative legislation, creative regulation, creative adjudication, sloppy authoring of all of the above, and they end the entire marxist, postmodern, feminist, effort to repeat the destruction of the ancient world, here.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186389319088529409


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays 10) Anyway, those are the primary differences, and they end creative legislation, creative regulation, creative adjudication, sloppy authoring of all of the above, and they end the entire marxist, postmodern, feminist, effort to repeat the destruction of the ancient world, here.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186389319088529409

  • 5) P-Law: most important is the formal articulation of Truthful (Testimonial spe

    5) P-Law: most important is the formal articulation of Truthful (Testimonial speech) across the entire spectrum of human knowledge, and the extension of involuntary warranty from good and service to speech in matters of the commons to the public.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 21:02:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186387259446169600

    Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186386897507180544


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays 4) P-Law: property defined by demonstrated interest (bearing a cost or opportunity cost in order to obtain an interest) regardless of its constitution – so institutions, traditions etc are commons defensible in court. ie: no state consumption of cultural commons.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186386897507180544


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays 4) P-Law: property defined by demonstrated interest (bearing a cost or opportunity cost in order to obtain an interest) regardless of its constitution – so institutions, traditions etc are commons defensible in court. ie: no state consumption of cultural commons.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186386897507180544

  • TOUGH LOVE: THE REASON FOR ASYMMETRY IN ARREST, PROSECUTION, AND CONVICTION Agai

    TOUGH LOVE: THE REASON FOR ASYMMETRY IN ARREST, PROSECUTION, AND CONVICTION

    Again, assuming the same crime, the reason for asymmetry of prosecution and conviction is ‘fleeing officers,… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=489763784953850&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 20:41:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186382060342120448

  • WHY DO PUNISHMENTS FOR CRIMES VARY? (from elsewhere) —“The reason for differen

    WHY DO PUNISHMENTS FOR CRIMES VARY?
    (from elsewhere)

    —“The reason for differences in sentencing, which are true, result from the law having three objectives 1) restitution (if possible),… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=489748718288690&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 20:16:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186375795519971332

  • TOUGH LOVE: THE REASON FOR ASYMMETRY IN ARREST, PROSECUTION, AND CONVICTION Agai

    TOUGH LOVE: THE REASON FOR ASYMMETRY IN ARREST, PROSECUTION, AND CONVICTION

    Again, assuming the same crime, the reason for asymmetry of prosecution and conviction is ‘fleeing officers, non-compliance with officers, resistance to arrest, lack of remorse, lack of family and parental guarantee of constraint, known associates, general demeanor (conform or non-conforming), behavior in custody, lack of restitution, likelihood of recidivism.” That’s why. No secret here. Everyone knows it. The fact that your family and friends pressure you into language, manner, dress, behavior, or that rivals will threaten you if you appear vulnerable or signaling mainstream conformity is no excuse – it just means you haven’t got the willpower, character, or family structure, to behave as a ‘citizen’ meaning ‘a member of commercial society demonstrating adherence to middle class (commercial) norm custom manner, and signal. Man up. Shut up. Don’t Trash Down, Gang Down, or Ghetto Down or speak, act and dress like you’re rebelling against the commercial civilization that made your participation in it’s rewards possible – no matter how small they may be.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 16:41:00 UTC

  • WHY DO PUNISHMENTS FOR CRIMES VARY? (from elsewhere) —“The reason for differen

    WHY DO PUNISHMENTS FOR CRIMES VARY?

    (from elsewhere)

    —“The reason for differences in sentencing, which are true, result from the law having three objectives 1) restitution (if possible), 2) prevention of repetition (repeating), 3) prevention of imitation (spreading). Those who have more to lose are more able to perform restitution and less likely to engage in repetition, and their punishments more likely to limit imitation. The only way to shorten punishments is to create good families good homes, good parenting, good education so that current losers have incentive not to enter the system.”—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 16:16:00 UTC

  • DISAMBIGUATION OF JUDICIAL JUDGEMENTS I have done a little work on disambiguatin

    DISAMBIGUATION OF JUDICIAL JUDGEMENTS

    I have done a little work on disambiguating the charge misdemeanor vs felony (meaningless), but not enough on judgement restitution, personal punishment (prevention), and political punishment(prevention). These subjects are important because the current structure appears illogical to the public, because some crimes are preventable by political punishments (things that are planned) and some crimes are not preventable by political punishments (animal impulse), and some while seemingly more serious, are less likely to be repeated (impulses), while others more likely to be repeated (planned).


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 13:15:00 UTC

  • I am aware that it’s an uneven contest but I’ll happily debate anyone intellectu

    I am aware that it’s an uneven contest but I’ll happily debate anyone intellectually honest: Women are excessively privileged, and failing to learn, just like all other peoples have failed to learn, from the lessons of european achievement in the ancient and modern world: Trade.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 22:00:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227519022714883

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227518133555201


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    If you can’t make a moral argument in economic terms either you lack the intellectual ability or you are engaging in some for of fraud by deceit. This is yet another book doing the latter. And then feminists wonder why men are losing patience with the experiment of the franchise.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227518133555201


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    If you can’t make a moral argument in economic terms either you lack the intellectual ability or you are engaging in some for of fraud by deceit. This is yet another book doing the latter. And then feminists wonder why men are losing patience with the experiment of the franchise.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227518133555201