Curt Doolittle

Theme: Responsibility

  • That’s a sophistry Corwin. There is always and everywhere an owner of an entity.

    That’s a sophistry Corwin. There is always and everywhere an owner of an entity. And a corporate entity exists solely as a means of limiting the liability of its members, in order to encourage investment, the result of which is taxes, for the gov’t as insurer of last resort.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 19:35:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221879403543695367

    Reply addressees: @CorwinElder @FrostieCash @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221853726115106817

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221853726115106817

  • Yeah. File this under “stupid libertarian games by the application of stupid Pil

    Yeah. File this under “stupid libertarian games by the application of stupid Pilpul games from Abrahamic theology”. You can’t have a contract with someone or something that can’t empathize and sympathize, cooperate, negotiate terms, or hold to a contract.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 13:55:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221793973985054720

    Reply addressees: @FrostieCash @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221746316272906240

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221746316272906240

  • Let’s avoid conflating sentience, awareness, and the consciousness spectrum – an

    Let’s avoid conflating sentience, awareness, and the consciousness spectrum – and prevent overreach. These things are our food. Not abusing them and not eating them are two different things. And the reason not to abuse them is that we don’t want such people in our midst. https://t.co/sO1yvXPoyg

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 13:44:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221791016304480261

    Reply addressees: @clairlemon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221727831966662657

    IN REPLY TO:

    @clairlemon

    “Sentience extends to cows, chicken, pigs & even fish. These are beings with a consciousness. They experience pleasure and pain, bond with their young & pursue their own purposes, even if they are simple purposes such as seeking food” https://t.co/m6gXxcevjS

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1221727831966662657

  • INTERSEX “DISCIPLINE” (hard questions) (judgemet of the natural law) —“Serious

    INTERSEX “DISCIPLINE”

    (hard questions) (judgemet of the natural law)

    —“Serious question, is it ever justifiable to hit a woman if she grsm’s you too much? What is the recommended amount of force under P?”—Jack Hwite

    This is a great example of how sovereignty has been used throughout our history. And why this question has such a long history in our law: because it’s a common problem.

    Justifiable isn’t a meaningful term. Instead, under natural law, and under traditional european law, you can challenge anyone male of female to a duel, demand apology, demand satisfaction, and if refused exercise sovereignty in self defense.

    Or put differently, in natural law, each of us is sovereign, whether male or female. But the sexes differ in our exercise of force.

    “A male physical super-predator exchanges the forgoing of his violence with women so long as women social super-predators exchange forgoing their their undermining (GSRRM) in return. If this contract is broken then physical violence and undermining are both licensed.

    Or the individuals may choose to forgo the duel and simply have at each other in words and hands.

    A judicially sanctioned duel before peers is preferred, since differences in ability can be minimized by traditional pit and bag or other means.

    A conflict can be brought before the court instead and settled there. Because “Scolding” is just as much a violation of sovereignty and the peach as is physical violence.

    However, this is limited to discipline for insult, and when the other party lies down and submits the conflict must stop – otherwise the parties extend beyond the judicial duel into attempted murder.

    This competition is the only way to prevent male and female warfare by their individual means.

    We have constrained men’s violence but let loose women’s violence – and we are paying the price of undermining our civilization as a consequence.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 11:14:00 UTC

  • Me and mine who pay for the commons because commons produce extraordinary return

    Me and mine who pay for the commons because commons produce extraordinary returns, want to know why you shouldn’t be imprisoned, enslaved, enserfed, ostacized or hung for obtaining the benefits of our commons without paying for them.

    Why should we permit you any freedom or liberty at all? Why is it that we don’t hang you? What’s your reason?

    (The difference between capitalizing commons, common infrastructure that improves trade, and redistributive consumption that is not a commons – I assume is rather obvious.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 09:58:00 UTC

  • BAITING INTO HAZARD WORKS BY SUGGESTION VS THE FOUNDERS ON INALIENABILTY UNDER N

    BAITING INTO HAZARD WORKS BY SUGGESTION VS THE FOUNDERS ON INALIENABILTY UNDER NATURAL LAW

    Inalienability means you can’t give up certain rights even ifyou want to, because by doing so you give up obligations to others. This means that the cowardly, weak, unable, and those lacking agency can defect and destroy ‘natural rights under natural law’.

    —“John Mark discusses lying to the public in his videos. but web search manipulation and subconscious/subliminal programming is much more vague. deceiving ppl by encouraging people to put themselves in harms way is discussed, like for example the message to give up your 2A rights, but what if that encouragement is subtle and subliminal? are you familiar with how it works in advertising?”—Brian Avran

    It’s called (a) false promise (b) baiting into hazard. And there is a reason why the tribe specializes in comedy, script writing, gossiping, and undermining, INSTEAD of offering a competitive solution.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-27 05:54:00 UTC

  • MASON’S CITATION OF ANCIENT LAW OF FACTS 8. That in all capital or criminal Pros

    MASON’S CITATION OF ANCIENT LAW OF FACTS

    8. That in all capital or criminal Prosecutions, a man hath a right to demand the cause & nature of his Accusation, to be confronted with the Accusers and Witnesses, to call for Evidence and be admitted Counsel in his Favor, and to a fair and speedy Trial by an impartial Jury of his Vicinage, without whose unanimous Consent he cannot be found guilty, (except in the Government of the Land and Naval Forces in Time of actual war, Invasion or rebellion) nor can he be compelled to give Evidence against himself.

    9. That no Freeman ought to be taken, imprisoned, or desseized of his Freehold, Liberties, privileges or Franchises, or outlawed or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, or deprived of his Life, Liberty or Property, but by the Law of the Land.

    10. That every Freeman restrained of his Liberty is entitled to a remedy, to enquire into the Lawfulness thereof, and to remove the same if unlawful, and that such Remedy ought not to be denied or delayed.

    11. That in Controversies respecting Property, and in Suits between Man and man, the ancient Trial by Jury of Facts, where they arise, is one of the greatest Securities to the Rights of a Free people, and ought to remain sacred and inviolable.

    12. That every Freeman ought to find a certain Remedy, by recourse to the Laws, for all Injuries or wrongs he may receive in his person, property or Character: He ought to obtain Right and Justice freely, without sale, compleatly and without Denial, promptly and without Delay; and that all Establishments or regulations contravening these Rights are oppressive and unjust.

    13. That excessive Bail ought not to be required, nor excessive Fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual Punishments inflicted.

    14. That every Freeman has a Right to be secure from all unreasonable Searches and Seizures of his Person, his papers, and his property; all Warrants therefore to search suspected places, or to seize any Freeman, his Papers or property, without Information upon Oath (or Affirmation of a person religiously scrupulous of taking an Oath) of legal and sufficient Cause, are grievous and Oppressive; and all General Warrants to search suspected Places, or to apprehend any suspected Person, without specially naming or describing the Place or Person, are dangerous and ought not to be granted.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-25 17:08:00 UTC

  • THE RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION IS THE RIGHT TO PERSISTENCE All people have both

    THE RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION IS THE RIGHT TO PERSISTENCE

    All people have both the right to self determination, if only because no others have the right to deprive them of it. The only restitution available to those whose self determination is thwarted, is a return in kind. Therefore the only solutions to conflicts of self determination are either separation or war. And in war it is possible for either side to lose, and in losing, lose the possibility of self determination.

    (To have a ‘right’ means ‘to be in the right’ under the natural law of reciprocity. Or it can mean that one has the right of demand of the court or state for the resolution of differences. One cannot ‘have’ a right.)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-24 12:56:00 UTC

  • APPLY P. CULTIVATE AGENCY by Noah J Revoy Apply the P that you learned in your p

    APPLY P. CULTIVATE AGENCY

    by Noah J Revoy

    Apply the P that you learned in your private life by shutting down people who are manipulating you via GSRRM.

    If you cant handle your business with your wife/kids/parents/friends/colleagues etc you aren’t going to be standing up to the authority of unjust government and its agents.

    Cultivate your Agency in little things and you will be ready to exercise your Agency in big things.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-23 14:30:00 UTC

  • ” I’d be curious to hear cowardice put into economic terms. I’d say something li

    —” I’d be curious to hear cowardice put into economic terms. I’d say something like: an irreciprocal transfer of risk onto the leadership/heros.”–Daniel T. Johnson

    It’s the conservative… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=559812224615672&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2020-01-22 17:06:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1220029899538403329